True emergency coronary artery bypass surgery

Amputation and cardiac comorbidity: analysis of severity of cardiac risk

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate population-based cardiovascular risk scores and coronary artery calcification scores (CACS) in amputees.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of 1300 veterans in a cardiac computed tomography database.

SETTING

1B Veterans Administration medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 76 amputees and similar number of age-, gender-, and Framingham Risk Scores (FRS)-matched control subjects.

METHODS

The amputee population was identified and compared for CACS and traditional cardiac risk factors. Two control groups were used: control group 1, with known risk factors including diabetes mellitus, and control group 2, with all risk factors without diabetes mellitus.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Statistical associations between amputee and control group FRS scores, CACS, and other cardiac risk factors were assessed.

RESULTS

The study included 57 nontraumatic and 19 traumatic amputees with an average age of 62.4 years. Sixty-six amputees were in the low-to-intermediate cardiac risk groups according to FRS. Despite this classification, the mean CACS were significantly higher in amputees (1285 ± 18) than in either of the control groups: control group 1 (540 ± 84) and control group 2 (481 ± 11), P < .001. CACS also were significantly higher in the nontraumatic subject group (1595 ± 12) compared with the traumatic group (356 ± 57; P < .001). Upon categorization of CACS based on probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), 76% of amputees had a CACS >100 and 38% of amputees had a CACS >1000. Interestingly, CACS were almost the same in finger/toe amputations compared with an above-knee amputation, indicating an already ongoing CAD process irrespective of level of amputation. The predominant clinical significant cardiac risk factors in amputees are hypertension (89.5%), P < .005; chronic kidney disease (31.6%), P < .001; dyslipidemia (72.4%), P < .04; and insulin resistance. Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein levels were nonsignificantly low in all amputees. Triglycerides were particularly higher in traumatic patients compared with nontraumatic patients, with the triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein ratio >7.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that amputees have a much greater burden of underlying atherosclerotic disease as detected by CACS than do control subjects matched by Framingham risk stratification. Early screening for CAD and aggressive targeted interventions may be an important part of management to reduce early mortality after amputation.

A practical and effective approach for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury after acute myocardial infarction: pressure-regulated tepid blood reperfusion

BACKGROUND

The prevention of perioperative ischemia-reperfusion injury is of critical importance, and this issue becomes more important in patients undergoing an early emergent revascularization procedure after an acute myocardial infarction. In this study, we sought to test the hypothesis that our simplified pressure-controlled initial reperfusion technique would be protective against ischemia-reperfusion injury in this subgroup of patients.

METHODS

The data of 20 patients (group I) who underwent an emergent coronary artery bypass grafting procedure were analyzed and compared with the results of 37 patients (group II) underwent an innovative reperfusion technique. In group I patients, the operation was carried out using standard techniques. In group II, after the completion of all anastomoses, reperfusion was initiated before rewarming with a pressure of 20 to 25 mmHg and continued for a 2-minute period. Systemic blood pressure was then gradually increased to 40 mmHg and the aortic root was perfused at this pressure for another 2-minute period. Following the completion of the second low-pressure reperfusion period, cardiopulmonary bypass flow was regulated to preoperatively calculated values until systemic temperature reached 37 degrees C.

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant differences in terms of cardiac output, arrhythmia rates, and biochemical parameters. Spontaneous sinus rhythm recurred more frequently in group II (P < .01, 86% versus 45%). Atrial fibrillation attacks were observed in 5 and 3 patients in groups I and II, respectively. All patients were medically converted to sinus rhythm with amiadarone and/or beta-blockers. Persistent electrocardiographic changes indicating postoperative myocardial infarction occurred in 5 patients in group I and in 1 patient in group II (P = .003). Postoperative enzyme levels were found to be lower in group II patients and the differences became statistically significant at the end of 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that our controlled initial reperfusion technique is effective in the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury. We advocate the use of this innovative technique as an alternative to complex controlled aortic root reperfusion with the guidance of the early promising results of this study.

URGENT AND EMERGENCY CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING FOR ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES

BACKGROUND

Urgent and emergency coronary artery bypass grafting may be associated with significant mortality and morbidity. We report our recent experience with this group of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 441 patients undergoing urgent and emergency surgery over a 3-year period was carried out. Multivariate analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients who were most at risk of death.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality was 3.3 and 16.3% in the urgent and emergency groups, respectively. Urgent surgery was associated with significantly shorter duration of ventilation (16 h vs 69 h) and stay at the intensive care unit (31 h vs 102 h). The incidence of pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, renal failure and neurological events were also less in the urgent group. The preoperative use of the intra-aortic balloon pump was low (0.8% in the urgent group and 4.8% in the emergency group). Multivariate analysis showed that patients over 70 years of age (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.1-9.5) with left main stenosis (odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 1.5-12.4) complicated by cardiogenic shock (odds ratio 17.8, 95% confidence interval 5.2-61.1) were at highest risk of death. Patients transferred directly to theatre from cardiac catheter laboratory following failed percutaneous interventions were found to be most at risk. Mortality in this group was 29%, with 50% patients being in shock and 36% having left main stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory results have been obtained in urgent coronary artery bypass grafting, but acute coronary syndromes complicated by cardiogenic shock remain a high-risk group. Further studies are needed to define the optimal operative management in this group of patients.

Protection of acutely ischemic myocardium by controlled reperfusion

The goal of revascularization after acute occlusion of a coronary artery is the return of contractile function and the reduction of mortality. Although reperfusion of ischemic myocardium is a prerequisite for return of function, it may, in itself, cause further injury. Controlled blood cardioplegic reperfusion reduces this "reperfusion injury" and provides maximal myocardial protection. In this article, we review recent advances in surgically controlled reperfusion and speculate on future prospects for myocardial protective techniques in patients with acute coronary artery occlusion.

A rare complication of coronary arteriography

We describe a 66-year-old man with acute mesenteric ischemia and myocardial ischemia within 6 hr after coronary arteriography. He underwent successful emergency surgery with embolectomy of the mesenteric artery and coronary artery bypass grafting.

Surgical revascularization for acute coronary insufficiency: analysis of risk factors for hospital mortality

BACKGROUND

A retrospective study of 444 patients undergoing urgent and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting for acute coronary insufficiency was performed to identify the risk factors for hospital death specifically associated with the clinical severity of the acute coronary insufficiency syndrome.

METHODS

The patients were divided into three groups-urgent, emergent A, and emergent B-on the basis of the evolution of the clinical pattern of the acute coronary insufficiency syndrome on full medical treatment. The three categories were defined as follows: urgent (257 patients), surgical revascularization could be delayed for 24 to 36 hours after surgical consultation because of adequate control of ischemia; emergent A (127 patients), prompt myocardial revascularization was required because medical treatment achieved only transient regression of an unrelenting ischemic pattern; and emergent B (60 patients), prompt myocardial revascularization was required because the acute coronary insufficiency was entirely refractory to medical treatment.

RESULTS

Mortality rates were 7.4% for the urgent group, 13.4% for the emergent A group, and 31.7% for the emergent B group. Multivariate analysis identified the following as risk factors for hospital mortality: ejection fraction (p = 0.023) and aortic cross-clamp time (p = 0.10) for the urgent group; aortic cross-clamp time (p = 0.017), ejection fraction (p = 0.03), and nonuse of blood cardioplegia (p = 0.04) for the emergent A group; and cardiogenic shock (p = 0.00), preoperative ischemic interval (p = 0.00), aortic cross-clamp time (p = 0.018), and nonuse of blood cardioplegia (p = 0.012) for the emergent B group.

CONCLUSIONS

A more exact definition of patient risk can be achieved when predictive outcome models are constructed using the risk factors specifically related to each level of clinical severity of the ischemic syndrome.

Long-term outcome when major complications follow coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Recovery after complicated coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether information available 1 week after surgery correlates with long-term function in patients who suffer major complications after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

DESIGN

An inception cohort study.

SETTING

A 526-bed community teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

All 67 patients who required at least 7 days of CT-ICU care following 2,751 consecutive CABG operations.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Hospital survival, long-term survival, and functional ability at long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients survived hospitalization (64%), while 24 died 37 +/- 45 days (range, 7 to 190 days) after surgery. When 42 patients were surveyed 22 +/- 9 months after surgery, 21 of the survivors enjoyed excellent, independent function, 7 were moderately impaired but living at home, 6 were institutionalized with severe limitations, and 8 had died. Patients with very severe cardiac or neurologic dysfunction 1 week after surgery had an extremely poor outcome. When mechanical ventilation was required for causes other than primary failure of the respiratory system, long-term function and hospital survival were poor. Twelve of 14 patients with pulmonary complications survived hospitalization, and all 12 were alive at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

More than half of patients requiring 7 days or more of ICU treatment after CABG surgery survive, and many enjoy excellent long-term function. However, those with very severe cardiac or neurologic dysfunction 1 week after surgery have little chance for independent recovery.

Outcome of isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Between 1989 and 1992 100 consecutive patients aged 80 or older underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in our institution. Eighty-six percent had angina grade III or IV symptoms.

METHODS

Emergency surgery was required in 31, urgent surgery in 30, and elective surgery in 39 patients. The average left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) in these groups were 36%, 43%, and 45% respectively. The operative mortality was 8% for these octogenarians compared to 2% in the younger cohort (p = 0.002). It was zero in elective cases and 13% (8/61) in urgent and emergency cases. It was increased by preoperative admission to coronary care unit (CCU) (p = 0.02), urgency of operation (p = 0.02), the use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) (p = 0.0002), preoperative renal dysfunction (p < 0.03), and < or = 3 grafts (p < 0.04). The late mortality was increased by LVEF < or = 20% (p = 0.03) and operation from CCU (p < 0.05). On multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis, the use of IABP (p < 0.0003) and preoperative renal dysfunction (p < 0.02) were independent predictors of operative mortality. LVEF < or = 20% was the only independent predictor (p < 0.02) of late mortality.

RESULTS

Actuarial survival was noted to be 87%, 80%, 77%, and 73%, respectively, at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, with two cardiac-related late deaths. Long-term follow-up revealed that 97% of patients had no or minimal anginal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to increasing use of nonsurgical options, the profile of elderly referred for CABG currently involves gravely ill patients with comorbidities. CABG under elective conditions, before deterioration of left ventricular function, can achieve normal life expectancy and good symptomatic relief in octogenarians.

Clinical usefulness of risk-stratified outcome analysis in cardiac surgery in New Jersey

BACKGROUND

The results of aortocoronary bypass grafting are under increasing scrutiny by the Health Care Financing Agency, health maintenance organizations, and the news media. Surgeons and hospital administrators are concerned that erroneous conclusions may be drawn from raw outcome data, which do not reflect the patient's preoperative condition. It is our contention that any realistic comparison of results among surgeons or institutions must take that condition into account through a process of risk management.

METHODS

We have developed a statistical model for risk stratification based on data compiled systematically at the Newark Beth Israel Medical Center since 1980. Univariate analysis and stepwise logistic regression are used to identify the most significant risk factors and determine the appropriate weight for each. Our original risk stratification system has now been updated by eliminating the optional fields and reweighting the variables. This has reduced the subjective input and improved the accuracy.

RESULTS

Use of the modified system shows good correlation between expected and observed outcomes at our institution and in other cases reported to the New Jersey Department of Health. It has improved the results especially in high-risk cases: in total, a group of 5,336 patients have been assessed by the modified system: the expected mortality overall was 7.2% and the observed mortality was 5.4%. In 1,280 high-risk patients, ie, those with an expected mortality of greater than 11%, the expected mortality was 16.2% and the observed mortality was 12.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a decline in length of hospital stay and beneficial changes in operative procedures. They also indicate that exclusion of high-risk cases will result in only minimal financial savings, perhaps less than 2%.

Risk stratification in cardiac surgery: is it worthwhile?

Outcome analysis of many surgical procedures has become increasingly important to surgeons, institutions, and the public. Because there may be wide differences in case mix, outcomes must be evaluated in light of the patient's preoperative status. All relevant preoperative conditions must be identified and weighted, so that when risk factor scores are combined in some fashion, they will provide a single preoperative risk estimate for the individual patient, representing the likelihood of dying as a consequence of the operation. Comparing the mean risk adjusted score of a group of patients undergoing the same procedure with the observed mortality rate for the same group yields an index of the quality of care, provided all preoperative risk scores are calculated with reference to the same benchmark. We question the logic and wisdom of surgical outcome analysis because of the infinitely complex nature of biological and pathological processes, as well as the practical problems of reliable data collection. The assumption of true scientific accuracy may be illusory. Even though risk adjusted outcome analysis has merit in studying trends in therapy, it should be regarded with caution when used as a tool for evaluating quality of care. If publicized at all, the results should not be represented as "hard" scientific fact.

Operation for unstable angina pectoris: factors influencing adverse in-hospital outcome

Coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of unstable angina is still associated with increased operative risk and postoperative morbidity. The impact of the extended use of arterial grafts on early results is incompletely defined. In a 7-year period (1986 to 1993), 474 patients (average age, 65 years; range, 34 to 85 years) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of unstable angina. Sixty-eight patients were operated on emergently and 406 urgently. They received an average of 3.0 distal anastomoses (range, 1 to 6). Seventy-nine patients had exclusively venous grafts, 316 had one internal thoracic artery graft, 79 had bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts, and 20 had inferior epigastric artery grafts. Sequential internal thoracic artery grafting was performed in 70 patients. Redo operations were performed in 26 patients. Thirty-four patients (7.2%) experienced a new myocardial infarction. Eighty-nine patients (18.8%) had an intraaortic balloon pump inserted preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively. Eight patients (1.7%) died intraoperatively and 24 patients (5.1%) died postoperatively. Seventy-seven patients (16.2%) had an adverse outcome, as shown by the need for an intraaortic balloon pump (intraoperatively or postoperatively) or hospital death, or by both. Forty variables were examined by multivariate analysis for their influence on the occurrence of an adverse outcome. Aortic cross-clamp time (p = 0.0004), transfer from the intensive care unit (p = 0.0023), female sex (p = 0.0023), operation performed in early years (p = 0.0041), left ventricular aneurysm (p = 0.0068), the number of diseased coronary vessels (p = 0.0312), and reoperation (p = 0.0318) were all found to be significant independent predictors of increased risk.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of saphenous vein grafts for medically refractory unstable angina

OBJECTIVES

We attempted to answer the question, Is balloon angioplasty a reasonable alternative to repeat coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with previous coronary bypass graft surgery, medically refractory unstable angina and vein graft lesions?

BACKGROUND

Patients with medically refractory unstable angina need revascularization. Patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery and medically refractory angina are at "high risk" for adverse outcomes with repeat coronary bypass graft surgery. Conversely, patients with angioplasty of old vein grafts are also at "high risk" for adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Balloon angioplasty of 89 lesions in saphenous vein grafts was performed in 75 consecutive patients with medically refractory unstable angina. Of these 75 patients, 24 (32%) had myocardial infarct within 30 days, 23 (31%) had left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.35, and 50 (67%) had major comorbidity. Patients underwent standard balloon angioplasty with aggressive use of intravenous and intracoronary heparin, urokinase, nitroglycerin, oral aspirin, calcium channel blocking agents and coumadin.

RESULTS

Angiographic success (reduction of stenosis < or = 50% without major complication) was seen in 84 of 89 lesions. Clinical success (angiographic success plus hospital discharge without major complication) was seen in 70 of 75 patients. During index hospitalization, two patients (3%) died, two (3%) had nonfatal infarcts, and one (1%) had emergency reoperation (coronary bypass graft surgery). In late follow up (3 to 66 months), 14 (20%) patients were lost to follow-up, 17 (23%) had repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 2 (3%) had late bypass graft reoperation, 18 (25%) had late death, and 1 (< 1%) had a heart transplant. Of the 41 patients alive after one or more angioplasties, 25 have little or no angina, and 16 have occasional or more angina. We compared long-term survival rate in these 75 patients with a cohort of patients with high risk, unstable angina from the Veterans Affairs Surgical Registry (2,570 patients). The 30-day survival rate was better in patients with coronary angioplasty (97% vs. 92%, p < 0.05), but by 6 months there was no difference, and by 5 years a trend toward a higher survival rate with coronary artery bypass graft surgery was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon angioplasty of saphenous vein grafts with aggressive adjunctive pharmacotherapy is a reasonable alternative to repeat coronary bypass graft surgery in patients with medically refractory unstable angina, previous coronary bypass graft surgery and saphenous vein narrowing.

Factors predictive of operative mortality among coronary artery bypass subsets

As risk-adjusted outcome is increasingly being used to make clinical decisions and to assess and improve quality of care, it is important to develop simple, stable models for predicting outcome. Here we address the hypothesis that a risk factor for increased operative mortality at coronary artery bypass grafting may have differential effects in subgroups of patients defined by the presence or absence of other risk variables. We used a series of univariate and multivariate analyses to identify a group of ten patient-related preoperative characteristics independently predictive of operative death in the total population of 12,712 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at 43 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers participating in the Department of Veterans Affairs Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Study. Separate logistic regression models were then developed for each of 14 clinically important subgroups defined by the presence or absence of seven risk variables. Odds ratios for operative death and estimated operative mortality were calculated from these subgroup regression models. Of 65 comparisons of pairs odds ratios of preoperative risk variables between the subgroups with and without a second risk variable, only five were found to be significant (p < 0.05 without adjustment for multiple comparisons); this is only slightly more than would be expected by chance alone. Risk factors for increased operative death appear to have similar odds ratios for subgroups of patients defined by a second risk variable. This finding greatly simplifies the use of predicted operative mortality in clinical decision making and quality assessment and improvement in coronary artery bypass grafting.

A model to predict survival at time of postcardiotomy intraaortic balloon pump insertion

To facilitate timely application of new forms of cardiac support to patients at highest risk after cardiotomy despite conventional support with the intraaortic balloon pump, an accurate prediction of survival must be available at the time of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. We, therefore, acquired 240 demographic, disease, and perioperative characteristics of 322 patients (mortality rate, 48.4%) who required IABP support to separate from bypass. Four variables available before or within 10 minutes of the first attempt at weaning from bypass significantly predicted mortality by stepwise logistic regression: complete heart block as demonstrated by need for temporary pacing at weaning (p < 0.001), advanced age (p < 0.002), preoperative blood urea nitrogen concentration (p = 0.036), and female sex (p = 0.048). An equation generated by the logistic model predicted a 72.2% survival rate in the 25% of patients at least risk (actual survival rate, 71.6%); in the 25% at greatest risk, death was predicted in 73.0%, and the actual mortality rate was 74.1%. The equation was then prospectively applied to 330 intraaortic balloon pump-supported patients managed at another institution. The overall mortality rate there was 41.2%; in the 25% at least risk, predicted survival rate was 70.5% (actual survival rate, 77.1%), and in the 25% at greatest risk, predicted mortality rate was 75.7% (actual mortality rate, 62.7%). Thus, retrospectively at one institution and prospectively at another, the equation generated by this model based only on data available at the time of weaning from bypass was able to define one subgroup of patients 2.6 to 2.7 times as likely to die as another subgroup from within similar cohorts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Device-supported myocardial revascularization: safe help for sick hearts

Although advances in both the technology of artificial oxygenation and our understanding of myocardial preservation have made aortocoronary bypass operations safer, clinical settings remain where even these improvements have limited efficacy. We have recently treated 43 severely ill patients with aortocoronary bypass, using a ventricular assist device for intraoperative hemodynamic support and ventricular decompression. For 34 of the patients, preoperative ejection fractions (multigated acquisition) ranged from 0.12 to 0.28 (average, 0.22); 6 patients manifested cardiogenic shock preoperatively, and emergency operations precluded multigated acquisition studies. Twenty-nine patients had preoperative evidence of congestive heart failure, 10 had a prior bypass operation, 9 had major chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 2 were Jehovah's Witnesses. The operative technique involved minimal doses of heparin (1 to 1.5 mg/kg), no cardioplegia, and no cardiopulmonary bypass. Revascularization was accomplished on beating, nonworking hearts, with right (40 of 43) and left (43 of 43) ventricles supported by Nimbus Hemopumps (4 of 43) or Bio-Medicus centrifugal ventricular assist devices for an average of 112 minutes. In each case, the patient's lungs were used as the oxygenator. An average of 3.7 bypass grafts per patient were constructed. The left internal mammary artery was used in 41 patients, whereas at least one coronary endarterectomy was required in 20. Six patients had concomitant placement of an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Two patients (4.6%) died: 1 (with preoperative cardiogenic shock) of low cardiac output on postoperative day 1, and 1 of a severe neurologic deficit on day 8. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 18 months (average, 8.9 months), with all survivors demonstrating improvement in cardiac function in both the early and late postoperative periods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Salvage angioplasty: an alternative to high risk surgery for unstable angina?

This prospective, Human Subjects Committee and Ethics Committee approved investigation was performed to determine if coronary angioplasty (PTCA) might be a reasonable alternative revascularization method for unstable angina patients thought to be at high risk for operative (CABG) mortality. Between March 1990 and October 1991, thirty-four consecutive patients with medically refractory rest angina were deamed to have high risk of surgical mortality and underwent PTCA without surgical backup. Predicted operative mortality was calculated for each patient based upon the VA Surgical Risk Assessment model. Angioplasty of 52 vessels was attempted. Reduction in lumenal narrowing to < 50% and improved angiographic flow was obtained in 47 vessels. There were four complicating infarctions. One death occurred in the lab, and three patients with unsuccessful angioplasty died within 30 days of pump failure. Relief of angina occurred in 30/34. Thirty patients were discharged home. In follow-up from 1 to 12 months, there have been 2 late sudden deaths at 4 months and 9 months, 1 death from lung cancer; 4 patients have stable exertional angina; 2 are awaiting heart transplant but are pain free, and one patient who had PTCA during cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction had elective coronary artery bypass surgery. There have been no late myocardial infarctions. The observed angioplasty 30-day mortality of 11.8% (95% confidence limit 1% to 22.6%) compares favorably with the predicted operative mortality of 23.8% for this group. This prospective but non-randomized series supports the concept that balloon angioplasty may be a reasonable alternative to surgical intervention in some patients with unstable angina and high risk for surgery. A prospective randomized trial is warranted.

Risk analysis of operative intervention for failed coronary angioplasty

To assess the outcome of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 91 patients undergoing emergency CABG after failed PTCA over a 30-month period ending July 31, 1991, were studied. For reference, a cohort of patients (91) concurrently undergoing elective CABG equally matched for age, sex, number of grafts, ventricular function, and reoperative status was compared. Specific outcomes including death, hospital length of stay, use of blood products, and development of myocardial infarction were analyzed. More than half the patients undergoing emergency CABG for failed PTCA required three or more grafts. Operative mortality was 12.1% (11/99) for emergency CABG compared with 1% (1/91) for elective case-matched CABG patients (p = 0.007). Emergency CABG patients required frequent use of postoperative inotropes (p = 0.02) and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (p = 0.001). Length of hospital stay (p = 0.005), administration of blood products (p = 0.009), postoperative myocardial infarction (p = 0.0005), and ventricular arrhythmias (p = 0.0004) were increased after emergency compared with elective CABG. The presence of multivessel disease or use of a reperfusion catheter had no influence on clinical outcome. Despite accumulated experience and improved operative management, patients requiring emergency CABG for failed PTCA remain at increased risk for postoperative complications and death.