Aprotinin reduces intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in membrane oxygenator cardiopulmonary bypass

Bentall procedure as a lifesaving surgery: A single center experience

The Bentall procedure is a surgical technique used in the management of aortic root abnormalities with ascending aorta and aortic valve issues. The present study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of 18 patients treated with the Bentall procedure in a single center. The present study was a single-center retrospective case series conducted over a period of 3 years. The patients had either acute ascending dissection and/or dilated ascending aorta with aortic valve dysfunction. The Bentall procedure was performed via standard median sternotomy. St. Jude Medical composite grafts with a valve were applied in all cases. A total number of 18 patients with either acute ascending dissection and/or dilated ascending aorta with aortic valve dysfunction were included in the study. The age of the participants ranged from 27-60 years. The ratio of males to females was 16:2 (males, 88.8%). The symptoms developed 3-4 days prior to hospital admission. Chest pain was the most common presenting symptom (n=10, 55.5%). Hypertension was the most common risk factor (n=12, 66.6%). In total, 14 cases underwent emergency surgery (77.7%). The emergency surgery was performed in 9 patients within 24 h of arrival owing to the association of aortic root dissection with tamponade. For the other cases, the surgery was performed within 2 and 7 days (n=5, 27.7% and n=4, 22.2%) respectively. Early post-operative complications occurred in 5 patients (27.7%). On the whole, as demonstrated herein, the modifications of the Bentall procedure have a notable impact on decreasing the overall mortality rates. Raising the awareness of clinicians and the general population as regards aortic dissection may aid in the early referral of patients to specialized centers and may thus decrease the overall mortality rate.

Use of heparin-bonded surfaces in cardiopulmonary bypass

Heparin surface coating is a convenient means of improving the thrombo resistance of blood-exposed surfaces. At this time, heparin can be bonded to oxygenator/heat-exchanger structures, soft venous reservoirs, cardiotomy reservoirs, centrifugal pump heads, tubings, and cannulae. Following experimental evaluation, these devices have become available for clinical application. Cardiopulmonary bypass with low or no systemic heparinization can be realized in selected cases. Improved haemostasis in combination with modification of standard surgical techniques results in limited blood loss and reduced transfusion requirements and appears to be the main benefit of cardiopulmonary bypass with heparin-bonded surfaces. Experience using heparin- bonded equipment in various clinical situations is reviewed.

Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding?

Background Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor used to limit perioperative bleeding and reduce the need for donated blood transfusions during cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin evaluating its effect on the outcome of perioperative transfusion have been published since 1987, and systematic reviews were conducted in 1992 and 1997.

Methods A systematic search was conducted for all RCTs of aprotinin that used placebo controls or were open-label with no active control treatment. Data collected included the primary outcome, objective of each study, whether a systematic review was cited or conducted as part of the background and/or rationale for the study and the number of previously published RCTs cited. Cumulative meta-analyses were performed.

Results Sixty-four randomized, controlled trials of aprotinin were found, conducted between 1987 and 2002, reporting an endpoint of perioperative transfusion. Median trial size was 64 subjects, with a range of 20 to 1784. A cumulative meta-analysis indicated that aprotinin greatly decreased the need for perioperative transfusion, stabilizing at an odds ratio of 0.25 (p, 10 2 6) by the 12th study, published in June of 1992. The upper limit of the confidence interval never exceeded 0.65 and results were similar in all subgroups. Citation of previous RCTs was extremely low, with a median of 20% of prior trials cited. Only 7 of 44 (15%) of subsequent reports referenced the largest trial (N 1/4 1784), which was 28 times larger than the median trial size.

Conclusions This study demonstrates that investigators evaluating aprotinin were not adequately citing previous research, resulting in a large number of RCTs being conducted to address efficacy questions that prior trials had already definitively answered. Institutional review boards and journals could reduce the number of redundant trials by requiring investigators to conduct adequate searches for prior evidence and conducting systematic reviews.

Blood Conservation Strategies in Cardiac Surgery

Perioperative bleeding in cardiac surgery is related to both surgical trauma of blood vessels and defects in the hemostatic mechanism caused, in part, by cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood transfusion therefore remains a significant risk of cardiac surgery with important health and economic consequences. Blood conservation strategies for cardiac surgery have advanced over the years and the following discussion will focus on the current practices at Toronto General Hospital.

The effects of MDCO-2010, a serine protease inhibitor, on activated clotting time in blood obtained from volunteers and cardiac surgical patients

BACKGROUND

The activated clotting time (ACT) is widely used for monitoring heparin anticoagulation during cardiac surgery. Celite-based ACT values are prolonged when aprotinin is administered. MDCO-2010, a novel serine protease inhibitor, is currently being evaluated as a possible alternative to aprotinin. Therefore, we evaluated the in vitro effects of this novel agent on ACT values using 3 different point-of-care instruments with kaolin or celite as an activator.

METHODS

The study was performed in 2 parts. In the first part, blood samples were obtained from 15 healthy volunteers. Samples were pipetted into small Eppendorf tubes and 2 concentrations of the MDCO-2010 (100 and 500 nM, final concentration) alone or with heparin (1.2 or 2.4 U/mL) were added. ACTs were measured using Helena (celite), Hemochron (kaolin), and Medtronic (kaolin) devices. In the second part of the study, blood samples were obtained intraoperatively, at 5 time points, from 15 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. MDCO-2010 at a final concentration of 100 or 500 nM was added and ACT testing was performed as before. Additional coagulation tests included prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, antithrombin, prothrombin, and anti-Xa levels.

RESULTS

Addition of MDCO-2010 concentration-dependently prolonged ACTs in volunteers' and patients' blood samples regardless of the ACT activator or device used. In volunteer samples (no heparin) and in patient samples (baseline and intensive care unit) percent changes in ACTs due to MDCO-2010 were on average 3.1 ± 1.8 times higher (95% confidence interval 2.6-3.6; P < 0.001) for the celite-based Helena device compared with either Hemochron or Medtronic devices.

CONCLUSION

MDCO-2010 causes less ACT prolongation with kaolin than with celite activation.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. This version of the review includes a sensitivity analysis excluding trials authored by Prof. Joachim Boldt.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss and the need for transfusion. Recently, questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs and the safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the internet. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 211 RCTs that recruited 20,781 participants. Data from placebo/inactive controlled trials, and from head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of operative blood loss, but the differences were small. Aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 0.71). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.69) and it was 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared superior in reducing the need for RBC transfusion: RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.99). Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding: RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.68). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of just under 3% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 37 (95% CI 27 to 56). Similar trends were seen with TXA and EACA, but the data were sparse and the differences failed to reach statistical significance. The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias. Evidence of publication bias was not observed in trials reporting re-operation rates. Adjustment for these effects reduced the magnitude of estimated benefits but did not negate treatment effects. However, the apparent advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues was small and may be explained by publication bias and non-equivalent drug doses. Aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.18), stroke (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.64) renal dysfunction (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.70) or overall mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.20). The analyses of myocardial infarction and death included data from the majority of subjects recruited into the clinical trials of aprotinin. However, under-reporting of renal events could explain the lack of effect seen with aprotinin. Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues but data were sparse. These results conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the need for allogeneic red cell transfusion. Based on the results of randomised trials their efficacy does not appear to be offset by serious adverse effects. In most circumstances the lysine analogues are probably as effective as aprotinin and are cheaper; the evidence is stronger for tranexamic acid than for aminocaproic acid. In high risk cardiac surgery, where there is a substantial probability of serious blood loss, aprotinin may be preferred over tranexamic acid. Aprotinin does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of vascular occlusion and death, but the data do not exclude an increased risk of renal failure. There is no need for further placebo-controlled trials of aprotinin or lysine analogues in cardiac surgery. The principal need is for large comparative trials to assess the relative efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in different surgical procedures.

Aprotinin Use in Cardiac Surgery Patients at Low Risk for Requiring Blood Transfusion

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine if aprotinin is safe and effective in patients at low risk for requiring blood transfusion after cardiac surgery by evaluating whether there is any significant difference in blood product use or other significant clinical outcomes between patients who received aprotinin versus those who did not.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Inpatient community nonteaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Three hundred thirty-five patients who underwent primary cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass between November 1, 2003, and December 31, 2005, and were considered at low risk for requiring postoperative blood transfusion; 162 patients received aprotinin and 173 patients received aminocaproic acid (control).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Comparison of patients in the aprotinin group versus those in the aminocaproic acid group revealed no difference in total donor exposures to blood products (1.86 vs 1.16 units/patient, p=0.07), total packed red blood cells (PRBCs) received (1.25 vs 0.86 units/patient, p=0.09), postoperative donor exposures to blood products (0.91 vs 0.48 unit/patient, p=0.13), or postoperative PRBCs received (0.61 vs 0.40 unit/patient, p=0.23). No difference was noted in any other clinical outcome in the aprotinin group versus the aminocaproic acid group, including postoperative azotemia (13.0% vs 10.4%, p=0.46), new onset of atrial fibrillation (14.8% vs 15.0%, p=0.95), myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. Mean +/- SD total hospital length of stay was similar in the aprotinin group versus the aminocaproic acid group (8.1 +/- 3.8 vs 7.4 +/- 2.8 days, p=0.08), but length of stay from surgery to discharge was longer in the aprotinin group than in the aminocaproic acid group (5.9 +/- 0.17 vs 5.4 +/- 0.12 days, p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Although aprotinin appeared to be safe in this low-risk patient population, it was not more effective than aminocaproic acid in reducing blood product use after cardiac surgery. More robust evidence is needed from a controlled randomized trial to demonstrate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacoeconomic benefit of aprotinin.

Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients having cardiac procedures (15% to 20%) consume more than 80% of the blood products transfused at operation. Blood must be viewed as a scarce resource that carries risks and benefits. A careful review of available evidence can provide guidelines to allocate this valuable resource and improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed all available published evidence related to blood conservation during cardiac operations, including randomized controlled trials, published observational information, and case reports. Conventional methods identified the level of evidence available for each of the blood conservation interventions. After considering the level of evidence, recommendations were made regarding each intervention using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology classification scheme.

RESULTS

Review of published reports identified a high-risk profile associated with increased postoperative blood transfusion. Six variables stand out as important indicators of risk: (1) advanced age, (2) low preoperative red blood cell volume (preoperative anemia or small body size), (3) preoperative antiplatelet or antithrombotic drugs, (4) reoperative or complex procedures, (5) emergency operations, and (6) noncardiac patient comorbidities. Careful review revealed preoperative and perioperative interventions that are likely to reduce bleeding and postoperative blood transfusion. Preoperative interventions that are likely to reduce blood transfusion include identification of high-risk patients who should receive all available preoperative and perioperative blood conservation interventions and limitation of antithrombotic drugs. Perioperative blood conservation interventions include use of antifibrinolytic drugs, selective use of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, routine use of a cell-saving device, and implementation of appropriate transfusion indications. An important intervention is application of a multimodality blood conservation program that is institution based, accepted by all health care providers, and that involves well thought out transfusion algorithms to guide transfusion decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available evidence, institution-specific protocols should screen for high-risk patients, as blood conservation interventions are likely to be most productive for this high-risk subset. Available evidence-based blood conservation techniques include (1) drugs that increase preoperative blood volume (eg, erythropoietin) or decrease postoperative bleeding (eg, antifibrinolytics), (2) devices that conserve blood (eg, intraoperative blood salvage and blood sparing interventions), (3) interventions that protect the patient's own blood from the stress of operation (eg, autologous predonation and normovolemic hemodilution), (4) consensus, institution-specific blood transfusion algorithms supplemented with point-of-care testing, and most importantly, (5) a multimodality approach to blood conservation combining all of the above.

Meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and adverse outcomes of antifibrinolytic agents in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Since the 1980s, antifibrinolytic therapies have assisted surgical teams in reducing the amount of blood loss. To date, however, serious questions remain regarding the safety and effectiveness of these agents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a meta-analysis to compare aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and tranexamic acid with placebo and head to head on 8 clinical outcomes from 138 trials. Published randomized controlled trial data were collected from OVID/PubMed. Outcomes included total blood loss, transfusion of packed red blood cells, reexploration, mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, dialysis-dependent renal failure, and renal dysfunction (0.5-mg/dL increase in creatinine from baseline). All agents were effective in significantly reducing blood loss by 226 to 348 mL and the proportion of patients transfused with packed red blood cells over placebo. Only high-dose aprotinin reduced the rate of reexploration (relative risk, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.73). There were no significant risks or benefits for any agent for mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or renal failure. However, high-dose aprotinin significantly increased the risk of renal dysfunction (relative risk, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.94), 12.9% versus 8.4%. Compared head to head, high-dose aprotinin demonstrated significant reduction in total blood loss over epsilon-aminocaproic acid (-184 mL; 95% CI, -256 to -112) and tranexamic acid (-195 mL; 95% CI, -286 to -105). There were no significant differences among any agent when compared head to head on other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

All antifibrinolytic agents were effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion. There were no significant risks or benefits for mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or renal failure. However, high-dose aprotinin was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of renal dysfunction.

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid for Reducing Blood Loss in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

BACKGROUND

Epsilon-aminocaproic acid is a plasmin inhibitor that potentially reduces perioperative bleeding when administered prophylactically to cardiac surgery patients. To evaluate the efficacy of epsilon-aminocaproic acid, a prospective placebo-controlled trial was conducted in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred patients were randomly assigned to receive either epsilon-aminocaproic acid (100 mg/kg before skin incision followed by 1 g/hour continuous infusion until chest closure, 10 g in cardiopulmonary bypass circuit) or placebo, and the efficacy of epsilon-aminocaproic acid was evaluated by the reduction in postoperative thoracic-drainage volume and in donor-blood transfusion up to postoperative day 12.

RESULTS

Postoperative thoracic-drainage volume was significantly lower in the epsilon-aminocaproic acid group compared with the placebo group (epsilon-aminocaproic acid, 649 +/- 261 mL; versus placebo, 940 +/- 626 mL; p=0.003). There were no significant differences between the epsilon-aminocaproic acid and placebo groups in the percentage of patients requiring donor red blood cell transfusions (epsilon-aminocaproic acid, 24%; versus placebo, 18%; p=0.62) or in the number of units of donor red blood cells transfused (epsilon-aminocaproic acid, 2.2 +/- 0.8 U; versus placebo, 1.9 +/- 0.8 U; p=0.29). Epsilon-aminocaproic acid did not reduce the risk of donor red blood cell transfusions compared with placebo (odds ratio: 1.2, 95% confidence interval; 0.4 to 3.2, p=0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic administration of epsilon-aminocaproic acid reduces postoperative thoracic-drainage volume by 30%, but it may not be potent enough to reduce the requirement and the risk for donor blood transfusion in cardiac surgery patients. This information is useful for deciding on a therapy for hemostasis in cardiac surgery.

Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery: Its Prevention and Treatment—an Evidence-Based Review

Expected and unexpected bleeding occur frequently in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Bleeding after cardiac surgery can be broadly divided into two groups: surgical (unrecognized bleeding vessel, anastomosis, or other suture line) or nonsurgical bleeding (caused by coagulopathy). Factors influencing both surgical and nonsurgical bleeding can be further broken down into those occurring preoperatively and those that occur intraoperatively and postoperatively. A thorough understanding of these factors is necessary to reduce bleeding. This is a desirable clinical goal, because excessive bleeding is associated with adverse outcomes.

Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents

Skilful surgery combined with blood-saving methods and careful management of blood coagulation will all help reduce unnecessary blood loss and transfusion requirements. Excessive surgical bleeding causes hypovolaemia, haemodynamic instability, anaemia and reduced oxygen delivery to tissues, with a subsequent increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. The role of anaesthetists in managing surgical blood loss has increased greatly in the last decade. Position of the patient during surgery and the provision of a hypotensive anaesthetic regimen were once considered the most important contributions of the anaesthetist to decreasing blood loss. Now, several pharmacological haemostatic agents are being used by anaesthetists as blood-saving agents. After a brief discussion of the physiology of haemostasis, this article will review the evidence for the role of such agents in reducing perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.

Current status of antifibrinolytics in cardiopulmonary bypass and elective deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) results in many physiologic derangements, including activation of the hemostatic and fibrinolytic pathways. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) adds a further insult to the coagulation systems because it involves more extreme hypothermia and organ ischemia related to blood stasis. The abnormalities induced by CPB disrupt the checks and balances in the hemostatic and fibrinolytic systems, resulting in a pathologic state that leads to excessive bleeding and other perioperative complications. Prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy can attenuate the response to this insult by restoring the delicate balance within these systems, potentially reducing the complication rate and improving patient outcomes.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have prompted re-consideration of the use of allogeneic (blood from an unrelated donor) blood transfusion.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon aminocaproic acid, on peri-operative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (to May 1998), EMBASE (to December 1997), web sites of international health technology assessment agencies (to May 1998). References in identified trials and review articles were checked and authors contacted to identify any additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 61 trials of aprotinin (7027 participants). Aprotinin reduced the rate of RBC transfusion by a relative 30% (RR=0.70: 95%CI: 0.64 to 0.76). The average absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 20.4% (95%CI: 15.6% to 25.3%). On average, aprotinin use saved 1.1 units of RBC (95%CI: 0.69 to 1.47) in those requiring transfusion. Aprotinin also significantly reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding (RR=0.40: 95%CI: 0.25 to 0.66). We found 18 trials of tranexamic acid (TXA) (1,342 participants). TXA reduced the rate of RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (RR=0.66: 95%CI: 0.54 to 0.81). This represented an ARR of 17.2% (95%CI: 8.7% to 25.7%). TXA use resulted in a saving of 1.03 units of RBC (95%CI: 0.67 to 1.39) in those requiring transfusion. We found four trials of epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) (208 participants). EACA use resulted in a statistically non-significant reduction in RBC transfusion (RR=0.48: 95%CI: 0.19 to 1.19). Comparisons between agents Eight trials made 'head-to-head' comparisons between TXA and aprotinin. There was no significant difference between the two drugs in the rate of RBC transfusion: RR=1.21 (95%CI: 0.83 to 1.76) for TXA compared to aprotinin. Adverse Effects Aprotinin did not seem to be associated with an excess risk of adverse effects, including thrombo-embolic events (thrombosis RR=0.64: 95%CI: 0.31 to 1.31) and renal failure (RR=1.19: 95%CI: 0.79 to 1.79). Fewer data were available for TXA and EACA.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

From this review it appears that aprotinin reduces the need for red cell transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to bleeding, without serious adverse effects. However, there was significant heterogeneity in trial outcomes, and some evidence of publication bias. Similar trends were seen with TXA and EACA, although the data were rather sparse. The poor evaluation of these latter drugs is unfortunate as results suggest they may be equally as effective as aprotinin, but are significantly cheaper. The evidence reviewed here supports the use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery. Further small trials of this drug are not warranted. Future trials should be large enough to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of aprotinin with that of TXA and EACA.

Pharmacological strategies to decrease excessive blood loss in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of clinically relevant endpoints

BACKGROUND

Excessive bleeding may complicate cardiac surgery, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Pharmacological strategies to decrease perioperative bleeding have been investigated in a large number of controlled trials, most of which have shown a decrease in blood loss. However, most studies lacked sufficient power to detect a beneficial effect on clinically more relevant outcomes. We did a meta-analysis of all randomised, controlled trials of the three most frequently used pharmacological strategies to decrease perioperative blood loss (aprotinin, lysine analogues [aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid], and desmopressin).

METHODS

Studies were included if they reported at least one clinically relevant outcome (mortality, rethoracotomy, proportion of patients receiving a transfusion, or perioperative myocardial infarction) in addition to perioperative blood loss. In addition, a separate meta-analysis was done for studies concerning complicated cardiac surgery.

FINDINGS

We identified 72 trials (8409 patients) that met the inclusion criteria. Treatment with aprotinin decreased mortality almost two-fold (odds ratio 0.55 [95% CI 0.34-0.90]) compared with placebo. Treatment with aprotinin and with lysine analogues decreased the frequency of surgical re-exploration (0.37 [0.25-0.55], and 0.44 [0.22-0.90], respectively). These two treatments also significantly decreased the proportion of patients receiving any allogeneic blood transfusion. By contrast, the use of desmopressin resulted in a small decrease in perioperative blood loss, but was not associated with a beneficial effect on other clinical outcomes. Aprotinin and lysine analogues did not increase the risk of perioperative myocardial infarction; however, desmopressin was associated with a 2.4-fold increase in the risk of this complication. Studies in patients undergoing complicated cardiac surgery showed similar results.

INTERPRETATION

Pharmacological strategies that decrease perioperative blood loss in cardiac surgery, in particular aprotinin and lysine analogues, also decrease mortality, the need for rethoracotomy, and the proportion of patients receiving a blood transfusion.

Heart transplantation: a review

This article explores current developments and continuing dilemmas in heart transplantation. Statistical trends such as the increased number of candidates and the increased waiting time are described. Recent developments in implantable ventricular assist device technology and the perioperative use of nitric oxide are also highlighted. In addition, advances in patient management from pretransplant care to long-term follow-up are presented, and alternatives to heart transplantation in current use and for the future are explored.

Is epsilon-aminocaproic acid as effective as aprotinin in reducing bleeding with cardiac surgery?: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although aprotinin is known to be effective in reducing postoperative hemorrhage after cardiac surgery, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, an alternative antifibrinolytic, is considerably less expensive. Because the results of 3 small randomized clinical trials comparing these 2 agents directly were inconclusive, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the relative effectiveness and adverse-effect profile of these 2 agents against placebo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 52 randomized clinical trials published between 1985 and 1998 involving the use of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (n=9) or aprotinin (n=46) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery were abstracted. Our primary outcomes were total blood loss, red blood cell transfusion rates and amounts, reexploration, stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality. The meta-analysis revealed substantial reductions in total blood loss with epsilon-aminocaproic acid and low-dose aprotinin (each with a 35% reduction versus placebo, P<0.001) and high-dose aprotinin (53% reduction, P<0.001). There were identical reductions in total postoperative transfusions with epsilon-aminocaproic acid (61% reduction versus placebo, P<0. 010) and high-dose aprotinin (62% reduction, P<0.001). The proportion of patients transfused was similarly reduced with epsilon-aminocaproic acid (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.69) and high-dose aprotinin (OR, 0.28; 0.22 to 0.37). Although both drugs reduced rates of reexploration to similar degrees, this effect was statistically significant only with high-dose aprotinin (OR, 0.39; 0. 24 to 0.61). epsilon-Aminocaproic acid and aprotinin had no effect on risks of postoperative myocardial infarction or overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the 2 antifibrinolytic agents appear to have similar efficacies, the considerably less-expensive epsilon-aminocaproic acid may be preferred over aprotinin for reducing hemorrhage with cardiac surgery.

Operations on the thoracic aorta and hypothermic circulatory arrest: is aprotinin safe?

INTRODUCTION

The safety of aprotinin, especially when used with profound hypothermic circulatory arrest, is still a matter of intense debate despite its presumed salutary effects on blood loss. Many investigators have reported toxic renal effects of high-dose aprotinin in such patients, but no prospective, randomized study has been conducted. To assess the potential detrimental effect of aprotinin on renal function and its putative reduction of blood loss, 50 patients undergoing thoracic aortic operations with the use of profound hypothermic circulatory arrest were randomly assigned to receive either low-dose aprotinin (1 x 10(6) kallikrein activation units) or placebo.

METHODS

The specific renal tubular markers beta-2-microglobulin and beta-N-acetyl-D-glucosaminidase, as well as serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, creatinine clearance, sodium excretion, and potassium excretion, were measured to evaluate renal function preoperatively, immediately after the procedure, and 24 hours and 48 hours later.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found in any measured renal parameter between the two groups (analysis of variance). Renal dysfunction, defined as an elevation of serum creatinine early postoperatively (> or = 1.5 times the preoperative value), occurred in two patients who received aprotinin and in one patient in the control group. Temporary dialysis (hemodialysis or continuous venovenous hemofiltration) was needed in two patients in the aprotinin group versus one in the control group. Furthermore, patients treated with aprotinin had significantly less total postoperative blood loss (718 +/- 340 ml vs 920 +/- 387 ml, p = 0.04). The aprotinin recipients also had a significantly lower transfusion requirement (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This controlled trial of low-dose aprotinin in patients undergoing thoracic aortic operations using profound hypothermic circulatory arrest demonstrated no detectable deleterious effects on renal function; moreover, the use of aprotinin was associated with significantly lower need for transfusion.

Drugs to minimize perioperative blood loss in cardiac surgery: meta-analyses using perioperative blood transfusion as the outcome. The International Study of Peri-operative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators

Concern about the side effects of allogeneic red blood cell transfusion has increased interest in methods of minimizing perioperative transfusion. We performed meta-analyses of randomized trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of aprotinin, desmopressin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon-aminocaproic acid in cardiac surgery. All identified randomized trials in cardiac surgery were included in the meta-analyses. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received at least one perioperative allogeneic red cell transfusion. Sixty studies were included in the meta-analyses. The largest number of patients (5808) was available for the meta-analysis of aprotinin, which significantly decreased exposure to allogeneic blood (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.39; P < 0.0001). The efficacy of aprotinin was not significantly different regardless of the type of surgery (primary or reoperation), aspirin use, or reported transfusion threshold. The use of aprotinin was associated with a significant decrease in the need for reoperation because of bleeding (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.73; P = 0.001). Desmopressin was not effective, with an OR of 0.98 (95% CI 0.64-1.50; P = 0.92). Tranexamic acid significantly decreased the proportion of patients transfused (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.76; P = 0.0009). Epsilon-aminocaproic acid did not have a statistically significant effect on the proportion of patients transfused (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-1.12; P = 0.07). There were not enough patients to exclude a small but clinically important increase in myocardial infarction or other side effects for any of the medications. We conclude that aprotinin and tranexamic acid, but not desmopressin, decrease the number of patients exposed to perioperative allogeneic transfusions in association with cardiac surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

Aprotinin, desmopressin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon-aminocaproic acid are used in cardiac surgery in an attempt to decrease the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion. This meta-analysis of all published randomized trials provides a good estimate of the efficacy of these medications and is useful in guiding clinical practice. We conclude that aprotinin and tranexamic acid, but not desmopressin, decrease the exposure of patients to allogeneic blood transfusion perioperatively in relationship to cardiac surgery.

Aprotinin in aortic surgery requiring profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest

OBJECTIVE

The use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery to improve haemostasis and reduce blood loss particularly in patient groups at increased risk of bleeding is well established. Previous retrospective studies in profound hypothermic surgery have highlighted concerns that in this circumstances aprotinin may paradoxically cause increased bleeding and intravascular thrombosis. We therefore adopted a modified protocol for administering aprotinin, which was not started until cardiopulmonary bypass had been reinstituted after circulatory arrest.

METHODS

Between April 1993 and June 1995, 45 patients underwent 46 thoracic aortic procedures which required hypothermic circulatory arrest; 25 of these were emergencies. All of these patients received aprotinin.

RESULTS

There were five deaths (10.8%) in hospital. Two patients with preoperative oliguric renal failure required postoperative dialysis, and a further six (13%) developed transient renal dysfunction with complete recovery. Two patients suffered postoperative stroke; one from embolisation of a severely diseased aorta, while the other had signs of an acute evolving stroke before surgery. None of the patients suffered acute Q-wave perioperative myocardial infarction. The mean blood loss was 575 ml in the first 12 h, with a mean postoperative transfusion requirement of 1 U blood.

CONCLUSIONS

We cannot implicate aprotinin in increased postoperative blood loss, renal dysfunction or mortality when used with hypothermic circulatory arrest according to this protocol. Elucidating the role of aprotinin in hypothermic circulatory arrest requires a randomised prospective study.

Aprotinin for primary coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter trial of three dose regimens

BACKGROUND

High-dose aprotinin reduces transfusion requirements in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, but the safety and effectiveness of smaller doses is unclear. Furthermore, patient selection criteria for optimal use of the drug are not well defined.

METHODS

Seven hundred and four first-time coronary artery bypass grafting patients were randomized to receive one of three doses of aprotinin (high, low, and pump-prime-only) or placebo. The patients were stratified as to risk of excessive bleeding.

RESULTS

All three aprotinin doses were highly effective in reducing bleeding and transfusion requirements. Consistent efficacy was not, however, demonstrated in the subgroup of patients at low risk for bleeding. There were no differences in mortality or the incidences of renal failure, strokes, or definite myocardial infarctions between the groups, although the pump-prime-only dose was associated with a small increase in definite, probable, or possible myocardial infarctions (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose and pump-prime-only aprotinin regimens provide reductions in bleeding and transfusion requirements that are similar to those of high-dose regimens. Although safe, aprotinin is not routinely indicated for the first-time coronary artery bypass grafting patient who is at low risk for postoperative bleeding. The pump-prime-only dose is not currently recommended because of a possible association with more frequent myocardial infarctions.

Rationale of the Cox maze procedure for atrial fibrillation during redo mitral valve operations

OBJECTIVE

The frequency of reoperation for mitral valve diseases with chronic atrial fibrillation has increased steadily. This study examined the rationale for using the Cox maze operation for atrial fibrillation during redo mitral valve operations.

METHODS

Between June 1992 and July 1995, we performed the maze procedure in 42 patients as a concomitant operation with redo mitral valve surgery (maze group). Associated procedures were tricuspid valve surgery in 27 patients and aortic valve surgery in 15 patients. The mean age at operation was 57.3 +/- 9.7 years, and the mean interval from the previous operation was 14.3 +/- 10.5 years. The mean follow-up period after the maze procedure was 25.5 +/- 10.8 months. Atrial fibrillation was present at the time of the previous operation in 29 patients (69%).

RESULTS

Neither hospital death nor late death occurred. Sinus rhythm was regained in 28 patients (67%), and an atrial A-wave was detected in 21 patients (50%) by pulsed Doppler study. Patients in whom sinus rhythm was restored had a shorter history of atrial fibrillation (9.0 +/- 6.0 years vs 15.9 +/- 4.6 years, p = 0.0009), a larger f-wave on lead V1 of the electrocardiogram (0.18 +/- 0.10 mV vs 0.10 +/- 0.08 mV, p = 0.017), and a smaller cardiothoracic ratio (63% +/- 8% vs 67% +/- 5%, p = 0.049) than patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. During the same period, 54 patients underwent mitral valve reoperation without the maze procedure (control group). The aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were slightly longer (p = 0.048 and p = 0.012) in the maze group (133 +/- 28 minutes and 221 +/- 43 minutes) than in the control group (126 +/- 65 minutes and 197 +/- 78 minutes). There was no significant difference in the amount of chest tube drainage or transfusion between the two groups (890 +/- 510 ml and 2120 +/- 1600 ml, respectively, in the maze group and 840 +/- 480 ml and 2140 +/- 1760 ml, respectively, in the control group). It was not necessary to reopen the chest for bleeding significantly more often in one group than in the other (14% in the maze group and 7% in the control group), and it was possible to operate without transfusion with the same frequency in the two groups (17% in the maze group and 20% in the control group).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the maze procedure should be considered in selected patients who have a high possibility of regaining sinus rhythm during redo mitral valve operations.

Low-dose and high-dose aprotinin improve hemostasis in coronary operations

Prophylactic aprotinin therapy has become a popular method to reduce bleeding associated with cardiac operations. Today essentially two dose regimens are used, a high-dose regimen with administration throughout the complete operative procedure and a low-dose regimen with administration only during bypass. In unblinded studies both regimens were found to be equally effective. This double-blind placebo-controlled study in 115 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting was done to confirm these results without potential investigator bias. Intraoperative hemoglobin loss was significantly reduced (p < 0.01) by 42% in the high-dose group and by 17% in the low-dose group compared with loss in control subjects. Blood loss 6 hours after operation was 377 ml in the low-dose and 266 ml in the high-dose group compared with 630 ml in the placebo group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). The average number of transfusions with packed red blood cells was reduced 31% in the low-dose group and 45% in the high-dose group, but the reductions were not significant. In a subgroup of patients, markers for coagulation and fibrinolysis were studied to investigate whether a different extent of activation existed. Fibrinolysis as measured by D-dimer levels was completely inhibited by the high-dose regimen, but was only partly suppressed in the low-dose group as compared with findings in the placebo group. Thrombin generation during cardiopulmonary bypass as reflected by F1 + 2 levels was lower in patients treated with aprotinin, but the difference was not significant. Concentrations of thrombin inactivated by antithrombin III were not different between the groups. The observation that low-dose aprotinin significantly improved hemostasis but did not inhibit hyperfibrinolysis supports our previous finding that low-dose aprotinin mainly protects platelet adhesive function. The better result obtained with high-dose aprotinin may indicate the contribution of hyperfibrinolysis to bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass. Because high-dose aprotinin is administered outside the period of full heparinization and might therefore increase the risk of thromboembolic complications, we propose a modification of the low-dose schedule to increase aprotinin levels sufficient for plasmin inhibition before release of the aortic crossclamp.

Open-heart surgery in Jehovah's Witness patients

Open-heart surgery has been performed since 1975 on 25 patients who are Jehovah's Witnesses by religion. The patients' ages ranged from 6-60 years, and their body weights from 18-51 kg. Surgical procedures included correction of congenital heart disease in 14 patients and valve repair or replacement in 11. Six procedures were reoperations. The lowest mean haematocrits, during perfusion and the postoperative period, were 22.7% (range 15.0-31.0%) and 27% (range 16.0-36.0%), respectively. Twenty-four patients survived and are alive and well. One patient died of low output failure before discharge. The blood return system reduced blood loss. Five of the patients who underwent cardiac surgery received recombinant erythropoietin before and after surgery, leading to higher postoperative haematocrits. In one patient, a haematocrit which fell to 16.9% after surgery was raised to 27% by administration of erythropoietin, without blood transfusion. In two recent cases, high doses of aprotinin were used during surgery, resulting in better haemostasis after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Aprotinin

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical pharmacology of aprotinin in patients undergoing surgical procedures involving major blood loss, namely, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was used to identify French- and English-language publications on aprotinin using the indexing terms aprotinin, cardiothoracic surgery, and hemorrhage. The MEDLINE search was supplemented by review of article bibliographies. Data also were obtained from the approved Canadian and US product labels.

STUDY SELECTIONS

All abstracts and uncontrolled and controlled clinical trials were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Study design, population, results, and safety information were retained. Efficacy conclusions were drawn from controlled trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor isolated from bovine lung tissue, decreases bleeding after cardiac surgery by mechanisms including antifibrinolytic activity and preservation of platelet function. Several trials have shown that aprotinin reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing CABG. Its use in other surgical procedures involving major blood loss has been reported. Aprotinin is well tolerated, with minor allergic reactions being the most frequently reported adverse effect. Although unsubstantiated, the possibility that aprotinin could create a prothrombic state leading to early graft occlusion and formation of microthrombi in renal and coronary vasculatures is of concern.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin is an effective hemostatic agent in CABG. Clear definitions of indications, dosing, safety, and repeated use remain to be investigated thoroughly.

Genetically engineered serine protease inhibitor for hemostasis after cardiac operations

BACKGROUND

The serine protease inhibitor aprotinin has been widely reported for its beneficial action in limiting blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A potent human serine protease inhibitor known as protease nexin II or amyloid precursor protein has been recently isolated. A recombinant protein known as recombinant Kunitz protease inhibitor (rKPI; Scios Nova, Mountain View, CA) with sequence homology to the protease nexin II-amyloid precursor protein molecule has been manufactured.

METHODS

Recombinant Kunitz protease inhibitor was assessed in an ovine model of CPB as a hemostatic agent after CPB. Sheep (n = 22) underwent CPB for 90 minutes. Two thoracic drains were sited and drain losses collected for a period of 3 hours after CPB. Wounds were subjectively assessed before closure for "dryness" using a visual analogue scale. Sheep were randomized to control (n = 8), aprotinin (n = 8), and rKPI (n = 6) groups.

RESULTS

Control animals had a drain loss of 409.4 +/- 39.4 mL/3 h, compared with 131.3 +/- 20.3 mL/3 h for the aprotinin group and 163.7 +/- 34.3 mL/3 h for the rKPI group (p = 0.16). Hemoglobin loss was 11.6 +/- 3.6, 6.02 +/- 2.1, and 4.6 +/- 1.2 g/3 h for the control, rKPI, and aprotinin groups respectively (p = 0.25). The subjective analysis of the wounds at the end of CPB found aprotinin (1.25 +/- 0.16; p < 0.05) and rKPI (1.17 +/- 0.17; p < 0.05) animals to score significantly lower than control animals (2.63 +/- 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of these in vivo findings, genetic modification may yield a more efficacious serine protease inhibitor with the inherent advantages of using a human-based protein.

Reducing thrombin formation during cardiopulmonary bypass: is there a benefit of the additional anticoagulant action of aprotinin?

During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), contact-phase activation of factor XII, prekallikrein, and high molecular weight kininogen initiates the intrinsic pathway of coagulation. To prevent gross clot formation during CPB, heparin is commonly used as an anticoagulant. There is a wide variability in the sensitivity of individual patients to the actions of heparin. We did not find a significant correlation between plasma heparin levels and concentrations of D-dimers, thrombin-antithrombin III complexes (TAT), and prothrombin fragments F1+2 as markers of fibrinolysis and coagulation activation. In addition, heparin cannot completely inhibit thrombin formation and action and may play a central role in the coagulation disorders associated with CPB. F1+2 and TAT rise throughout the course of CPB and fibrin monomers are generated. Attempts to improve anti-coagulation using heparin-coated bypass circuits and specific inhibitors of thrombin have not thus far proven successful. The serine protease inhibitor aprotinin can inhibit contact-phase activation, as evidenced by generation of significantly fewer prothrombin fragments F1+2, thrombin-antithrombin III complexes, fibrinopeptide A, and fibrin monomers in aprotinin-treated patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Studies performed with a simulated CPB system have shown attenuation of plasma kallikrein C1 inhibitor complex (PKC1 I) with aprotinin and the recombinant Arg 15 aprotinin. This action of aprotinin to inhibit contact-phase activation may influence the degree of anticoagulation with heparin. Patients treated with aprotinin require approximately 20% less heparin to achieve an activated clotting time (ACT) of 400 s than control patients. Despite lower plasma concentrations of heparin, aprotinin-treated patients had significantly lower concentrations of the markers of coagulation activation (thrombin-antithrombin III complex, fibrin monomers, and antiplasmin-plasmin complex). We have also investigated the role of aprotinin in contact-phase [correction of contact phase] activation of fibrinolysis. Patients treated with aprotinin showed higher concentrations of single-chain urinary type plasminogen activator (scuPA) at the end of CPB compared with control patients, indicating reduced contact- phase [correction of contact phase] activation.

Safety and efficacy of aprotinin under conditions of deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest

Aprotinin has been successfully used to reduce blood loss and blood product requirements in patients undergoing primary and reoperative cardiac operations. Its safety and efficacy during profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest have been questioned, however. A retrospective review compared 24 patients who received aprotinin during complex aortic procedures under profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest with 24 age-matched patients undergoing similar procedures without aprotinin. Activated clotting time was maintained at longer than 500 seconds (kaolin activating agent) or longer than 750 seconds (celite). We observed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of neurologic events (p not significant) or myocardial infarctions (p not significant), and there was a trend toward reduced in-hospital mortality rate in aprotinin-treated patients. A higher incidence of postoperative renal dysfunction was encountered in aprotinin-treated patients. Aprotinin recipients had a significant reduction in requirements for postoperative homologous erythrocytes (p = 0.01). We conclude that aprotinin may be safely and effectively used in patients undergoing deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest.

A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of aprotinin for reducing blood loss and the requirement for donor-blood transfusion in patients undergoing repeat coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor that reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements when administered prophylactically to cardiac surgical patients. To examine the safety and dose-related efficacy of aprotinin, a prospective, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in patients undergoing repeat coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive either high-dose aprotinin, low-dose aprotinin, pump-prime-only aprotinin, or placebo. Drug efficacy was determined by the reduction in donor-blood transfusion up to postoperative day 12 and in postoperative thoracic-drainage volume. The percentage of patients requiring donor-red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusions in the high- and low-dose aprotinin groups was reduced compared with the pump-prime-only and placebo groups (high-dose aprotinin, 54%; low-dose aprotinin, 46%; pump-prime only, 72%; and placebo, 75%; overall P = .001). The number of units of donor RBCs transfused was significantly lower in the aprotinin-treated patients compared with placebo (high-dose aprotinin, 1.6 +/- 0.2 U; low-dose aprotinin, 1.6 +/- 0.3 U; pump-prime-only, 2.5 +/- 0.3 U; and placebo, 3.4 +/- 0.5 U; P = .0001). There was also a significant difference in total blood-product exposures among treatment groups (high-dose aprotinin, 2.2 +/- 0.4 U; low-dose aprotinin, 3.4 +/- 0.9 U; pump-prime-only, 5.1 +/- 0.9 U; placebo, 10.3 +/- 1.4 U). There were no differences among treatment groups for the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that high- and low-dose aprotinin significantly reduces the requirement for donor-blood transfusion in repeat CABG patients without increasing the risk for perioperative MI.

Retransfusion of suctioned blood during cardiopulmonary bypass impairs hemostasis

In a previous study we observed extensive clotting and fibrinolysis in blood from the thoracic cavities during cardiopulmonary bypass. We hypothesized that retransfusion of this suctioned blood could impair hemostasis. In this prospective clinical study we investigated the effect of suctioned blood retransfusion on systemic blood activation and on postoperative hemostasis. During coronary artery bypass grafting in 40 patients, suctioned blood was collected separately. It then was retransfused to the patient at the end of the operation (n = 19), or it was retained (n = 21). During the study, 12 consecutive patients, randomized in two groups of 6, were analyzed for biochemical parameters indicating blood activation and clotting. The immediate and significant increase in circulating concentrations of thrombin-antithrombin III complex, tissue-type plasminogen activator, fibrin degradation products, and free plasma hemoglobin demonstrated the effect of suctioned blood retransfusion. Moreover, the increased concentrations of thrombin-antithrombin III complex and fibrin degradation products indicated renewed systemic clotting and fibrinolysis as a direct result of the retransfusion of suctioned blood. Concentrations of all indicators mentioned remained significantly lower in the retainment group. The clinical data showed that retainment of suctioned blood resulted in significantly decreased postoperative blood loss (822 mL in the retransfusion group versus 611 mL in the retainment group; p < 0.05) and similar or even reduced consumption of blood products (513 versus 414 mL red blood cell concentrate and 384 versus 150 mL single-donor plasma; both not significant). We conclude that retransfusion of highly activated suctioned blood during cardiopulmonary bypass exacerbates wound bleeding.

Aprotinin for coronary artery bypass grafting: effect on postoperative renal function

Two hundred sixteen patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft procedures were randomized to receive either high-dose aprotinin or placebo. Clinically important postoperative renal insufficiency was infrequent, with a single patient (0.9%) from each group requiring dialysis. Although increases in the serum creatinine level occurred postoperatively in more patients who received aprotinin (20/108) than in those given placebo (13/108), the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.186), and the increases were generally small and transient. Likewise, there was no difference between the groups in terms of the incidence of abnormal serum electrolyte levels, blood urea nitrogen levels, or urinalysis findings, or in the frequency of abnormal creatinine clearance rates. Under the conditions described, aprotinin use does not appear to be associated with a significant risk of serious renal toxicity.

Metaanalysis of prophylactic drug treatment in the prevention of postoperative bleeding

Prophylactic drug treatment is one of several strategies to reduce postoperative blood loss and potentially limit homologous blood use in open heart surgery. A computerized MEDLINE search supplemented with manual bibliography reviews was performed for randomized clinical trials published in peer-reviewed English-language journals from January 1980 to June 1993. A metaanalysis was conducted of trials evaluating desmopressin (group DD, n = 13), epsilon-aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid (group EA, n = 4), and aprotinin (group AP, n = 16). Eligible studies used placebo controls and administered the drug in a prophylactic manner. The primary study end point was postoperative chest tube loss (mL, mean +/- standard deviation). There was a significant reduction in postoperative chest tube loss detected for each of the active treatments versus the placebo (DD versus controls: percent reduction 0.11, p = 0.0021; EA versus controls: percent reduction 0.30, p < 0.0001; and AP versus controls: percent reduction 0.36, p < 0.0001). Therapy with EA or AP was associated with a greater reduction in chest tube loss than DD (EA versus DD, p = 0.0033, and AP versus DD, p < 0.0001). Secondary study end points were transfusion requirements, chest reexploration, and perioperative mortality. The volume of postoperative red cell transfusion (mean +/- standard deviation) was reduced with EA (p < 0.0001) or AP treatment (p < 0.0001) compared with a placebo or DD, whereas the proportion of patients given transfusions was limited only in the AP-treated patients (odds ratio 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.33; p < 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Natural and synthetic antifibrinolytics in adult cardiac surgery: efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency

Epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid, two synthetic antifibrinolytics, and aprotinin, an antifibrinolytic derived from bovine lung, are used to reduce excessive bleeding and transfusion of homologous blood products (HBP) after cardiac surgery. This review analyzes the studies on the utilization of antifibrinolytics in adult cardiac surgery according to the epidemiological concepts of efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency. A majority of published studies confirm the efficacy of antifibrinolytics administered prophylactically to reduce postoperative bleeding and transfusion of HBP. More studies are needed, however, to compare antifibrinolytics and determine if any one is superior to the others. Despite their demonstrated efficacy, antifibrinolytics are only one of the options available to diminish the use of HBP. Other blood-saving techniques, surgical expertise, temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass and respect of established transfusion guidelines may modify the effectiveness of antifibrinolytics to the point where antifibrinolytics may not be necessary. At this time, insufficient data have been published to perform a cost vs benefit analysis of the use of antifibrinolytics. This complex analysis takes into account not only direct costs (cost of the drug and of blood products), but also the ensuing effects of treatment such as: length of stay in the operating room, in the intensive care unit and in the hospital; need for surgical re-exploration; treatment of transfusion or drug-related complications, etc. In particular, the risk of thrombotic complications associated with antifibrinolytics is the subject of an ongoing, unresolved controversy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aprotinin to decrease bleeding and intraoperative blood transfusion requirements during descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysmectomy using cardiopulmonary bypass

The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy of aprotinin, an antifibrinolytic agent, in reducing bleeding and blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysmectomy using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent thoracic or thoracoabdominal aneurysmectomy using CPB in a 2-year period. None of the 29 patients operated on in 1990 (group 1) received aprotinin, whereas all 40 patients operated on in 1991 (group 2) were placed on a high-dose regimen of aprotinin. There were no significant differences between the two groups. Administration of aprotinin was associated with a decrease in CPB time (p = 0.02), surgical duration (p = 0.05) and intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.008) as well as a reduction in intraoperative packed red cells (p = 0.01), Cell-Saver units (p = 0.05), fresh-frozen plasma units (p = 0.002), and platelet concentrate (p = 0.01) requirements. These data suggest that aprotinin is effective in reducing bleeding and blood transfusion requirements during descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysmectomy using CPB.