Optimizing "delay period" for burst stimulation in dynamic cardiomyoplasty

Dynamic cardiomyoplasty as a therapeutic alternative: current status

Dynamic cardiomyoplasty was proposed as an alternative surgical treatment for severe cardiomyopathies and has been performed worldwide in more than 1,000 patients. Patients indicated for this procedure are specifically those with dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathies. The ventricular function improvement observed after dynamic cardiomyoplasty derived from the direct action of synchronized skeletal muscle flap contraction and from a girdling effect that helps to reverse chamber remodeling and to decrease ventricular wall stress. Although long-term benefits of this procedure may be limited by skeletal muscle flap ischemic compromise, technological advances incorporated in the new myostimulators will possibly decrease this complication incidence. Clinical improvement has been reported as a consistent finding in cardiomyoplasty follow-up and the overall 5-year survival after this procedure ranges from 39 % to 54 %. On the other hand, the mortality after cardiomyoplasty has been significantly higher for patients in persistent New York Heart Association functional class IV, showing that this procedure needs to be indicated earlier than the heart transplantation. In this regard, only the results of an ongoing randomized trial will potentially define cardiomyoplasty influence on the survival of patients with severe heart failure. In the meantime, however, there are clearly several functional class III patients whose quality of life and exercise capacity have worsened despite the use of maximum medical therapy, justifying dynamic cardiomyoplasty indication.

Permanent cardiac assistance from skeletal muscle: a prospect for the new millennium

This paper looks at the prospects for new surgical solutions to the problem of end-stage heart failure based on cardiac assistance from skeletal muscle. The current status of the main biological approaches, cardiomyoplasty, aortomyoplasty, and the skeletal muscle ventricle, are discussed, followed by a consideration of some of the important basic issues that need to be addressed if these techniques are to achieve their full potential. Although there is a review element to the paper, the main emphasis is on the work of our own research group and collaborating workers.

Optimization of synchronization delay in latissimus dorsi dynamic cardiomyoplasty

BACKGROUND

Optimal synchronization delay (SD) for triggering the implanted cardiomyostimulators in patients undergoing latissimus dorsi dynamic cardiomyoplasty has not been clearly defined. Generally a synchronization delay time of 45 to 60 ms is used in the current practice, in which the implanted cardiomyostimulator stimulates the latissimus dorsi muscle 45 to 60 ms after mitral valve closure acquired with M-mode echocardiography. We investigated the effect of shortening or prolonging the delay time on cardiac functions.

METHODS

We studied 10 patients who were in their first 2 years postoperatively. Three values for SD (SD = 0 ms, 45 to 60 ms, and 150 to 160 ms) were echocardiographically evaluated for their influence on both systolic and diastolic left ventricular parameters.

RESULTS

Ejection fractions were 0.27 +/- 0.07, 0.28 +/- 0.07, and 0.32 +/- 0.06; peak aortic velocities were 0.85 +/- 0.8, 0.86 +/- 0.11, and 0.92 +/- 0.8 m/s; and velocity-time integrals were 0.16 +/- 0.03, 0.16 +/- 0.03, and 0.19 +/- 0.03 m for the SD values of 0, 45 to 60 ms, and 150 to 160 ms, respectively. Diastolic parameters were also measured. Isovolumetric diastolic relaxation time was 97.5 +/- 49, 97.20 +/- 44, and 111.8 +/- 49 ms; deceleration time was 83.67 +/- 32, 88.48 +/- 35, and 92.68 +/- 34 ms; and ratio or velocity-time integral of e wave to velocity-time integral of a wave was 3.09 +/- 0.98, 2.48 +/- 0.69, and 2.38 +/- 0.65 for the SD values of 0, 45 to 60 ms, and 150 to 160 ms, respectively. Systolic functions were better when SD was set at 150 to 160 ms, but there was a diastolic compromise. On the other hand, diastolic parameters were more favorable when SD = 0 (i.e., cardiomyostimulator triggered without delay) but the systolic assist was suboptimal. Systolic and diastolic parameters seemed relatively well-balanced with the current practice of setting the synchronization delay at 45 to 60 ms.

CONCLUSIONS

The most favorable systolic effects were obtained with a prolonged delay of synchronization (150 to 160 ms), at some expense of diastolic functions. On the other hand, with a short or absent delay, diastolic parameters were improved but systolic parameters became suboptimal. Therefore, the current practice of setting the SD between 45 and 60 ms after echocardiographic mitral valve closure is suggested for the optimal timing for cardiomyostimulator stimulation in patients who have undergone latissimus dorsi dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Yet a great deal of individualization is necessary, and fixed preset values cannot definitely be determined because one setting does not fit all patients.

Stabilization of chronic remodeling by asynchronous cardiomyoplasty in dilated cardiomyopathy: effects of a conditioned muscle wrap

BACKGROUND

Dynamic cardiomyoplasty is a promising new therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy. The girdling effects of a conditioned muscle wrap alone have recently been postulated to partly explain its mechanism. We investigated this effect in a canine model of chronic dilated cardiomyopathy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty dogs underwent rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) for 4 weeks to create a model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Seven dogs were then randomly selected to undergo subsequent cardiomyoplasty, and all dogs had 6 weeks of additional RVP. The cardiomyoplasty group also received 6 weeks of concurrent skeletal muscle stimulation consisting of single twitches delivered asynchronously at 2 Hz to transform the wrap without active assistance. All dogs were studied by pressure-volume analysis and echocardiography at baseline and after 4 and 10 weeks of pacing. Systolic indices, including ejection fraction (EF), end-systolic elastance (Ees), and preload-recruitable stroke work (PRSW) were all increased at 10 weeks in the wrap versus controls (EF, 34.0 versus 27.1, P=.008; Ees, 1.65 versus 1.26, P=.09; PRSW, 35.9 versus 25.5, P=.001). Ventricular volumes, diastolic relaxation, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressures stabilized in the cardiomyoplasty group but continued to deteriorate in controls. Both the end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationships shifted farther rightward in controls but remained stable in the cardiomyoplasty group.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to potential benefits from active systolic assistance, benefits from dynamic cardiomyoplasty appear to be partially accounted for by the presence of a conditioned muscle wrap alone. This conditioned wrap stabilizes the remodeling process of heart failure, arresting progressive deterioration of systolic and diastolic function.

Mechanisms of dynamic cardiomyoplasty: current concepts

Dynamic cardiomyoplasty is an operation that is undergoing worldwide clinical evaluation. It had been developed to utilize the patient's own skeletal muscle to assist the failing heart. Although the clinical and quality of life benefits of cardiomyoplasty have been reported in most patients, the results of quantitative hemodynamic analyses have been less consistent. This has prompted the reevaluation of the mechanisms of dynamic cardiomyoplasty other than simple cardiac compression by the wrapped muscle. There is good evidence to suggest that the following, either together or in part, comprise some of the mechanisms of dynamic cardiomyoplasty: (1) direct systolic assist; (2) myocardial (wall stress) sparing effect; (3) remodeling/girdling effect; and (4) angiogenesis. Current concepts and potential additional mechanisms are discussed and integrated, based on a review of the literature and our own recent studies.

Hemodynamic effects in acute cardiomyoplasty of different wrapped muscle activation times as measured by pressure-volume relations

BACKGROUND

Correct timing of mechanical interaction between wrapped latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) and the heart during cardiac systole has been poorly understood and remains a controversial issue. Therefore, left ventricular pressure-volume relations were analyzed in acute cardiomyoplasty while changing the synchronization delays.

METHODS

Effects of different delays between the sensed cardiac R wave and wrapped muscle contraction were studied in goats submitted to acute left cardiomyoplasty. Conductance and micromanometer catheters were used to evaluate hemodynamics. Systolic contribution of the wrapped muscle was studied in preassisted and assisted beats, whereas diastolic effects were studied in assisted and postassisted beats.

RESULTS

At best settings, cardiomyoplasty resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (from 42.2 +/- 9.2 to 56.7% +/- 13%), in stroke work (from 2769 +/- 1140 to 4271 +/- 1717 gm/m2), in dP/dt (from 1185 +/- 342 to 1510 +/- 285 mmHg/sec), in end-systolic pressure (from 93.5 +/- 22.5 mmHg to 97.3 +/- 22.3 mmHg), and in peak ejection rate (from 282 +/- 64 to 533 +/- 241 mL/sec). Stroke volume showed a mean increase of 35% (from 42.2 +/- 9.9 mL to 56.9 +/- 20.1 mL) during assisted beats. Diastolic function was not substantially impaired at optimal stimulation delay. Incorrect timing of LD contraction resulted in suboptimal improvement or no change in comparison with unassisted hemodynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study documents support of cardiac performance by LDM. Incorrect timing of heart/wrapped muscle interaction led to suboptimal hemodynamic results. Muscle contraction timing is an important factor in cardiomyoplasty outcome.

Dynamic cardiomyoplasty in the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy: current results and perspectives

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the current indications, results, and perspectives of dynamic cardiomyoplasty in the treatment of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Particular emphasis is placed on the clinical experience with 36 patients operated at the São Paulo Heart Institute between 1988 and 1995.

METHODS

Based on several clinical reports, the mechanisms of action of dynamic cardiomyoplasty in these patients include the enhancement of left ventricular systolic function, by the direct action of synchronized skeletal muscle flap contraction and the reversion of chamber remodeling. Moreover, both mechanisms seem to be responsible for improved diastolic function properties and for the decrease of ventricular wall stress. Besides the acceptable hospital mortality observed for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy ranging from 0% to 8% with this surgical procedure, clinical improvement after dynamic cardiomyoplasty has been demonstrated as a prevailing and significant outcome.

RESULTS

Nevertheless, the 1-year survival for these patients ranges from 82% to 86% and the 5-year survival on the order of 41% to 49%. In addition, the analysis of factors influencing the outcome showed that cardiomyoplasty long-term survival was significantly affected by the severity of preoperative clinical compromise and cardiac function impairment. On the other hand, patients with dilated cardiomyopathy who were operated in functional Class III or intermittent Class IV and with pulmonary vascular resistance below 4 Wood units, present survival rates on the order of 79% at 2 years and of 64% at 5 years of follow-up, which are similar to those reported after cardiac transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Furthermore, technological advances incorporated in the new cardiomyostimulators may ameliorate skeletal muscle flap performance at long term. Other developments are also discussed in this field.