Brain metastasis in resected lung cancer: value of intensive follow-up with computed tomography

Osteogenic and brain metastases after non-small cell lung cancer resection

BACKGROUND

A significant number of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients develop osteogenic metastases (OMs) and/or brain metastases (BMs) after surgery, however, routine chest computed tomography (CT) sometimes fails to diagnose these recurrences. We investigated the incidence of BMs and OMs after pulmonary resection and aimed to identify candidates who can benefit from brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in addition to CT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 1099 NSCLC patients who underwent pulmonary resection between 2002 and 2013. Clinicopathological factors associated with OM and/or BM were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Postoperative recurrence occurred in 344 patients (32.6%). OMs were diagnosed in 56 patients (5.6%) with 93% within 3 years. BMs were identified in 72 patients (6.6%) with 91.1% within 3 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that poorly differentiated tumor and the presence of pathological nodal metastases were significantly associated with postoperative BM (p = 0.037, < 0.001), preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of 5 ng/mL or higher and the presence of pathological nodal metastases were significantly associated with OM (p = 0.034, < 0.001). The prevalence of OM and/or BM in 5 years was as high as 25.9% in patients with pathological nodal metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified significant predictive factors of postoperative BM and OM. Under patient selection, the effectiveness of intensive surveillance for the modes of recurrence should be investigated with respect to earlier detection, maintenance of quality of life, and survival outcomes.

Outcomes of patients with disease recurrence after treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer detected by routine follow-up CT scans versus a symptom driven evaluation

OBJECTIVES

The majority of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) will recur after receiving multimodal treatment with curative intent. Current guidelines recommend routine follow-up with computerized tomography (CT) scans, though minimal data exist on the utility of this approach nor has an optimal follow-up strategy to detect recurrence been defined. This study examined whether survival varied if relapse was detected with scheduled follow-up CT versus symptoms, and whether the pattern of recurrence affected these outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single institution retrospective review of patients who had undergone definitive management of LANSCLC with chemoradiotherapy +/- surgical resection. Standard follow-up testing consisted of routine exam and chest CT beginning at every 3 months in the first year and decreasing to annually after the fifth year.

RESULTS

311 patients were assessed, of which 167 patients recurred and were evaluable. 104 progressions were detected by follow-up and 63 by symptoms. For the entire group, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) for those detected by scans vs. symptoms (7.6 vs. 6.1 months, p = 0.797). After excluding patients with oligometastatic (1-3) brain metastases (OBM), OS was superior in patients with scan detected relapse (7.5 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine surveillance by CT chest detects more localized disease than symptom driven follow-up, though OS does not differ. This null result is largely driven by the favorable outcomes for patients with OBM who present symptomatically. A strategy of both chest and brain imaging could be considered and warrants further investigation.

Playing the odds: lung cancer surveillance after curative surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

After 'curative' resection, many patients are still at risk for further lung cancer, either as a recurrence or a new metachronous primary. In theory, close follow-up should improve survival by catching relapse early - but in reality, many experts feel that surveillance for recurrence is of uncertain value. In this article, we explore the reasons behind the controversy, what the current guidelines recommend, and what future solutions are in development that may ultimately resolve this debate.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although postoperative surveillance for a new lung cancer may impart a survival advantage, this benefit does not appear to extend to the phenomenon of recurrence. Nevertheless, close radiographic follow-up after curative resection is still recommended by most professional societies, with more frequent scanning in the first 2 years, and then annual screening thereafter. Given the radiation risk, however, low-dose and minimal-dose computed tomography options are under investigation, as well as timing scans around expected peaks of recurrence rather than a set schedule.

SUMMARY

Applying the same surveillance algorithm to all lung cancer patients after curative resection may not be cost-effective or reasonable, especially if there is no demonstrable mortality benefit. Therefore, future research should focus on finding safer nonradiographic screening options, such as blood or breath biomarkers, or developing nomograms for predicting which patients will relapse and require closer follow-up. Ultimately, however, better tools for surveillance may be moot until we develop better treatment options for lung cancer recurrence.

Combining Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio to Predict Brain Metastasis of Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

We aimed to evaluate the role of pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in predicting brain metastasis after radical surgery for lung adenocarcinoma patients. The records of 103 patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinoma between 2013 and 2014 were reviewed. Clinicopathologic characteristics of these patients were assessed in the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Brain metastasis occurred in 12 patients (11.6%). On univariate analysis, N2 stage (P = 0.013), stage III (P = 0.016), increased CEA level (P = 0.006), and higher PLR value (P = 0.020) before treatment were associated with an increased risk of developing brain metastasis. In multivariate model analysis, CEA above 5.2 ng/mL (P = 0.014) and PLR ≥ 120 (P = 0.036) remained as the risk factors for brain metastasis. The combination of CEA and PLR was superior to CEA or PLR alone in predicting brain metastasis according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under ROC curve, AUC 0.872 versus 0.784 versus 0.704). Pretreatment CEA and PLR are independent and significant risk factors for occurrence of brain metastasis in resected lung adenocarcinoma patients. Combining these two factors may improve the predictability of brain metastasis.

A case-matched study of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: comparing treatment results for those with versus without neurological symptoms

We aimed to reappraise whether post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) results for brain metastases differ between patients with and without neurological symptoms. This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study using our prospectively accumulated database including 2825 consecutive BM patients undergoing gamma knife SRS alone during the 15-year period since July 1998. The 2825 patients were divided into two groups; neurologically asymptomatic [group A, 1374 patients (48.6 %)] and neurologically symptomatic [group B, 1451 (51.4 %)]. Because there was considerable bias in pre-SRS clinical factors between groups A and B, a case-matched study was conducted. Ultimately, 1644 patients (822 in each group) were selected. The standard Kaplan–Meier method was used to determine post-SRS survival. Competing risk analysis was applied to estimate cumulative incidences of neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, re-SRS for new lesions and SRS-induced complications. Post-SRS median survival times (MSTs) did not differ between the two groups; 7.8 months in group A versus 7.4 months in group B patients (HR 1.064, 95 % CI 0.963–1.177, p = 0.22). However, cumulative incidences of neurological death (HR 1.637, 95 % CI 1.174–2.281, p = 0.0036) and neurological deterioration (HR 1.425, 95 % CI 1.073–1.894, p = 0.014) were significantly lower in the group A than in the group B patients. Neurologically asymptomatic patients undergoing SRS for BM had better results than symptomatic patients in terms of both maintenance of good neurological state and prolonged neurological survival. Thus, we conclude that screening computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is highly beneficial for managing cancer patients.

A nomogram to predict brain metastasis as the first relapse in curatively resected non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Development of brain metastasis results in a significant reduction in overall survival. However, there is no an effective tool to predict brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We conducted this study to develop a feasible nomogram that can predict metastasis to the brain as the first relapse site in patients with curatively resected NSCLC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review of NSCLC patients who had received curative surgery at National Cancer Center (Goyang, South Korea) between 2001 and 2008 was performed. We chose metastasis to the brain as the first relapse site after curative surgery as the primary endpoint of the study. A nomogram was modeled using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 1218 patients, brain metastasis as the first relapse developed in 87 patients (7.14%) during the median follow-up of 43.6 months. Occurrence rates of brain metastasis were higher in patients with adenocarcinoma or those with a high pT and pN stage. Younger age appeared to be associated with brain metastasis, but this result was not statistically significant. The final prediction model included histology, smoking status, pT stage, and the interaction between adenocarcinoma and pN stage. The model showed fairly good discriminatory ability with a C-statistic of 69.3% and 69.8% for predicting brain metastasis within 2 years and 5 years, respectively. Internal validation using 2000 bootstrap samples resulted in C-statistics of 67.0% and 67.4% which still indicated good discriminatory performances.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram presented here provides the individual risk estimate of developing metastasis to the brain as the first relapse site in patients with NSCLC who have undergone curative surgery. Surveillance programs or preventive treatment strategies for brain metastasis could be established based on this nomogram.

What is the most practical, optimal, and cost effective method for performing follow-up after lung cancer surgery, and by whom should it be done?

Surgery is the treatment of choice for early stage non-small cell lung cancer. In this context, postoperative follow-up is important to diagnose late postoperative complications, as well as to detect recurring cancer or new primaries as early as possible. There is, however, no high-quality evidence regarding the benefits of monitoring programs on survival and quality of life. Most studies recommend clinical and radiological follow-up (radiograph or chest computed tomography) performed more intensively during the first two years and annually thereafter. The physician doing the follow-up can be the thoracic surgeon, the diagnosing physician, or the family physician.

Is computed tomography follow-up of patients after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer of benefit in terms of survival?

A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether following up patients after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with computed tomography (CT) scanning is of benefit in terms of survival. Altogether, 448 papers were found using the reported search, of which five represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question and three provided supporting evidence. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. There is no general consensus in the literature. From the limited number of papers that address the effect of CT follow-up on survival following surgery for NSCLC, three showed that CT scanning may improve the survival of patients by detecting local and distant recurrences at an earlier stage when the patient is asymptomatic. One paper showed that detection by the use of low-dose CT or simultaneous chest CT plus positron emission tomography-CT led to a longer duration of survival compared with detection by clinical suspicion (2.1 ± 0.3 vs 3.6 ± 0.2 years, p = 0.002). However, two papers broadly showed that follow-up with CT does not improve survival outcomes regardless of the site of recurrence. One such study showed that there was no clinically significant difference in survival whether patients were followed up using a strict CT protocol compared with a symptom-based follow-up (median survival after recurrence: strict 7.9 months, symptom-based 6.6 months, p = 0.219). The remaining papers supported the use of CT as a screening tool for recurrence but did not comment directly on survival. Owing to the limited and contradictory evidence, there is a need for an randomized controlled trial to assess the survival outcomes of patients followed up with a CT screening protocol vs a symptom-based follow-up.

Growth rate of newly developed metastatic brain tumors after thoracotomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Among 1372 lung cancer patients without brain metastasis that underwent resection of lung cancer at our center from 2001 to 2007, brain metastases developed in 72 patients (5.2%) during their hospital course. We hypothesized that there were micro-metastases in the brain at the time of lung surgery in these patients, even though there were no detectable brain metastases on the MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the growth rates of metastatic brain tumors in this unique subset of patients, and to compare the findings with our previous study that calculated the growth rate of brain metastases during chemotherapy. Among 72 patients, 23 with cystic or hemorrhagic metastases were excluded. Seventy-six metastatic brain tumors in 49 patients were reviewed. Twenty-five patients underwent adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, for the rest of the patients, chemotherapy was not added after lung cancer surgery. The tumor volume was determined using V-works software (v. 4.0) (Cybermed, Seoul, Korea) and T1 gadolinium enhanced MR images. The overall median tumor growth rate was 11.7 mm³/day (interquartile range, 4.9-26.8). There were no statistically significant differences in the tumor growth among the lung cancer stages and the growth rate was similar regardless of the use of chemotherapy. The growth rate reported in this study shows consistency with that of our previous report (12.1 mm³/day). These findings may help optimize patient management during follow up.

Effectiveness of intensive follow-up after response in patients with small cell lung cancer

We investigated whether intensive follow-up leads to earlier diagnosis of recurrence, more effective treatment, and longer survival in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who had shown a complete or partial response to first-line chemotherapy. The subjects of this retrospective study were 94 patients with SCLC who had shown a complete or partial response to first-line chemotherapy. The patients were separated into two arms: an intensive follow-up arm in which patients underwent regular blood tests, chest radiography, computed tomography of the chest and upper abdomen, magnetic resonance or computed tomography of the brain, and bone scintigraphy bimonthly for 6 months and then quarterly for 1.5 years; and a nonintensive follow-up arm in which these examinations were performed at the physician's discretion. All patients also underwent interviews and physical examinations monthly for 2 years and bimonthly for a further 3 years. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the arms. Disease recurred in 55 of 62 patients of the intensive arm and 29 of 32 patients of the nonintensive arm. Asymptomatic recurrences were detected more frequently in the intensive arm than in the nonintensive arm. The response rate to salvage therapy among all patients with recurrent disease was significantly higher in the intensive arm (61.8%) than in the nonintensive arm (37.9%; p=0.04). Both median postrelapse survival and overall median survival were significantly longer in the intensive arm (9 and 20 months, respectively, p=0.04 and p=0.001) than in the nonintensive arm (4 and 13 months, respectively). Intensive follow-up helps detect recurrence earlier, enhances the effectiveness of treatment, and lengthens survival in patients with SCLC. Well-designed prospective, randomized trials including a cost-benefit analysis are needed to compare intensive and nonintensive follow-up regimens.

Routine screening by brain magnetic resonance imaging decreased the brain metastasis rate following surgery for lung adenocarcinoma

Since May 1999, the institutional guidelines of Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, have required preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) screening of the brain in all patients with lung adenocarcinoma. To investigate the brain metastasis and survival rates since the adoption of this guideline, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent complete lung resection between January 1995 and December 2000. Recurrence rate, recurrence site, and survival were investigated and compared between patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent complete resection before May 1999, who did not undergo MR screening of the brain (non-MR group, n=160), and those after May 1999, who did receive MR screening of the brain (MR group, n=86). The brain metastasis rate was lower in the MR group than in the non-MR group (p<0.05), especially for the first 2 years. However, the recurrence rate at sites other than the brain was similar between the two groups. The 5-year survival was higher in the MR group (59%) than in the non-MR group (45%, p<0.05). Even in patients with stage I cancer, brain metastasis was diagnosed more frequently in the non-MR group (5%) than in the MR group (2%). Preoperative MR screening of the brain can help early detection of brain metastases in the patients with lung adenocarcinoma prior to surgical resection and lead to increase postoperative survival in patients with operable lung adenocarcinoma.

Does intensive follow-up alter outcome in patients with advanced lung cancer?

BACKGROUND

Despite aggressive multimodality treatment, 5-year survival of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains <30%. To detect relapse, progression, or development of a second primary cancer early, many clinicians perform follow-up scans. To assess the impact of routine scanning, we compared clinical trial patients who had study-mandated scans with those treated off-study who had less intensive radiologic follow-up.

METHODS

The hospital cancer registry and trials databases were searched for patients with locally advanced NSCLC who had undergone multimodality treatment with curative intent. Baseline demographics were collected as well as frequency and results of clinical and radiologic follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty trial patients and 35 nontrial control patients were identified. Trial patients underwent significantly more imaging, particularly in the first 2 years (2.9 versus 2.0 body scans per year, p = 0.0016; 1.1 versus 0.4 brain scans per year, p < 0.001) but did not have more frequent follow-up visits. Forty-five cancers were detected (41 relapses, four metachronous primary tumors) in 44 (59%) patients. Of these, 28 (64%) sought medical attention that led to detection before a scheduled appointment or procedure. There was no significant difference in time to relapse or second primary in trial and nontrial patients (p = 0.80). Twenty-three patients had localized relapse, but only 15 could be treated with curative intent. Despite the trial group demonstrating a higher number of asymptomatic cancers and being offered potentially curative therapy more frequently, there was no significant difference in survival between trial and nontrial patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients with locally advanced NSCLC, frequent cross-sectional imaging does not alter survival after combined modality therapy.

A dosimetric evaluation of conventional helmet field irradiation versus two-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique

PURPOSE

To compare dosimetric differences between conventional two-beam helmet field irradiation (external beam radiotherapy, EBRT) of the brain and a two-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients who received helmet field irradiation at our institution were selected for study. External beam radiotherapy portals were planned per usual practice. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy fields were created using the identical field angles as the EBRT portals. Each brain was fully contoured along with the spinal cord to the bottom of the C2 vertebral body. This volume was then expanded symmetrically by 0.5 cm to construct the planning target volume. An IMRT plan was constructed using uniform optimization constraints. For both techniques, the nominal prescribed dose was 3,000 cGy in 10 fractions of 300 cGy using 6-MV photons. Comparative dose-volume histograms were generated for each patient and analyzed.

RESULTS

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improved dose uniformity over EBRT for whole brain radiotherapy. The mean percentage of brain receiving >105% of dose was reduced from 29.3% with EBRT to 0.03% with IMRT. The mean maximum dose was reduced from 3,378 cGy (113%) for EBRT to 3,162 cGy (105%) with IMRT. The mean percent volume receiving at least 98% of the prescribed dose was 99.5% for the conventional technique and 100% for IMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduces dose inhomogeneity, particularly for the midline frontal lobe structures where hot spots occur with conventional two-field EBRT. More study needs to be done addressing the clinical implications of optimizing dose uniformity and its effect on long-term cognitive function in selected long-lived patients.

Irradiation prophylactique cérébrale dans les cancers bronchopulmonaires non à petites cellules

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has become part of the standard treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in complete remission. Not only does it decrease the risk of brain recurrence by almost 50%, it has a significant positive effect on survival (5.4 percent increase at 3 years). As the prognosis of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has improved with combined modality treatment, brain metastases have also become an important cause of failure (10 to 30%, approaching 50% in certain studies as in SCLC). Survival after treatment of brain metastases is poor and impact on quality of life of patients is important. As in SCLC, 4 randomised evaluating PCI in NSCLC have been carried out in the seventies and early eighties. If 3 out of 4 trials have shown a significant decrease of brain metastases, none of them demonstrated any impact on survival. Thus PCI cannot be recommended as standard treatment in NSCLC, however new trials would be needed.

Comparative study of vascular enhancement on post-contrast CT using three dosages of iodinated contrast media for the aim of detecting brain metastasis in patients with lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

A prospective double-blind randomized study was performed to compare the contrast of vascular enhancement using three dosages of iodinated contrast media for a possible metastatic lesion in the brain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-six patients with lung cancer received brain computed tomography (CT) with intravenous administration of iodinated contrast medium (CM). The patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the three types of CM: 30 g iodine, 24 g iodine, and 15 g iodine. Three radiologists judged the degree of vascular contrast enhancement and diagnosed the presence of brain metastasis. The CT numbers in major arteries were also measured.

RESULTS

The subjective average scores with standard deviation were 2.06+/-0.48, 1.97+/-048, and 1.44+/-0.43, and the measured average CT numbers with standard deviation (SD) were 168.5+/-39.6, 166.1+/-28.6, and 146.1+/-27.0 HU with 30 g, 24 g, and 15 g iodine, respectively. The scores and the CT numbers in 15 g iodine were less than those with 30 g and 24 g iodine. Brain metastasis was detected in one patient each in groups A and C, and one false-positive case was found in group B.

CONCLUSION

CT study with a dose of 24 g iodine showed equivalent quality on vascular enhancement in comparison with a 30 g iodine dose.

Does the incidence and outcome of brain metastases in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer justify prophylactic cranial irradiation or early detection?

OBJECTIVE

The radical treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) currently involves combined modality therapy (CMT) with the use of chemotherapy in addition to radiation therapy and/or surgery. Chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival, but does not alter brain relapse. We reviewed the outcomes of Stage IIIA and IIIB LA-NSCLC patients treated with CMT at our institution. We assessed the incidence of brain metastases and the management and outcome of these patients.

METHODS

Using our radiation-planning database (RSTS), we identified 230 consecutive patients from the years 1999 and 2000 who received radical radiation therapy to the lung. Extracting data from the chart, we identified 83 patients who were treated radically with chemotherapy, radiation and possibly surgery. These patients form the basis of this study.

RESULTS

At 2 years, the actuarial rates for any brain failure, first failure in the brain and sole failure in the brain were 34.2%, 24.6% and 11.0%, respectively. Age was the only factor among sex, histology, stage, weight loss and the timing of chemotherapy and radiation that predicted for an increased risk of first failure in the brain. Patients less than age 60 had a risk of 25.6% versus 11.4% for those greater than 60 (p = 0.022). Among the patients who failed first in the brain, those who had aggressive management of their brain metastases with surgical resection in addition to whole brain radiotherapy had a median survival of 26.3 months compared with 3.3 months for those treated with palliative whole brain radiotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Brain metastases are common in patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CMT. These patients may benefit from either prophylactic cranial irradiation or early detection and aggressive treatment of brain metastases.

Screening of brain metastasis with limited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): clinical implications of using limited brain MRI during initial staging for non-small cell lung cancer patients

The purpose of this prospective study was to determine whether using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for early screening for brain metastases (BM) can improve quality of life, survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study group comprised 183 patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC. All patients underwent limited brain MRI and routine workups. The control group comprised 131 patients with NSCLC who underwent limited brain MRI only if they had neurologic symptoms. The incidence of BM was 20.8% (38/183) in the study group and 4.6% (6/131) in the control group. The rate of upstaging based on the MRI data was 13.5% (15/111) overall and 15.9% (11/69) in patients that had been considered initially to be resectable surgically. There was no significant difference in survival outcome between the groups. Patients who had BM alone had a greater overall survival time (49 weeks) than those who had multiple systemic metastases (27 weeks; p=0.0307). In conclusions, limited brain MRI appears to be a useful, cost-effective method to screen for BM at the time of initial staging. And it may facilitate timely treatment of patients with NSCLC and improve their survival and quality of life.

Multivariate analysis of factors predictive of brain metastases in localised non-small cell lung carcinoma

Brain metastases are a frequent feature of the course of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The potential usefulness of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has led to the search for target groups likely to derive benefit. This multivariate analysis looked for factors predictive of brain metastases in a group of stages I-III NSCLC patients under care of the thoracic oncology unit of Besançon University Hospital from 1977 to 2001. All the patients had the same follow-up. They were divided into two groups: BM+ when they had a brain metastasis as the first site of progression, whether solitary or not, and BM(-) otherwise. Variables analysed were age, gender, performance status (0-1 versus 2-3), weight-loss stage T-status, N-status, pathological type, type of treatment, administration of chemotherapy, use of cisplatin and response to treatment. Three hundred and five patients were eligible and there were 77 patients (25.25%) in the BM+ group. Median time to onset of brain metastases was 12 months (1-163 months) and median survival from the diagnosis of brain metastases was 6 months (1-65 months). Factors predictive of brain progression were age < or =62 years (RR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.33-4.76 and P = 0.004), T4 tumour status (RR: 3.75, 95% CI: 1.72-8.21 and P = 0.0009), N2-3 (RR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.32-5.15 and P = 0.0057), and adenocarcinoma (RR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.78-6.46 and P = 0.0002). No aspect of treatment plays a role in the frequency of this type of metastasis. These factors predictive of brain progression could serve as a basis for the selection of patients with the aim of sitting of studies on prophylactic cranial irradiation in NSCLC.

Brain metastases in locally advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after multimodality treatment: risk factors analysis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are frequent sites of initial failure in patients with locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (LAD-NSCLC) undergoing multimodality treatments (MMT). New treatment and follow-up strategies are needed to reduce the risk of BM and to diagnose them early enough for effective treatment.

METHODS

The incidence rate of BM as the first site of recurrence in 112 patients with LAD-NSCLC treated with the same MMT protocol was calculated. The influence of patient, disease, and treatment-related factors on the incidence of BM and on the time-to-brain recurrence (TBR) was analyzed.

RESULTS

BM as the first site of failure was observed in 25 cases (22% of the study population and 29% of all recurrences). In 18 of those cases, the brain was the exclusive site of recurrence. Median TBR was 9 months. The 2-year actuarial incidence of BM was 29%. Central nervous system (CNS) recurrence was more common in patients younger than 60 years (P = 0.006) and in whom bulky (> or = 2 cm) mediastinal lymph nodes were present (P = 0.02). TBR was influenced by age (P = 0.004) and by bulky lymph node disease (P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic role of age, whereas the presence of clinical bulky mediastinal lymph nodes was of borderline significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed a high rate of BM in patients with LAD-NSCLC submitted to MMT. Most of these CNS recurrences were isolated and occurred within 2 years of initial diagnosis. Age younger than 60 years was associated with an increased risk of BM and reduced TBR, whereas the presence of clinical bulky mediastinal lymph nodes was of borderline significance. Although our data require further validation in future studies, our results suggest that additional trials on prophylactic cranial irradiation and on intensive radiologic follow-up should focus on these high-risk populations.

Emergence of increased cerebral metastasis after high-dose preoperative radiotherapy with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In recent years, combined modality induction therapy has defined a new standard of care in the treatment of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, providing improved local control and improved disease-free survival. However, the majority of Stage III patients still die of recurrent disease.

METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients with AJCC Stage IIIA/IIIB nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who were undergoing induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection of the primary NSCLC tumor between December 1, 1987 and September 1, 1999 were analyzed for resectability, survival, and patterns of disease failure. These patients received cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) on Days 1 and 22 and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 2, and 3, and Days 22, 23, and 24 together with 5940 centigrays (cGy) of radiation in 180-cGy fractions delivered over 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of the 42 patients (74%) underwent surgical resection of the primary lung tumor and mediastinal lymph nodes after chemoradiotherapy. No surgical deaths were reported. The median survival of these 31 patients was 52 months. The 5-year survival estimate using the Kaplan-Meier method was 49.9%. The local control rate was 80%. The incidence of distant metastases other than in the brain was reduced. The most frequently involved site of isolated first recurrence was the brain. The median time to brain recurrence was 7.5 months from the time of surgical resection. All brain metastases were detected within 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The high incidence of isolated brain metastasis after induction chemoradiotherapy and curative resection and their response to treatment suggest that routine scans of the brain may be indicated in the follow-up of patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Lung cancer and positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose

Over the past years, positron emission tomography (PET) with fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has emerged as an important imaging modality. In the thorax, FDG-PET has been shown to differentiate benign from malignant pulmonary lesions and stage lung cancer. Preliminary studies have shown its usefulness in assessing tumor recurrence, and assisting in radiotherapy planning. FDG-PET is often more accurate than conventional imaging studies, and has been proven to be cost-effective in evaluating lung cancer patients. This review will discuss the current applications of FDG-PET as compared with conventional imaging in diagnosing, staging, and following patients with lung cancer.

Duodenal metastasis from large cell carcinoma of the lung: report of a case

Duodenal metastasis from primary lung cancer is extremely rare. It rarely shows any symptoms, and the prognosis for this condition is poor. We herein describe the case of a 46-year-old woman with primary lung cancer who underwent a left upper lobectomy. Severe anemia was observed about 20 days after lobectomy. Gastroduodenoscopy showed duodenal metastasis. Simultaneously, brain metastasis was also detected using magnetic resonance imaging. The patient underwent a local resection of the duodenum and a tumor resection of the brain. Postoperative irradiation of the brain metastases and systemic chemotherapy of the lung metastases were performed, and complete remission occurred. However, abdominal lymph node metastasis recurred, and the patient died 1 year after the lobectomy.

Staging non-small cell lung cancer with whole-body PET

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracies of whole-body 2-[fluorine 18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and conventional imaging (thoracic computed tomography [CT], bone scintigraphy, and brain CT or magnetic resonance [MR] imaging) in staging bronchogenic carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Within 20 months, 100 patients with newly diagnosed bronchogenic carcinoma underwent whole-body FDG PET and chest CT. Ninety of these patients underwent radionuclide bone scintigraphy, and 70 patients underwent brain CT or MR imaging. For each patient, all examinations were completed within 1 month. A radiologic stage was assigned by using PET and conventional imaging independently and was compared with the pathologic stage. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

PET staging was accurate in 83 (83%) patients; conventional imaging staging was accurate in 65 (65%) patients (P < .005). Staging with mediastinal lymph nodes was correct by using PET in 67 (85%) patients and by using CT in 46 (58%) patients (P < .001). Nine (9%) patients had metastases demonstrated by using PET that were not found with conventional imaging, whereas 10 (10%) patients suspected of having metastases because of conventional imaging findings were correctly shown with PET to not have metastases.

CONCLUSION

Whole-body PET was more accurate than thoracic CT, bone scintigraphy, and brain CT or MR imaging in staging bronchogenic carcinoma.

Suspected non-small cell lung cancer: incidence of occult brain and skeletal metastases and effectiveness of imaging for detection--pilot study

PURPOSE

To estimate the incidence of occult metastases to the brain and skeleton in patients suspected of having non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (stage higher than T1Nomo) with surgically resectable disease, to assess the accuracy of screening magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radionuclide bone scanning for help in identifying occult metastases, and to determine the effectiveness of a high dose of MR contrast material.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients suspected of having NSCLC localized to the lung or to the lung and regional nodes underwent preoperative MR imaging with contrast material enhancement and radionuclide bone scanning for detection of brain or skeletal metastases. Patients were followed up for 12 months to determine the incidence of clinical metastatic disease.

RESULTS

Eight (28%) patients had occult metastatic disease to the brain or skeleton. Brain metastases were identified on MR images in five of six patients. Bone metastases were identified on MR images in four of five patients and on bone scans in three of five patients. MR imaging was no more accurate than bone scanning for skeletal evaluation. A high dose of MR contrast material allowed detection of more metastases and of small lesions.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the brain is indicated for the exclusion of brain metastases in patients with clinically operable known or possible NSCLC and a large (> 3-cm) lung mass. Skeletal imaging may be indicated if an isolated brain metastasis is detected.

Evaluation of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose whole body positron emission tomography imaging in the staging of lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of lung cancer remains the treatment of choice in appropriately staged disease, but conventional imaging techniques have limitations. Positron emission tomography (PET) may improve staging accuracy.

METHODS

We studied whole body and localized thoracic PET in staging lung cancer. Standardized uptake value was calculated for the primary lesion. Ninety-seven patients under consideration for surgical resection were included. PET, computed tomography, and clinical staging were compared to stage at operation, biopsy, or final outcome. Mean follow up was 17.5 months.

RESULTS

PET detected all primary lung cancers with two false-positive primary sites. Sensitivity and specificity for N2 and N3 mediastinal disease was 20% and 89.9% for computed tomography and 70.6% and 97% for PET. PET correctly altered stage in 26.8%, nodal stage in 13.4%, and detected distant metastases in 16.5%. PET missed 7 of 10 cerebral metastases. PET altered management in 37% of patients. PET staging (p<0.0001) and standardized uptake value (p<0.001) were the best predictors of time to death apart from operative staging.

CONCLUSIONS

PET provides significant staging and prognostic information in lung cancer patients considered operable by standard criteria. Routine use of PET will prevent unnecessary operation and may be cost effective.

Detection of brain metastasis in potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison of CT and MRI

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the usefulness of MRI and CT in the detection of brain metastases during preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up.

DESIGN

A prospective and sequential comparison.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 332 patients with potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer who were free of neurologic signs and symptoms, brain CT was performed preoperatively on 155 patients (CT group) and brain MRI on 177 patients (MRI group). Patient characteristics in both groups were comparable. In 279 patients with complete resection of the primary lung tumor, intensive follow-up with CT and MRI was performed in the respective groups. The preoperative detection of brain metastases, postoperative intracranial recurrence rates, and characteristics of detected brain tumors were compared between the two groups. The survival of patients with brain metastases was also compared.

RESULTS

From the first evaluation to 12 months after surgery for primary lung cancer, brain metastases were observed in 11 patients (7.1%) from the CT group and 12 patients (6.8%) from the MRI group. MRI detected brain metastases preoperatively in 6 of the 12 patients (3.4% of the total MRI group), whereas CT detected brain metastases preoperatively in 1 of the 11 patients (0.6% of the total CT group). MRI showed a tendency toward a higher preoperative detection rate of brain metastases than CT (p = 0.069). Furthermore, the mean (+/- SD) maximal diameter of the brain metastases was significantly smaller in the MRI group (12.8+/-9.1 mm) than in the CT group (20.3+/-7.0 mm) (p = 0.041). However, the median survival time and 2-year survival rate after treatment of detected brain metastases, respectively, were 10 months and 27% in the CT group and 17 months and 28% in the MRI group. There was no significant difference between the groups in survival time.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative evaluation and intensive follow-up with MRI could facilitate early detection of brain metastases in patients with potentially operable lung cancer. However, further studies on detection and treatment of the metastatic tumors are considered necessary.