Flash induced fluorescence kinetics in chloroplasts in the 20 microseconds-100 s time range in the presence of 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Effects of hydroxylamine

Transfer and trapping of excitation energy in photosystem II as studied by chlorophyll alpha 2 fluorescence quenching by dinitrobenzene and carotenoid triplet. The matrix model

1. The curves representing the reciprocal fluorescence yield of chlorophyll alpha of Photosystem II (PS II) in Chlorella vulgaris as a function of the concentration of m-dinitrobenzene in the states P Q and P Q-, are found to be straight parallel lines; P is the primary donor and Q the primary acceptor of PS II. In the weakly trapping state P Q- the half-quenching of dinitrobenzene is about 0.2 mM, in vitro it is of the order of 10 mM. The fluorescence yield as a function of the concentration of a quencher is described for three models for the energy transfer between the units, and the matrix model. If it is assumed that the rate constant of quenching by dinitrobenzene is high and thus the number of dinitrobenzene molecules per reaction center low, it can be concluded that the pigment system of PS II in C. vulgaris is a matrix of chlorophyll molecules in which the reaction centers are embedded. Theoretical and experimental evidence is consistent with such an assumption. For Cyanidium caldarium the zero fluorescence yield phi 0 and its quenching by dinitrobenzene were found to be much smaller than the corresponding quantities for C. vulgaris. Nevertheless, our measurements on C. caldarium could be interpreted by the assumption that the essential properties (rate constants, dinitrobenzene quenching) of PS II are the same for these two species belonging to such widely different groups. 2. The measured dinitrobenzene concentrations required for half-quenching in vivo and other observations are explained by (non-rate-limiting) energy transfer between the chlorophyll alpha molecules of PS II and by the assumptions that dinitrobenzene is approximately distributed at random in the membrane and does not diffuse during excitation. 3. The fluorescence kinetics of C. vulgaris during a 350 ns laser flash of variable intensity could be simulated on a computer using the matrix model. From the observed fluorescence quenching by the carotenoid triplet (CT) and the measurement of the the number of CT per reaction center via difference absorption spectroscopy, the rate constant for quenching of CT is calculated to be kT = 3.3 . 10(11)s-1 which is almost equal to the rate constant of trapping by an open reaction center (Duysens, L.N.M. (1979) CIBA Foundation Symposium 61 (New Series), pp. 323--340). 4. The fluorescence quenching by CT in non-treated spinach chloroplasts after a 500 ns laser flash (Breton, J., Geacintov, N.E. and Swenberg, C.E. (1979) Biochim, Biophys. Acta 548, 616--635) could be explained within the framework of the matrix model when the value for kT is used as given in point 3. 5. The observations mentioned under point 1 indicate that the fluorescence yield phi 0 for centers in trapping state P Q is probably for a fraction exceeding 0.8 emitted by PS II.

The effects of pH on the reductions kinetics of P-680 in Tris-treated chloroplasts

The primary donor of Photosystem II (PS II), P-680, was photo-oxidized by a short flash and its rate of reduction was measured at different pH values by following the recovery of the absorption change at 820 nm in chloroplasts pretreated with a high concentration of Tris. The re-duction is biphasic with a fast phase (dominant after the first flash) attributed to the donation by a donor, D1, and a slow phase (usually dominant after the second flash) attributed to a back-reaction with the primary acceptor. It is found that pH has a strong influence on the donation from D1 (PI = 2 MICROSECONDS AT PH 9, 44 microseconds at pH 4), but no influence on the back reaction (pi approximately 200 microseconds). pH also influences the stability of the charge separation since the contribution of donation from D1 at the second flash increases at lower pH, getting close to 100% at pH 4.

Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a monitor of nanosecond reduction of the photooxidized primary donor P-680 Of photosystem II

1. Changes in the fluorescence yield of aerobic Chlorella vulgaris have been measured in laser flashes of 15 ns, 30 ns and 350 ns half time. The kinetics after the first flash given after a 3 min dark period could be simulated on a computer using the hypothesis that the oxidized acceptor Q and primary donor P+ are fluorescence quenchers, and Q- is a weak quencher, and that the reduction time for P+ is 20-35 ns. 2. The P+ reduction time for at least an appreciable part of the reaction centers was found to be longer after the second and subsequent flashes. In the first 5 flashes an oscillation was observed. Under steady state conditions, with a pulse separation of 3 s, a reduction time for P+ of about 400 ns for all reaction centers gave the best correspondence between computed and experimental fluorescence kinetics.

Primary and secondary electron donors in photosystem II of chloroplasts. Rates of electron transfer and location in the membrane

Absorption changes at 820 or 515 nm after a short laser flash were studied comparatively in untreated chloroplasts and in chloroplasts in which oxygen evolution is inhibited. In chloroplasts pre-treated with Tris, the primary donor of Photosystem II (P-680) is oxidized by the flash it is re-reduced in a biphasic manner with half-times of 6 microseconds (major phase) and 22 microseconds. After the second flash, the 6 microseconds phase is nearly absent and P-680+ decays with half-times of 130 microseconds (major phase) and 22 microseconds. Exogenous electron donors (MnCl2 or reduced phenylenediamine) have no direct influence on the kinetics of P-680+. In untreated chloroplasts the 6 and 22 microseconds phases are of very small amplitude, either at the 1st, 2nd or 3rd flash given after dark-adaptation. They are observed, however, after incubation with 10 mM hydroxylamine. These results are interpreted in terms of multiple pathways for the reduction of P-680+: a rapid reduction (less than 1 microseconds) by the physiological donor D1; a slower reduction (6 and 22 microseconds) by donor D'1, operative when O2 evolution is inhibited; a back-reaction (130 microseconds) when D'1 is oxidized by the pre-illumination in inhibited chloroplasts. In Tris-treated chloroplasts the donor system to P-680+ has the capacity to deliver only one electron. The absorption change at 515 nm (electrochromic absorption shift) has been measured in parallel. It is shown that the change linked to Photosystem II activity has nearly the same magnitude in untreated chloroplasts or in chloroplasts treated with hydroxylamine or with Tris (first and subsequent flashes). Thus we conclude that all the donors (P-680, D1, D'1) are located at the internal side of the thylakoid membrane.

Kinetics of reduction of the oxidized primary electron donor of photosystem II in spinach chloroplasts and in Chlorella cells in the microsecond and nanosecond time ranges following flash excitation

Absorption changes (deltaA) at 820 nm, following laser flash excitation of spinach chloroplasts and Chlorella cells, were studied in order to obtain information on the reduction time of the photooxidized primary donor of Photosystem II at physiological temperatures. In the microsecond time range the difference spectrum of deltaA between 750 and 900 nm represents a peak at 820 nm, attributable to a radical-cation of chlorophyll a. In untreated dark-adapted material the signal can be attributed solely to P+-700; it decays in a polyphasic manner with half-times of 17 microseconds, 210 microseconds and over 1 ms. The oxidized primary donor of Photosystem II (P+II) is not detected with a time resolution of 3 microseconds. After treatment with 3--10 mM hydroxylamine, which inhibits the donor side of Photosystem II, P+II is observed and decays biphasically (a major phase with t1/2=20--40 microseconds, and a minor phase with t1/2 congruent to 200 microseconds), probably by reduction by an accessory electron donor. In the nanosecond range, which was made accessible by a new fast-response flash photometer operating at 820 nm, it was found the P+II is reduced with a half-time of 25--45 ns in untreated dark-adapted chloroplasts. It is assumed that the normal secondary electron donor is responsible for this fast reduction.

Evidence for a double hit process in photosystem II based on fluorescence studies

1. The amplitudes of the fast (0-20 microseconds) and slow (20 microseconds-2 ms) fluorescence rise induced by a 2 microseconds flash have been measured as a function of the energy of the flash in chloroplasts inhibited by 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea. The saturation curve for the slow rise shows a characteristic lag which is not observed for the fast fluorescence rise. This lag indicates that Photosystem II centers undergo a double hit process which implies that (a), each photocenter includes two acceptors Q1 and Q2; (B), after the first hit, oxidized chlorophyll Chl+ is reduced by a secondary acceptor Y in a time shor compared to the duration of the flash; (c), after the second hit, Chl+ is reduced by another secondary donor, D. 2. According to Den Haan et al. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 368, 409-421), hydroxylamine destroys the secondary donor responsible for the fast reduction of Chl+. In the presence of 3 mM hydroxylamine, only the secondary donor D is functional and a flash induses mainly a single hit process. 3. The saturation curves for the fast and the slow rises have been studied in the presence of 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea for a second actinic flash given 2.5 s after a first saturating one. The large decrease in the half-saturating energy indicates the existence of efficient energy transfer occuring between potosynthetic units. 4. Two alternate hypotheses are discussed (a) in which D is an auxiliary donor and (b) in which D is included in the main electron transfer chain.