Nucleoside transport-deficient mutants of PK-15 pig kidney cell line

Enhancing Drug Efficacy and Therapeutic Index through Cheminformatics-Based Selection of Small Molecule Binary Weapons That Improve Transporter-Mediated Targeting: A Cytotoxicity System Based on Gemcitabine

The transport of drug molecules is mainly determined by the distribution of influx and efflux transporters for which they are substrates. To enable tissue targeting, we sought to develop the idea that we might affect the transporter-mediated disposition of small-molecule drugs via the addition of a second small molecule that of itself had no inhibitory pharmacological effect but that influenced the expression of transporters for the primary drug. We refer to this as a “binary weapon” strategy. The experimental system tested the ability of a molecule that on its own had no cytotoxic effect to increase the toxicity of the nucleoside analog gemcitabine to Panc1 pancreatic cancer cells. An initial phenotypic screen of a 500-member polar drug (fragment) library yielded three “hits.” The structures of 20 of the other 2,000 members of this library suite had a Tanimoto similarity greater than 0.7 to those of the initial hits, and each was itself a hit (the cheminformatics thus providing for a massive enrichment). We chose the top six representatives for further study. They fell into three clusters whose members bore reasonable structural similarities to each other (two were in fact isomers), lending strength to the self-consistency of both our conceptual and experimental strategies. Existing literature had suggested that indole-3-carbinol might play a similar role to that of our fragments, but in our hands it was without effect; nor was it structurally similar to any of our hits. As there was no evidence that the fragments could affect toxicity directly, we looked for effects on transporter transcript levels. In our hands, only the ENT1-3 uptake and ABCC2,3,4,5, and 10 efflux transporters displayed measurable transcripts in Panc1 cultures, along with a ribonucleoside reductase RRM1 known to affect gemcitabine toxicity. Very strikingly, the addition of gemcitabine alone increased the expression of the transcript for ABCC2 (MRP2) by more than 12-fold, and that of RRM1 by more than fourfold, and each of the fragment “hits” served to reverse this. However, an inhibitor of ABCC2 was without significant effect, implying that RRM1 was possibly the more significant player. These effects were somewhat selective for Panc cells. It seems, therefore, that while the effects we measured were here mediated more by efflux than influx transporters, and potentially by other means, the binary weapon idea is hereby fully confirmed: it is indeed possible to find molecules that manipulate the expression of transporters that are involved in the bioactivity of a pharmaceutical drug. This opens up an entirely new area, that of chemical genomics-based drug targeting.

The role of mitochondrial and plasma membrane nucleoside transporters in drug toxicity

Many anticancer and antiviral drugs are nucleoside analogues, which interfere with nucleotide metabolism and DNA replication to produce pharmacological effects. Clinical efficacy and toxicity of nucleoside drugs are closely associated with nucleoside transporters because they mediate the transport of nucleoside drugs across biological membranes. Two families of human nucleoside transporters (equilibrative nucleoside transporters and concentrative nucleoside transporters) have been extensively studied for several decades. They are widely distributed, from the plasma membrane to membranes of organelles such as mitochondria, and the distribution differs in different tissues. In addition, they have different specificities to nucleoside drugs. The characteristics of equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside transporters affect the therapeutic outcomes achieved with anticancer and antiviral nucleoside drugs. In this review, an overview of the role of mitochondrial and plasma membrane nucleoside transporters in nucleoside drug toxicity is provided. Rational design and therapeutic application of nucleoside analogues are also discussed.

Kinetic and pharmacological properties of cloned human equilibrative nucleoside transporters, ENT1 and ENT2, stably expressed in nucleoside transporter-deficient PK15 cells. Ent2 exhibits a low affinity for guanosine and cytidine but a high affinity for inosine

We stably transfected the cloned human equilibrative nucleoside transporters 1 and 2 (hENT1 and hENT2) into nucleoside transporter-deficient PK15NTD cells. Although hENT1 and hENT2 are predicted to be 50-kDa proteins, hENT1 runs as 40 kDa and hENT2 migrates as 50 and 47 kDa on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Peptide N-glycosidase F and endoglycosidase H deglycosylate hENT1 to 37 kDa and hENT2 to 45 kDa. With hENT1 being more sensitive, there is a 7000-fold and 71-fold difference in sensitivity to nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR) (IC(50), 0.4 +/- 0.1 nM versus 2.8 +/- 0.3 microM) and dipyridamole (IC(50), 5.0 +/- 0.9 nM versus 356 +/- 13 nM), respectively. [(3)H]NBMPR binds to ENT1 cells with a high affinity K(d) of 0.377 +/- 0.098 nM, and each ENT1 cell has 34,000 transporters with a turnover number of 46 molecules/s for uridine. Although both transporters are broadly selective, hENT2 is a generally low affinity nucleoside transporter with 2.6-, 2.8-, 7. 7-, and 19.3-fold lower affinity than hENT1 for thymidine, adenosine, cytidine, and guanosine, respectively. In contrast, the affinity of hENT2 for inosine is 4-fold higher than hENT1. The nucleobase hypoxanthine inhibits [(3)H]uridine uptake by hENT2 but has minimal effect on hENT1. Taken together, these results suggest that hENT2 might be important in transporting adenosine and its metabolites (inosine and hypoxanthine) in tissues such as skeletal muscle where ENT2 is predominantly expressed.

Nucleoside transporters of mammalian cells

In this review, we have summarized recent advances in our understanding of the biology of nucleoside transport arising from new insights provided by the isolation and functional expression of cDNAs encoding the major nucleoside transporters of mammalian cells. Nucleoside transporters are required for permeation of nucleosides across biological membranes and are present in the plasma membranes of most cell types. There is growing evidence that functional nucleoside transporters are required for translocation of nucleosides between intracellular compartments and thus are also present in organellar membranes. Functional studies during the 1980s established that nucleoside transport in mammalian cells occurs by two mechanistically distinct processes, facilitated diffusion and Na(+)-nucleoside cotransport. The determination of the primary amino acid sequences of the equilibrative and concentrative transporters of human and rat cells has provided a structural basis for the functional differences among the different transporter subtypes. Although nucleoside transporter proteins were first purified from human erythrocytes a decade ago, the low abundance of nucleoside transporter proteins in membranes of mammalian cells has hindered analysis of relationships between transporter structure and function. The molecular cloning of cDNAs encoding nucleoside transporters and the development of heterologous expression systems for production of recombinant nucleoside transporters, when combined with recombinant DNA technologies, provide powerful tools for characterization of functional domains within transporter proteins that are involved in nucleoside recognition and translocation. As relationships between molecular structure and function are determined, it should be possible to develop new approaches for optimizing the transportability of nucleoside drugs into diseased tissues, for development of new transport inhibitors, including reagents that are targeted to the concentrative transporters, and, eventually, for manipulation of transporter function through an understanding of the regulation of transport activity.

Evidence that adenine nucleotides modulate nucleoside-transporter function. Characterization of uridine transport in chromaffin cells and plasma membrane vesicles

Uridine transport was investigated in cultured chromaffin cells and plasma membrane vesicles from chromaffin tissue. In intact cells, the kinetic parameters for uridine uptake were Km 150 +/- 45 microM, and Vmax 414 +/- 17 pmol . 10(6) cells-1 . min-1. This low affinity for uridine and its inhibition by low concentrations of nitrobenzylthioinosine (Ki 3 nM) and dipyridamole (Ki 54 nM) are consistent with a facilitated diffusion nucleoside transport system. The IC50 value for the adenosine transport inhibition by uridine was very high (240 microM), agreeing with the relative affinities of these nucleosides in the chromaffin cell nucleoside transport system, which was 150-fold higher for adenosine than for uridine. Uridine was significantly metabolized in chromaffin cells but not in plasma membrane vesicles. The affinity of uridine transport measured in these membrane vesicles was reproducible and similar to the affinity found for intact cells with a Km value of 185 +/- 11 microM and a Vmax value of 4.24 +/- 0.10 pmol . mg protein-1 . s-1. These membrane preparations were employed to investigate the regulatory action of ATP and other nucleotide analogues on nucleoside transport. ATP increased the Vmax value but the Km value was not significantly modified. Adenosine 5'-[beta,gamma-imino]triphosphate, 1,N6-ethenoadenosine 5'-triphosphate, and adenosine(5')-tetraphospho(5')adenosine(Ap4A) at 100 microM were able to mimic the ATP effect. These results agree with a regulatory role of ATP, and the uridine transport on chromaffin plasma membrane vesicles is a good model for analyzing the nucleoside-transporter function and regulation.