1
|
Kozlova EV, Hegde S, Roundy CM, Golovko G, Saldaña MA, Hart CE, Anderson ER, Hornett EA, Khanipov K, Popov VL, Pimenova M, Zhou Y, Fovanov Y, Weaver SC, Routh AL, Heinz E, Hughes GL. Microbial interactions in the mosquito gut determine Serratia colonization and blood-feeding propensity. ISME JOURNAL 2020; 15:93-108. [PMID: 32895494 PMCID: PMC7852612 DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-00763-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
How microbe–microbe interactions dictate microbial complexity in the mosquito gut is unclear. Previously we found that, Serratia, a gut symbiont that alters vector competence and is being considered for vector control, poorly colonized Aedes aegypti yet was abundant in Culex quinquefasciatus reared under identical conditions. To investigate the incompatibility between Serratia and Ae. aegypti, we characterized two distinct strains of Serratia marcescens from Cx. quinquefasciatus and examined their ability to infect Ae. aegypti. Both Serratia strains poorly infected Ae. aegypti, but when microbiome homeostasis was disrupted, the prevalence and titers of Serratia were similar to the infection in its native host. Examination of multiple genetically diverse Ae. aegypti lines found microbial interference to S. marcescens was commonplace, however, one line of Ae. aegypti was susceptible to infection. Microbiome analysis of resistant and susceptible lines indicated an inverse correlation between Enterobacteriaceae bacteria and Serratia, and experimental co-infections in a gnotobiotic system recapitulated the interference phenotype. Furthermore, we observed an effect on host behavior; Serratia exposure to Ae. aegypti disrupted their feeding behavior, and this phenotype was also reliant on interactions with their native microbiota. Our work highlights the complexity of host–microbe interactions and provides evidence that microbial interactions influence mosquito behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena V Kozlova
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Shivanand Hegde
- Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher M Roundy
- World Reference Center for Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses, Institute for Human Infections and Immunity, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - George Golovko
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Miguel A Saldaña
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.,Department of Paediatrics and Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charles E Hart
- The Institute for Translational Science, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.,Institute for Global Health and Translational Science and SUNY Center for Environmental Health and Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Enyia R Anderson
- Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Emily A Hornett
- Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.,Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kamil Khanipov
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Vsevolod L Popov
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Maria Pimenova
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Yiyang Zhou
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Yuriy Fovanov
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Scott C Weaver
- World Reference Center for Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses, Institute for Human Infections and Immunity, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew L Routh
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Eva Heinz
- Departments of Vector Biology and Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Grant L Hughes
- Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feng JS, Webb JW, Tsang JC. Enhancement by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate of Pigment Formation in
Serratia marcescens
O8. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 43:850-3. [PMID: 16345993 PMCID: PMC241931 DOI: 10.1128/aem.43.4.850-853.1982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Three methods were used to determine the enhancement by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) of prodigiosin formation in
Serratia marcescens
O8. The results of the agar disk diffusion method indicated that pigment formation was dependent upon the concentration of SDS. Diameters of the pigment zones were proportional to the logarithm of SDS concentrations of 300 to 1,500 μg/ml. When bacteria were grown in broth containing SDS from 0 to 800 μg/ml and the pigment extracts were analyzed spectrophotometrically, a similar enhancement of pigment formation was observed. Finally, these results were confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of the extracts. Prodigiosin appeared to be the sole component with increased synthesis. The possible mechanism of the SDS enhancement effect could be explained by an increase in negative binding sites by the association of SDS with a cell envelope component(s). These binding sites may be required for prodigiosin synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Feng
- Department of Chemistry, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois 61761
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Potter CS, Hubert EG, Montgomerie JZ, Kalmanson GM, Guze LB. Defects in prodigiosin formation by L-forms of Serratia marcescens. J Bacteriol 1973; 116:1343-5. [PMID: 4584812 PMCID: PMC246493 DOI: 10.1128/jb.116.3.1343-1345.1973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
An L-form of Serratia marcescens has previously been shown incapable of producing the red pigment, prodigiosin, characteristic of the parent bacteria. Mutants of S. marcesens, unable to form one or the other of the two prodigiosin precursors, 4-methoxy-2,2'-bipyrrole-5-carboxaldehyde or 2-methyl-3-n-amylpyrrole, were used to test the nature of the L-form defect. The L-forms failed to form sufficient amounts of either precursor to be detected by the appropriate mutant, and, when furnished the precursors, failed to couple them to form prodigiosin.
Collapse
|
6
|
Goldschmidt MC, Williams RP. Thiamine-induced formation of the monopyrrole moiety of prodigiosin. J Bacteriol 1968; 96:609-16. [PMID: 4895047 PMCID: PMC252349 DOI: 10.1128/jb.96.3.609-616.1968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Thiamine stimulates the production of a red pigment, which is chromatographically and spectrophotometrically identical to prodigiosin, by growing cultures of Serratia marcescens mutant 9-3-3. This mutant is blocked in the formation of 2-methyl-3-amylpyrrole (MAP), the monopyrrole moiety of prodigiosin, but accumulates 4-methoxy-2,2,'-bipyrrole-5-carboxaldehyde (MBC) and can couple this compound with MAP to form prodigiosin. Addition of thiamine caused production of MAP, and as little as 0.02 mg of thiamine per ml in a peptone-glycerol medium stimulated production of measurable amounts of prodigiosin. Phosphate salts and another type of peptone decreased the thiamine-induced formation of prodigiosin; yeast extract and glycerol enhanced the formation of this substance. Thiamine also enhanced production of prodigiosin by wild-type strain Nima of S. marcescens. The thiamine antagonists, oxythiamine and pyrithiamine, inhibited thiamine-induced production of MAP and of prodigiosin by the mutant strain 9-3-3, formation of prodigiosin by the wild-type strain Nima, and production of MAP by another mutant, strain WF. The pyrimidine moiety of thiamine was only 10% as effective as the vitamin; the thiazole moiety, only 4%; and the two moieties together, 25%. Various other vitamins tested did not stimulate formation of prodigiosin by strain 9-3-3. Thiamine did not stimulate production of prodigiosin by a single-step mutant that showed the same phenotypic block in prodigiosin biosynthesis as strain 9-3-3. This is not surprising since strain 9-3-3 originated as a result of two mutational events. One event may involve thiamine directly, and the other may involve the biosynthesis of MAP. Thiamine is probably involved in the regulation of the biosynthesis of MAP, because the vitamin or inhibitory antagonists must be added during the early phases of growth in order to be effective.
Collapse
|