Differential effects of chloramphenicol on the induction of nitrate and nitrite reductase in green leaf tissue

Synthesis of wheat leaf nitrite reductase de novo following induction with nitrate and light

Nitrite reductase has been purified almost 3000-fold, in 35% yield, to a specific activity of 77 units (mg protein)-1 from wheat leaves using a multi-step procedure with affinity chromatography on ferredoxin-Sepharose as the final step. The purified enzyme, although not homogeneous, exhibited absorption maxima at 278, 390, 568 and 687 nm. Minor contaminants were removed by gel filtration in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulphate to yield a single polypeptide of Mr 60 500 as judged by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Antibodies raised against this polypeptide were shown to cross-react with native nitrite reductase and were used to study the synthesis of nitrite reductase in vivo and in vitro. The increase in nitrite reductase activity following exposure of dark-grown plants to nitrate and light was shown by immunodecoration of Western blots to be due to synthesis de novo. Poly(A)-rich RNA isolated from plants actively synthesising nitrite reductase was shown to direct the synthesis in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate of a polypeptide of Mr 64000 which was immunoprecipitated by antibodies to nitrite reductase.

Chloramphenicol stimulates acid phosphatase activity in germinating cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) embryos

Low dosages of chloramphenicol (25-50 micrograms/ml) brought about a 2-4-fold stimulation of acid phosphatase activity in 48 h-germinated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) embryos. However, at high concentrations of chloramphenicol (100-1000 micrograms/ml), there was a progressive decline in enzyme activity. The stimulatory effect of the drug on acid phosphatase activity was relatively specific, since no significant stimulation of activities of proteinase, deoxyribonuclease, ribonuclease, o-diphenolase and peroxidase was observed in germinating cotton embryos. Chloramphenicol, however, did promote the activities of isocitric lyase and alkaline phosphatase. Sephadex G-200 chromatography of the enzyme fraction revealed high (230 000)- and low (106 000)-molecular-weight multiple forms of acid phosphatase in the chloramphenicol-treated embryos, in contrast with a single molecular form (mol.wt. 106 000) in the untreated embryos. Thus the treatment of cotton embryos with chloramphenicol induced both a qualitative and a quantitative change in the acid phosphatase activity. Chloramphenicol-stimulated acid phosphatase activity was strongly inhibited when Pi was included in the germination medium. However, the control embryos showed less pronounced inhibition of enzyme activity in presence of Pi ions.

The light-induced development of nitrate reductase in etiolated barley shoots: An inhibitory effect of laevulinic acid

Induction of nitrate reductase EC 1.6.6.1 in etiolated barley (Hordeum vulgare L., var. Proctor) required continuous illumination and showed a lag period of about three hours. During the first 16 h of illumination the ratio NADH/NAD and NADPH/NADP, taken as a measure of internal oxidation reduction potential, declined. The inhibitor DCMU applied to whole leaves at concentrations shown to inhibit the reduction of cytochrome f by Photosystem 2 light did not inhibit the induction of nitrate reductase nor did it diminish the ratio of reduced to oxidised puridine nucleotides in the early hours of greening. It was concluded that light driven electron flow was not necessary for nitrate reductase induction. Chloramphenicol gave a slight inhibition of nitrate reductase induction. Laevulinic acid was added to greening barley leaves to inhibit tetrapyrrole pigment biosynthesis and plastid development. It strongly inhibited chlorophyll synthesis and nitrate reductase induction, with relatively little effect upon Photosystem 1 and 2 activities in isolated plastids. The activities of other inducible enzymes and control enzymes were little affected by laevulinic acid. Laevulinic acid also inhibited nitrate reductase induction by added nitrate in fully-greened illuminated plants grown in nitrate-free medium and so is unlikely to be acting through inhibition of plastid development. This inhibitor lowered the level of protohaem in whole leaves and plastids of greening barley and it is postulated that it may diminish the protohaem available for the assembly of a cytochrome b component of nitrate reductase.

Stimulation of polyphenol oxidase (monophenolase) activity in wheat endosperm by gibberellic acid, cycloheximide and actinomycin D

Embryoless wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) half-seeds on incubation with gibberellic acid (GA3) showed a 2- to 2.5fold stimulation of monophenolase activity. The enzyme activity was not released into the incubation medium in GA3-treated half-seeds. The effect of GA3 was counteracted by the addition of abscisic acid (ABA) to the half-seeds. Adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate and its structural analogues were ineffective in increasing the monophenolase activity. Actinomycin D and cycloheximide showed no inhibitory effecton the monophenolase activity in controls as well as in GA3-treated half-seeds, but on the contrary caused a 2- to 3fold stimulation of enzyme activity similar to that observed in endosperm treated with GA3 alone. However, there was no additive or synergistic enhancement of monophenolase activity when GA3 was tested in combination with cycloheximide or actinomycin D. GA3- or cyclic AMP-treated half-seeds showed no stimulation of o-diphenolase activity.

Induction of nitrate reductase by chloramphenicol in detached cucumber cotyledons

Chloramphenicol (CAP) induced nitrate reductase activity (NRA) in detached, etiolated cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cotyledons. The effect was reduced by cycloheximide. Light was not necessary for induction of the enzyme but potentiated the effect of CAP as an inducer of NRA, despite the fact that the antibiotic inhibited chlorophyll accumulation.CAP at suboptimal concentrations (2.5-5 mM) acted synergistically with succinic acid-2,2-dimethylhydrazide (B-Nine) and benzylaminopurine (BAP) in respect to induction of NRA, the effect being especially marked in darkness. The highest NRA was found in cotyledons treated for 24 h with a mixture of CAP+BAP+B-Nine. The effects of KNO3 and CAP on NRA were neither synergistic nor additive.KNO3 and BAP induced NADH-NR (EC 1.6.6.1). The same was true for CAP and B-Nine, but the latter two compounds induced, in addition, some activity of another NR that could utilize NADPH as an electron donor.

Effect of chloramphenicol and cycloheximide on the induction of nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase in bean leaves

In etiolated leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Prelude only low levels of NADH-nitrate oxidoreductase (E.C. 1.6.6.2; NAR) and reduced benzyl viologen-nitrite oxidoreductase (E.C. 1.6.6.4; NIR) could be detected, even in the presence of nitrate. When nitrate was available illumination of leaves of 10-day-old etiolated seedlings resulted in an induction of both NAR and NIR. In the absence of nitrate no induction of the enzymes took place, although greening of the leaves was normal. Chloramphenicol (CAP) and cycloheximide (CHI), applied at the beginning of the light period, inhibited the induction of both NAR and NIR. Administered after 24 h of illumination CHI still inhibited the induction of both enzymes whereas CAP was no longer inhibitory. The induction of NAR and NIR by nitrate in green leaves in light was inhibited by CHI but not by CAP. From these results it seems likely that both the enzymes NAR and NIR are synthesized on cytoplasmic ribosomes. Before the enzymes can be manufactured in the cytoplasm some chloroplast development is required.

Role of light in the synthesis of nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase in rice seedlings

1. In rice seedlings synthesis of methyl viologen-nitrite reductase was stimulated by light, as was that of NADH-nitrate oxidoreductase (EC 1.6.6.1). A small residual effect of light on the synthesis of the enzymes persisted in the dark for a short time. 2. In etiolated seedlings exposed to light and nitrate, a lag period of 3h was necessary before enzyme synthesis commenced, whereas in green seedlings kept in the dark for 36h, synthesis of both the enzymes started as soon as light and nitrate were provided. 3. Experiments with cycloheximide suggested that fresh protein synthesis in light was necessary for formation of active enzymes. Mere activation by light of inactive enzymes or their precursors, was not involved. 4. In green seedlings synthesis of nitrite reductase was more sensitive to chloramphenicol than that of nitrate reductase. In chloramphenicol-treated etiolated seedlings, however, synthesis of both the enzymes was inhibited to the same extent on subsequent light-treatment. 5. A close correlation was observed between inhibition of the Hill reaction by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and simazin [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] (at high concentration) and the inhibition of enzyme synthesis. At lower concentrations, however, simazin stimulated nitrate reductase. 6. In a single leaf synthesis of enzymes was observed only in portions exposed to light, whereas little activity was present in the dark covered part. 7. CO(2) deprivation severely inhibited the synthesis of enzymes in the light. Sucrose could not reverse this effect. 8. In excised embryos cultured in synthetic media containing sucrose, light was also essential for enzyme formation. 9. It is suggested that redox changes taking place in the green tissues as a result of the Hill reaction create conditions favourable for the induced synthesis of nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase.