Production and significance of TGF-beta in AT-3 metastatic cell line established from the Dunning rat prostatic adenocarcinoma

Structure, unique biological properties, and mechanisms of action of transforming growth factor β

Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) is a ubiquitous molecule that is extremely conserved structurally and plays a systemic role in human organism. TGF-β is a homodimeric molecule consisting of two subunits joined through a disulphide bond. In mammals, three genes code for TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3 isoforms of this cytokine with a dominating expression of TGF-β1. Virtually, all normal cells contain TGF-β and its specific receptors. Considering the exceptional role of fine balance played by the TGF-β in anumber of physiological and pathological processes in human body, this cytokine may be proposed for use in medicine as an immunosuppressant in transplantology, wound healing and bone repair. TGFb itself is an important target in oncology. Strategies for blocking members of TGF-β signaling pathway as therapeutic targets have been considered. In this review, signalling mechanisms of TGF-β1 action are addressed, and their role in physiology and pathology with main focus on carcinogenesis are described.

Molecular Pathogenesis and Diagnostic Imaging of Metastatic Jaw Tumors

Metastasis is the spread of malignant cells from a primary tumor to distant sites through lymphatics or blood vessels. Malignant lesions metastasizing to the oral and perioral region are a rarity indeed. Malignant lesions could metastasize to both soft tissue of oral cavity and the hard tissues of the jaws and recent meta-analysis showed that metastasis is more common in the jaws than oral soft tissues because of rich vascular supply. The incidence is very low when compared to the incidence of primary oral cancers; nevertheless, one has to include in the diagnostic workup, metastatic malignant lesions, when an irregular ill-defined radiolucency or radiodensity with ragged edges in noted. It could be a challenging task for a diagnostician, in cases with the presence and location of the primary tumor is unknown. Advanced oral imaging technologies and biochemical markers play a vital role in diagnosing such lesions.

A common promoter hypomethylation signature in invasive breast, liver and prostate cancer cell lines reveals novel targets involved in cancer invasiveness

Cancer invasion and metastasis is the most morbid aspect of cancer and is governed by different cellular mechanisms than those driving the deregulated growth of tumors. We addressed here the question of whether a common DNA methylation signature of invasion exists in cancer cells from different origins that differentiates invasive from non-invasive cells. We identified a common DNA methylation signature consisting of hyper- and hypomethylation and determined the overlap of differences in DNA methylation with differences in mRNA expression using expression array analyses. A pathway analysis reveals that the hypomethylation signature includes some of the major pathways that were previously implicated in cancer migration and invasion such as TGF beta and ERBB2 triggered pathways. The relevance of these hypomethylation events in human tumors was validated by identification of the signature in several publicly available databases of human tumor transcriptomes. We shortlisted novel invasion promoting candidates and tested the role of four genes in cellular invasiveness from the list C11orf68, G0S2, SHISA2 and TMEM156 in invasiveness using siRNA depletion. Importantly these genes are upregulated in human cancer specimens as determined by immunostaining of human normal and cancer breast, liver and prostate tissue arrays. Since these genes are activated in cancer they constitute a group of targets for specific pharmacological inhibitors of cancer invasiveness.

Novel tools for prostate cancer prognosis, diagnosis, and follow-up

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the main diagnostic tool when it comes to prostate cancer but it possesses serious limitations. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more sensitive and specific biomarkers for prostate cancer prognosis and patient follow-up. Recent advances led to the discovery of many novel diagnostic/prognostic techniques and provided us with many worthwhile candidates. This paper briefly reviews the most promising biomarkers with respect to their implementation in screening, early detection, diagnostic confirmation, prognosis, and prediction of therapeutic response or monitoring disease and recurrence; and their use as possible therapeutic targets. This review also examines the possible future directions in the field of prostate cancer marker research.

Action, localization and structure-function relationship of growth factors and their receptors in the prostate

Whereas the direct action of sex steroids, namely of androgens, on prostate cell division was questioned as early as in the 1970s, and remains so, the interest in prostatic growth factors (GFs) is rather recent but has expanded tremendously in the last five years. This lag period can be partly explained by the fact that, at the time, androgen receptors had just been discovered, and newly developed hormonal regimens or strategies to treat patients with prostate carcinoma (PCa) or epithelioma had generated great enthusiasm and hopes in the medical and scientific community. Another point to consider was the difficulty in maintaining prostate tissues in organ cultures and the relative novelty of culturing prostate epithelial cells in monolayers. Failures of sex steroids to elicit a direct positive response on prostate cell divisionin vitro, as seenin vivo, were interpreted as resulting from inappropriate models or culture conditions. However, the increasing number of reports confirming the lack of mitogenic activity of sex steroidsin vitro, coupled with the powerful mitogenic activity of GFs displayed in other systems, the discovery of GF receptors (GF-Rs), and the elucidation of their signalling pathways showing sex steroid receptors as potential substrates of GF-activated protein kinases gradually led to an increased interest in the putative role of GFs in prostate physiopathology. Of utmost importance was the recognition that hormone refractiveness was responsible for PCa progression, and for the poor outcome of patients with advanced disease under endocrine therapies. This problem remains a major issue and it raises several key questions that need to be solved at the fundamental and clinical levels.

Tumor metastasis to bone

Establishment of skeletal metastasis involves bidirectional interactions between the tumor cell and the cellular elements in the bone microenvironment. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of bone metastasis will be critical in developing the means to prevent bone metastasis or inhibit its progression. The receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK)/RANK ligand pathway has emerged as the key pathway regulating osteolysis in skeletal metastasis. A number of candidate factors, including the Wnt (wingless int) proteins, endothelin-1, and bone morphogenetic proteins, have been implicated in the establishment of osteoblastic metastasis. The complex nature of tumor-bone microenvironment interactions and the presence of multiple pathways that lead to bone metastasis suggests that simultaneous targeting of these pathways in the metastatic cascade are required for effective treatment. This review discusses current understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms that underlie the establishment of bone metastasis and potential molecular therapeutic strategies for prevention and treatment of bone metastasis.

Molecular markers of prostate cancer

Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has evolved as a very useful tool for detection of prostate cancer, there remains an urgent need for more accurate biomarkers to diagnose prostate cancer and predict cancer-related outcomes. Recent advances in the study of proteomics and high throughput techniques have led to the discovery of many potential biomarkers for prostate cancer. This article briefly reviews the current status of PSA testing and discusses several candidate protein biomarkers for prostate cancer, as well as highlighting some recent proteomic discoveries with the potential to supplement or even replace PSA for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer.

Human prostate cancer risk factors

Prostate cancer has the highest prevalence of any nonskin cancer in the human body, with similar likelihood of neoplastic foci found within the prostates of men around the world regardless of diet, occupation, lifestyle, or other factors. Essentially all men with circulating androgens will develop microscopic prostate cancer if they live long enough. This review is a contemporary and comprehensive, literature-based analysis of the putative risk factors for human prostate cancer, and the results were presented at a multidisciplinary consensus conference held in Crystal City, Virginia, in the fall of 2002. The objectives were to evaluate known environmental factors and mechanisms of prostatic carcinogenesis and to identify existing data gaps and future research needs. The review is divided into four sections, including 1) epidemiology (endogenous factors [family history, hormones, race, aging and oxidative stress] and exogenous factors [diet, environmental agents, occupation and other factors, including lifestyle factors]); 2) animal and cell culture models for prediction of human risk (rodent models, transgenic models, mouse reconstitution models, severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome mouse models, canine models, xenograft models, and cell culture models); 3) biomarkers in prostate cancer, most of which have been tested only as predictive factors for patient outcome after treatment rather than as risk factors; and 4) genotoxic and nongenotoxic mechanisms of carcinogenesis. The authors conclude that most of the data regarding risk relies, of necessity, on epidemiologic studies, but animal and cell culture models offer promise in confirming some important findings. The current understanding of biomarkers of disease and risk factors is limited. An understanding of the risk factors for prostate cancer has practical importance for public health research and policy, genetic and nutritional education and chemoprevention, and prevention strategies.

Biochemical staging of prostate cancer

PSA continues to be one of the most effective and widely used cancer screening tools available. Its popularity in prostate cancer screening, however, has eroded its usefulness in the staging of this disease. As more men are screened every year on a routine basis with DRE and PSA, the average PSA at diagnosis has drifted down to well below 10 ng/mL in many centers, including ours. This trend is likely to accelerate, as a PSA cut off for prompting biopsy of the prostate of 2.5 ng/mL gains more widespread acceptance. The recent realization that, at these levels, serum PSA is more reflective of the presence of BPH than of the extent of cancer and, therefore, does not provide additional staging information, has renewed the search for new biochemical markers that are capable of predicting prostate cancer stage and prognosis. Because of the heterogeneity of this disease, it is unlikely that a single biochemical marker that is capable of accurately staging all prostate cancer patients will be found. For this reason, nomograms that are capable of integrating various parameters to predict stage and prognosis will remain indispensable. As new biochemical markers that provide independent predictive information about stage or prognosis are identified, they can be incorporated into currently available nomograms. Of the biochemical markers discussed in this article, IL-6sR and TGF-beta1 are the most promising. By incorporating them into a preoperative nomogram designed to predict PSA recurrence, we found that they improved the ability to predict biochemical recurrence by a statistically and clinically significant margin. The ability to stage prostate cancer and predict response to therapy has improved dramatically over the last 3 decades. Nevertheless, there is still a need for new biochemical markers that will improve the ability to predict an individual patient's stage and response to therapy. Incorporating these new markers into nomograms will enhance the ability to provide optimal care for each prostate cancer patient.

Increased expression of bone morphogenetic protein-7 in bone metastatic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer frequently metastasizes to bone. The skeletal metastases of prostate cancer origin are osteoblastic rather than osteolytic. Recently, the expression of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) in prostate cancer cell lines was detected. The present study indicated the existence of BMP-7 in normal prostate tissue, but its function has not been clarified. The mechanism by which prostate cancer causes osteoblastic metastasis is not clear. We investigated the expression of BMP-7 and -6 in normal and metastatic bone tissues to clarify the biological relationship between the expression of BMPs and bone metastasis in prostatic cancer.

METHODS

Six samples of normal bone tissue and nine samples of bone metastasis tissue were collected during the autopsies of six patients with prostate cancer. Total RNA was extracted from these samples. After reverse transcription (RT) of the RNA samples, the expression of BMP-6 and -7 in each sample was measured by the real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal standard.

RESULTS

Although the expression of BMP-7 was detected in five out of seven (71%) metastatic bone lesions of prostate cancer, it was not detected in normal bone tissues. The expression level of BMP-7 was significantly higher in metastatic bone lesions than in normal bone (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the level of expression of BMP-6 in metastatic bone lesions from prostate cancer and the level in normal bone tissue (P = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that high expression of BMP-7 in metastatic bone lesions of prostate cancer is related to osteoblastic metastasis. BMP-7 in the bone metastasis tissue indicates that the cells expressing BMP-7 probably originated from the prostate, because we have detected high expression of BMP-7 in the prostate. Prostate 54: 268-274, 2003.

Preoperative plasma levels of transforming growth factor beta(1) (TGF-beta(1)) strongly predict progression in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Elevated local and circulating levels of transforming growth factor beta(1) (TGF-beta(1)) have been associated with prostate cancer invasion and metastasis. We tested the hypothesis that preoperative plasma TGF-beta(1) levels would independently predict cancer stage and prognosis in patients who undergo radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study group consisted of 120 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer (median follow-up, 53.8 months). Preoperative plasma levels of TGF-beta(1) were measured and correlated with pathologic parameters and clinical outcomes. TGF-beta(1) levels also were measured in 44 healthy men without cancer, in 19 men with prostate cancer metastatic to regional lymph nodes, and in 10 men with prostate cancer metastatic to bone.

RESULTS

Plasma TGF-beta(1) levels in patients with lymph node metastases (14.2 +/- 2.6 ng/mL) and bone metastases (15.5 +/- 2.4 ng/mL) were higher than those in radical prostatectomy patients (5.2 +/- 1.3 ng/mL) and healthy subjects (4.5 +/- 1.2 ng/mL) (P <.001). In a preoperative analysis, preoperative plasma TGF-beta(1) level and biopsy Gleason sum both were predictors of organ-confined disease (P =.006 and P =.006, respectively) and PSA progression (P <.001 and P =.021, respectively). In a postoperative multivariate analysis, preoperative plasma TGF-beta(1) level, pathologic Gleason sum, and surgical margin status were predictors of PSA progression (P =.020,P =.020, and P =.022, respectively). In patients who progressed, preoperative plasma TGF-beta(1) levels were higher in those with presumed distant compared with local-only failure (P =.019).

CONCLUSION

Plasma TGF-beta(1) levels are markedly elevated in men with prostate cancer metastatic to regional lymph nodes and bone. In men without clinical or pathologic evidence of metastases, the preoperative plasma TGF-beta(1) level is a strong predictor of biochemical progression after surgery, presumably because of an association with occult metastatic disease present at the time of radical prostatectomy.

Growth factors and epithelial-stromal interactions in prostate cancer development

Epithelial-stromal interactions are important not only in growth, development, and functional cytodifferentiation of the prostate but also in derangements of prostate gland such as BPH and prostate carcinoma. This chapter explores the roles of epithelium and stroma during this delicate process and highlights the role and mutual influence of each on the other. It also examines the importance of ECM in mediating the effects of androgens and drawn attention to estrogen and genetic factors in the process. During this process of epithelial-stromal interaction, growth factors play a central role in mediating the interactions. This chapter focuses on the role of several growth factors including epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth factor alpha, transforming growth factor beta, insulin-like growth factor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor, nerve growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and hepatocyte growth factor. This chapter emphasizes the importance of epithelial-stromal interactions in tumorigenesis and highlights the switch of paracrine to autocrine mode during the process of carcinogenesis.

Endothelium-derived factors as paracrine mediators of prostate cancer progression

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelium represents a complex network of cells producing a large number of active substrates affecting physiologic, metabolic, and immunologic properties of the whole organism, as well as particular organs or tissues. The potential influence of endothelium-derived paracrine factors on prostate cancer progression has only begun to be examined.

METHODS

This review summarizes recent literature on endothelium-derived factors, including vasoactive agents, peptide growth factors, cytokines, and colony-stimulating factors, involved in the development and progression of prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Endothelial cells produce an array of active substrates, many of which have been shown to influence prostate cancer growth. Available data demonstrate the positive impact of such molecules as endothelin-1, basic FGF, TGF-beta, IL-6, and IL-8 on prostate cancer progression. Many other endothelium-derived factors NO, IGF, PDGF, IL-1, G-CSF, and GM-CSF (Nitric Oxide, Insulin-Like Growth Factor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, Interleukin-1, Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor, and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor) are, at best, implicated in prostate cancer growth, and in most cases support cancer progression.

CONCLUSIONS

A better understanding of endothelium-derived factors, as paracrine mediators of prostate carcinogenesis and progression, should aid in the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Elevated expression of FGF-2 does not cause prostate cancer progression in LNCaP cells

BACKGROUND

Androgen-independent (AI) prostate cancer (CaP) resulting from progression of disease is untreatable. Such progression may relate to upregulation and autocrinicity of growth factor expression. We studied one candidate growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2).

METHODS

LNCaP cells made autocrine for FGF-2 by stable transfection with FGF-2 were examined for cancer progression, measured by 1) altered response to androgen, 2) ability to grow more quickly when cocultured with bone cells in vitro or to form tumors when coinoculated with bone cells in vivo, or 3) increase in metastatic ability.

RESULTS

Stably transfected lines differed in FGF-2 protein expression. LNCaP-HF (high production of FGF-2) expressed more FGF-2 than LNCaP-LF (low production of FGF-2); controls were negative. In vitro, compared with LNCaPs, LNCaP-HF cells showed a slightly increased growth rate, reduced proliferation in response to androgen but not to estrogen or progesterone, and a decreased proliferative response to epidermal growth factor (EGF) and FGF-2. Although giving a slightly faster take rate, LNCaP-HF cells without Matrigel only formed small, fast-regressing tumors in male nude mice, and with Matrigel, did not differ from LNCaPs in growth rate or tumor size. No metastases occurred. No tumors grew in females. Mixed growth of FGF-2 transfectants with human fetal osteoblasts failed to cross-stimulate in vitro, or to allow tumor formation in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Although FGF-2 is overexpressed in AI CaPs, our experiments show that upregulation of FGF-2 expression is not sufficient to cause androgen independence, tumorigenicity, or metastases production (i.e., prostate cancer progression) in LNCaP cells.

Regulation of prostatic growth and function by peptide growth factors

Polypeptide growth factors are positive and negative regulators of prostatic growth and function. Expression and biological effects of epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factors (TGFs) alpha and beta, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), and insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) in the prostate have been extensively studied. EGF and TGF alpha, which share the same receptor, are strong mitogens for prostatic epithelial and stromal cells. Their paracrine mode of action in normal tissue and early-stage tumors is apparently altered towards an autocrine stimulation in hormone-independent tumors, which gain the ability to produce TGF alpha by themselves. TGF beta has a dual role in the regulation of prostatic growth. It inhibits growth of prostatic epithelial cells in culture and mediates programmed cell death after androgen withdrawal. However, advanced prostatic carcinomas become insensitive to the inhibitory effect of TGF beta. Several members of the FGF family have been identified in the prostate. They are mainly or exclusively expressed in the stromal cells, and stimulate the epithelial cells. In the rat Dunning tumor model, progression is accompanied by distinct changes in the expression of FGFs and their receptors. In the hyperplastic tissue, basic FGF (bFGF) is accumulated. This growth factor is also a potent angiogenic inducer, expression of which may determine the metastatic capability of a tumor. IGFs are paracrine growth stimulators in the normal and hyperplastic prostate. It is still under consideration whether prostatic cancer cells gain the ability to produce IGF-I by themselves and thus shift to an autocrine mode of IGF-I stimulation. Growth factors also interact with the androgen-signaling pathway. IGF-I in particular, other growth factors as well, can activate the androgen receptor.

Activin and inhibin have opposite effects on steroid 5 alpha-reductase activity in genital skin fibroblasts

The transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) superfamily includes several closely related peptides including the activins and inhibins. Since we recently reported that TGF-beta 1 and beta 2 are potent inducers of steroid 5 alpha-reductase (5 alpha R), we have now studied the effects of these other peptides using primary cultures of human scrotal skin fibroblasts. Recombinant human activin A or inhibin A were added to cultured cells (2 x 10(5) cells) for 2 days in a serum free media and 5 alpha R activity was measured by the %-conversion of tracer [3H]-testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) over a 4-h period. Activin significantly stimulated 5 alpha R activity in a dose related manner (control 3.0 +/- 0.4%, activin (1.2 x 10(-9) M) 6 +/- 0.7%, P < 0.01, (2.4 x 10(-9) M) 8.5 +/- 0.6%, P < 0.001). In comparison, androgen (DHT 10(-7) M) induction of 5 alpha R was 4.7 +/- 0.2%, P < 0.05. Combined exposure of fibroblasts to activin (1.2 x 10(-9) M) and androgen (10(-7) M) did not result in additive or synergistic effect on 5 alpha R activity. In contrast, exposure of cells to an androgen (10(-7) M) and TGF-beta (2 x 10(-10) M) led to synergistic effects on 5 alpha R activity (control 1.5 +/- 0.1%, DHT 2.6 +/- 0.2% TGF-beta 1 4.8 +/- 0.5, TGF-beta 1 + DHT 9.2 +/- 1.2%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Secretion of transforming growth factor-beta by the immature rat prostate

Immature rat ventral prostate was used to identify a potent cell growth inhibitory factor in normal prostate. Both conditioned media and peptide extracts derived from ventral prostates inhibit the cellular growth and DNA synthesis in metastatic androgen-independent human prostate carcinoma cell line (PC3). The prostatic inhibitory factor was partially purified using an hydrophobic HPLC column (C18). Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis (SDS-PAGE) of partially purified material revealed a major 25-kDa band. Immunoblot analysis showed similarity of the inhibitory factor to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta). Furthermore, the proliferation inhibiting activity of the prostatic factor was completely abolished by anti-TGF-beta antibodies. These data indicate that normal prostate produces a TGF-beta-like protein under non-physiological conditions.

Effect of suramin on the mitogenic response of the human prostate carcinoma cell line PC-3

BACKGROUND

Suramin is an anthelmintic drug that recently has been shown to have clinical efficacy in the treatment of patients with some advanced malignancies, including prostate carcinoma. The current study was done to assess the effect of suramin at clinically relevant doses on the growth in culture of a human prostatic carcinoma cell line, PC-3.

METHODS

The antiproliferative effect of varying doses of suramin on PC-3 was assessed. Northern blot analysis was done to assess the potential changes in genetic expression at different times after the initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

Suramin inhibited the proliferation of PC-3 in a dose-related manner (concentration range, 30-300 microM). Compared with fetal calf serum 2%, when the cells were grown in fetal calf serum 10%, higher concentrations of suramin were required to inhibit tritiated thymidine incorporation. When grown in RPMI without supplement, the PC-3 cell number remained the same. When 100 microM suramin was included, the cell number decreased. By contrast, when RPMI was supplemented with insulin, transferrin, and selenium (ITS), PC-3 grew well. The inhibition of the proliferation of PC-3 cells by suramin was decreased when ITS were added to the cells grown under serum-free conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

These results were consistent with the hypothesis that in vitro inhibition of the growth of PC-3 cells by suramin may be caused, at least in part, by the growth factor antagonism of the drug. In fetal calf serum 2%, the suramin inhibition was reversible after 3 days. If the treatment was extended to 6 days, however, the PC-3 cells were unable to recover. Cell-cycle analysis revealed that, after 6 days of treatment, there was a decrease in the number of cells in G1 that corresponded with an increased number of cells in G2/M. This suggested that critical antineoplastic events were occurring during this time. Molecular analysis did not detect any altered expression of actin, transforming growth factors alpha or beta, or histone compared with untreated control samples.

Stromal-epithelial paracrine interactions in the neoplastic rat and human prostate

Homotypic paracrine interactions in the rat and human prostate have been investigated using prostatic stromal cells and neoplastic epithelial cells (PA-III, rat; TSU-pr1, human). Secretory proteins prepared from each cell type were used to determine the dose dependent regulation of growth (DNA synthesis) of the corresponding homotypic responder cell, as determined by 3H-thymidine incorporation. PA-III secretory protein stimulated rat stromal cell proliferation by 1.8-fold. This stimulatory activity of PA-III protein on stromal cell proliferation was partially reduced (approximately 35%) by treatment with nerve growth factor (NGF) antibody, whereas neither acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF) antibody nor basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) antibody immunoneutralized the stimulatory activity of PA-III cell protein. In the corresponding opposite interaction, rat stromal cell protein modulated PA-III growth in a biphasic manner. At lower concentrations of stromal cell protein (1.25 micrograms/ml) PA-III cell growth was stimulated by 1.6-fold, whereas at higher concentrations of protein (100 micrograms/ml) PA-III cell growth was inhibited to 60%. Treatment of the stromal cell protein (1.25 micrograms/ml and 100 micrograms/ml) with NGF antibody reduced PA-III cell relative growth to approximately 30% and 5%, respectively. bFGF antibody treatment of stromal cell protein at 1.25 micrograms/ml did not influence relative growth, whereas bFGF antibody treatment of 100 micrograms/ml stromal cell protein reduced relative growth by an additional 40%. Treatment of the stromal cell protein (1.25 micrograms/ml and 100 micrograms/ml) with aFGF antibodies reduced relative growth from that observed at these two protein concentrations by approximately 50% in both cases. Human epithelial TSU-pr1 protein stimulated human stromal cell proliferation approximately 1.7-fold. Treatment of TSU-pr1 protein with NGF antibody resulted in stimulation of human stromal cell proliferation (4-fold). In the corresponding opposite interaction, human stromal cell secretory protein stimulated TSU-pr1 epithelial cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner up to a maximum of 2.6-fold. This stimulation of TSU-pr1 proliferation by stromal cell secretory protein was reduced to 20% of maximal levels by treatment with antibody against NGF, whereas antibodies against bFGF and aFGF did not significantly influence the stimulatory effect of stromal cell secretory protein mediated proliferation of TSU-pr1 cells. These results suggest that prostatic stromal cells and neoplastic epithelial cells secrete several paracrine factors. One of these factors is nerve growth factor-like, and appears to have a major non-neurotrophic influence on the paracrine regulation of prostatic growth.

Active cell death in hormone-dependent tissues

Active cell death (ACD) in hormone-dependent tissues such as the prostate and mammary gland is readily induced by hormone ablation and by treatment with anti-androgens or anti-estrogens, calcium channel agonists and TGF beta. These agents induce a variety of genes within the hormone-dependent epithelial cells including TRPM-2, transglutaminase, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, Hsp27 and several other unidentified genes. Not all epithelial cells in the glands are equally sensitive to the induction of ACD. In the prostate, the secretory epithelial cells that are sensitive to hormone ablation are localized in the distal region of the prostatic ducts, and are in direct contact with the neighboring stroma. In contrast, the epithelial cells in the proximal regions of the ducts are more resistant to hormone ablation, probably because the permissive effects of the stroma are attenuated by the presence of the basal epithelial cells, which are intercalated between the epithelium and stroma. The underlying biology of ACD in prostate and mammary glands, and its relevance to hormone resistance, is discussed in this review.

Distribution of nerve growth factor-like protein and nerve growth factor receptor in human benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic adenocarcinoma

Recent observations from our laboratory have identified a nerve growth factor (NGF)-like protein in conditioned media of stromal cells and neoplastic epithelial cells of the human prostate which mediates paracrine interactive growth of both cell types in vitro. In order to investigate the location of this NGF-like protein in the human prostate in vivo, and whether a nerve growth factor receptor (NGF-R) could be identified, we have carried out immunocytochemical studies on frozen tissue sections of human benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatic adenocarcinoma and normal prostatic tissue. The NGF-like protein localized predominantly to the stromal component of BPH, adenocarcinoma and normal (non-cancerous) prostatic tissue. Conversely, the NGF-R localized predominantly to the epithelial cells of these tissues. Renal tissue provided negative controls for both the NGF-like protein and the NGF-R. The testis provided positive controls for both the NGF-like protein and the NGF-R. These results provide corroborative evidence for a NGF-like protein produced by stromal cells which interacts with a NGF-R on the adjacent epithelial cells thereby mediating paracrine interactive growth regulation of the human prostate.

Potential role of HBGF (FGF) and TGF-beta on prostate growth

We review in this paper the role of heparin-binding growth factor (HBGF*) or fibroblast growth factor (FGF*), rat prostate cancer cells produce TGF-beta, IGF-II* and OGF*. Of these growth factors, TGF-beta and unknown labile factor with 19 kDa are the most probable candidates responsible for osteoblastic bony metastasis of prostate cancer. In vitro experiments suggest that TGF-beta modulates cell detachment of prostate cancer cells together with nutritional factors. HBGF-dependent growth of the prostate tumor epithelial cells is free from inhibition by TGF-beta, whereas normal prostate epithelial cells are sensitive to TGF-beta inhibition. Transfection experiments suggest that HBGF-2 (basic FGF) might be closely related to the malignant growth of prostate cancer, in addition to tumor angiogenesis.

Localization of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in a metastatic cell line (AT-3) established from the Dunning prostatic carcinoma of rat: application of a specific monoclonal antibody

Localization of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in a metastatic cell line, AT-3, established from the Dunning prostatic carcinoma of rat was determined by two immunological techniques using a specific monoclonal antibody against bFGF. Concentration of bFGF in cell extract was measured by sandwich radioimmunoassay (RIA) with heparin-Sepharose and 125I-labeled monoclonal antibody. bFGF concentration in the extract of AT-3 cells increased with increasing concentration of NaCl in extraction buffer. Localization of bFGF in AT-3 cells was determined by counting radioactivity of 125I-labeled monoclonal antibody binding to AT-3 cells before or after increasing permeability of the cells. The binding increased significantly by this treatment, indicating that bFGF within the cells was detected.

Role of cyclic AMP and polypeptide growth regulators in growth inhibition by interferon in PC-3 cells

Participation of growth factors and intracellular cAMP in direct antiproliferative action of interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) was investigated in PC-3 human prostate carcinoma cell line. IFN-alpha inhibited proliferation of PC-3 cells in a dose-dependent manner in vitro, and the effect was reversible. Fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor, when added to the culture medium, showed no effect on growth of PC-3 cells in presence or absence of IFN-alpha. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) significantly inhibited PC-3 cell growth, and the effect was additived to that of IFN-alpha. TGF-beta content in conditioned medium of PC-3 cells was not affected by treatment with IFN-alpha. On the other hand, IFN-alpha increased intracellular cAMP concentration about 20-fold. Dibutyryl cAMP and reagents which elevated intracellular cAMP level also inhibited PC-3 cell growth. These indicated that direct antiproliferative effect of IFN-alpha on PC-3 cells was at least partly mediated by cAMP, and that neither growth factors nor a growth inhibitor participated in the action of IFN-alpha.