Purification of monomeric agmatine iminohydrolase from soybean

Structural Study of Agmatine Iminohydrolase From Medicago truncatula, the Second Enzyme of the Agmatine Route of Putrescine Biosynthesis in Plants

Plants are unique eukaryotes that can produce putrescine (PUT), a basic diamine, from arginine via a three-step pathway. This process starts with arginine decarboxylase that converts arginine to agmatine. Then, the consecutive action of two hydrolytic enzymes, agmatine iminohydrolase (AIH) and N-carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase, ultimately produces PUT. An alternative route of PUT biosynthesis requires ornithine decarboxylase that catalyzes direct putrescine biosynthesis. However, some plant species lack this enzyme and rely only on agmatine pathway. The scope of this manuscript concerns the structural characterization of AIH from the model legume plant, Medicago truncatula. MtAIH is a homodimer built of two subunits with a characteristic propeller fold, where five αββαβ repeated units are arranged around the fivefold pseudosymmetry axis. Dimeric assembly of this plant AIH, formed by interactions of conserved structural elements from one repeat, is drastically different from that observed in dimeric bacterial AIHs. Additionally, the structural snapshot of MtAIH in complex with 6-aminohexanamide, the reaction product analog, presents the conformation of the enzyme during catalysis. Our structural results show that MtAIH undergoes significant structural rearrangements of the long loop, which closes a tunnel-shaped active site over the course of the catalytic event. This conformational change is also observed in AIH from Arabidopsis thaliana, indicating the importance of the closed conformation of the gate-keeping loop for the catalysis of plant AIHs.

Listeria monocytogenes aguA1, but not aguA2, encodes a functional agmatine deiminase: biochemical characterization of its catalytic properties and roles in acid tolerance

Listeria monocytogenes is adaptable to low pH environments and therefore crosses the intestinal barrier to establish systemic infections. L. monocytogenes aguA1 and aguA2 encode putative agmatine deiminases (AgDIs) AguA1 and AguA2. Transcription of aguA1 and aguA2 was significantly induced at pH 5.0. Deletion of aguA1 significantly impaired its survival both in gastric fluid at pH 2.5 and in mouse stomach, whereas aguA2 deletion did not show significant defect of survival in gastric fluid. With agmatine as the sole substrate, AguA1 expressed in Escherichia coli was optimal at 25 °C and over a wide range of pH from 3.5 to 10.5. Recombinant AguA2 showed no deiminase activity. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that all nine AguA1 mutants completely lost enzymatic activity. AguA2 acquired AgDI activity only when Cys-157 was mutated to glycine. AguA1 mutation at the same site, G157C, also inactivated the enzyme. Thus, we have discovered Gly-157 as a novel residue other than the known catalytic triad (Cys-His-Glu/Asp) in L. monocytogenes that is critical for enzyme activity. Of the two putative AgDIs, we conclude that only AguA1 functionally participates in the AgDI pathway and mediates acid tolerance in L. monocytogenes.

Occurrence of agmatine pathway for putrescine synthesis in Selenomonas ruminatium

Selenomonas ruminantium synthesizes cadaverine and putrescine from L-lysine and L-ornithine as the essential constituents of its peptidoglycan by a constitutive lysine/ornithine decarboxylase (LDC/ODC). S. ruminantium grew normally in the presence of the specific inhibitor for LDC/ODC, DL-alpha-difluoromethylornithine, when arginine was supplied in the medium. In this study, we discovered the presence of arginine decarboxylase (ADC), the key enzyme in agmatine pathway for putrescine synthesis, in S. ruminantium. We purified and characterized ADC and cloned its gene (adc) from S. ruminantium chromosomal DNA. ADC showed more than 60% identity with those of LDC/ODC/ADCs from Gram-positive bacteria, but no similarity to that from Gram-negative bacteria. In this study, we also cloned the aguA and aguB genes, encoding agmatine deiminase (AguA) and N-carbamoyl-putrescine amidohydrolase (AguB), both of which are involved in conversion from agmatine into putrescine. AguA and AguB were expressed in S. ruminantium. Hence, we concluded that S. ruminantium has both ornithine and agmatine pathways for the synthesis of putrescine.

Agmatine deiminase from cucumber seedlings is a mono-specific enzyme: purification and characteristics

Agmatine deiminase was purified to homogeneity from cucumber seedlings. The purification procedures included treatment with DE52, ammonium sulfate precipitation, DE52 column chromatography, Superdex 200 column chromatography, and agmatine-(CNBr)-diaminohexane-CNBr-activated-Sepharose 4B column chromatography. The purified agmatine deiminase exhibited a specific activity of 242nkat/mg protein at 30 degrees C, pH 7.0, with a yield of 33%. The molecular mass of the native enzyme was 67kDa, as estimated by Superdex 200 column chromatography. On the other hand, SDS-PAGE showed that the molecular masses of the subunits with 1% SDS and 5% of 2-mercaptoethanol treatment and with additional N-glycosidase F treatment were 47 and 36kDa, respectively. These results suggest that agmatine deiminase from cucumber is a glycoprotein. The Km of the enzyme for agmatine was 16microM and arcaine was a potent competitive inhibitor of the enzyme, with a Ki of 7.1microM. The enzyme was stable for 2 months at 4 degrees C. The enzyme does not have putrescine synthase activity or the activities of its components ornithine and putrescine transcarbamylase. The characteristics of the enzyme purified from cucumber were like those of the enzyme from maize. These results indicate that agmatine deiminase is distinctly different from putrescine synthase in higher plants.

Identification and characterization of plant agmatine iminohydrolase, the last missing link in polyamine biosynthesis of plants

The cloning, expression and characterization of plant agmatine iminohydrolase (AIH, also known as agmatine deiminase, EC 3.5.3.12) is described. Recombinant AIH of Arabidopsis thaliana forms dimers and catalyzes the specific conversion of agmatine to N-carbamoylputrescine and ammonia. Biochemical data suggested that cysteine side chains are involved in catalysis. However, site-directed mutagenesis of the two highly conserved cysteine residues of AIH showed that these cysteines are important but not essential for activity, arguing against a thioester substrate-enzyme intermediate during catalysis. This work represents the completion of the cloning of the arginine decarboxylase pathway genes of higher plants.

Identification of the putrescine biosynthetic genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and characterization of agmatine deiminase and N-carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase of the arginine decarboxylase pathway

Putrescine can be synthesized either directly from ornithine by ornithine decarboxylase (ODC; the speC product) or indirectly from arginine via arginine decarboxylase (ADC; the speA product). The authors identified the speA and speC genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. The activities of the two decarboxylases were similar and each enzyme alone appeared to direct sufficient formation of the polyamine for normal growth. A mutant defective in both speA and speC was a putrescine auxotroph. In this strain, agmatine deiminase (the aguA product) and N-carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase (the aguB product), which were initially identified as the catabolic enzymes of agmatine, biosynthetically convert agmatine to putrescine in the ADC pathway: a double mutant of aguAB and speC was a putrescine auxotroph. AguA was purified as a homodimer of 43 kDa subunits and AguB as a homohexamer of 33 kDa subunits. AguA specifically deiminated agmatine with K(m) and K(cat) values of 0.6 mM and 4.2 s(-1), respectively. AguB was specific to N-carbamoylputrescine and the K(m) and K(cat) values of the enzyme for the substrate were 0.5 mM and 3.3 s(-1), respectively. Whereas AguA has no structural relationship to any known C-N hydrolases, AguB is a protein of the nitrilase family that performs thiol-assisted catalysis. Inhibition by SH reagents and the conserved cysteine residue in AguA and its homologues suggested that this enzyme is also involved in thiol-mediated catalysis.

Polyamine synthesis in plants. Purification and properties of amidinotransferase from soybean (Glycine max) axes

Three-day-old soybean (Glycine max) seedlings were exposed to 0.4 M sorbitol solution for 4 h to induce amidinotransferase activity, with the corresponding enzyme being purified to homogeneity by chromatographic separation on DEAE-Sephacel, Sephacryl S-300 and L-arginine Sepharose 4B. The purified enzyme used L-arginine and L-glycine as the major donor/acceptor of the amidino group, respectively, with formation of guanidinoacetic acid and ornithine products being confirmed by ESI-MS. The enzyme is a tetrameric protein having a molecular mass of 240,000 Da, whose thiol group is needed for enzymatic activity. The K(M)s for arginine and glycine were 3.8 and 0.89 mM, respectively, with optimal temperature and pH being 37 degrees C and 9.5, respectively. The soybean amidinotransferase could be indirectly involved in nitrogen metabolism, as suggested by the observation that arginine:glycine amidinotransferase in soybean axes is indirectly involved in putrescine biosynthesis and displays feedback control at high levels of an endogenous regulator, putrescine.

Agmatine deiminase from maize shoots: purification and properties

Agmatine deiminase was purified to a specific activity of 537 nkat/mg protein using an improved procedure. The recovery was 47% and the enzyme was homogeneous and remarkably stable. The molecular mass of the enzyme as determined by gel filtration was 75 kDa, and SDS-PAGE suggests that the enzyme is a heterodimer composed of subunits of 43.5 and 44 kDa. The Km for agmatine was 12 microM and arcaine was shown to be a potent competitive inhibitor of the enzyme, with a Ki of 3.3 microM. The enzyme does not have either putrescine synthase activity or the activities of its components ornithine and putrescine transcarbamylase. These results distinctly demonstrate that agmatine deiminase is different from putrescine synthase.

Phylogeny of related functions: the case of polyamine biosynthetic enzymes

Genome annotation requires explicit identification of gene function. This task frequently uses protein sequence alignments with examples having a known function. Genetic drift, co-evolution of subunits in protein complexes and a variety of other constraints interfere with the relevance of alignments. Using a specific class of proteins, it is shown that a simple data analysis approach can help solve some of the problems posed. The origin of ureohydrolases has been explored by comparing sequence similarity trees, maximizing amino acid alignment conservation. The trees separate agmatinases from arginases but suggest the presence of unknown biases responsible for unexpected positions of some enzymes. Using factorial correspondence analysis, a distance tree between sequences was established, comparing regions with gaps in the alignments. The gap tree gives a consistent picture of functional kinship, perhaps reflecting some aspects of phylogeny, with a clear domain of enzymes encoding two types of ureohydrolases (agmatinases and arginases) and activities related to, but different from ureohydrolases. Several annotated genes appeared to correspond to a wrong assignment if the trees were significant. They were cloned and their products expressed and identified biochemically. This substantiated the validity of the gap tree. Its organization suggests a very ancient origin of ureohydrolases. Some enzymes of eukaryotic origin are spread throughout the arginase part of the trees: they might have been derived from the genes found in the early symbiotic bacteria that became the organelles. They were transferred to the nucleus when symbiotic genes had to escape Muller's ratchet. This work also shows that arginases and agmatinases share the same two manganese-ion-binding sites and exhibit only subtle differences that can be accounted for knowing the three-dimensional structure of arginases. In the absence of explicit biochemical data, extreme caution is needed when annotating genes having similarities to ureohydrolases.