Inhibition of alveolar macrophage 5-lipoxygenase metabolism by auranofin

CUSP9* treatment protocol for recurrent glioblastoma: aprepitant, artesunate, auranofin, captopril, celecoxib, disulfiram, itraconazole, ritonavir, sertraline augmenting continuous low dose temozolomide

CUSP9 treatment protocol for recurrent glioblastoma was published one year ago. We now present a slight modification, designated CUSP9*. CUSP9* drugs--aprepitant, artesunate, auranofin, captopril, celecoxib, disulfiram, itraconazole, sertraline, ritonavir, are all widely approved by regulatory authorities, marketed for non-cancer indications. Each drug inhibits one or more important growth-enhancing pathways used by glioblastoma. By blocking survival paths, the aim is to render temozolomide, the current standard cytotoxic drug used in primary glioblastoma treatment, more effective. Although esthetically unpleasing to use so many drugs at once, the closely similar drugs of the original CUSP9 used together have been well-tolerated when given on a compassionate-use basis in the cases that have come to our attention so far. We expect similarly good tolerability for CUSP9*. The combined action of this suite of drugs blocks signaling at, or the activity of, AKT phosphorylation, aldehyde dehydrogenase, angiotensin converting enzyme, carbonic anhydrase -2,- 9, -12, cyclooxygenase-1 and -2, cathepsin B, Hedgehog, interleukin-6, 5-lipoxygenase, matrix metalloproteinase -2 and -9, mammalian target of rapamycin, neurokinin-1, p-gp efflux pump, thioredoxin reductase, tissue factor, 20 kDa translationally controlled tumor protein, and vascular endothelial growth factor. We believe that given the current prognosis after a glioblastoma has recurred, a trial of CUSP9* is warranted.

Synthesis, cytotoxicity, cellular uptake and influence on eicosanoid metabolism of cobalt–alkyne modified fructoses in comparison to auranofin and the cytotoxic COX inhibitor Co-ASS

Propargylhexacarbonyldicobalt complexes with fructopyranose ligands were prepared and investigated for cytotoxicity in the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line. The antiproliferative effects depended on the presence of isopropylidene protecting groups in the carbohydrate ligand and correlated with the cellular concentration of the complexes. IC(50) values of > 20 microM demonstrated that the fructose derivatives were only moderately active compared to the references auranofin and the aspirin (ASS) derivative [2-acetoxy(2-propynyl)benzoate]hexacarbonyldicobalt (Co-ASS). In continuation of our studies on the mode of action of cobalt-alkyne complexes we studied the influence of the compounds on the formation of 12-HHT (COX-1 product) and 12-HETE (12-LOX product) by human platelets as an indication of the interference in the eicosanoid metabolism, which is discussed as a target system of cytostatics. Co-ASS was an efficient COX-1 inhibitor without LOX inhibitory activity and auranofin inhibited both COX-1 and 12-LOX eicosanoid production. The missing activity of the fructopyranose complexes at the 12-LOX and the only moderate effects at COX-1 indicate that COX/LOX inhibition may be in part responsible for the pharmacological effects of auranofin and Co-ASS but not for those of the fructopyranose complexes.

Induction of nitric oxide synthase by lipopolysaccharide and its inhibition by auranofin in RAW 264.7 cells

In RAW 264.7 cells, a murine macrophage cell line, treatment with lipopolysaccharide (1 to 10 ng/ml) stimulated production of nitric oxide (NO), which was inhibited by L-N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine acetate, an inhibitor of NO synthase. Auranofin, an orally active chrysotherapeutic agent, also inhibited the lipopolysaccharide-induced NO production in a concentration-dependent manner (0.3 to 3 microM). Other gold salts such as aurothioglucose and aurothiomalate had no effect. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the lipopolysaccharide (10 ng/ml)-induced expression of inducible NO synthase protein was inhibited by auranofin as well as by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. In addition, the lipopolysaccharide-induced increase in the level of mRNA for inducible NO synthase was also lowered by auranofin. Furthermore, auranofin showed no direct effect on the conversion of [3H]arginine to [3H]citrulline by the cell lysate. These findings indicate that auranofin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced NO production by suppressing the expression of inducible NO synthase.

The mechanisms of action of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a review with emphasis on macrophage signal transduction and the induction of proinflammatory cytokines

1. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is probably the most common source of treatable disability. A major problem in modern rheumatology is that the mechanism(s) of action of the currently used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) remain unclear. Many of these drugs entered rheumatology mainly through clinical intuition and have been used for decades. 2. The former T-cell-centered paradigm of rheumatoid inflammation has given way to a model of inflammation highlighting the macrophage and its proinflammatory cytokines. In particular, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) has gained prominence as a central proinflammatory mediator in RA, and antibodies against TNF-alpha have been successfully used in patients with RA. 3. This review will summarize the recent advances in determining the mechanisms of action of the currently used DMARDs, with particular emphasis on their effects on the induction of TNF-alpha and interleukin 1 (IL-1) in mononuclear phagocytes. Although some DMARDs, such as auranofin, antimalarials and tenidap, act as inhibitors of the induction of these cytokines in monocytes or macrophages or both, other drugs, such as methotrexate, D-penicillamine and aurothiomalate, do not seem to affect either TNF-alpha or IL-1. 4. The drugs' effects on proinflammatory cytokine induction are correlated to those on other macrophage responses.

Dual effects of auranofin on prostaglandin E2 production by rat peritoneal macrophages

Incubation of rat peritoneal macrophages in medium containing various concentrations of auranofin (1, 3 and 10 microM) increased prostaglandin E2 production at 4 h in a concentration-dependent manner, in accordance with the increase in the release of [3H]arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids. However, at 20 h, no stimulation of prostaglandin E2 production by auranofin was observed. When the peritoneal macrophages were incubated in the presence of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA), thapsigargin or A23187, prostaglandin E2 production at 4 and 20 h was enhanced. The stimulator-induced prostaglandin E2 production at 20 h was suppressed by 10 microM of auranofin. Western blot analysis demonstrated that auranofin inhibited the induction of cyclooxygenase 2 by TPA, thapsigargin or A23187 at 4 and 20 h. The level of cyclooxygenase 1 did not change by treatment with these stimulators in the presence or absence of auranofin. These findings suggest that auranofin has dual effects on prostaglandin E2 production: without stimulation, auranofin increases prostaglandin E2 production at 4 h due to the increased release of arachidonic acid which is converted to prostaglandin E2 mainly by cyclooxygenase 1, but inhibits the stimulator-induced late-phase prostaglandin E2 production by inhibiting the induction of cyclooxygenase 2.

5-lipoxygenase inhibitors and their anti-inflammatory activities

A wide variety of agents have been reported as 5-LO inhibitors. The majority of the series appear to be lipophilic reducing agents, including phenols, partially saturated aromatics, and compounds containing heteroatom-heteroatom bonds. Many of these are not selective 5-LO inhibitors, but often affect CO and other LOs as well. In vivo systemic activity for many of these has been, in general, disappointing, probably because of poor bioavailability caused by lipophilicity and metabolic instability (oxidation, and conjugation of phenolic compounds). However, topically a number of agents have shown promise for skin inflammation, with Syntex's lonapalene the most advanced of these. Most results published to date appear more disappointing in the allergy/asthma field. More excitingly, a few structural types are selective 5-LO inhibitors which have shown systemic activity in vivo and in the clinic. Abbott's zileuton (136) appears to be one of the leading compounds in this category, along with other hydroxamates such as BW-A4C (129) from Burroughs-Wellcome. Recent selective non-reducing agents such as Wyeth-Ayerst's Wy-50,295 (143) and the similar ICI compounds such as ICI 216800 (145) also hold promise. The enantiospecific effects of (106) and (145) are especially interesting for the design of new inhibitors. If compounds like these validate the hypothesis that inhibition of 5-LO will have a significant anti-inflammatory effect, a redoubling of effort throughout the industry to find second- and third-generation selective agents may be expected. Part of the difficulty in interpreting and comparing the 5-LO literature is the plethora of test methods and activity criteria. As pointed out in the introduction, inhibition of product release from cells, often stimulated with A23187, has commonly been used to demonstrate 5-LO inhibition. However, this type of assay cannot be assumed to be diagnostic for 5-LO inhibition. Only if specificity for 5-LO product generation and (ideally) activity in cell-free enzymes is also shown should mechanistic interpretations be made. Recently, a new class of compounds was found at Merck which inhibited LT biosynthesis without inhibiting 5-LO, but apparently by a novel, specific mechanism. L-655,240 (169) and L-663,536 (MK-886) (170) were both active in human ISN, with IC50 values in the low micromolar range. Both also orally inhibited GPB (< 1 mg/kg). MK-886 was effective in Ascaris-induced asthma in squirrel monkeys, in rat carrageenan pleurisy, in rat Arthus pleurisy, and (topically) in guinea-pig ear oedema induced by A23187.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)