The role of glutamate in pigeon optic tectum

Systematic Analysis of Pigeons' Discrimination of Pixelated Stimuli: A Hierarchical Pattern Recognition System Is Not Identifiable

Pigeons learned to discriminate two different patterns displayed with miniature light-emitting diode arrays. They were then tested with 84 interspersed, non-reinforced degraded pattern pairs. Choices ranged between 100% and 50% for one or other of the patterns. Stimuli consisting of few pixels yielded low choice scores whereas those consisting of many pixels yielded a broad range of scores. Those patterns with a high number of pixels coinciding with those of the rewarded training stimulus were preferred and those with a high number of pixels coinciding with the non-rewarded training pattern were avoided; a discrimination index based on this correlated 0.74 with the pattern choices. Pixels common to both training patterns had a minimal influence. A pixel-by-pixel analysis revealed that eight pixels of one pattern and six pixels of the other pattern played a prominent role in the pigeons’ choices. These pixels were disposed in four and two clusters of neighbouring locations. A summary index calculated on this basis still only yielded a weak 0.73 correlation. The individual pigeons’ data furthermore showed that these clusters were a mere averaging mirage. The pigeons’ performance depends on deep learning in a midbrain-based multimillion synapse neuronal network. Pixelated visual patterns should be helpful when simulating perception of patterns with artificial networks.

Columnar projections from the cholinergic nucleus isthmi to the optic tectum in chicks (Gallus gallus): a possible substrate for synchronizing tectal channels

The cholinergic division of the avian nucleus isthmi, the homolog of the mammalian nucleus parabigeminalis, is composed of the pars parvocellularis (Ipc) and pars semilunaris (SLu). Ipc and SLu were studied with in vivo and in vitro tracing and intracellular filling methods. 1) Both nuclei have reciprocal homotopic connections with the ipsilateral optic tectum. The SLu connection is more diffuse than that of Ipc. 2) Tectal inputs to Ipc and SLu are Brn3a-immunoreactive neurons in the inner sublayer of layer 10. Tectal neurons projecting on Ipc possess "shepherd's crook" axons and radial dendritic fields in layers 2-13. 3) Neurons in the mid-portion of Ipc possess a columnar spiny dendritic field. SLu neurons have a large, nonoriented spiny dendritic field. 4) Ipc terminals form a cylindrical brush-like arborization (35-50 microm wide) in layers 2-10, with extremely dense boutons in layers 3-6, and a diffuse arborization in layers 11-13. SLu neurons terminate in a wider column (120-180 microm wide) lacking the dust-like boutonal features of Ipc and extend in layers 4c-13 with dense arborizations in layers 4c, 6, and 9-13. 5) Ipc and SLu contain specialized fast potassium ion channels. We propose that dense arborizations of Ipc axons may be directed to the distal dendritic bottlebrushes of motion detecting tectal ganglion cells (TGCs). They may provide synchronous activation of a group of adjacent bottlebrushes of different TGCs of the same type via their intralaminar processes, and cross channel activation of different types of TGCs within the same column of visual space.

The nucleus isthmi and dual modulation of the receptive field of tectal neurons in non-mammals

The nucleus isthmi in the dorsolateral tegmentum had been one of the most obscure structures in the nonmammalian midbrain for eight decades. Recent studies have shown that this nucleus and its mammalian homologue, the parabigeminal nucleus, are all visual centers, which receive information from the ipsilateral tectum and project back either ipsilaterally or bilaterally depending on species, but not an auditory center as suggested before. On the other hand, the isthmotectal pathways exert dual, both excitatory and inhibitory, actions on tectal cells in amphibians and reptiles. In birds, the magnocellular and parvocellular subdivisions of this nucleus produce excitatory and inhibitory effects on tectal cells, respectively. The excitatory pathway is mediated by glutamatergic synapses with AMPA and NMDA receptors and/or cholinergic synapses with muscarinic receptors, whereas the inhibitory pathway is mediated by GABAergic synapses via GABA(A) receptors. Further studies have shown that the magnocellular and parvocellular subdivisions can differentially modulate the excitatory and inhibitory regions of the receptive field of tectal neurons, respectively. Both the positive and the negative feedback pathways may work together in a winner-take-all manner, so that the animal could attend to only one of several competing visual targets simultaneously present in the visual field. Some behavioral tests seem to be consistent with this hypothesis. The present review indicates that the tecto-isthmic system in birds is an excellent model for further studying tectal modulation and possibly winner-take-all mechanisms.

Effects of glutamatergic, cholinergic and gabaergic antagonists on tectal cells in toads

The present paper using microiontophoresis analysis describes transmitters and their receptor subtypes used in retinotectal and isthmotectal transmission, and suggests several modes converging retinotectal and isthmotectal afferents on tectal neurons in toads (Bufo bufo gargarizans). Neuronal responses of tectal cells were extracellularly recorded to both visual stimulation and electrical stimulation of the nucleus isthmi, and effects of glutamatergic, cholinergic, GABAergic and glycinergic antagonists on these responses examined. Visual responses in 80% of tectal cells were reversibly blocked by the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist 3-Rs-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl-propyl-1-phosphonic acid, and those of the remaining 20% of cells by the muscarinic antagonist atropine, suggesting that there may be at least two kinds of retinotectal synapse that use glutamate and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, and acetylcholine and muscarinic receptors, respectively. Electrical stimulation of the nucleus isthmi elicited excitatory responses in 67% of tectal cells, excitatory-inhibitory responses in 16% of cells, and inhibitory responses in 17% of cells examined. The excitatory responses were reversibly abolished by atropine, but not affected by either 3-Rs-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl-propyl-1-phosphonic acid or the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, whereas the inhibitory responses were released by the GABA receptor A antagonist bicuculline, but not influenced by the GABA receptor B antagonist 2-hydroxysaclofen and glycinergic antagonist strychnine. Excitatory and inhibitory components in the excitatory-inhibitory responses were blocked by atropine and bicuculline, respectively. It appears that glutamatergic and cholinergic afferents from the retina, and cholinergic and GABAergic afferents from the nucleus isthmi may converge on tectal neurons in at least five modes of synaptic connections, in agreement with the heterogeneous populations of tectal cells in amphibians.

Glutamate-like immunoreactivity in chick cerebellum and optic tectum

Glutamate was coupled via glutaraldehyde to bovine serum albumin. The conjugate was used for raising specific anti-glutamate antibodies. The purified antibody was used for immunostaining of chick cerebellum and optic tectum. Staining was intense in the molecular layer and in cell bodies of the granule cell layer. In the optic tectum a diffuse staining was detected in the superficial layers of stratum griseum fibrosum superficiale and in cell bodies especially in the layers a and e. Large cell bodies located in the stratum griseum centrale were also stained.

Localization of L-glutamate binding sites in chick brain by quantitative autoradiography

Quantitative autoradiography was used for the localization of L-[3H]glutamate binding sites in chick brain. The highest concentration of these sites was observed in the molecular layer of cerebellum. High concentrations were also observed in the hippocampus, area parahippocampalis, neostriatum, neostriatum intermedium and hyperstriatum ventrale. In most areas binding of L-[3H]glutamate was increased when incubation was done in chloride-containing medium. This increase was statistically significant in only few of these areas.

Substance P-immunoreactivity in the developing human retinogeniculate pathway

Substance P has been immunohistochemically localized in the human optic nerves and lateral geniculate nuclei during the prenatal period from 13-14 to 37 weeks of gestation. Substance P-immunoreactive fibres were present in the optic nerves and lateral geniculate nuclei in all these ages thereby providing direct evidence of this undecapeptide being associated with the retinogeniculate pathway. At 16-17 weeks, greater numbers of fibres were observed than in the later ages. It is likely that the reduction in number of optic nerve fibres seen quantitatively during prenatal life may partly be due to the loss of substance P fibres.

In vitro release of endogenous beta-alanine, GABA, and glutamate, and electrophysiological effect of beta-alanine in pigeon optic tectum

The efflux of 20 amino acids, induced by either high K+ concentration or veratrine, was determined in pigeon tectal slices. Ca2+-dependent, K+-induced release of beta-alanine, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and glutamate was observed. Veratrine caused release of the same amino acids plus glycine in a tetrodotoxin-sensitive manner. beta-Alanine had a strong inhibitory effect on the activity of tectal neurons which was blocked by strychnine but not by bicuculline. The results indicated a transmitter function for beta-alanine in the optic tectum, and were consistent with the previously proposed transmitter role of GABA and glutamate in this structure.

Enkephalin-mediated basal ganglia influences over the optic tectum: immunohistochemistry of the tectum and the lateral spiriform nucleus in pigeon

By using immunohistochemical techniques with antisera directed against either leucine-enkephalin or methionine-enkephalin (generously supplied by K.-J. Chang), four distinct bands of fibers with enkephalinlike immunoreactivity were demonstrated in the pigeon tectum: (1) a thin band of thick fibers and tightly clustered bulbous swellings in layer 3, (2) a broader band of fibers with less tightly clustered bulbous swellings in layer 5, (3) a broad band of numerous obliquely and radially oriented fibers that spanned layers 8-13, and (4) a band of sinuous fibers in layer 15. In addition, numerous enkephalinergic cell bodies with radially ascending processes were seen in layers 8-10. Since the neurons of the avian lateral spiriform nucleus (SpL) of the pretectum are known to contain enkephalin (Davis et al., '80; De Lanerolle et al., '81) and project to the tectum (Brecha et al., '76; Reiner et al., '82), unilateral electrolytic lesions were made of SpL. In birds with unilateral lesions of SpL, layers 8-13 of the ipsilateral tectum were nearly devoid of enkephalinergic fibers, but no alterations were seen in layers 3, 5, and 15. Since no other neurons in the vicinity of SpL are enkephalinergic and project to the tectum, the loss of enkephalin-immunoreactive fibers in the ipsilateral tectal layers 8-13 is attributable to the destruction of SpL. Although the source of the enkephalinergic fibers in tectal layers 3, 5, and 15 is unclear, part of the enkephalin pattern in layers 3 and 5 may derive from the ascending processes of the enkephalinergic neurons of layer 8-10. The present results indicate that SpL has an enkephalinergic projection to layers 8-13 of the ipsilateral tectum. The avian SpL receives its major input from the ascending processes of the enkephalinergic neurons of layers 8-10, nuclei that themselves receive major basal ganglia inputs (Reiner et al., '82) and projects to the tectal layers 8-13 (Reiner et al., '82), the layers of origin of the major tectal efferent projections (Reiner and Karten, '82). The enkephalinergic fibers in layers 8-13 may, thus, have some influence upon the motor output functions of the avian tectum.

The topographical distribution of alanine, aspartate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, glutamine, and glycine in the pigeon optic tectum and the effect of retinal ablation

The concentrations of alanine, aspartate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamine, glutamate, and glycine were measured in the pigeon optic nerve and in the individual tectal layers. Characteristic topographical distribution patterns were observed for the different amino acids. After unilateral retinal ablation, the concentration of aspartate and glutamate was decreased in the nerve and contralateral tectum. The reduction was restricted to the superficial part of the tectum, which receives a direct retinal input. The maximal loss was measured in the first two layers, where aspartate was reduced by 51% and glutamate by 75% in comparison with the ipsilateral side 4 weeks after ablation. The results favor a special role for aspartate and glutamate in pigeon retino-tectal afferents.

The nature of the excitatory transmitter mediating X and Y cell inputs to the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus

1. In experiments examining the possibility that an excitatory amino acid may be an optic nerve transmitter in mammals, excitatory amino acid antagonists have been ionophoretically applied to cells in layers A and A(1) of the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus and their effect on the excitatory response to visual stimulation of the receptive field centre has been assessed.2. The antagonists used were D-alpha-aminoadipate (D-alpha-AA), DL-alpha-epsilon-diaminopimelic acid (DAP), 1-hydroxy-3-amino-2-pyrrolidone (HA-966) and L-glutamate diethyl ester (GDEE). The antagonist effects on the visual response were compared with their effect on similar magnitude responses evoked by ionophoretic pulses of selected agonists and a control excitant, generally acetylcholine.3. Both D-alpha-AA and HA-966 would selectively block or depress the visual response with respect to the response to the control excitant. At the stage the visual input was blocked, responses to the agonists N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), DL-homocysteic acid (DLH) and glutamate were also greatly reduced or blocked. At dose levels below those causing a significant reduction in the visual response, D-alpha-AA and HA-966 would selectively depress responses to NMDA and DLH with respect to the response to glutamate.4. GDEE was relatively ineffective in blocking either agonist responses or the visual response and only produced a significant reduction in either at dose levels that caused a similar depression in the response to acetylcholine. DAP would block responses to DLH but produced no significant effect on the visual response or the responses to glutamate and acetylcholine.5. The cholinergic antagonists atropine and dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE) blocked responses to acetylcholine without significantly reducing either visual driving or the response to DLH.6. The effects were the same for X and Y cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN). There was also no distinctions between ;on' and ;off' centre types of each of the two groups.7. The significance of these results is discussed. It is argued that they reintroduce the possibility that either L-aspartate, L-glutamate or a similar substance may be the transmitter mediating the optic nerve input to the cat dLGN.

Kainate-induced lesion in the optic tectum: dependency upon optic nerve afferents or glutamate

Kainic acid is known to induce characteristic lesions in neurons receiving an intact input with presumed glutamate-mediated neurotransmission. There are indications for glutamate as a transmitter of retinal afferent terminals in the pigeon optic tectum. After tectal injection of kainic acid (0.5-2.0 microgram in 0.5 microliter) the optic tectum was studied by light and electron microscopy and the following changes were observed: (a) within 1-48 h important neuropil vacuolization predominantly in lower part of layer 5. Such vacuoles were sometimes postsynaptic to identified retinal afferent terminals: (b) within 1 h to 21 days progressive neuronal cell loss throughout the tectal layers. These toxic effects were not observed 2-12 weeks after contralateral retinal ablation but could partially be restored by combined glutamate (0.2 mg) and kainate injection. Thus in the pigeon tectum, kainic acid neurotoxicity is dependent upon an intact retinal input, a finding consistent with a special role for glutamate - possibly as a transmitter - in retinal terminals.