Pericruciate cortex unit activity during intentional movement. Effect of subcortical electrical stimulation

Primary motor cortex influences on the descending and ascending systems

The motor cortex plays a crucial role in the co-ordination of movement and posture. This is possible because the pyramidal tract fibres have access both directly and through collateral branches to structures governing eye, head, neck trunk and limb musculature. Pyramidal tract axons also directly reach the dorsal laminae of the spinal cord and the dorsal column nuclei, thus aiding in the selection of the sensory ascendant transmission. No other neurones in the brain besides pyramidal tract cells have such a wide access to different structures within the central nervous system. The majority of the pyramidal tract fibres that originate in the motor cortex and that send collateral branches to multiple supraspinal structures do not reach the spinal cord. Also, the great majority of the corticospinal neurones that emit multiple intracraneal collateral branches terminate at the cervical spinal cord level. The pyramidal tract fibres directed to the dorsal column nuclei that send collateral branches to supraspinal structures also show a clear tendency to terminate at supraspinal and cervical cord levels. These facts suggest that a substantial co-ordination between descending and ascending pathways might be produced by the same motor cortex axons at both supraspinal and cervical spinal cord sites. This may imply that the motor cortex co-ordination will be mostly directed to motor responses involving eye-neck-forelimb muscle synergies. The review makes special emphasis in the available evidence pointing to the role of the motor cortex in co-ordinating the activities of both descending and ascending pathways related to somatomotor integration and control. The motor cortex may function to co-operatively select a unique motor command by selectively filter sensory information and by co-ordinating the activities of the descending systems related to the control of distal and proximal muscles.

The distribution of corticocortical, thalamocortical, and callosal inputs on identified motor cortex output neurons: mechanisms for their selective recruitment

Motor cortex neurons were identified antidromically in anesthetized cats by their axonal projections to one of six targets: (1) somatosensory cortex, (2) opposite motor cortex, (3) red nucleus, (4) lateral reticular nucleus, (5) spinal cord, and (6) ventrolateral thalamus. Three inputs to motor cortex were tested for their influences on the identified cortical efferent neurons. The tested inputs originated from ipsilateral somatosensory cortex, opposite motor cortex, and ventral thalamus. Subthreshold effects of input pathways were detected by monitoring latency variations of antidromic responses. The three afferent sources, when activated by electrical stimulation, were not equally effective on motor cortex neurons. Ipsilateral corticocortical and thalamocortical excitation were found for the majority of neurons; the influenced proportions ranged from 55% to 100%, according to the target of the output neurons. Effects from the opposite hemisphere were found for only 5% to 30% of the neurons in the same projection classes. Many neurons (36 of 81, or 44%) were excited from more than one source, but few (5 of 37, or 14%) were influenced by all three possible sources of input, even in small regions of cortex innervated by all three of the inputs. Among 19 electrode tracks where all three inputs were present, there were only 2 tracks where all the neurons shared the same combination of inputs. Even for neurons in closest anatomical proximity ("clusters"), it was unusual (only 7 of 25 clusters) for all the neurons to have the same input pattern. Among the seven clusters where all the neurons shared the same input pattern, five of the clusters projected to the same target. These variable combinations of inputs to motor cortex neurons support the conclusion that efferent neurons could be recruited selectively from separate cortical layers or from within clusters of nearby neurons, according to the target of their axonal projection.

Neuronal responses related to reinforcement in the primate basal forebrain

In the present study neurones recorded in the substantia innominata, the diagonal band of Broca and a periventricular region of the basal forebrain responded differentially to stimuli signalling the availability of fruit juice or saline obtained by making lick responses in two different visual discrimination tasks. The activity of certain neurones reflected the rewarding nature of stimuli used to signal the availability of juice in the tasks, responding to the sight and delivery of both foods and syringes used to deliver juice in tests in which behavioural responses were irrelevant. The activity of other neurones reflected aversion, responding to task stimuli signalling availability of saline and to syringes used to deliver saline to the mouth. In another task an auditory cue that signalled the availability of juice elicited neuronal responses. These neurones also responded to a tone cue used to signal the onset of the trial, and during certain mouth and arm movements which the monkey used to obtain reinforcement. The responses of these differential neurones were similar in most respects in all 3 regions of the basal forebrain. Thus these neurones respond to a range of visual and auditory stimuli that monkeys have learned can be used to obtain reinforcement, but not on the basis of sensory properties such as shape or colour of the stimuli. We conclude that the reinforcement-related nature of the neuronal signal from the basal forebrain could be used to facilitate processing in cortical regions, optimising the functioning of sensory, motor and association cortices, thus increasing the probability of responding appropriately to learned environmental contingencies. We suggest that the properties of these neurones are due to afferent inputs from ventromedial regions of the prefrontal and temporal cortices and amygdala.