Baclofen attenuates hyperpolarizing not depolarizing responses of caudate neurons in cat

Glutamate and GABA receptors and transporters in the basal ganglia: what does their subsynaptic localization reveal about their function?

GABA and glutamate, the main transmitters in the basal ganglia, exert their effects through ionotropic and metabotropic receptors. The dynamic activation of these receptors in response to released neurotransmitter depends, among other factors, on their precise localization in relation to corresponding synapses. The use of high resolution quantitative electron microscope immunocytochemical techniques has provided in-depth description of the subcellular and subsynaptic localization of these receptors in the CNS. In this article, we review recent findings on the ultrastructural localization of GABA and glutamate receptors and transporters in monkey and rat basal ganglia, at synaptic, extrasynaptic and presynaptic sites. The anatomical evidence supports numerous potential locations for receptor-neurotransmitter interactions, and raises important questions regarding mechanisms of activation and function of synaptic versus extrasynaptic receptors in the basal ganglia.

An electron microscope immunocytochemical study of GABA(B) R2 receptors in the monkey basal ganglia: a comparative analysis with GABA(B) R1 receptor distribution

Functional gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(B) receptors are heterodimers made up of GABA(B) R1 and GABA(B) R2 subunits. The subcellular localization of GABA(B) R2 receptors remains poorly known in the central nervous system. Therefore, we performed an ultrastructural analysis of the localization of GABA(B) R2 receptor immunoreactivity in the monkey basal ganglia. Furthermore, to characterize better the neuronal sites at which GABA(B) R1 and GABA(B) R2 may interact to form functional receptors, we compared the relative distribution of immunoreactivity of the two GABA(B) receptors in various basal ganglia nuclei. Light to moderate GABA(B) R2 immunoreactivity was found in cell bodies and neuropil elements in all basal ganglia nuclei. At the electron microscope level, GABA(B) R2 immunoreactivity was commonly expressed postsynaptically, although immunoreactive preterminal axonal segments were also frequently encountered, particularly in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra, where they accounted for the third of the total number of GABA(B) R2-containing elements. A few labeled terminals that displayed the ultrastructural features of glutamatergic boutons were occasionally found in most basal ganglia nuclei, except for the subthalamic nucleus, which was devoid of GABA(B) R2-immunoreactive boutons. The relative distribution of GABA(B) R2 immunoreactivity in the monkey basal ganglia was largely consistent with that of GABA(B) R1, but some exceptions were found, most noticeably in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra, which contained a significantly larger proportion of presynaptic elements labeled for GABA(B) R1 than GABA(B) R2. These findings suggest the possible coexistence and heterodimerization of GABA(B) R1 and GABA(B) R2 at various pre- and postsynaptic sites, but also raise the possibility that the formation of functional GABA(B) receptors in specific compartments of basal ganglia neurons relies on mechanisms other than GABA(B) R1/R2 heterodimerization.

Ionotropic and metabotropic GABA and glutamate receptors in primate basal ganglia

The functions of glutamate and GABA in the CNS are mediated by ionotropic and metabotropic, G protein-coupled, receptors. Both receptor families are widely expressed in basal ganglia structures in primates and nonprimates. The recent development of highly specific antibodies and/or cDNA probes allowed the better characterization of the cellular localization of various GABA and glutamate receptor subtypes in the primate basal ganglia. Furthermore, the use of high resolution immunogold techniques at the electron microscopic level led to major breakthroughs in our understanding of the subsynaptic and subcellular localization of these receptors in primates. In this review, we will provide a detailed account of the current knowledge of the localization of these receptors in the basal ganglia of humans and monkeys.

GABA(B) and group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in the striatopallidal complex in primates

Glutamate and GABA neurotransmission is mediated through various types of ionotropic and metabotropic receptors. In this review, we summarise some of our recent findings on the subcellular and subsynaptic localisation of GABA(B) and group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in the striatopallidal complex of monkeys. Polyclonal antibodies that specifically recognise GABA(B)R1, mGluR1a and mGluR5 receptor subtypes were used for immunoperoxidase and pre-embedding immunogold techniques at the light and electron microscope levels. Both subtypes of group I mGluRs were expressed postsynaptically in striatal projection neurons and interneurons where they aggregate perisynaptically at asymmetric glutamatergic synapses and symmetric dopaminergic synaptic junctions. Moreover, they are also strongly expressed in the main body of symmetric synapses established by putative intrastriatal GABAergic terminals. In the globus pallidus, both receptor subtypes are found postsynaptically in the core of striatopallidal GABAergic synapses and perisynaptically at subthalamopallidal glutamatergic synapses. Finally, extrasynaptic labelling was commonly seen in the globus pallidus and the striatum. Moderate to intense GABA(B)R1 immunoreactivity was observed in the striatopallidal complex. At the electron microscope level, GABA(B)R1 immunostaining was commonly found in neuronal cell bodies and dendrites. Many striatal dendritic spines also displayed GABA(B)R1 immunoreactivity. Moreover, GABA(B)R1-immunoreactive axons and axon terminals were frequently encountered. In the striatum, GABA(B)R1-immunoreactive boutons resembled terminals of cortical origin, while in the globus pallidus, subthalamic-like terminals were labelled. Pre-embedding immunogold data showed that postsynaptic GABA(B)R1 receptors are concentrated at extrasynaptic sites on dendrites, spines and somata in the striatopallidal complex, perisynaptically at asymmetric synapses and in the main body of symmetric striatopallidal synapses in the GPe and GPi. Consistent with the immunoperoxidase data, immunoparticles were found in the presynaptic grid of asymmetric synapses established by cortical- and subthalamic-like glutamatergic terminals. These findings indicate that both GABA and glutamate metabotropic receptors are located to subserve various modulatory functions of the synaptic transmission in the primate striatopallidal complex. Furthermore, their pattern of localisation raises issues about their roles and mechanisms of activation in normal and pathological conditions. Because of their 'modulatory' functions, these receptors are ideal targets for chronic drug therapies in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease.

Pre- and postsynaptic localization of GABA(B) receptors in the basal ganglia in monkeys

GABAergic neurotransmission involves ionotropic GABA(A) and metabotropic GABA(B) receptor subtypes. Although fast inhibitory transmission through GABA(A) receptors activation is commonly found in the basal ganglia, the functions as well as the cellular and subcellular localization of GABA(B) receptors are still poorly known. Polyclonal antibodies that specifically recognize the GABA(B)R1 receptor subunit were produced and used for immunocytochemical localization of these receptors at the light and electron microscope levels in the monkey basal ganglia. Western blot analysis of monkey brain homogenates revealed that these antibodies reacted specifically with two native proteins corresponding to the size of the two splice variants GABA(B)R1a and GABA(B)R1b. Preadsorption of the purified antiserum with synthetic peptides demonstrated that these antibodies recognize specifically GABA(B)R1 receptors with no cross-reactivity with GABA(B)R2 receptors. Overall, the distribution of GABA(B)R1 immunoreactivity throughout the monkey brain correlates with previous GABA(B) ligand binding studies and in situ hybridization data as well as with recent immunocytochemical studies in rodents. GABA(B)R1-immunoreactive cell bodies were found in all basal ganglia nuclei but the intensity of immunostaining varied among neuronal populations in each nucleus. In the striatum, interneurons were more strongly stained than medium-sized projection neurons while in the substantia nigra, dopaminergic neurons of the pars compacta were much more intensely labeled than GABAergic neurons of the pars reticulata. In the subthalamic nucleus, clear immunonegative neuronal perikarya were intermingled with numerous GABA(B)R1-immunoreactive cells. Moderate GABA(B)R1 immunoreactivity was observed in neuronal perikarya and dendritic processes throughout the external and internal pallidal segments. At the electron microscope level, GABA(B)R1 immunoreactivity was commonly found in neuronal cell bodies and dendrites in every basal ganglia nuclei. Many dendritic spines also displayed GABA(B)R1 immunoreactivity in the striatum. In addition to strong postsynaptic labeling, GABA(B)R1-immunoreactive preterminal axonal segments and axon terminals were frequently encountered throughout the basal ganglia components. The majority of labeled terminals displayed the ultrastructural features of glutamatergic boutons and formed asymmetric synapses. In the striatum, GABA(B)R1-containing boutons resembled terminals of cortical origin, while in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra, subthalamic-like terminals were labeled. Overall, these findings demonstrate that GABA(B) receptors are widely distributed and located to subserve both pre- and postsynaptic roles in controlling synaptic transmission in the primate basal ganglia.

Intracellular response of neurons of the caudate nucleus and putamen to intrastriatal stimulation in cat

The purpose of this research was to determine if the different functional areas of the striatum, as defined by corticostriate connections, have excitatory and/or inhibitory interconnections. In cats anesthetized with barbiturates, an intracellular recording electrode was angled at 45 degrees such that it (1) crossed all functional areas of the striatum in a single pass and (2) traversed perpendicular to intrastriatal axonal bundles and their terminal fields. > 95% of the neurons recorded intracellularly in the head of the caudate (Cd) nucleus responded to stimulation of the rostromedial striatum (limbic area) producing an initial excitatory response in all cases. Membrane hyperpolarization and inhibition followed the initial excitatory response in approximately half of the responsive neurons. As the recording electrode approached the stimulating electrode, latencies to response onset decreased and amplitudes of the initial excitatory responses increased. Stimulation of a single site produced responses in neurons found in all functional areas of the Cd nucleus. Based on the known topography of afferents to the striatum, these results cannot be explained by stimulation of fibers en passant. Therefore, we conclude that the limbic striatum is connected to other functional areas of the Cd nucleus by intrinsic excitatory and inhibitory circuits. We speculate that intrinsic circuits are a hidden layer of organization providing connectional plasticity by which the influence of an input on striatal neurons may be expanded or contracted beyond the anatomical limits of the afferent terminal field.

GABAA and GABAB receptors differentially regulate striatal acetylcholine release in vivo

Microdialysis was used to study the effects of selective GABAergic agents on striatal acetylcholine (ACh) release in awake, freely moving rats. Local perfusion with the GABAA agonist muscimol dramatically reduced striatal ACh release, while the GABAB agonist baclofen caused only minor decreases in ACh release. Co-perfusion with the GABAA antagonist bicuculline diminished the muscimol-induced decrease in ACh release. Likewise, co-perfusion with the GABAB antagonist 2-hydroxysaclofen attenuated the baclofen-induced reduction in ACh release. Bicuculline alone markedly increased striatal ACh release, but 2-hydroxysaclofen by itself had no effect. These results suggest that GABA tonically regulates striatal ACh release primarily through stimulation of inhibitory GABAA receptors.

Intracellular response of caudate neurons to variable frequency stimulation of motor cortical areas in dog

The intracellular response to electrical stimulation of motor cortex was studied in 77 neurons recorded in the head of the caudate (Cd) nucleus of dog. Single pulse stimulation of either medial, intermediate or lateral precruciate cortex produced a response in 69 neurons, 59% of which responded to more than one cortical area. Most intracellular responses were complex potentials consisting of an initial depolarization (E) followed by a longer duration hyperpolarization (I) or E-I response complex. When stimulated with trains of low frequency pulses (10 Hz), the stimulus-generated I potentials reduced the absolute amplitude of the evoked E's, often to a level below resting potential. However, at higher frequencies (50 Hz), the I potentials were attenuated and the E potentials summated into a prolonged depolarization lasting the duration of the stimulus train. A computer model of the response to multiple stimuli was generated assuming that the E-I response to each stimulus pulse in the train should temporally summate with previous responses. As the frequency of stimulation was increased, this model consistently predicted greater summation of the I potentials than was experimentally observed. These data suggest that inhibition of Cd neurons is input frequency dependent such that as the frequency of cortical input increases there is a decrease of input-generated inhibition of Cd neurons. Thus, inhibition may modulate the response of Cd neurons such that cortical input must reach a critical firing frequency before being relayed through the Cd nucleus.

Electrophysiological characterization of potent agonists and antagonists at pre- and postsynaptic GABAB receptors on neurones in rat brain slices

1. Intracellular recordings were made from neurons in striatum (caudate-putamen) and substantia nigra pars compacta in rat brain slices. Three GABAB agonists, baclofen, 3-aminopropylphosphinic acid (3-APPA) and 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acid (SK&F 97541), depressed excitatory postsynaptic potentials (e.p.s.ps) mediated by glutamate in the striatum, and hyperpolarized neurones in the substantia nigra. The ability of 3-aminopropyl(diethyoxymethyl)phosphinic acid (CGP 35348), 3-aminopropyl (hexyl)phosphinic acid (3-APHPA) and phaclofen to antagonize these responses was assessed. 2. Striatal e.p.s.ps, studied in the presence of bicuculline (30 microns), were reduced in amplitude by 92% with 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX; 30 microns). These e.p.s.ps were depressed by up to 95% by SK&F 97541 and baclofen with EC50s of 0.092 microns and 1.25 microns respectively. The maximal effect of 3-APPA was 67% with an EC50 of 0.83 microns. Agonist concentration-effect data fitted a single-site logistic model. GABAB agonists were without effect on striatal neurone membrane potential, input resistance or depolarizations induced by applied glutamate. 3. The depression of striatal e.p.s.ps by SK&F 97541 was reversibly antagonized by CGP 35348, 3-APHPA and phaclofen with estimated equilibrium dissociation constants (KB) of 11.2 +/- 1.7 microns (n = 4), 13.3 +/- 0.4 microM (n = 3) and 405 +/- 43 microM (n = 3) respectively. CGP 35348 and 3-APHPA appeared to act competitively (Schild plot slopes of 0.99 and 1.01 respectively). 4. Nigral neurones were hyperpolarized by up to 25 mV by SK&F 97541 and baclofen with EC50s of 0.15 microns and 3.6 microns respectively. The maximum hyperpolarization by 3-APPA was only 84% that of the other agonists, with an EC50 of 9.0 microM. Agonist concentration-effect data fitted a single-site logistic model. 5. The SK&F 97541-induced hyperpolarization was reversibly antagonized by CGP 35348, 3-APHPA and phaclofen with estimated KBS of 17.6 + 4.4 (n = 3), 14.0 + 1.5 (n = 4), and >400 microM (n = 1) respectively. CGP 35348 appeared competitive (Schild plot slope of 0.99). Antagonists were also tested with baclofen as agonist, yielding similar KB estimates as for SK&F 97541. 6. It is concluded that at both the presynaptic and postsynaptic sites examined, SK&F 97541 was about 10 fold more potent than baclofen or 3-APPA. The antagonists CGP 35348 and 3-APHPA (KB 1O-20 microM) were about 20 fold more potent than phaclofen. The similarities in relative agonist potency and estimated antagonist affinity between these two functionally distinct GABAB receptors renders them pharmacologically indistinguishable at present.

Distribution and kinetics of GABAB binding sites in rat central nervous system: a quantitative autoradiographic study

[3H]GABA quantitative autoradiography was used to examine the binding kinetics and regional distribution of GABAB receptors in rat brain. The regional distribution was compared to that of GABAA receptors. At 4 degrees C, [3H]GABA binding to GABAB receptors reached equilibrium within 45 min. The association and dissociation rate constants for GABAB binding to outer neocortical layers were 2.87 +/- 0.17 X 10(5) min-1 M-1 and 0.0966 +/- 0.0118 min-1, respectively, indicating a dissociation constant of 336 +/- 40 nM. Saturation binding studies in the same region yielded a dissociation constant for GABAB receptors of 341 +/- 41 nM while that of GABAA receptors was 92 +/- 10 nM. While the affinities of each type of GABA receptor were uniform across brain regions, the maximal number of binding sites for both types of GABA receptor varied across regions. The distributions of the two receptors in rat brain were different in the olfactory bulb, cerebellum, thalamus, neocortex, medial habenula and interpeduncular nucleus. Areas high in GABAB binding included the medial and lateral geniculates, the superior colliculus and certain amygdaloid nuclei. Binding to white matter tracts and ventricles was negligible. The distribution of GABAB receptors was in agreement with previously postulated sites of action of baclofen.