Electrophysiological analysis of the tecto-olivo-cerebellar (crus II) projection in the rat

Disynaptic Inhibitory Cerebellar Control Over Caudal Medial Accessory Olive

The olivocerebellar system, which is critical for sensorimotor performance and learning, functions through modules with feedback loops. The main feedback to the inferior olive comes from the cerebellar nuclei (CN), which are predominantly GABAergic and contralateral. However, for the subnucleus d of the caudomedial accessory olive (cdMAO), a crucial region for oculomotor and upper body movements, the source of GABAergic input has yet to be identified. Here, we demonstrate the existence of a disynaptic inhibitory projection from the medial CN (MCN) to the cdMAO via the superior colliculus (SC) by exploiting retrograde, anterograde, and transsynaptic viral tracing at the light microscopic level as well as anterograde classical and viral tracing combined with immunocytochemistry at the electron microscopic level. Retrograde tracing in Gad2-Cre mice reveals that the cdMAO receives GABAergic input from the contralateral SC. Anterograde transsynaptic tracing uncovered that the SC neurons receiving input from the contralateral MCN provide predominantly inhibitory projections to contralateral cdMAO, ipsilateral to the MCN. Following ultrastructural analysis of the monosynaptic projection about half of the SC terminals within the contralateral cdMAO are GABAergic. The disynaptic GABAergic projection from the MCN to the ipsilateral cdMAO mirrors that of the monosynaptic excitatory projection from the MCN to the contralateral cdMAO. Thus, while completing the map of inhibitory inputs to the olivary subnuclei, we established that the MCN inhibits the cdMAO via the contralateral SC, highlighting a potential push-pull mechanism in directional gaze control that appears unique in terms of laterality and polarity among olivocerebellar modules.

An internal model architecture for novelty detection: implications for cerebellar and collicular roles in sensory processing

The cerebellum is thought to implement internal models for sensory prediction, but details of the underlying circuitry are currently obscure. We therefore investigated a specific example of internal-model based sensory prediction, namely detection of whisker contacts during whisking. Inputs from the vibrissae in rats can be affected by signals generated by whisker movement, a phenomenon also observable in whisking robots. Robot novelty-detection can be improved by adaptive noise-cancellation, in which an adaptive filter learns a forward model of the whisker plant that allows the sensory effects of whisking to be predicted and thus subtracted from the noisy sensory input. However, the forward model only uses information from an efference copy of the whisking commands. Here we show that the addition of sensory information from the whiskers allows the adaptive filter to learn a more complex internal model that performs more robustly than the forward model, particularly when the whisking-induced interference has a periodic structure. We then propose a neural equivalent of the circuitry required for adaptive novelty-detection in the robot, in which the role of the adaptive filter is carried out by the cerebellum, with the comparison of its output (an estimate of the self-induced interference) and the original vibrissal signal occurring in the superior colliculus, a structure noted for its central role in novelty detection. This proposal makes a specific prediction concerning the whisker-related functions of a region in cerebellar cortical zone A₂ that in rats receives climbing fibre input from the superior colliculus (via the inferior olive). This region has not been observed in non-whisking animals such as cats and primates, and its functional role in vibrissal processing has hitherto remained mysterious. Further investigation of this system may throw light on how cerebellar-based internal models could be used in broader sensory, motor and cognitive contexts.

Behavioural significance of cerebellar modules

A key organisational feature of the cerebellum is its division into a series of cerebellar modules. Each module is defined by its climbing input originating from a well-defined region of the inferior olive, which targets one or more longitudinal zones of Purkinje cells within the cerebellar cortex. In turn, Purkinje cells within each zone project to specific regions of the cerebellar and vestibular nuclei. While much is known about the neuronal wiring of individual cerebellar modules, their behavioural significance remains poorly understood. Here, we briefly review some recent data on the functional role of three different cerebellar modules: the vermal A module, the paravermal C2 module and the lateral D2 module. The available evidence suggests that these modules have some differences in function: the A module is concerned with balance and the postural base for voluntary movements, the C2 module is concerned more with limb control and the D2 module is involved in predicting target motion in visually guided movements. However, these are not likely to be the only functions of these modules and the A and C2 modules are also both concerned with eye and head movements, suggesting that individual cerebellar modules do not necessarily have distinct functions in motor control.

Purkinje cells in the lateral cerebellum of the cat encode visual events and target motion during visually guided reaching

In this study the receipt of visual information by the lateral cerebellum and its contribution to a motor output was studied using single unit recording of cerebellar cortical neurones in cats trained to perform visually guided reaching. The activity of Purkinje cells and other cortical neurones in the lateral cerebellum was investigated in relation to various aspects of the task, such as visual events, parameters of target movement, and limb and eye movements. Two-thirds (66%) of Purkinje cells tested could signal simple visual events, such as a flash of light. Neurones were also capable of detecting other less potent, but behaviourally important visual events, such as a 'GO' signal (LED brightening). Half of the cells tested were responsive to the on-going motion of the visual target, displaying tonically altered discharge rates for as long as it was moving, and a 'preferred' target velocity. A small proportion of cells showed short latency visual modulation that persisted during the forelimb reach. Anatomical tracing studies confirmed that the recordings were obtained from the D1 zone of crus I. In summary, cells in this region of lateral cerebellar cortex perform simple visual functions, such as event detection, but also more complex visual functions, such as encoding parameters of target motion, and their visual responsiveness is appropriate for a role in accurate visually guided reaching to a moving target.

Zonal organization of the climbing fiber projection to the flocculus and nodulus of the rabbit: a combined axonal tracing and acetylcholinesterase histochemical study

The localization and termination of olivocerebellar fibers in the flocculus and nodulus of the rabbit were studied with anterograde axonal transport methods [wheatgerm agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) and tritiated leucine] and correlated with the compartments in the white matter of these lobules delineated with acetylcholinesterase histochemistry (Tan et al. J. Comp. Neurol., 1995, this issue). Olivocerebellar fibers originating from the caudal dorsal cap travel through floccular compartments FC2 and FC4 to terminate as climbing fibers in floccular zones FZII and FZIV. Fibers from the rostral dorsal cap and the ventrolateral outgrowth traverse compartments FC1 and FC3, which are interleaved with compartments FC2 and FC4, and terminate in zones FZI and FZIII. Fibers from the rostral pole of the medial accessory olive traverse the C2 compartment and terminate in the C2 zone. FZI-III extend into the adjoining folium (folium p) of the ventral paraflocculus. The C2 zone continues across folium p into other folia of the ventral paraflocculus and into the dorsal paraflocculus. Four compartments and five zones were distinguished in the nodulus. Medial compartment XC1 contains olivocerebellar fibers from the caudal dorsal cap and subnucleus beta that terminate in the XZI zone. Olivocerebellar fibers from the rostral dorsal cap and the ventrolateral outgrowth occupy XC2 and terminate in XZII. The XC4 compartment contains fibers from both the caudal dorsal cap and from the rostral dorsal cap and the ventrolateral outgrowth. The latter terminate in a central portion of the XZIV zone. The dorsomedial cell column projects to the XZIII zone, which is present only in the dorsal part of the nodulus. The rostral medial accessory olive projects to the XZV zone, which occupies the lateral border of the nodulus. These results confirm and extend the conclusions of Katayama and Nisimaru ([1988] Neurosci. Res. 5:424-438) on the zonal pattern in the olivo-nodular projection in the rabbit. Additional observations were made on the presence of a lateral A zone (Buisseret-Delmas [1988] Neurosci. Res. 5:475-493) in the hemisphere of lobules VI and VII. Retrograde labeling of the nucleo-olivary tract of Legendre and Courville ([1987] Neuroscience 21:877-891) was observed after WGA-HRP injections into the inferior olive including the rostral dorsal cap and the ventrolateral outgrowth. The anatomical and functional implications of these observations are discussed.

The tectorecipient zone in the inferior olivary nucleus in the rat

Tecto-olivary and olivocerebellar projections in the rat were investigated in order to identify the tectorecipient zone in the inferior olivary nucleus and to determine whether inferior olivary neurons projecting to the cerebellar tecto-olivo-recipient zones (lobule VII, crus II, lobulus simplex, and paramedian lobule) originate in the different regions within the tectorecipient zone. An electrophysiological method and an axonal transport technique of wheat-germ agglutinin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase were used. The tectorecipient zone was identified in the caudomedial region of the medial accessory olive. Neurons projecting to lobule VII originated in the caudomedial region of the tectorecipient zone, but those to crus II, lobulus simplex, and paramedian lobule originated in its rostrolateral region. These observations suggest that there are two independent tecto-olivo-cerebellar systems: 1) superior colliculus--the medial region of the tectorecipient zone--lobule VII--the caudomedial region of the fastigial nucleus; and 2) superior colliculus--the rostralateral region of the tectorecipient region--crus II, lobulus simplex, and paramedian lobule--the dorsolateral protuberance of the fastigial nucleus.

Cerebellotectal pathways in the macaque: implications for collicular generation of saccades

The cerebellum is thought to modulate saccadic activity in the primate in order to maintain targeting accuracy, and the cerebellotectal pathway has been posited to play a role in this modulation. However, anatomical descriptions of this pathway in primates are sketchy and conflicting. To determine whether the organization of the cerebellotectal projection in primates is similar to that found in other species, neuroanatomical tracer transport techniques were utilized in two species of macaque monkey to label cerebellotectal somata and fiber terminations. Two pathways were found. One, the fastigiotectal pathway, is derived from cells in the caudal fastigial nucleus and projects bilaterally to the rostral end of the intermediate gray layer. The other pathway is derived from cells in the posterior interposed nucleus and the adjacent posterior wing of the dentate nucleus, and it terminates contralaterally throughout the ventral half of the intermediate gray and the deep gray layers. Both of these pathways terminate within the layers of the superior colliculus containing premotor, saccade-related neurons, but the differences in the distribution of their terminals and cells of origin suggest that these two pathways have different functions. Furthermore, the pattern of connections of these two pathways indicates that they do not function as a traditional feedback circuit. We suggest that the cerebellotectal pathways may instead modulate collicular activity in a more complex manner. For example, it may provide signals necessary for corrective saccades or for maintaining spatial registry between the different sensory representations supplied to the superior colliculus and its presaccadic output, which is organized into a motor map.

Electrophysiological analysis of the trigemino-olivo-cerebellar (crura I and II, lobulus simplex) projection in the rat

In albino rats the whisker area was electrically stimulated while climbing fiber responses were surveyed in the cerebellar hemisphere on the ipsilateral side. They were identified both deep in the intercrural sulcus, and in the posterior superior fissure. Histological examination has revealed that the response areas extend longitudinally from the dorsal surface of crus II to the ventral surface of crus I in the intercrural sulcus, and from the rostral surface of crus I to the caudal surface of lobulus simplex in the posterior superior fissure. These are supposed to be transmitted through direct trigemino-olivary projections.

Electrophysiological analysis of the trigemino-tecto-olivo-cerebellar (crus II) projection in the rat

In albino rats the whisker area was electrically stimulated while climbing fiber responses were surveyed in the cerebellar cortex of the tecto-olivo-recipient zone in the medial region of crus II. Climbing fiber responses were evoked by the vibrissal stimulation only in the medial portion of the zone. Based both on lesion experiments of the superior colliculus and on recording multiunit potentials in the inferior olive it is suggested that the trigeminal climbing fiber responses are evoked via the superior colliculus.

Electrophysiological analysis of the tecto-olivo-cerebellar (lobulus simplex) projection in the rat

In albino rats the deep layers of the superior colliculus were stimulated, and climbing fiber responses of Purkinje cells were explored in the medial region of the lobulus simplex. They were identified in a strip (ca. 0.7-1.0 mm wide) in the most medial region of folium b. In the tectorecipient zone of the medial accessory olive antidromically evoked potentials from the lobulus simplex were recorded laterally to those from lobule VII. Evidence is presented that climbing fibers innervating the zone in the lobulus simplex are axon collaterals of the inferior olivary neurons which project to crus II.

Differential localization of inferior olivary neurons projecting to the tecto-olivo-recipient zones of lobule VII or crus II in the rat cerebellum

In albino rats antidromically evoked potentials by stimulation of the cerebellar cortices of lobule VII or crus II were surveyed in the tectorecipient zone of subnucleus c in the medial accessory olive. Those from lobule VII were localized in the medial region, while those from crus II in the lateral region of the tectorecipient zone. The results confirm the tecto-olivo-cerebellar (lobule VII and crus II) projections via different inferior olivary neurons.