Lesions of dorsolateral funiculi (DLF) do not affect the depressive effects of systemic morphine upon dorsal horn convergent neuronal activities related to pain in the rat

Blocking mu opioid receptors in the spinal cord prevents the analgesic action by subsequent systemic opioids

Systemically administered mu opioids may produce analgesia through inhibition of the ascending nociceptive transmission and activation of descending pathways. However, the relative importance of the spinal and supraspinal sites in the analgesic action of systemic opioids remains uncertain. It has been shown that systemic morphine can inhibit dorsal horn neurons independent of the descending system. In this study, we determined the extent to which spinal mu opioid receptors mediate the analgesic effect of systemic mu opioids. Rats were instrumented with an intrathecal catheter with the tip placed in the lumbar spinal cord. Nociception was measured by testing the paw withdrawal threshold in response to a noxious radiant heat or pressure stimulus. Surprisingly, intrathecal pretreatment with naloxone or H-D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTAP, a specific mu opioid receptor antagonist) completely blocked the inhibitory effect of intravenous morphine on mechanical nociception. Intrathecal naloxone or CTAP also abolished the effect of intravenous morphine on the withdrawal latency of the hindpaw, but not the forepaw, measured with a radiant heat stimulus. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of subcutaneous fentanyl on mechanical nociception was eliminated by CTAP injected intrathecally. Intrathecal CTAP similarly abolished the effect of subcutaneous fentanyl on thermal nociception of the hindpaw but not the forepaw. Therefore, this study provides new information that when spinal mu opioid receptors are blocked, subsequent systemic administration of mu opioids fails to produce an analgesic effect. This finding highlights the important role of mu opioid receptors in the spinal cord in the antinociceptive action of opioids.

The effects of sham and full spinalization on the systemic potency of mu- and kappa-opioids on spinal nociceptive reflexes in rats

1. Flexor withdrawal reflexes to noxious mechanical pinch stimuli were recorded as single motor unit activity in alpha-chloralose anaesthetized rats, by means of tungsten bipolar electrodes inserted percutaneously into hindlimb flexor muscles. The relative spinal and supraspinal contributions to mu- and kappa-opioid agonists in inhibiting these spinal reflexes, together with possible potency changes elicited by surgical trauma, were examined by comparing their relative potencies in spinally unoperated, sham spinalized and spinalized rats. 2. The noxious stimuli, which were of comparable intensity in the three groups, elicited similar mean firing rates of the motor units in all groups. This indicates that the excitability levels in the reflex pathway were not greatly affected by either sham or actual spinalization. 3. The mu-agonists morphine and fentanyl, and the kappa-agonist U-50,488H, inhibited the reflexes in a dose-dependent manner, when administered intravenously in a log2 cumulative dose regime. 4. The surgery of sham spinalization had little effect on the potency of morphine and fentanyl, whereas it doubled the potency of U-50,488. 5. Spinalization did not affect the potency of morphine. In contrast it decreased the potency of fentanyl 2-4 fold and that of U-50,488 approximately 6 fold. 6. The effects of all agonists were antagonized by naloxone. Dose-dependence studies indicating that antagonism of U-50,488H required about 5 times the dose of naloxone that antagonized morphine. 7. The data suggest that surgical trauma to the spinal column and/or dura mater triggers supraspinal mechanisms that significantly enhance the potency of kappa- but not mu-agonists. 8. It is concluded that most of the effects of systemic morphine on spinal reflexes are mediated, under all three conditions tested, by direct effects in the spinal cord. In contrast, the inhibition of reflexes by U-50,488H is mediated at both spinal and supraspinal levels, the latter being enhanced in the presence of surgical trauma. The differences between morphine and fentanyl remain unexplained.

Spinal vs. supraspinal actions of morphine on the rat tail-flick reflex

A controversy exists as to whether morphine attenuates spinal cord nociceptive transmission through a supraspinal site of action. The approach of examining the effects of morphine on spinal cord nociceptive transmission in the presence and absence of spinal cord conduction has led to conflicting conclusions. We have compared the effects of morphine on the rat tail-flick reflex (TFR) in lightly anaesthetized animals in the presence and absence of a spinal cord cold-block. Morphine, administered systemically, was found to be more potent in increasing the latency of the reflex when the spinal cord conduction was present. However, when low doses of morphine were injected intrathecally, morphine was more potent when spinal cord conduction was blocked. These data indicate that systematically administered morphine, at low doses, has a supraspinal site of action in prolonging the onset of the TFR. Conflicting results on this issue do not appear to be due to plasticity changes following spinal cord section or lesions, psychological stress in conscious animals or the presence of tonic bulbospinal inhibition.