Prevention by a purine analogue of kainate-induced neuropathology in rat hippocampus

Adenosine, neurodegeneration and neuroprotection

Protection against neuronal damage is a major objective of current research in areas such as stroke medicine, Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative conditions. Adenosine receptors are important modulators of cell survival, and thus agents targeting these receptors could be valuable therapeutic agents. Agonists at A(1) receptors and antagonists at A(2A) receptors are known to protect acutely against neuronal damage caused by toxins or ischemia-reperfusion, and these compounds can also protect against the cell damage inflicted by reactive oxygen species. Even endogenous adenosine may be neuroprotective, since its levels rise substantially in association with a period of ischemia-reperfusion. Unfortunately, there is growing evidence that the efficacy of adenosine receptor activation can be reduced by the concomitant activation of glutamate receptors responding to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), probably acting via the release of nitric oxide. Such problems will need to be resolved before adenosine receptor agonists can proceed far as neuroprotective agents. The use of receptor antagonists may prove a more valuable approach.

Effect of chronic gestational treatment with the adenosine A1 receptor agonist R-phenylisopropyladenosine on metabotropic glutamate receptors/phospholipase C pathway in maternal and fetal brain

Pregnant Wistar rats were orally treated with the adenosine receptor agonist R-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA) throughout the gestational period, and the status of the metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor/phospholipase C transduction pathway from maternal and fetal brain was analyzed. In mothers' brains, radioligand binding assays revealed a significant decrease in the Bmax value, without any significant alteration in Kd value. Similar results were observed in the steady-state level of mGlu(1) and mGlu(5) receptors assayed by Western blot, suggesting that both receptor subtypes were modulated by chronic R-PIA treatment. mRNA coding mGlu(1) or mGlu(5) receptors was not altered, suggesting a posttranscriptional modulation as a possible mechanism of the loss of mGlu(1) and mGlu(5) receptors at the membrane surface. Moreover, phospholipase C stimulated by (R,S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG), a selective agonist of group I mGlu receptors, was also significantly decreased after R-PIA treatment, suggesting a heterologous desensitization of group I mGlu/PLC pathway in maternal brain. Western blot and RT-PCR assays showed that neither alphaG(q/11) nor PLCbeta(1) was affected by R-PIA treatment. In fetal brain, no significant differences in mGlu receptors/PLC transduction pathway were observed after R-PIA treatment. These results suggest that chronic R-PIA intake during pregnancy modulates group I mGlu receptor signalling pathway in maternal brain, promoting a down-regulation of mGlu(1) and mGlu(5) receptors and a heterologous desensitization of the mGlu/PLC system.

Adenosine receptors and neurological disease: neuroprotection and neurodegeneration

Adenosine receptors modulate neuronal and synaptic function in a range of ways that may make them relevant to the occurrence, development and treatment of brain ischemic damage and degenerative disorders. A(1) adenosine receptors tend to suppress neural activity by a predominantly presynaptic action, while A(2A) adenosine receptors are more likely to promote transmitter release and postsynaptic depolarization. A variety of interactions have also been described in which adenosine A(1) or A(2) adenosine receptors can modify cellular responses to conventional neurotransmitters or receptor agonists such as glutamate, NMDA, nitric oxide and P2 purine receptors. Part of the role of adenosine receptors seems to be in the regulation of inflammatory processes that often occur in the aftermath of a major insult or disease process. All of the adenosine receptors can modulate the release of cytokines such as interleukins and tumor necrosis factor-alpha from immune-competent leukocytes and glia. When examined directly as modifiers of brain damage, A(1) adenosine receptor (AR) agonists, A(2A)AR agonists and antagonists, as well as A(3)AR antagonists, can protect against a range of insults, both in vitro and in vivo. Intriguingly, acute and chronic treatments with these ligands can often produce diametrically opposite effects on damage outcome, probably resulting from adaptational changes in receptor number or properties. In some cases molecular approaches have identified the involvement of ERK and GSK-3beta pathways in the protection from damage. Much evidence argues for a role of adenosine receptors in neurological disease. Receptor densities are altered in patients with Alzheimer's disease, while many studies have demonstrated effects of adenosine and its antagonists on synaptic plasticity in vitro, or on learning adequacy in vivo. The combined effects of adenosine on neuronal viability and inflammatory processes have also led to considerations of their roles in Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Huntington's disease and multiple sclerosis, as well as the brain damage associated with stroke. In addition to the potential pathological relevance of adenosine receptors, there are earnest attempts in progress to generate ligands that will target adenosine receptors as therapeutic agents to treat some of these disorders.

Functional interference between glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta and the transcription factor Nrf2 in protection against kainate-induced hippocampal cell death

Excitotoxicity mediated by glutamate receptors may underlay the pathology of several neurologic diseases. Considering that oxidative stress is central to excitotoxic damage, in this study we sought to analyze if the transcription factor Nrf2, guardian of redox homeostasis, might be targeted to prevent kainate-induced neuron death. Hippocampal slices from Nrf2 knockout mice exhibited increased oxidative stress and cell death compared to those of control mice in response to kainate, as determined with the redox sensitive probes 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H(2)DCFAC) and propidium iodide and lactate dehydrogenase release, respectively, therefore demonstrating a role of Nrf2 in antioxidant protection against excitotoxicity. In the hippocampus of mice intraperitoneally injected with kainate we observed a rapid activation of Akt, inhibition of GSK-3beta and translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus, but after 4 h Akt was inactive, GSK-3beta was active and Nrf2 was mostly cytosolic, therefore extending our previous studies which indicate that GSK-3beta excludes Nrf2 from the nucleus. Lithium, a GSK-3beta inhibitor, promoted Nrf2 transcriptional activity towards an Antioxidant-Response-Element (ARE) luciferase reporter and cooperated with sulforaphane (SFN) to induce this reporter and to increase the protein levels of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), coded by a representative ARE-containing gene. Conversely, ARE activation by SFN was attenuated by over-expression of active GSK-3beta. Finally, combined treatment with SFN and lithium attenuated oxidative stress and cell death in kainate-treated hippocampal slices of wild type mice but not Nrf2 null littermates. Our findings identify the axis GSK-3beta/Nrf2 as a pharmacological target in prevention of excitotoxic neuronal death.

Tryptophan, adenosine, neurodegeneration and neuroprotection

This review summarises the potential contributions of two groups of compounds to cerebral dysfunction and damage in metabolic disease. The kynurenines are oxidised metabolites of tryptophan, the kynurenine pathway being the major route for tryptophan catabolism in most tissues. The pathway includes quinolinic acid -- an agonist at N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, kynurenic acid -- an antagonist at glutamate and nicotinic receptors, and other redox active compounds that are able to generate free radicals under many physiological and pathological conditions. The pathway is activated in immune-competent cells, including glia in the central nervous system, and may contribute substantially to delayed neuronal damage following an infarct or metabolic insult. Adenosine is an ubiquitous purine that can protect neurons by suppressing excitatory neurotransmitter release, reducing calcium fluxes and inhibiting NMDA receptors. The extent of brain injury is critically dependent on the balance between the two opposing forces of kynurenines and purines.

Protective effect of adenosine reuptake inhibitors in haloperidol-induced orofacial dyskinesia and associated behavioural, biochemical and neurochemical changes

Chronic administration of typical neuroleptics is known to cause persistent oral dyskinesia in rats, an alleged animal model of tardive dyskinesia (TD). The pathophysiology of the syndrome remains unclear. Adenosine is now widely accepted as the major inhibitory neuromodulators in the central nervous system besides gamma-aminobutyric acid. Based on the hypothesis that adenosinergic receptor system may involve in the pathogenesis of TD, we investigated the effect of dipyridamole (5 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.), an adenosine reuptake inhibitor and nimodipine (10 and 20 mg/kg, i.p.) an adenosine transport inhibitor in haloperidol-induced TD by using different behavioural, biochemical and neurochemical parameters in rats. Chronic administration of haloperidol (1 mg/kg, i.p., for 21 days) significantly increased vacuous chewing movements, tongue protrusion, facial jerking which was prevented by adenosine reuptake inhibitors. Chronic administration of haloperidol also resulted in the development of dopamine sensitivity as suggested by increased locomotor activity and stereotypy and decreased % retention time on elevated plus maze paradigm. Pretreatment with adenosine reuptake/transport inhibitors, dipyridamole and nimodipine prevented all these behavioural changes. Chronic administration of haloperidol also resulted in increased oxidative damage in all brain regions which was prevented dose-dependently by both dipyridamole and nimodipine in different brain regions. Chronic administration of haloperidol resulted in decreased turnover of dopamine and norepinephrine in both cortex and subcortical regions which was dose-dependently prevented by adenosine reuptake/transport inhibitors. The major findings of the present study suggested that adenosine reuptake inhibitors dipyridamole and nimodipine could be a possible therapeutic option in neuroleptic induced TD.

Involvement of adenosinergic receptor system in an animal model of tardive dyskinesia and associated behavioural, biochemical and neurochemical changes

Tardive dyskinesia is a syndrome characterized by repetitive involuntary movements usually involving the mouth, face and tongue. It is considered as the late onset adverse effect of prolonged administration of typical neuroleptic drugs. Adenosine is now widely accepted as the major inhibitory neuromodulators in the central nervous system besides GABA. Both, agonists of adenosine A(1) and A(2) receptors and the antagonists of A(2A) receptors are known to protect against neuronal damage caused by toxins as well as they can also protect against the cell damage inflicted by reactive oxygen species. The present study investigated the effect of adenosine and A(2A) receptor antagonist, caffeine in an animal model of tardive dyskinesia by using different behavioural (orofacial dyskinetic movements, stereotypic rearing, locomotor activity, % retention), biochemical (lipid peroxidation, reduced glutathione levels, antioxidant enzyme levels (superoxide dismutase and catalase) and neurochemical (neurotransmitter levels) parameters. Chronic administration of haloperidol (1 mg/kg i.p. for 21 days) significantly increased vacuous chewing movements (VCMs), tongue protrusions, facial jerking in rats which was dose dependently inhibited by adenosine and caffeine. Chronic administration of haloperidol also resulted in an increased dopamine receptor sensitivity as evident by increased locomotor activity and stereotypic rearing after day 14. Chronic administration of haloperidol also decreased % retention time on elevated plus maze paradigm. Treatment with adenosine or caffeine reversed these behavioural changes. Besides, haloperidol also induced oxidative damage in all regions of brain which was prevented by caffeine and adenosine, especially in striatum. On chronic administration of haloperidol there was a decrease in dopamine and norepinephrine turnover which was dose-dependently reversed by treatment with adenosine or caffeine. When caffeine and adenosine were co-administered, there was no synergistic effect, possibly due to mutual antagonistic effects. The findings of the present study suggested the involvement of adenosinergic receptor system in the genesis of neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia.

Modulation of Seizures and Synaptic Plasticity by Adenosinergic Receptors in an Experimental Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Induced by Pilocarpine in Rats

PURPOSE

Adenosine is a major negative neuromodulator of synaptic activity in the central nervous system and can exert anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effects in many experimental models of epilepsy. Extracellular adenosine can be formed by a membrane-anchored enzyme ecto-5'-nucleotidase. The purposes of this study were to characterize the role of adenosine receptors in modulating status epilepticus (SE) induced by pilocarpine and evaluate its neuroprotective action. Ecto-5'-nucleotidase activity was studied during the different phases of pilocarpine-induced epilepsy in rats.

METHODS

Adult rats were pretreated with different adenosinergic agents to evaluate the latency and incidence of SE induced by pilocarpine in rats. The neuroprotective effect also was evaluated.

RESULTS

A proconvulsant effect was observed with DPCPX and DMPX that reduced the latency of SE in almost all rats. Pretreatment with the MRS 1220 did not alter the incidence of SE but reduced the latency to develop SE. An anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effect was detected with R-PIA. Rats pretreated with R-PIA had a decreased number of apoptotic cells in the hippocampus, whereas pretreatment with DPCPX did not modify the hippocampal damage. An intensification of neuronal death was observed in the dentate gyrus and CA3 when rats were pretreated with DMPX. MRS-1220 did not modify the number of apoptotic cells in the hippocampus. An increase in the ecto-5 -nucleotidase staining was detected in the hippocampus during silent and chronic phases.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data show that adenosine released during pilocarpine-induced SE via A1-receptor stimulation can exhibit neuroprotective and anticonvulsant roles. Similar effects could also be inferred with A2a and A3 adenosinergic agents, but further experiments are necessary to confirm their roles. Ecto-5 -nucleotidase activity during silent and chronic phases might have a role in blocking spontaneous seizures by production of inhibitory neuromodulator adenosine, besides taking part in the mechanism that controls sprouting.

Purines and neuroprotection

The activation of adenosine A1, A2 andA3 receptors can protect neurones against damage generated by mechanical or hypoxic/ischaemic insults as well as excitotoxins. A1 receptors are probably effective by suppressing transmitter release and producing neuronal hyperpolarisation. They are less likely to be of therapeutic importance due to the plethora of side effects resulting from A1 agonism, although the existence of receptor subtypes and recent synthetic chemistry efforts to increase ligand selectivity, may yet yield clinically viable compounds. Activation of A2A receptors can protect neurons, although there is much uncertainty as to whether agonists are acting centrally or via a peripheral mechanism such as altering blood flow or immune cell function. Selective antagonists at the A2A receptor, such as 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)(1,2,4)triazolo(2,3-a)(1,3,5)triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl)phenol (ZM 241385) and 7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH 58261), can also protect against neuronal death produced by ischaemia or excitotoxicity. In addition, A2A receptor antagonists can reduce damage produced by combinations of subthreshold doses of the endogenous excitotoxin quinolinic acid and free radicals. Since the A2A receptors do not seem to be activated by normal endogenous levels of adenosine, their blockade should not generate significant side effects, so that A2A receptor antagonists appear to be promising candidates as new drugs for the prevention of neuronal damage. Adenosine A3 receptors have received less attention to date, but agonists are clearly able to afford protection against damage when administered chronically. Given the disappointing lack of success of NMDA receptor antagonists in human stroke patients, despite their early promise in animal models, it is possible that A2A receptor antagonists could have a far greater clinical utility.

Adenosine: does it have a neuroprotective role after all?

A neuroprotective role for adenosine is commonly assumed. Recent studies revealed that adenosine may unexpectedly, under certain circumstances, have the opposite effects contributing to neuronal damage and death. The basis for this duality may be the activation of distinct subtypes of adenosine receptors, interactions between these receptors, differential actions on neuronal and glial cells, and various time frames of adenosinergic compounds administration. If these aspects are understood, adenosine should remain an interesting target for therapeutical neuroprotective approaches after all.

Adenosine receptors as potential therapeutic targets

Recent studies indicate a widening role for adenosine receptors in many therapeutic areas. Adenosine receptors are involved in immunological and inflammatory responses, respiratory regulation, the cardiovascular system, the kidney, various CNS-mediated events including sleep and neuroprotection, as well as central and peripheral pain processes. In this review, the physiological role of adenosine receptors in these key areas is described with reference to the therapeutic potential of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists.

Protection against hippocampal kainate excitotoxicity by intracerebral administration of an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist

We have previously shown that the peripheral administration of an A2A receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride (CGS 21680) protected the hippocampus against kainate-induced excitotoxicity. The present study utilises the intrahippocampal route to further investigate CGS 21680-mediated protection as well as examining the role of adenosine and both A1 and A2A receptors in kainate-induced excitotoxicity. Injections were made directly into the hippocampus of anaesthetised male Wistar rats. Following surgery and the administration of 0.25 nmol kainate in 1 microl of solution, the animals were left to recover for seven days before perfusion and brain slicing. Haematoxylin and eosin staining revealed substantial damage to the CA3 region. Co-administration of the A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 over a range of doses did not protect the region to any degree. Similarly neither the A1 receptor agonist R-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA), nor adenosine itself reduced kainate-induced damage. The intrahippocampal injection of the selective A2A receptor antagonist, 4-(2-[7-amino-2-¿2-furyl¿¿1,2, 4¿triazolo¿2,3-a¿¿1,3,5¿triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl)phenol (ZM241385) however, significantly decreased kainate damage to the CA3 region. These results show that adenosine A2A receptor-induced protection is most likely to be mediated peripherally and is probably not due to activation of A2A receptors within the hippocampus. The lack of protection observed with either R-PIA or adenosine may be due to an inhibitory action of the A2A receptor on the neuroprotective A1 receptor. Importantly, this study also questions the role of endogenously released adenosine in protecting the hippocampus from excitotoxic damage.

Protection against kainate-induced excitotoxicity by adenosine A2A receptor agonists and antagonists

The neuroprotective role of adenosine receptor agonists in various models of ischaemia and neuronal excitotoxicity has been attributed to adenosine A1 receptor activation. In this study we examine the role of the A2A receptor in the kainate model of excitotoxicity. Kainate (10 mg/kg) was administered systemically 10 min after the intraperitoneal injection of adenosine analogues. The A2A agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride (CGS21680) protected the hippocampus at concentrations of 0.1 and 0.01 mg/kg, but not at 2 microg/kg. The addition of the centrally acting adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine partially reduced protection only in the CA3a region, suggesting that only a small proportion of the protection was attributable to the A1 receptor. A less potent A2A agonist, N6-[2-(3,5-dimethyoxyphenyl)-2-(2-methylphenyl)-ethyl]adenosine (1 mg/kg), provided only partial protection against kainate. 4-(2-[7-Amino-2-[2-furyl][1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-yl -amino]ethyl)phenol, a selective A2A antagonist, also showed protection against kainate-induced neuronal death, when administered alone or in combination with CGS21680. These results show that adenosine A2A receptor activation is protective against excitotoxicity. The protection is largely independent of A, receptor activation or blockade.