Bilateral bronchial carcinoma

Three different synchronous primary lung tumours: A case report with extensive genetic analysis and review of the literature

Synchronous triple lung tumours are rare and little is known as for their genetic basis. Here we report a case of a 59 years old male with three synchronous independent and histological different primary tumours of the left lung. Two nodules were located in the upper lobe and consisted of an adenocarcinoma (ADC) and an endobronchial poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). A third nodule of the lower lobe corresponded to a small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCLC). To assess if they represented independent primary tumours and have common genetic profiles, tumours were investigated for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 40 chromosomal markers. A comparable fractional allelic loss of 0.52 was observed in the ADC and SCLC, while it was 0.28 in the SCC. Microallelotyping analysis did not reveal a common genetic profile, supporting the hypothesis that the three synchronous tumours are truly independent primaries with different histogenesis.

Small bronchogenic carcinomas presenting as solitary pulmonary nodules. Bioptic approach guided by CT-positive bronchus sign

To evaluate the utility of the CT bronchus sign in making a choice between transbronchial biopsy (TBB) and transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) as the first diagnostic procedure in a patient with a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN), we reviewed the results of TBB and TTNA in 26 patients who had a bronchogenic carcinoma less than 3 cm, studied with thin-section CT. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included ten cases with a third- to fifth-order bronchus sign. Group 2 included two cases with a sixth-order bronchus sign and 14 cases with absence of a bronchus sign. TBB was performed in all the patients; conversely, TTNA was carried out in 22 patients. In group 1, TBB gave a diagnostic yield in eight (80 percent) of ten patients, while TTNA was positive in three (42 percent) of seven patients (p > 0.05). Conversely, in group 2, results of TBB were normal in all the patients, while TTNA gave a diagnosis in 10 (66 percent) of 15 patients (p < 0.05). We think that TBB should be considered the method of choice in diagnosing SPNs associated with a third- to fifth-order bronchus sign; conversely, TTNA is more useful than TBB in diagnosing SPNs in the presence of a more peripheral bronchus sign or with the absence of a bronchus sign. In conclusion, we suggest routine evaluation with thin-section CT of each SPN to optimize diagnostic management.