Epoxidation of aflatoxin B1 by Aspergillus flavus microsomes in vitro: interaction with DNA and formation of aflatoxin B1-glutathione conjugate

Effects of neem leaf extract on production of aflatoxins and activities of fatty acid synthetase, isocitrate dehydrogenase and glutathione S-transferase in Aspergillus parasiticus

The relationship between the activities of 3 cytosolic enzymes with aflatoxin biosynthesis in Aspergillus parasiticus cultured under different conditions has been investigated in order to find out the role of each enzyme in aflatoxin biosynthesis. Basically the activity of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) was higher in non-toxigenic strains as compared to its counterpart toxigenic fungi (p < 0.05). In contrast, the activities of fatty acid synthase (FAS) as well as glutathione S-transferase (GST) were higher (P < 0.05) in toxigenic strains than that of the non-toxigenic fungi. Aflatoxin production was inhibited in fungi grown in presence of various concentrations of neem leaf extract. Aflatoxin was at its lowest level (>90% inhibition) when the concentration of neem extract was adjusted to 50% (v/v). No significant changes in FAS and IDH activities were observed when aflatoxin synthesis was under restraints by neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf extract. During a certain period of time of culture growth, when aflatoxin production reached to its maximum level, the activity of FAS was slightly induced in the toxigenic strains fed with a low concentration (1.56% v/v) of the neem leaf extract. At the time (96 h) when aflatoxin concentration reached to its maximum levels, the activity of GST in the toxigenic fungi was significantly higher (i.e., 7-11 folds) than that of non-toxigenic strains. The difference was highest in mycelial samples collected after 120 h. However unlike FAS and IDH, GST was readily inhibited (approximately 67%) in mycelia fed with 1.56% v/v of the neem extract. The inhibition reached to maximum of 80% in samples exposed to 6.25-12.5% of the extract. These results further substantiate previous finding that there is a positive correlation between GST activity and aflatoxin production in fungi.

Non-invasive in vivo magnetic resonance imaging assessment of acute aflatoxin B1 hepatotoxicity in rats

Acute aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)-induced hepatotoxicity was assessed in vivo in male Sprague-Dawley rats (150-300 g) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI results were compared to serum enzyme levels, histology and electron microscopy. Twenty-four hours following intraperitoneal delivery of AFB1 (3 mg/kg body weight in a saline/dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; 0.03 ml/kg body weight) solution), regions of damage, characterised by increased proton signal intensities in T2-weighted images, were observed in the vicinity of the hepatic portal vein (HPV) and in the right medial regions of the liver. Image analysis of regions of apparent damage around the HPV and right medial regions, following 24 h of AFB1 exposure, indicated statistically significant (P<0.05) increases in proton image signal intensities, when compared to saline/DMSO-treated rats. No significant difference in proton image signal intensities were observed 1-2 h following AFB1 exposure. Twenty-four hours following AFB1 exposure, histopathological assessment was characterised by portal/central vein/artery congestion, sinusoid congestion, nuclear pyknosis and karyolysis, and hepatocyte vacuolation; electron microscopy (EM) examination indicated nuclear debris, swollen cytoplasmic compartments, vacuolation, and the disappearance of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum, and elevated levels of serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were found to be significantly different (P<0.01) than controls.

The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance

The glutathione S-transferases (GST) represent a major group of detoxification enzymes. All eukaryotic species possess multiple cytosolic and membrane-bound GST isoenzymes, each of which displays distinct catalytic as well as noncatalytic binding properties: the cytosolic enzymes are encoded by at least five distantly related gene families (designated class alpha, mu, pi, sigma, and theta GST), whereas the membrane-bound enzymes, microsomal GST and leukotriene C4 synthetase, are encoded by single genes and both have arisen separately from the soluble GST. Evidence suggests that the level of expression of GST is a crucial factor in determining the sensitivity of cells to a broad spectrum of toxic chemicals. In this article the biochemical functions of GST are described to show how individual isoenzymes contribute to resistance to carcinogens, antitumor drugs, environmental pollutants, and products of oxidative stress. A description of the mechanisms of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of GST isoenzymes is provided to allow identification of factors that may modulate resistance to specific noxious chemicals. The most abundant mammalian GST are the class alpha, mu, and pi enzymes and their regulation has been studied in detail. The biological control of these families is complex as they exhibit sex-, age-, tissue-, species-, and tumor-specific patterns of expression. In addition, GST are regulated by a structurally diverse range of xenobiotics and, to date, at least 100 chemicals have been identified that induce GST; a significant number of these chemical inducers occur naturally and, as they are found as nonnutrient components in vegetables and citrus fruits, it is apparent that humans are likely to be exposed regularly to such compounds. Many inducers, but not all, effect transcriptional activation of GST genes through either the antioxidant-responsive element (ARE), the xenobiotic-responsive element (XRE), the GST P enhancer 1(GPE), or the glucocorticoid-responsive element (GRE). Barbiturates may transcriptionally activate GST through a Barbie box element. The involvement of the Ah-receptor, Maf, Nrl, Jun, Fos, and NF-kappa B in GST induction is discussed. Many of the compounds that induce GST are themselves substrates for these enzymes, or are metabolized (by cytochrome P-450 monooxygenases) to compounds that can serve as GST substrates, suggesting that GST induction represents part of an adaptive response mechanism to chemical stress caused by electrophiles. It also appears probable that GST are regulated in vivo by reactive oxygen species (ROS), because not only are some of the most potent inducers capable of generating free radicals by redox-cycling, but H2O2 has been shown to induce GST in plant and mammalian cells: induction of GST by ROS would appear to represent an adaptive response as these enzymes detoxify some of the toxic carbonyl-, peroxide-, and epoxide-containing metabolites produced within the cell by oxidative stress. Class alpha, mu, and pi GST isoenzymes are overexpressed in rat hepatic preneoplastic nodules and the increased levels of these enzymes are believed to contribute to the multidrug-resistant phenotype observed in these lesions. The majority of human tumors and human tumor cell lines express significant amounts of class pi GST. Cell lines selected in vitro for resistance to anticancer drugs frequently overexpress class pi GST, although overexpression of class alpha and mu isoenzymes is also often observed. The mechanisms responsible for overexpression of GST include transcriptional activation, stabilization of either mRNA or protein, and gene amplification. In humans, marked interindividual differences exist in the expression of class alpha, mu, and theta GST. The molecular basis for the variation in class alpha GST is not known. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)