[Sex-specific differences of serum proteins in adults and influence of oral hormonal contraceptives on serum protein composition]

Reference distributions for apolipoproteins AI and B and the apolipoprotein B/AI ratios: a practical and clinically relevant approach in a large cohort

The two serum apolipoproteins in the highest concentrations, apolipoprotein (apo) AI and apolipoprotein B, and the apolipoprotein B/AI ratio are measured to assess clinical risk for atherosclerotic heart and peripheral vascular diseases. The study is based on a cohort of over 37,000 Caucasian individuals from northern New England measured in one laboratory by immunonephelometry using standardized reference materials. All samples received for protein analyses were accepted provided adequate identifying information was available. Laboratory and demographic information was entered into a single database for subsequent study. Our results show that for males without evidence of inflammation, values of apo AI change little through life. For females, however, values gradually increase until about 60 years of age then fall somewhat thereafter. Among adults, females have higher apo AI values on average, than males. Apo B values change significantly through life, increasing after the end of the second decade to a peak during the sixth decade, then falling thereafter. In the past, concern has been expressed that apo AI is an acute phase reactant (APR), thus complicating cardiovascular risk assessment. The effects of an APR (C-reactive protein >or=10 mg/L) on apo AI, but not on apo B, are measurable for both sexes, most noticeably beyond the age of 60 years in males and females. When values were expressed as age- and gender-specific multiples of the median (MoMs), the resulting distributions fit a log-Gaussian distribution well over a broad range. The size of the relatively homogenous cohort, by a standardized approach, provides a firm basis for comparison to preexisting reference intervals and for establishing a clinically useful and current reference interval for the three main apolipoprotein values.

Selecting clinically relevant populations for reference intervals

The selection of individuals to represent a group for any purpose can commit the effort to success or failure from the very outset. The description of this group must reflect what is, in reality, the purpose for which the group is being studied. Considering that reference intervals are designed to assist clinicians during diagnostic triage, criteria must reflect the nature of the subjects entering the system for care. The majority of people seeking care have non-life-threatening, yet troublesome complaints. In other words, persons who are in a reasonable state of health and who are not suffering from significant illness. Therefore the relevant cohort should fit this description, not individuals who lack any clinical or laboratory issues. Our focus is to employ reference intervals to exclude disease and not to define normality. Normality in the eyes of statisticians is quite different from the word as viewed by clinical staff, yet the term is used interchangeably without concern for its ultimate use. As a result medicine today stumbles over this issue at every turn. Scientists and artists do not speak the same language. Compounding this awkward situation has been the conviction that by increasing laboratory precision and accuracy, the utility of laboratory data, reference intervals in particular, will improve clinical understanding. This has, after many years, not proven to be the case. What has become very evident, however, is that unsustainably large sums of money are being devoted to improving laboratory performance. To what end, when we are unable to grasp the significance of what is available now including published reference intervals for common test values? A realistic perspective on the value of prevailing laboratory performance, as illustrated by reference intervals, must be adopted. The obligation of laboratories, its regulators and professional groups is to create a sustainable mechanism to provide clinically usable information, in a timely and affordable manner, to our population and to those legions of less fortunate humans.

Reference distributions for alpha2-macroglobulin: a comparison of a large cohort to the world's literature

The lack of satisfactory methods for quantifying serum levels and a credible reference material has limited bedside use of serum alpha(2)-macroglobulin (alpha2M) measurements. Great strides have been made in the last few years. The remaining barrier to more relevant and cost effective use of serum protein data for diagnosis and prognosis is the availability of reliable reference intervals from birth to old age for both males and females. A total of 40 publications reporting reference intervals have been identified that meet the criteria used in our prior five studies, and these have been analyzed statistically. On average, previous small studies of these individual proteins agree with our life-long reference ranges over their constrained age ranges. This meta-analysis provides support for our reference ranges and places them in the perspective of previous publications.

Reference distributions for complement proteins C3 and C4: a practical, simple and clinically relevant approach in a large cohort

The two serum proteins of the complement cascade in the highest concentrations, C3 and C4, respond to various conditions in much the same manner as do other positive acute-phase proteins. A major difference is that they are relatively sluggish in response to cytokine drive, requiring several days rather than hours to be detectably elevated by serial measurements. As with other acute-phase proteins, there are many processes that up- or down-regulate synthesis, including infection or inflammation, hepatic failure, and immune-complex formation. Clinicians may find it difficult to distinguish among these processes, because they often occur simultaneously. The situation is further complicated by genetic polymorphism, with rare instances of markedly reduced synthesis and circulating levels, and consequent vulnerability to infection. C3 and C4 are measured for clinical purposes to help define certain rheumatic and immunologically mediated renal diseases. Interpreting the measured blood levels of these two components requires one to consider the intensity of the inflammatory drive, the timing of the suspected clinical process, the production of complement-consuming immune complexes, and the possible existence of benign circumstances. In this fifth article in a series, reference ranges for serum levels of two complement proteins (C3 and C4) are examined. The study is based on a cohort of over 55,000 Caucasian individuals from northern New England, who were tested in our laboratory in 1994-1999. Measurements were standardized against certified reference material (CRM) 470/reference preparation for proteins in human serum (RPPHS), and analyzed using a previously described statistical approach. Individuals with unequivocal laboratory evidence of inflammation (C-reactive protein of 10 mg/L or higher) were excluded. Our results show that the levels of C3 and C4 change little during life and between the sexes, except that they increase slightly and then fall after age 20 in males and at about age 45 in females. When values were expressed as multiples of the age- and gender-specific median levels, the resulting distributions fitted a log-Gaussian distribution well over a broad range. When patient data are normalized in this manner, the distribution parameters can be used to assign a centile corresponding to an individual's measurement, thus simplifying interpretation.

Reference distributions for serum iron and transferrin saturation: a practical, simple, and clinically relevant approach in a large cohort

The principal considerations driving iron status evaluation are clinical concern for anemia and the possibility of iron-storage disease. Most often, the circulating levels of transferrin (or total iron binding capacity) and serum iron are measured and the percentage of transferrin saturation (TSAT) is then computed. Optimally, reference ranges for these analytes should exclude the effects of the acute phase response, nutritional status, estrogen effect, specific genetic disorders, liver disease, and blood transfusion. The current study reports reference ranges for serum iron and TSAT within a cohort of over 55,000 Caucasians from northern New England, tested in our laboratory between 1994 and 1999. Measurements were standardized against serum reference material (SRM) 937 (for iron) and certified reference material (CRM) 470 (also called reference preparation for proteins in human serum (RPPHS)) (for transferrin), and analyzed using a previously published approach. Individual cases with evidence of inflammation (C-reactive protein > or =10 mg/L), or iron overload (TSAT >80% for males and >70% for females) or serum iron values <5 micro mol/L, were removed. Among the referent individuals, iron and TSAT levels rose slightly until the teen years, at which time levels in males increased while those in females remained essentially constant. Between 20 and 70 years of age, males had 10-15% higher iron levels and 15-20% higher TSAT levels than females. When values were expressed as multiples of the age- and gender-specific median levels, the serum iron and TSAT observations fit log-Gaussian distributions reasonably well from the 20th to 99th centile, and the 10th to the 99th centile, respectively. After normalization, the Gaussian parameters can be used to assign a corresponding centile to an individual's measurement, simplifying interpretation. These data provide new and more detailed reference ranges for serum iron and TSAT.

Reference distributions for the positive acute phase serum proteins, alpha1-acid glycoprotein (orosomucoid), alpha1-antitrypsin, and haptoglobin: a practical, simple, and clinically relevant approach in a large cohort

Most clinical conditions are accompanied by corresponding changes in serum levels of some, if not all, of the acute phase proteins. While conditions that affect the acute phase proteins are usually inflammatory in nature, non-inflammatory conditions also can cause changes (e.g., malnutrition, some malignancies without secondary inflammation, and genetic polymorphism). Only after the confounding effects of non-inflammatory conditions are taken into account can these measurements be used to detect and stage the inflammatory process and to evaluate the impact of treatment. In this third article in a series, reference ranges for serum levels for three of the acute phase proteins that increase during inflammation are examined: alpha1-acid glycoprotein (orosomucoid), alpha-antitrypsin, and haptoglobin. The study is based on a cohort of 55,199 Caucasian individuals from northern New England, tested in our laboratory between 1994 and 1999. Measurements were standardized against CRM 470 (RPPHS) and analyzed using a previously described statistical approach. Individuals with unequivocal laboratory evidence of inflammation (C-reactive protein of 10 mg/l or higher) were excluded. Levels of a,-acid glycoprotein changed little during life and between the sexes. Levels of alpha1-antitrypsin varied somewhat by age, rising slightly beyond age 55; males followed a pattern similar to that for females. For this protein, it was necessary to apply two equations to describe the lower levels associated with certain phenotypes. Haptoglobin levels fell significantly during the first decade of life for both males and females and climbed thereafter. Males and females displayed a similar pattern. When values were expressed as multiples of the age- and gender-specific median levels, the resulting distributions fitted a log-Gaussian distribution well over a broad range. When patient data are normalized in this manner, the distribution parameters can be used to assign a centile corresponding to an individual's measurement, thus simplifying interpretation.