A biotin-avidin enzyme immunoassay for the quantitation of serum ferritin

Performance and comparability of laboratory methods for measuring ferritin concentrations in human serum or plasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different laboratory methods are used to quantify ferritin concentrations as a marker of iron status. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the accuracy and comparability of the most used methods for ferritin detection.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

National and regional databases were searched for prospective, retrospective, sectional, longitudinal and case-control studies containing the characteristics and performance of at least one method for serum/plasma ferritin determinations in humans published to date. The analysis included the comparison between at least 2 methods detailing: sensitivity, precision, accuracy, predictive values, inter-methods adjustment, and use of international reference materials. Pooled method performance was analyzed for each method and across methods.

OUTCOMES

Search strategy identified 11893 records. After de-duplication and screening 252 studies were assessed, including 187 studies in the qualitative analysis and 148 in the meta-analysis. The most used methods included radiometric, nonradiometric and agglutination assays. The overall within-run imprecision for the most reported ferritin methods was 6.2±3.4% (CI 5.69-6.70%; n = 171), between-run imprecision 8.9±8.7% (CI 7.44-10.35%; n = 136), and recovery rate 95.6% (CI 91.5-99.7%; n = 94). The pooled regression coefficient was 0.985 among all methods analyzed, and 0.984 when comparing nonradiometric and radiometric methods, without statistical differences in ferritin concentration ranging from 2.3 to 1454 μμg/L.

CONCLUSION

The laboratory methods most used to determine ferritin concentrations have comparable accuracy and performance. Registered in PROSPERO CRD42016036222.

Development of an automated immunoturbidimetric ferritin assay

We have developed a new procedure for turbidimetric measurement of ferritin concentration in human serum, based on latex microparticle agglutination technology. The procedure has been automated using the Falcor 300 analyzer. Carboxilated latex particles (336 nm in diameter) were covalently coupled with immunopurified F(ab')2 fragments of anti-ferritin IgG antibodies. Coated microparticles were automatically mixed with undiluted sample and the resulting absorbance due to agglutination was measured at 550 nm. The procedure generated a calibration curve with a measuring range of 0 to 558 microg/l, showing a day-to-day imprecision lower than 5.7%. The detection limit was 4 microg/l. There were no interferences from bilirubin, hemoglobin or rheumatoid factors. Turbid and lipemic samples caused an important interference which could be avoided by pretreating those samples prior to measurement. A prozone effect was provisionally obtained with ferritin concentrations over 1800 microg/l. The results suggested a hook-like effect due to a rapid microparticle precipitation in the reaction media, that could be avoided by increasing the reaction medium density by adding sucrose to the buffer, up to 150 g/l concentration. This sucrose addition resulted in a displacement of the Heidelberger curve with a prozone phenomenon occuring at concentration higher than 3000 microg/l of ferritin. Results obtained with the present procedure correlated well with those obtained by a nephelometric procedure and with those obtained by an RIA. We conclude that this latex turbidimetric immunochemical procedure is simple, rapid, has a good analytical and operational performance on the Falcor 300 analyzer and is well suited for the measurement of ferritin concentration in human serum.

Automated quantitative nephelometric latex immunoassay for determining ferritin in human serum

We describe a rapid and sensitive latex nephelometric immunoassay for quantifying ferritin in human serum. This latex immunoassay procedure uses commercially available ready-for-use reagents [Tina-Quant (a) Ferritin, Boehringer Mannheim] that have a long shelf life. The assay consists of incubating the diluted serum sample (5-fold) for 12 min at room temperature with latex particles covalently coated with anti-ferritin antibodies, and then quantifying the change of light-scatter produced. The assay is fully automated on the Behring nephelometer analyzer with a sampling rate of 150 samples/hour. The method has an analytical range of 3 to 260 micrograms/l. Maximal intra- and inter-assay CVs were 4.0 and 6.2%, respectively. Analytical recoveries ranged from 91.3 to 103.6%. Assay detection limit was less than 3 micrograms/l. Linearity of the test is given throughout the measuring range. There was no interference from bilirubin (up to 340 mumol/l), haemoglobin (up to 7 g/l), or rheumatoid factor (up to 1,100 IU/ml). Turbid and lipemic samples interfere. This interference may be avoided by pretreating these samples prior to assay. Results correlated well with those obtained by an automated ELISA test (r = 0.995) and with those of two commercial RIA methods (r greater than 0.97). This latex nephelometric procedure is a convenient method and represents an interesting alternative to other immunoassays for measuring ferritin in human serum.

A sensitive time-resolved immunofluorometric assay of ferritin in serum with monoclonal antibodies

We describe a new non-isotopic immunoassay for the quantitation of ferritin in serum. Ferritin is first immunoextracted from serum with a monoclonal antibody immobilized in white microtiter wells. A second biotinylated antibody is then added. The bound biotinylated antibody is quantified by a bridge reaction with streptavidin labeled with the europium chelate 4,7-bis(chlorosulfophenyl)-1,10-phenanthroline-2,9-dicarboxylic acid (BCPDA) in the presence of excess Eu3+. The fluorescence on the bottom of the dry microtiter well consisting of monoclonal antibody-ferritin-monoclonal antibody-biotin-streptavidin-BCPDA-Eu3+ is then measured with a time-resolved fluorometer. The assay is sensitive (0.5 microgram/l), precise (CV's 3-9%) and accurate (average recovery 102%). Results compared well (r = 0.99) with those of a widely used RIA procedure.