Total and free disopyramide by fluorescence polarization immunoassay and relationship between free fraction and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein

QT-prolonging class I drug, disopyramide, does not aggravate but suppresses adrenaline-induced arrhythmias. Comparison with cibenzoline and pilsicainide

We investigated the effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs on corrected QT (QTc) interval and adrenaline-induced arrhythmias in halothane-anaesthetized, closed-chest dogs. For this purpose, we plotted a dose-response curve for adrenaline by calculating the arrhythmic ratio, which is the number of ventricular ectopic beats induced by adrenaline divided by the total heart rate, and observed the changes in the arrhythmic ratio-adrenaline dose relation before and after administration of class I drugs. Disopyramide and cibenzoline decreased the arrhythmic ratio induced by adrenaline. Disopyramide prolonged the QTc interval by 20% (P<0.01), but cibenzoline did not. Pilsicainide prolonged the QTc interval (12%), but this drug did not change the arrhythmic ratio. These results indicate that in contrast to the class III drugs which we have reported earlier, i.e. 1, 3-dimethyl-6-2-[N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-propylamino]eth ylamino-2,4 (1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione hydrochloride (MS-551), 1-(2-amino-4-methanesulfonamidophenoxy)2-[N-(3, 4-dimethoxyphenethyl)-N-methylamino]ethane hydrochloride (KCB-328) and E-1-[(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-furanyl)methylene]amino-3-[4-(4-methyl-1 -piperazinyl)butyl]-2,4-imidazolidinedione dihydrochloride (azimilide), class I drugs do not aggravate adrenaline-induced arrhythmias even though some drugs prolong the QTc interval.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and effects of an oral sustained-release preparation of disopyramide prescribed for patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

AIMS

We evaluated the clinical pharmacokinetics of a sustained-release preparation of disopyramide phosphate (DSR) and its effects on supraventricular arrhythmias in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Eight hemodialysis patients with either paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) or PSVT plus paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (Paf) were given 150 mg of DSR 2 h before each hemodialysis. The frequency of PSVT, the duration of Paf before and 2 weeks after starting DSR and the blood concentration of the drug were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between serum levels of DSR before and after hemodialysis. The frequency of PSVT and the duration of Paf were significantly reduced by the therapy. Side effects and electrocardiographic abnormalities did not appear during the period.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that hemodialysis does not remove DSR, and that a single dose of 150 mg of DSR given 2 h before hemodialysis is safe and sufficient to reduce the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias.

Drug-protein binding sites. New trends in analytical and experimental methodology

In the last few years, continuous progress in instrumental analytical methodology has been achieved with a substantial increase in the number of new, more specific and more flexible methods for ligand-protein assays. In general, the methods used for drug-protein binding studies can be divided into two main groups: separation methods (enabling the calculation of binding parameters, i.e. the number of binding sites and their respective affinity constants) and non-separation methods (describing predominantly qualitative parameters of the ligand-protein complex). This review will be focussed particularly on recent trends in the development of drug-protein binding methods including stereoselective and non-stereoselective aspects using chromatography, capillary electrophoresis and microdialysis as compared to the "conventional approach" using equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration or size exclusion chromatography. The advantages and limitations of various methods will be discussed including a focus on "optimal" experimental strategies taking into account in vitro, ex vivo and/or in vivo studies. Furthermore, the importance of some particular aspects concerning the drug binding to proteins (covalent binding of drugs and metabolites, stereoselective interactions and evaluation of binding data) will be outlined in more detail.

Simplified, rapid and inexpensive extraction procedure for a high-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of disopyramide and its main metabolite mono-N-dealkylated disopyramide in serum

A simplified, rapid and inexpensive extraction procedure for the determination of the antiarrhythmic drug disopyramide and its main metabolite mono-N-desalkylated disopyramide in serum by high-performance liquid chromatography has been developed. The analysis uses ultraviolet detection at 254 nm, and a 5 micron reversed-phase column with a mobile phase of water-triethylamine-acetonitrile-PIC-B8 reagent. Serum extraction is performed with dichloromethane and 1 M sodium hydroxide. p-Chlorodisopyramide is used as internal standard. Recovery rates were 94.5% (S.D. 5.7%) for disopyramide, 96.8% (S.D. 2.2%) for mono-N-desalkylated disopyramide and 97.9% (S.D. 2.8%) for the internal standard.

Direct determination of protein binding of phenytoin in serum by high-performance liquid chromatography

A reliable, routine method has been developed which speeds and simplifies the determination of free phenytoin levels in serum. The free fraction of the drug was determined by a single direct injection of serum (350 microL) into a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system. The mobile phase was a mixture of isopropanol (0.5%) and pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. An internal surface reversed-phase silica column, the Pinkerton column, was used with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at ambient temperature, and the wavelength was set at 254 nm. The resolution of free and bound phenytoin peaks was affected by the percentage of isopropanol, the serum volume injected, and the protein concentration in the sample. The concentrations of free and bound drug agreed well with those determined by the conventional ultrafiltration method (MPS-1). The determination of protein binding by HPLC appears to be a satisfactory method for routine therapeutic drug monitoring. The factors affecting the binding and chromatographic separation and the application of this method for clinical use are discussed.