Short- and long-term effects of LDL-apheresis on lipoprotein (a) serum levels

Effects of Lipoprotein apheresis on the Lipoprotein(a) levels in the long run

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a low density lipoprotein-like particle to which apolipoprotein(a) is bound. It is recognized as an atherosclerosis-inducing risk factor. Up to now a detailed description of the effect of Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) on Lp(a) levels in the long run is lacking.

METHODS

We studied 59 patients with elevated Lp(a) levels who were treated with LA at the Lipoprotein Apheresis Center at the University Hospital Dresden. We analyzed Lp(a) concentrations before the start of the LA treatment and during this extracorporeal therapy.

RESULTS

Comparing the Lp(a) levels before the start of LA therapy and pre-apheresis (measured before the LA sessions) Lp(a) levels, we observed a reduction of the Lp(a) levels of about 22.8% in all patients. Lp(a) levels were acutely (comparing post-apheresis with pre-apheresis concentrations) reduced by all 6 available LA methods (by about 70%). A linear regression analysis was performed to differentiate the long term course of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels. In 30 patients we saw an increase of the pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time, in 15 patients a constancy and in 14 patients a decrease. Patients with a decrease of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time had significantly higher initial (before the start of the extracorporeal treatment) and pre-apheresis values and they were significantly older. These patients had significantly more severe peripheral arterial disease as well as cardiac valve and carotid stenosis. The patients with the lowest initial Lp(a) levels and an increase of the pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels over the time had the highest percentage of intake of Tredaptive(®)/Niaspan(®) though after stopping the intake of these nicotinic acid preparations no clear increase of Lp(a) concentrations was observed. The applied LA systems did not seem to have a significant influence on the course of pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels. In all patients there was a high variability of Lp(a) concentrations between LA sessions which may in part be due to the inaccuracy of the method used to measure Lp(a) concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Pre-apheresis Lp(a) levels (before the LA sessions) are lower than those before the start of a LA treatment but they behave differently among patients during LA treatment.

Apheresis in Coronary Heart Disease With Elevated Lp (a): A Review of Lp (a) As a Risk Factor and Its Management

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)) increases global cardiovascular risk, especially when LDL cholesterol is concomitantly elevated. Epidemiologic data show that Lp (a) concentration in plasma can be used to predict the risk of early atherogenesis in a dose-dependent manner and late stages of atherosclerosis are accelerated by elevated Lp (a). Therapeutic means to lower Lp (a) are limited. The most effective method to reduce plasma Lp (a) concentration significantly is therapeutic apheresis. Because apheresis is laborious and expensive, patients considered for this procedure should suffer from high Lp (a) concentrations, well beyond 50 mg/dL, and have manifested and progressive coronary heart disease despite maximal drug therapy. Experimental data and therapeutic results will be discussed in the present paper.

Is Lipoprotein (a)-Apheresis Useful?

Numerous epidemiological investigations have shown the importance of cholesterol, and in particular low density lipoprotein (LDL), and of the lipoproteins in the development of coronary sclerosis. A continuing relationship between cholesterol levels and coronary morbidity has been established. The LDL concentration in the blood is, in particular, to be made responsible for the development of arteriosclerosis and especially of coronary heart disease (CHD). Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], as a risk factor for premature cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, can be lowered by LDL-apheresis. Especially in isolated high levels of Lp(a) with CHD or polygenic hypercholesterolemia with elevated Lp(a) levels, LDL-apheresis can be indicated and can be useful to improve endothelium regulation and induce changes in coronary tone by an increase in endothelial derived relaxing factor. Lipoprotein (a) can be dramatically lowered by LDL-apheresis, but clinical improvement especially by low LDL is not still not clarified. Studies with weekly apheresis with statins versus drug therapy alone are necessary. To clarify the controversial discussions of whether lowering Lp(a) may be unnecessary or necessary to arrest progression of CHD, more clinical and randomized studies are needed. Lipoprotein (a) can be also lowered by current LDL-apheresis methods.

In vitro characterization of a membrane-based low-density lipoprotein affinity adsorption device

The objective of this study was to explore the use of microporous membranes as an alternative substrate to porous beads in affinity adsorption of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) for therapeutic purposes. Flat sheet immunoaffinity membranes containing a polyclonal antibody preparation were utilized as the affinity substrate. The antibody was covalently immobilized to the surface through a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) spacer. Equilibrium adsorption of LDL from plasma was measured. Adsorption from plasma and elution of bound LDL using citrate buffer were studied as a function of flow rate. Specific capacity was as great as 2 mg apolipoprotein B per milliliter membrane volume. The superior transport properties of the membrane allowed rapid adsorption and regeneration, which translated to a large number of adsorptive cycles that can be performed within a given treatment time. On the basis of in vitro performance characteristics, it is estimated that an immunoaffinity membrane device can provide a reduction in patient plasma LDL concentration comparable to that provided by packed columns, but with almost an 80% reduction in the device volume.

Lipoprotein(a) apheresis in severe coronary heart disease: an immunoadsorption method

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. It is similar to low-density lipoprotein with an additional molecule of apo A covalently linked to apo B-100 by one disulfide bridge. Apo A is highly homologous to plasminogen. The kringle 4 motive of plasminogen is repeated between 10 and 40 times in apo (a). Currently, there is no drug therapy available to lower Lp(a). Since October 1993, we have carried out over 160 immunoadsorption treatments on 3 patients with elevated Lp(a) as their only risk factor and a history of myocardial infarction. Lp(a) was removed from plasma by sepharose coupled anti-Lp(a) columns. Lp(a) levels were lowered from above 170 mg/dl to below 30 mg/dl immediately after Lp(a) apheresis. To achieve this, the patient's plasma volume had to be treated 2 to 3 times. Nonspecific protein loss during column changes remained negligible. There were no serious unwanted effects during or after treatment. Minor circulatory problems (tachycardia, flush) occurred in 11% of the treatments but only with plasma flow rates above 55 ml/min. In 1 patient, coronary angiography after 2 years and in another patient after 1 year showed no progression. The third patient has not yet had repeat coronary angiography. Like the others, he reported subjective improvement after 1 year of apheresis. It is concluded that Lp(a) apheresis may retard progression of atherosclerosis in patients with selective Lp(a) elevation. Further studies to support this hypothesis are needed.

Short- and long-term effects on serum lipoproteins by three different techniques of apheresis

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is applied in patients with coronary heart disease because of severe inherited forms of hypercholesterolemia, for which dietary and combined drug treatment cannot lower LDL cholesterol concentrations less than 130 mg/dl. The following article describes the changes in lipoprotein levels in a total of 19 patients undergoing weekly LDL apheresis. Immunoadsorption, operating with polyclonal antibodies against apolipoprotein B-100, was used in 6 patients. Five patients were put on heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation (HELP) therapy; 6 received dextran sulfate adsorption treatments. Under steady-state conditions a single treatment reduced LDL cholesterol by 149 + or - 3 mg/dl with immunoadsorption, 122 + or - 2 mg/dl with HELP, and 124 + or - 18 mg/dl with dextran sulfate adsorption. Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) declined by 52 to 65%. Very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and VLDL triglycerides declined by 45 to 55% because of the activation of lipoprotein lipase and precipitation during the HELP procedure. In all procedures, there was a small reduction in the different high-density lipoprotein fractions, which had returned to normal after 24 h. The long-term HDL3 cholesterol levels increased significantly. During all procedures there was a decrease in the molar esterification rate of lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase activity. All changes in lipid fractions were paralleled by changes in the corresponding apolipoprotein levels. It is concluded that all three techniques described are powerful tools capable of lowering LDL cholesterol in severe hereditary forms of hypercholesterolemia. In HELP and dextran sulfate adsorption, the amount of plasma is limited by the elimination of other plasma constituents. Immunoadsorption may thus be preferred in very severe forms of hypercholesterolemia.

Treatment of hypercholesterolemia with heparin-induced extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein precipitation (HELP)

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) can cause early disability and death from premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients homozygous for the disease have very high plasma cholesterol, extensive xanthomatosis, and die from atherosclerosis in childhood or early adulthood. Past attempts to improve the prognosis included removal of cholesterol from the circulation by ileal bypass or biliary diversion. Neither treatment was successful. Direct removal by plasmapheresis of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), the primary carrier of cholesterol in plasma, was first performed on an FH homozygous patient in 1966. The treatment was well tolerated and led to rapid diminution of xanthomas. Other experimental treatments included selective LDL apheresis with monoclonal or polyclonal antibody affinity columns. A method for selective LDL apheresis was developed in 1983 by Armstrong, Seidel, and colleagues based on heparin precipitation of LDL at low pH. This method, called HELP, removes all apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins including LDL and lipoprotein (a), as well as some fibrinogen. LDL apheresis by HELP is well tolerated; the incidence of side effects is low, and the treatment has been associated with regression of cardiovascular disease. LDL apheresis, rather than liver transplantation, is the treatment of choice for patients with severe, life-threatening hypercholesterolemia which does not respond to diet and drug therapy.

Heparin extracorporeal LDL precipitation (HELP): an effective apheresis procedure for lowering Lp(a) levels

Heparin-induced extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein precipitation (HELP) is based on the precipitation of apolipoprotein B (apo B) containing lipoproteins with heparin at low pH (4.85). In in vitro experiments we could show that Lp(a) is quantitatively (> 99%) precipitated from plasma by heparin in the pH range 4.6-5.2. The acute changes in Lp(a) after a single HELP-LDL apheresis were investigated in twelve patients with Lp(a) concentrations > 30 mg/dl. A single treatment caused a highly significant decrease (62%) in the concentration of Lp(a), similar to the decrease (60%) observed for LDL-cholesterol. Analysis of the data from ten patients with different apo(a) phenotypes indicated that Lp(a) is eliminated with almost 100% efficiency in the extracorporeal circulation, irrespective of apo(a) phenotype and plasma concentration. The mean rate of recovery of Lp(a) following HELP-LDL apheresis was slightly slower than that of LDL-cholesterol. Plasma Lp(a) concentrations were monitored in seven patients over 2 years. Mean Lp(a) concentrations after 2 years were lower than pre-treatment levels, indicating that repeated elimination of the lipoprotein does not lead to an induction in its synthesis. HELP-LDL apheresis should be particularly suitable for treatment of patients with elevated LDL-cholesterol levels who are also at increased coronary risk because of high Lp(a) concentrations.

Effects of LDL-apheresis on serum lipoprotein (a), C4b binding protein, protein C, protein S, and complement components

The short-term effects of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis using a dextran sulfate-cellulose (DSC) column equipped with a plasma separator using a polysulfone (PS) membrane filter on the serum total cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), C4b binding protein (C4bp), protein C and protein S and complement components levels were examined in a patient with familial hypercholesterolemia (heterozygote, type IIa). PS/DSC-LDL apheresis markedly lowered the total cholesterol by 69.9 +/- 2.9%, serum Lp(a) level by 80.2 +/- 3.4%, and C4bp by 81.1 +/- 2.5% after 8 apheresis sessions. All the above parameters gradually returned to the baseline levels within 10 days. The free protein S level was not significantly changed, while the C4bp/protein S complex level was markedly decreased relative to the decrease in C4bp. The protein C level was moderately reduced by 29%. Almost all serum complements and complement co-factors as well as C4bp were moderately to markedly decreased after LDL apheresis, but returned to the initial levels within a few days. PS/DSC-LDL apheresis effectively eliminated both serum LDL and Lp(a), and did not have an adverse effect on fibrinolysis or complement cascade in the blood.

Three-year treatment of familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia by extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein immunoadsorption with polyclonal apolipoprotein B antibodies

Familial hypercholesterolemia is a disorder of lipid metabolism associated with a highly increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Since in such patients even combined drug therapy often fails to decrease low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels sufficiently, extracorporeal LDL elimination has been developed. We treated eight adult patients with LDL immunoadsorption using antibodies against apolipoprotein B without additional lipid-lowering drug therapy for 3 years; this procedure was performed at weekly intervals. By one treatment session, LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels were decreased by 55%. Under regular treatment, mean LDL cholesterol levels of 165 mg/dL between two consecutive treatment sessions could be reached, compared with 522 +/- 24 mg/dL before any treatment. As high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels increased under regular treatment, the LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio decreased from 13.4 to 3.4. Positive influences on plasma and whole-blood viscosity as well as on erythrocyte aggregation also seem to be beneficial with regard to retarding atherosclerosis. Very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) levels were reduced by approximately 50% after treatment, accompanied by a marked increase of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) activity. The effects of LDL apheresis on hemostasis, complement activation transport proteins, and hematological parameters were found to be small. In addition, no side effects amounting to any major clinical relevance occurred in any of the patients. After 3 years of LDL apheresis, a decrease in the frequency of anginal chest pain and ST segment depression on exercise testing and a marked reduction of tendon xanthoma size were observed.