Effects of dietary fat on drug absorption

Review on Preclinical and Clinical Evidence of Food (Beverages, Fruits and Vegetables) and Drug Interactions: Mechanism and Safety

Background:

The therapeutic potency and efficacy of drugs can be affected by a patient’s dietary habit. The food composition and their nutritional value interact with drugs that lead to alteration of the therapeutic response of drugs in patients.

Objective:

This present review is an attempt to illustrate clinical reports of food-drug interaction. Further, it also highlights specific interaction mechanism(s) and the safety thereof.

Methods:

Through the search engine “Scopus”; literature on recent advances in food and drug interactions includes almost all therapeutic categories such as antimicrobials, antiviral, antifungal, antihistamines, anticoagulants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and drugs acting on the central nervous system and cardiovascular system.

Results:

Preclinical and clinical studies that have been conducted by various researchers affirm significant drug-food interactions across the various therapeutic categories of drugs. Preclinical studies have documented the effects of food, milk products, alcohols, fruit and vegetables on the drug absorption, metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. The clinical studies on fruits/vegetables and drugs interactions report significant alteration in therapeutic response.

Conclusion:

Based on the preclinical and clinical reports, it can be concluded that the interaction of food with drug(s) significantly alters their therapeutic potential. The inputs from clinical practitioners to elucidate potential risk of food-drug interaction need to be intensified in order to prevent adverse clinical consequences.

Comparative effect of different types of food on the bioavailability of cefaclor extended release tablet

This randomized, six-treatment, six-period, six sequence, single dose, crossover pharmacokinetic study assessed the effect of different types of food on the bioavailability of 500-mg cefaclor extended release tablet in 23 healthy male volunteers. A single dose of cefaclor extended release 500-mg tablet was administered at six occasions: after overnight fasting, after two vegetarian (high-fat and low-fat), two non-vegetarian (high-fat and low-fat) and rice diets. Serial blood samples were collected up to 12 h after dose. Serum cefaclor concentrations were determined by a validated HPLC method. An almost equivalent increase in both Cmax and AUC was observed with both high-fat non-vegetarian and low-fat vegetarian breakfasts. However, when MIC90 values, a pharmacodynamic end-point were compared, the low-fat vegetarian diet fared better than the high-fat non-vegetarian diet. The results obtained favor low-fat vegetarian diet (breakfast) to be taken with cefaclor extended release tablet to achieve maximum benefit in terms of clinical efficacy.

Time effects of food intake on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of quazepam

AIMS

There is little information on interaction between food and the hypnotic agent quazepam. We therefore studied the effects of food and its time interval on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of quazepam.

METHODS

A randomized three-phase crossover study with 2-week intervals was conducted. Nine healthy male volunteers took a single oral 20 mg dose of quazepam under the following conditions: 1) after fasting overnight; 2) 30 min after eating standard meal; or 3) 3 h after eating the same meal. Plasma concentrations of quazepam and its metabolite, 2-oxoquazepam and psychomotor function using the Digit Symbol Substitute Test (DSST), Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) and Visual Analogue Scale were measured up to 48 h.

RESULTS

During the food treatments at 30 min and 3 h before dosing, the peak concentrations (Cmax) were 300% (95% CI 260, 340%; P < 0.001) and 250% (95% CI 210, 290%; P < 0.01) of the corresponding value during the fasting phase. For quazepam, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h measured at 30 min and 3 h before dosing was significantly increased, with the food treatments by 2.4-fold (95% CI 2.0; 2.8-fold; P < 0.001) and 2.1-fold (95% CI 1.7; 2.4-fold; P < 0.01), respectively. In response to pharmacokinetic changes, some of the pharmacodynamics (DSST, P < 0.05; SSS, P < 0.05) differed significantly between fasted status and fed status. No difference was found in any pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters between the two food treatment phases.

CONCLUSIONS

A food effect on quazepam absorption is evident and continues at least until 3 h after food intake. The dosing of quazepam after a long period of ordinary fasting might reduce its efficacy because a 3 h interval between the timing of the evening meal and bedtime administration of hypnotics is regarded as normal in daily life.

Effect of dietary fat content in meals on pharmacokinetics of quazepam

Dietary fat content in meals has been reported to increase the absorption of several drugs proportionately. However, there is no information about the effects of dietary fat in meals on the sedative hypnotic agent quazepam, although limited data suggest that food intake alters quazepam absorption. Therefore, the authors measured and compared pharmacokinetic parameters of quazepam taken in a fasted state and taken 30 minutes after consuming meals containing different amounts of dietary fat. A three-arm randomized crossover study was conducted. Nine healthy male volunteers took a single oral 20-mg dose of quazepam under the following conditions: (1) after fasting overnight for at least 12 hours, (2) 30 minutes after consuming a low-fat meal (two slices of bread and 200 ml of apple juice), or (3) 30 minutes after consuming high-fat meal (two slices of bread with 30 gm of butter and 200 ml of apple juice). Plasma concentrations of quazepam and its metabolite, 2-oxoquazepam, were monitored up to 48 hours after the dosing. In comparison with corresponding plasma values for quazepam taken in a fasting state, the peak concentrations (Cmax) of quazepam taken 30 minutes after consuming a low-fat meal and high-fat meal were 243% (90% confidence interval [CI] = 161%-325%) and 272% (90% CI = 190%-355%), respectively. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 hours (AUC(0-8)) and 0 to 48 hours (AUC(0-48)) of quazepam was increased with the low-fat meal by 2-fold (90% CI = 1.5- to 2.7-fold) and 1.4-fold (90% CI = 1.0- to 1.7-fold), respectively, and with the high-fat meal by 2.2-fold (90% CI = 1.3- to 3-fold) and 1.5-fold (90% CI = 0.7- to 2.4-fold), respectively. The pharmacokinetic change in 2-oxoquazepam to the parent compound was similar. Quazepam was well tolerated, with no significant difference in the Stanford Sleepiness Scale between fasted and fed conditions. These findings show that food intake has an evident effect on quazepam absorption, but further studies are needed to clarify a determinant factor of this alteration (2.5-fold for Cmax and 2.1-fold for AUC(0-8), on average). It might not be necessary to do dose adjustment with meal content because quazepam is well tolerated.

Effect of food on everolimus absorption: quantification in healthy subjects and a confirmatory screening in patients with renal transplants

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To quantify the influence of a high-fat meal on the oral bioavailability of the immunosuppressant everolimus in a single-dose study in healthy subjects and to confirm the results in a small food-effect screening assessment in patients with renal transplants who were receiving multiple-dose everolimus.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, crossover, single-dose study and confirmatory screening.

SETTING

Phase 1 unit for the single-dose study and two German hospitals for the patient screening.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-four healthy male volunteers; six clinically stable patients with renal transplants who were originally part of a phase I dose-escalation study.

INTERVENTION

The 24 healthy men received everolimus 2 mg orally under fasting conditions and after a high-fat meal. The six patients received everolimus 2.5 mg/day orally, in addition to cyclosporine and prednisone. On two occasions, a pharmacokinetic profile was obtained over the dosing interval after drug administration under fasting conditions and after a high-fat meal in a randomized sequence.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In the single-dose study in healthy subjects, a high-fat meal delayed everolimus time to maximum concentration (Tmax) by a median 1.25 hours, reduced peak blood concentration (Cmax) by 60%, and reduced area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 16%. In the multiple-dose screening in patients with renal transplants, a high-fat meal delayed Tmax by a median 1.75 hours and reduced Cmax by 53% and AUC by 21%. Everolimus trough levels showed no food effect, whereas the peak-trough fluctuation was dampened by 52%.

CONCLUSIONS

A high-fat meal modestly reduced everolimus AUC. To minimize longitudinal variability in exposure, everolimus should be administered consistently either with food or without food.

Comparative bioavailability evaluation of two cyclosporine oral formulations in healthy Mexican volunteers

BACKGROUND

The use of conventional cyclosporine (Sandimmune) requires great care, as this drug exhibits a narrow therapeutic index and wide interindividual variability in its pharmacokinetics. Recently, a new microemulsion formulation (Neoral) was developed. With this formulation, cyclosporine is absorbed at the small intestine without the presence of bile. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the bioavailability of cyclosporine after the administration of conventional and microemulsion formulations in healthy Mexican volunteers in order to approach the optimal dosage regimen of microemulsion in the Mexican population.

METHODS

The trial was conducted using 23 healthy volunteers according to a randomized crossover design. Volunteers received one 7.5-mg/kg dose as each formulation, with a 1-week washout period between treatments. Blood samples of 0.5 mL were obtained according to the following schedule: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after medication.

RESULTS

These indicated that Cmax and AUC0-24 values were higher with the microemulsion than with the conventional formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The microemulsion had a better absorption profile than the conventional formulation, because plasma levels with the conventional formulation demonstrated oscillations rather than reflecting an erratic absorption. Lower doses of the microemulsion are required to obtain Cmax values similar to those obtained with conventional cyclosporine.

Management of drug interactions in patients with HIV

OBJECTIVE

To provide a complication of relevant information on drug interactions to assist healthcare practitioners in managing complex HIV-related pharmacotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

Information was retrieved via a MEDLINE search (January 1966-December 1996) using MeSH headings "human immunodeficiency virus," "drug interactions," and names of medications commonly prescribed for the management of HIV infection and related opportunistic infections. Abstracts of international and national conferences, review articles, textbooks, and references of all articles were also searched.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All literature on pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions was considered for inclusion. Pertinent information, as assessed by the authors, was selected and summarized for discussion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Drug disposition and/or pharmacologic effect may be affected either by HIV-related physiologic changes or by the presence of concomitant drug therapy. Modifications in drug selection, dosage, dosing regimen, or route of administration may be needed to avoid or manage drug-disease, drug-drug, or drug-food interactions. Management options may depend on the mechanism and the clinical significance of the interaction, the availability of therapeutic alternatives, patient convenience, and cost restrictions. In the absence of specific data, consideration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics to assist practitioners in predicting the likelihood of possible interactions was included.

RESULTS

A comprehensive table of clinically significant drug interactions is provided. Drug interaction principles and practical management strategies are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for drug interactions is extremely common, given the increasing complexity of managing patients infected with HIV. To avoid compromising therapeutic efficacy or increasing drug toxicity, practitioners need to be aware of potential interactions and are encouraged to use a systematic approach when managing patient drug therapy.