Ovarian function is effectively inhibited by a low-dose triphasic oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel

Pharmacodynamics of combined estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives 3. Inhibition of ovulation

INTRODUCTION

Following a historical overview, the ovulation-inhibiting effect of various orally administered estrogen-progestin combinations (combined oral contraceptives [COCs]) are examined for their components alone or in the various combined formulations. Special emphasis is given to products containing natural estrogens. Areas covered: Inhibition of ovulation with progestins alone; estrogens alone; various progestins in combination with ethinyl estradiol; various progestins in combination with natural estrogens (estradiol, estradiol valerate, and estetrol). Expert commentary: The original idea to achieve ovulation blockage through the administration of steroid hormones involved the use a progestogen (both progesterone and its synthetic homologous). The ability of a progestin to inhibit ovulation depends on the type of compound and on its dosage and a difference of more than 20-fold in activity exists between compounds utilized today in COCs. Initially, the estrogenic component was present only because it contaminated the first progestin utilized. It was soon found that an estrogen is necessary for proper cycle control. It was also found that the estrogen acts synergistically in inhibiting ovulation. For almost half a century, most COCs contained ethinyl estradiol. Today, also natural estrogens are being employed. Inhibition of ovulation was complete with all early high dose preparations. Decreasing dosage allowed some ovarian activity to occur, occasionally leading to a mature follicle. Even in this situation, defective corpus luteum formation assured contraceptive protection.

Oral contraceptive pill, progestogen or oestrogen pretreatment for ovarian stimulation protocols for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

BACKGROUND

Among subfertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART), hormone pills given before ovarian stimulation may improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether pretreatment with the combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) or with a progestogen or oestrogen alone in ovarian stimulation protocols affects outcomes in subfertile couples undergoing ART.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to January 2017: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, The Cochrane Central Register Studies Online, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and registers of ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of hormonal pretreatment in women undergoing ART.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were live birth or ongoing pregnancy and pregnancy loss.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 29 RCTs (4701 women) of pretreatment with COCPs, progestogens or oestrogens versus no pretreatment or alternative pretreatments, in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist cycles. Overall, evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate. The main limitations were risk of bias and imprecision. Most studies did not describe their methods in adequate detail. Combined oral contraceptive pill versus no pretreatmentWith antagonist cycles in both groups the rate of live birth or ongoing pregnancy was lower in the pretreatment group (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.95; 6 RCTs; 1335 women; I2 = 0%; moderate quality evidence). There was insufficient evidence to determine whether the groups differed in rates of pregnancy loss (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.26; 5 RCTs; 868 women; I2 = 0%; moderate quality evidence), multiple pregnancy (OR 2.21, 95% CI 0.53 to 9.26; 2 RCTs; 125 women; I2 = 0%; low quality evidence), ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS; OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.28 to 3.40; 2 RCTs; 642 women; I2 = 0%, low quality evidence), or ovarian cyst formation (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.75; 1 RCT; 64 women; very low quality evidence).In COCP plus antagonist cycles versus no pretreatment in agonist cycles, there was insufficient evidence to determine whether the groups differed in rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.25; 4 RCTs; 724 women; I2 = 0%; moderate quality evidence), multiple pregnancy (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.19; 4 RCTs; 546 women; I2 = 0%; moderate quality evidence), or OHSS (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.96; 2 RCTs; 290 women, I2 = 0%), but there were fewer pregnancy losses in the pretreatment group (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.72; 5 RCTs; 780 women; I2 = 0%; moderate quality evidence). There were no data suitable for analysis on ovarian cyst formation.One small study comparing COCP versus no pretreatment in agonist cycles showed no clear difference between the groups for any of the reported outcomes. Progestogen versus no pretreatmentAll studies used the same protocol (antagonist, agonist or gonadotrophins) in both groups. There was insufficient evidence to determine any differences in rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy (agonist: OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.65; 2 RCTs; 222 women; I2 = 24%; low quality evidence; antagonist: OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.54; 1 RCT; 47 women; low quality evidence; gonadotrophins: OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.09 to 4.23; 1 RCT; 42 women; very low quality evidence), pregnancy loss (agonist: OR 2.26, 95% CI 0.67 to 7.55; 2 RCTs; 222 women; I2 = 0%; low quality evidence; antagonist: OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.09; 1 RCT; 47 women; low quality evidence; gonadotrophins: OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 17.12; 1 RCT; 42 women; very low quality evidence) or multiple pregnancy (agonist: no data available; antagonist: OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.06 to 17.76; 1 RCT; 47 women; low quality evidence; gonadotrophins: no data available). Three studies, all using agonist cycles, reported ovarian cyst formation: rates were lower in the pretreatment group (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.32; 374 women; I2 = 1%; moderate quality evidence). There were no data on OHSS. Oestrogen versus no pretreatmentIn antagonist or agonist cycles, there was insufficient evidence to determine whether the groups differed in rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy (antagonist versus antagonist: OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.17; 2 RCTs; 502 women; I2 = 0%; low quality evidence; antagonist versus agonist: OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.50; 2 RCTs; 242 women; I2 = 0%; very low quality evidence), pregnancy loss (antagonist versus antagonist: OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.47; 1 RCT; 49 women; very low quality evidence; antagonist versus agonist: OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.62 to 4.06; 1 RCT; 220 women; very low quality evidence), multiple pregnancy (antagonist versus antagonist: no data available; antagonist versus agonist: OR 2.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 53.59; 1 RCT; 22 women; very low quality evidence) or OHSS (antagonist versus antagonist: no data available; antagonist versus agonist: OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.25 to 9.42; 1 RCT; 220 women). Ovarian cyst formation was not reported. Head-to-head comparisonsCOCP was compared with progestogen (1 RCT, 44 women), and with oestrogen (2 RCTs, 146 women), and progestogen was compared with oestrogen (1 RCT, 48 women), with an antagonist cycle in both groups. COCP in an agonist cycle was compared with oestrogen in an antagonist cycle (1 RCT, 25 women). Data were scant but there was no clear evidence that any of the groups differed in rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy, pregnancy loss or other adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Among women undergoing ovarian stimulation in antagonist protocols, COCP pretreatment was associated with a lower rate of live birth or ongoing pregnancy than no pretreatment. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy were influenced by pretreatment with progestogens or oestrogens, or by COCP pretreatment using other stimulation protocols. Findings on adverse events were inconclusive, except that progesterone pretreatment may reduce the risk of ovarian cysts in agonist cycles, and COCP in antagonist cycles may reduce the risk of pregnancy loss compared with no pretreatment in agonist cycles.

Ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel alter cognition and anxiety in rats concurrent with a decrease in tyrosine hydroxylase expression in the locus coeruleus and brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in the hippocampus

In the United States, more than ten million women use contraceptive hormones. Ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel have been mainstay contraceptive hormones for the last four decades. Surprisingly, there is scant information regarding their action on the central nervous system and behavior. Intact female rats received three weeks of subcutaneous ethinyl estradiol (10 or 30μg/rat/day), levonorgestrel (20 or 60μg/rat/day), a combination of both (10/20μg/rat/day and 30/60μg/rat/day), or vehicle. Subsequently, the rats were tested in three versions of the novel object recognition test to assess learning and memory, and a battery of tests for anxiety-like behavior. Serum estradiol and ovarian weights were measured. All treatment groups exhibited low endogenous 17β-estradiol levels at the time of testing. Dose-dependent effects of drug treatment manifested in both cognitive and anxiety tests. All low dose drugs decreased anxiety-like behavior and impaired performance on novel object recognition. In contrast, the high dose ethinyl estradiol increased anxiety-like behavior and improved performance in cognitive testing. In the cell molecular analyses, low doses of all drugs induced a decrease in tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA and protein in the locus coeruleus. At the same time, low doses of ethinyl estradiol and ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel increased galanin protein in this structure. Consistent with the findings above, the low dose treatments of ethinyl estradiol and combination ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in the hippocampus. These effects of ethinyl estradiol 10μg alone and in combination with levonorgestrel 20μg suggest a diminution of norepinephrine input into the hippocampus resulting in a decline in learning and memory.

The effect of combined oral contraception on testosterone levels in healthy women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND; Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) reduce levels of androgen, especially testosterone (T), by inhibiting ovarian and adrenal androgen synthesis and by increasing levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Although this suppressive effect has been investigated by numerous studies over many years, to our knowledge no systematic review concerning this issue had been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of COCs on concentrations of total T, free T and SHBG in healthy women and to evaluate differences between the various types of COCs (e.g. estrogen dose, type of progestin) and the assays used to assess total T and free T.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed using database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials) and all publications (from inception date until July 2012) investigating the effect of COCs on androgen levels in healthy women were considered eligible for selection. Three reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction and critical appraisal. For the meta-analysis, data on total T, free T and SHBG were extracted and combined using random effects analysis. Additional subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate differences between the various types of COCs (e.g. estrogen dose, type of progestin) and the assays used to assess total T or free T.

RESULTS

A total of 151 records were identified by systematic review and 42 studies with a total of 1495 healthy young women (age range: 18-40 years) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies were experimental studies and 21 were non-comparative. Pooling of the results derived from all the included papers showed that total T levels significantly decreased during COC use [mean difference (MD) (95% confidence interval, CI) -0.49 nmol/l (-0.55, -0.42); P < 0.001]. Significantly lower levels of free T were also found [relative change (95% CI) 0.39 (0.35, 0.43); P < 0.001], with a mean decrease of 61%. On the contrary, SHBG concentrations significantly increased during all types of COC use [MD (95% CI) 99.08 nmol/l (86.43, 111.73); P < 0.001]. Subgroup analyses revealed that COCs containing 20-25 µg EE had similar effects on total and free T compared with COCs with 30-35 µg EE. In addition, suppressive effects on T levels were not different when comparing different types of progestins. However, subgroup analyses for the estrogen dose and the progestin type in relation to changes in SHBG levels did show significant differences: COCs containing second generation progestins and/or the lower estrogen doses (20-25 µg EE) were found to have less impact on SHBG concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature review and meta-analysis demonstrates that COCs decrease circulating levels of total T and free T and increase SBHG concentrations. Due to the SHBG increase, free T levels decrease twice as much as total T. The estrogen dose and progestin type of the COC do not influence the decline of total and free T, but both affect SHBG. The clinical implications of suppressed androgen levels during COC use remain to be elucidated.

Combined effects of levonorgestrel and quinestrol on reproductive hormone levels and receptor expression in females of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus)

The effects of treatment with a combination of levonorgestrel and quinestrol (EP-1; ratio of 2:1) on reproductive hormone levels and the expression of their receptors in female Mongolian gerbils were examined. We show that serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) decreased, whereas serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) increased after EP-1 treatment. EP1 down-regulated mRNA expression of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) and the estrogen receptor (ER) βin the ovary. EP-1 up-regulated the mRNA expression of the luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) and the progesterone receptor (PR) in the ovary as well as ERα and PR in the uterus of Mongolian gerbils. The effects were time-dependent and dose-dependent. EP-1 had no obvious effects on ERα mRNA expression in the ovary. The current study demonstrates that the effect of EP-1 on the expression of ER subtypes is tissue-specific in Mongolian gerbils. EP-1 disrupted the reproductive endocrinology of the Mongolian gerbil. These findings suggest that the effects of EP-1 on reproductive hormone levels and their receptor expression in Mongolian gerbils may be the result of synergistic actions of levonorgestrel and quinestrol, with quinestrol playing the major role.

Androgenic hormones and aging--the link with female sexual function

In women, sexual function, hormones and aging are inextricably related. Sexual activity in women involves interest and motivation, the ability to become aroused and achieve orgasm, the pleasure of the experience and subsequent personal satisfaction. Androgens, as endogenous hormones or given as a therapy, potentially influence female sexual function, with research into the effects of exogenous androgens in women mostly devoted to effects on sexual desire. Some studies have been conducted to delineate the effects of testosterone on arousal, however arousal determined by laboratory measures does not always correlate with subjective reporting of a sensation of arousal. Overall large randomised controlled trials of exogenous testosterone show benefits over placebo on sexual desire, arousal, orgasm, pleasure and satisfaction. The aspects of consideration of androgen therapy for women that continue to stimulate debate in this therapeutic area include whether female sexual dysfunction is a condition that merits pharmacotherapy, how effective is such treatment and whether testosterone therapy is safe.

Oral contraceptive pill, progestogen or estrogen pre-treatment for ovarian stimulation protocols for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

BACKGROUND

For many subfertile women, assisted reproductive techniques (ART) is the only hope for a pregnancy and live birth. The combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) given prior to the hormone therapy in an IVF cycle may result in better pregnancy outcomes of ART.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether pre-treatment with combined OCPs, progestogens or estrogens in ovarian stimulation protocols affects outcomes in subfertile couples undergoing ART.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO. Other electronic resources on the Internet, reference list of relevant articles were also searched as well as the ESHRE abstracts (2008). All these searches were conducted in November 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of pre-treatment with combined OCP, progestogen or estrogen in subfertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed risk of bias. We calculated Peto odds ratios for dichotomous data and weighted mean difference for continuous variables. Authors of trials were contacted in case of missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

No evidence of effect was found with regard to the number of live births when using a pre-treatment. However, the combined OCP in GnRH antagonist cycles, compared to no pre-treatment, is associated with fewer clinical pregnancies (Peto OR 0.69, P = 0.03) and more days and a higher amount of gonadotrophin therapy (respectively: MD 1.44, P < 0.00001; and MD 691.69, P < 0.00001). Also compared to placebo or no pre-treatment, a progestogen pre-treatment in GnRH agonist cycles, is associated with more clinical pregnancies (Peto OR 1.95, P = 0.007) and fewer ovarian cysts (Peto OR 0.21, P < 0.00001). At last, in estrogen pre-treated GnRH antagonist cycles, compared to no pre-treatment, more oocytes are retrieved (MD 2.01, P < 0.00001), but a higher amount of gonadotrophin therapy is needed (MD 207.08, P < 0.00001). For the other outcomes no evidence of effect was found or there were not enough studies available in the subgroup for pooling.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was evidence of improved pregnancy outcomes with progestogen pre-treatment and poorer pregnancy outcomes with a combined OCP pre-treatment. However, we conclude that major changes in ART protocols should not be made at this time, since the number of overall studies in the subgroups is small and reporting of the major outcomes is inadequate.

Biological factors and the determination of androgens in female subjects

The idea of the presence of androgens in females may sound peculiar as androgens generally refer to male hormones. Although produced in small amounts in women, androgens have direct and significant effects on many aspects of female physiology. Moreover, androgens are precursors to estrogens, which are the predominant female sex hormones. The measurement of androgens in blood is important in the diagnosis of both gonadal and adrenal functional disturbances, as well as monitoring subsequent treatments. The accuracy of such measurements is crucial in sports medicine and doping control. Therefore, the concentration of androgens in female subjects is frequently measured. Analysing such compounds with accuracy is especially difficult, costly and time consuming. Therefore, laboratories widely use direct radioimmunoassay kits, which are often insensitive and inaccurate. It is especially complicated to determine the level of androgens in women, as the concentration is much lower compared to the concentration found in males. Additionally, the amount of androgens in fluids tends to decrease with aging. Analyses of hormone concentrations are influenced by a myriad of factors. The factors influencing the outcome of these tests can be divided into in vivo preanalytical factors (e.g., aging, chronobiological rhythms, diet, menstrual cycle, physical exercise, etc.), in vitro preanalytical factors (e.g., specimen collection, equipment, transport, storage, etc.) and as mentioned before, analytical factors. To improve the value of these tests, the strongly influencing factors must be controlled. This can be accomplished using standardised assays and specimen collection procedures. In general, sufficient attention is not given to the preanalytical (biological) factors, especially in the measurement of androgens in females. Biological factors (non-pathological factors) that may influence the outcome of these tests in female subjects have received little attention and are the topic of the present review.

Effects of oral contraceptives administered at defined stages of ovarian follicular development

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the effects of initiating oral contraceptives (OC) at defined stages of ovarian follicle development.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

Healthy volunteers in an academic research environment.

PATIENT(S)

Forty-five healthy women between the ages of 18 and 35 years, randomized to initiate OC when a follicle diameter of 10, 14, or 18 mm was first detected.

INTERVENTION(S)

The OC administration at defined stages of dominant follicle development.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Fates of all dominant follicles and serum concentrations of E(2)-17beta, LH, and P before and after initiating OC.

RESULT(S)

No ovulations (0/16) were observed when OC use was initiated at a follicle diameter of 10 mm, 4/14 (29%) follicles ovulated when OC were initiated at 14 mm, and 14/15 (93%) ovulated when OC were initiated at 18 mm. When ovulation did not occur, follicles regressed or became anovulatory cysts. Peak LH and E(2) levels were lowest in the 10-mm group, moderate in the 14-mm group, and greatest in the 18-mm group. Peak endocrine levels in all treatment groups were lower than the historic reference group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Follicular development, ovulation, and endocrine concentrations were not suppressed effectively when OC were initiated at late stages of dominant follicle development.

Ovarian follicular development during the use of oral contraception: a review

Over the past 40 years, alterations to the composition of oral contraceptives (OCs) have been made in attempts to reduce adverse effects and to improve patient compliance while maintaining contraceptive efficacy. However, there is growing evidence to indicate that reducing the estrogen dose to minimize adverse effects may have compromised the degree of hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian suppression, particularly during the hormone-free interval (HFI) or following missed doses. Follicle development during OC use appears to occur in association with a loss of endocrine suppression during the HFI. This information provides a rationale for reducing or eliminating the HFI in OC regimens. There is also evidence for an increased risk of follicle development and ovulation in women who use delayed OC initiation schemes, such as the "Sunday Start" method. It is not currently known why some follicles ovulate during OC use while others regress or form anovulatory follicle cysts. Continued research about follicle development during OC use would provide insight into understanding the precise mechanisms of action underlying combined OCs, as well as those of continuous OC formulations and emergency contraceptive regimens.

Effect of four different oral contraceptives on various sex hormones and serum-binding globulins

In a double-blind, controlled, randomized, four-arm, bicentric clinical study, the effect of four oral contraceptives (OCs) on various hormone parameters and serum-binding globulins was investigated. Four groups with 25 volunteers each (18-35 years of age) were treated for six cycles with monophasic combinations containing 21 tablets with either 30 microg ethinylestradiol (EE) + 2 mg dienogest (DNG) (30EE/DNG), 20 microg EE + 2 mg DNG (20EE/DNG), 10 microg EE + 2 mg estradiol valerate (EV) + 2 mg DNG (EE/EV/DNG) or 20 microg EE + 100 microg levonorgestrel (LNG) (EE/LNG). The study was completed by 91 subjects. Blood samples were taken after at least 12 h of fasting on Day 21-26 of the preceding control cycle and on Day 18-21 of the first, third and sixth treatment cycle. The serum concentrations of free testosterone were significantly decreased by about 40-60% in all four groups, while those of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) showed a time-dependent decrease during treatment. Except for EE/EV/DNG, which increased prolactin significantly during the third and sixth cycles, no change was observed with the EE-containing preparations. There was a significant increase in the levels of serum-binding globulins during treatment, which differed according to the composition of the OCs used. The rise in sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) was highest during intake of 30EE/DNG (+320%) and lowest with EE/LNG (+80%), while the effect of 20EE/DNG and EE/EV/DNG was similar (+270%). The thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG) levels increased significantly, by 50-60%, during treatment with the DNG-containing formulations, while the effect of EE/LNG was less significant (+30%). The rise in corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), which occurred in all groups, was most pronounced in women treated with 30EE/DNG (+90%) and least with EE/EV/DNG (+55%), indicating a strong influence of EE and no effect of the progestogen component. In all treatment groups, the frequency of intracyclic bleeding rose in the first treatment cycle and decreased thereafter. Cycle control was significantly better with 30EE/DNG or EE/LNG than with 20EE/DNG or EE/EV/DNG. There was no significant change in blood pressure, body mass index or pulse rate throughout the study. In conclusion, the DNG-containing OCs caused a higher rise in SHBG and TBG levels than the LNG-containing preparation. The effects on CBG suggest a lesser hepatic effect of 2 mg EV as compared to 20 or 30 microg EE. In contrast to EE, the use of estradiol in OCs appeared to increase prolactin release, while the cycle control was better with the OC containing 30 microg EE.

Progesterone receptor is not required for progesterone action in the rat corpus luteum of pregnancy

In this study, we investigated whether progesterone exerts a local action regulating the function of the corpus luteum of pregnancy in rats. The luteal activities of the enzymes 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3beta-HSD), involved in progesterone biosynthesis, and 20alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (20alpha-HSD), that catabolizes progesterone and reduces progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum, were evaluated after intrabursal ovarian administration of progesterone in pregnant rats that had received a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha). Luteal 3beta-HSD activity decreased and 20alpha-HSD activity increased after PGF2alpha treatment (100 microg x 2 intraperitoneally on Day 19 of pregnancy at 12:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.) when compared with controls sacrificed at 8:00 p.m. on Day 20 of pregnancy. This effect of PGF2alpha on the luteal 3beta-HSD and 20alpha-HSD activities was abolished in animals that also received an intraovarian dose of progesterone (3 microg/ovary on Day 19 of pregnancy at 8:00-9:00 a.m.). In a second functional study, luteal cells obtained from 19-day pregnant rats responded to the synthetic progestin promegestone (R5020) in a dose-dependent manner, with an increase in the progesterone output. In addition, the glucocorticoid agent hydrocortisone did not affect progesterone accumulation in the same luteal cell culture. We also examined by immunocytochemistry the expression of progesterone receptors (PR) in the corpora lutea during pregnancy and demonstrated the absence of PR in this endocrine gland in all the days of pregnancy studied. In the same pregnant rats, positive staining for PR was observed in cells within the uteroplacental unit, such as cells of the decidua basalis and trophoblast giant cells of the junctional zone. In addition, positive PR staining was observed in the ovarian granulosa and theca cells of growing follicles, but not in corpora lutea of ovaries obtained from cycling rats at proestrus. In summary, this report provides further evidence of a local action of progesterone regulating luteal function in the rat despite the absence of a classic PR.

A randomized cross-over study on various hormonal parameters of two triphasic oral contraceptives

The effect of two triphasic oral contraceptives (Triquilar [TRQ] and Trisiston [TRS]) containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) on various hormonal parameters was investigated in 26 women during a cross-over study. TRS consisted of 0.03 mg EE + 0.05 mg LNG (six tablets), 0.04 mg EE + 0.075 mg LNG (six tablets), and 0.03 mg EE + 0.15 mg LNG (nine tablets), whereas TRQ was different in the second phase (five tablets) and third phase (10 tablets). Blood samples were taken on days 6, 11, 21, and 28 of the control and washout cycles and the third treatment cycle. Both formulations inhibited ovulation reliably and decreased the serum levels of gonadotropins, free testosterone, and dehydroepiandosterone sulfate in a time-dependent manner, whereas estradiol and testosterone were already suppressed on day 6, indicating a direct suppressive effect on ovarian steroid synthesis. Prolactin, which rose sporadically in some women, was not significantly changed. In contrast, the levels of sex hormone binding globulin, corticosteroid binding globulin, and cortisol were significantly elevated by 100%. During the hormone-free interval of 7 days, all parameters returned at least partly to baseline. There was no significant difference between the effects of both formulations. The results suggest the possibility of a direct inhibitory effect of contraceptive steroids on ovarian steroid synthesis.

Ovarian activity during regular oral contraceptive use

The aim of this study was to assess whether during regular OC use ovarian activity might lead to ovulation, as assessed by ultrasound (US) evaluation of follicular growth and blood levels of 17-beta-estradiol and progesterone. A total of 51 healthy women with normal menstrual cycles (28 +/- 3 days) and no gynecological symptoms were recruited. A total of 22 patients were given a triphasic OC pill containing 35 mg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 50 mg desogestrel (DSG) in the first seven tablets; 30 mg EE and 100 mg DSG in tablets 8 to 14, and 30 mg EE and 150 mg DSG in tablets 15 to 21; 29 patients received one of two OC pills, both containing 20 mg EE plus 150 mg DSG (15 patients) or 75 mg of gestodene (14 patients). A total of 86 cycles were monitored: 51 during the 3rd-4th cycle and 35 during the 6th-8th cycle of OC treatment. Follicular-like structures were observed in nine patients. The frequency of follicular-like structures was similar during the 3rd-4th cycle (9%) and during the 6th-8th cycle (11%). There was no relationship between follicular growth and blood levels of E2 and progesterone, which always appeared suppressed. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that during OC use (even with low dose of ethinyl estradiol), a little ovarian activity may be present without ovulation.

The effect of monophasic combinations of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone on gonadotropins, androgens and sex hormone binding globulin: a randomized trial

The effects of different monophasic combinations of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone on FSH, LH, sex hormone binding globulin, total testosterone, androstenedione, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels in non-obese, non-hirsute women were compared. Retrospective analysis of frozen serum from a prospective randomized trial in which women received one of three oral contraceptive pills containing ethinyl estradiol 50 micrograms/norethindrone 1 mg, ethinyl estradiol 35 micrograms/norethindrone 1 mg or ethinyl estradiol 35 g/norethindrone 0.5 mg for nine cycles was conducted. Blood samples were obtained prior to treatment and during the third, sixth and ninth pill cycles. Ethinyl estradiol 50 micrograms/norethindrone 1 mg and ethinyl estradiol 35 micrograms/norethindrone 1 mg suppressed FSH, LH, and total testosterone and increased sex hormone binding globulin to a similar degree. Ethinyl estradiol 35 micrograms/norethindrone 0.5 mg resulted in less suppression of FSH, LH, and total testosterone, but greater elevation of sex hormone binding globulin. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate was suppressed to a similar degree with ethinyl estradiol 35 micrograms/norethindrone 1 mg and ethinyl estradiol 35 micrograms/norethindrone 0.5 mg, but ethinyl estradiol 50 micrograms/norethindrone 1 mg resulted in the least suppression of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. Ethinyl estradiol 35 micrograms/norethindrone 1 mg caused greater suppression of androstenedione than did the other two oral contraceptives. Oral contraceptive-induced changes in gonadotropins, androgens, and sex hormone binding globulin can be predicted by considering the relative amounts of estrogen and progestin in the pill. When combined with 1 mg of norethindrone, 50 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol did not result in greater suppression of FSH, LH, or total testosterone or in greater elevation of sex hormone binding globulin than did 35 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol.

Levonorgestrel inhibits luteinizing hormone-stimulated progesterone production in rat luteal cells

The effects of the synthetic progestin levonorgestrel (LNG) on basal and LH-stimulated progesterone production were studied in collagenase-dispersed luteal cells obtained from 9-day pregnant rats. Luteal cells responded to ovine LH (oLH) with an increase in progesterone output which was maximal at a dose of 100 ng/ml. No effect of LNG was observed at 0.1-10 microM, but at 100 microM, it inhibited basal progesterone production. On the other hand, a dose of 10 microM LNG suppressed the stimulation of progesterone secretion induced by oLH, dibutyryl-cAMP and pregnenolone. It is suggested that the possible mechanism of action of the progestin involves a post-cAMP site and, in some way, may lead to an interference with 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity, which catalyzes the formation of progesterone from pregnenolone, the last step of progesterone biosynthesis. This study provides a different point of view supporting an autocrine control mechanism by which progesterone, the principal steroidogenic product of luteal cells, may exert a negative ultra-short loop regulation of its own biosynthesis.

New progestogens in oral contraception

The major developments in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have been a reduction in the total dose of both the oestrogen and progestogen administered per cycle and the introduction of new progestogens which are claimed to be more 'selective' than the older ones. This review examines in detail the clinical efficacy of the new COCs, where possible in comparison with those containing levonorgestrel or norethisterone, and their pharmacological effect on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, haematological factors, pituitary-ovarian function and serum protein and androgen concentrations. Based mainly on the pharmacological evidence, the newer COCs are an improvement over the older low-dose formulations and are clearly preferable to the high-dose ones. However, the older low-dose COCs, despite many years of use, have not resulted in a high incidence of adverse effects. The increasing use of the new COCs, as evidenced by their increasing market share throughout Europe, does indicate that they have been well accepted in clinical practice.

Mechanism of action of levonorgestrel: in vitro metabolism and specific interactions with steroid receptors in target organs

Levonorgestrel (LNG) is a synthetic steroid that displays potent progestational and androgenic effects but it lacks estrogen-like activity. To examine the mode of action of this progestin, we studied its metabolism in vitro in target organs and the specific interactions of LNG and its metabolites with putative steroid receptors. The results demonstrated that [3H]LNG was efficiently converted to A-ring reduced derivatives when incubated with rat hypothalamus and pituitary. Under optimal incubation conditions, [3H]5 alpha-dihydro LNG (5 alpha-LNG) and [3H]3 alpha,5 alpha-tetrahydro LNG (3 alpha,5 alpha-LNG) were identified as the major metabolic conversion products, while [3H]3 beta,5 alpha-LNG formation occurred to a lesser extent. A-ring reduction of LNG was NADPH-dependent. Assessment of the relative binding affinities of LNG and its derivatives to progesterone (PR), androgen (AR) and estrogen (ER) receptors by displacement analysis revealed that unchanged LNG binds with high affinity to PR and AR but not to ER. 5 alpha-LNG exhibited a diminished though significant interaction with PR and an enhanced binding affinity for AR as compared with LNG, indicating that 5 alpha-reduction of LNG increases its affinity for AR. The most striking finding was that further reduction of the 5 alpha-LNG molecule at C-3 abolished its binding activity to PR, AR, and even to ER. The overall data provides a plausible explanation for the lack of estrogen agonistic action of LNG and for its potent progestational and androgenic effects.

Lipids, cardiovascular disease, and oral contraceptives: a practical perspective

Figure 9 is an attempt to summate the influences of life-style on lipid parameters. Based on the work of Nikkila, it shows the source of the production of HDL and LDL, the factors that can affect these lipoprotein levels, and where in the cascade of lipoprotein metabolism these factors exert influence. The source of HDL production is the liver and the intestine. At this stage, diet, exercise, hormones, genetics, drugs, and certain disease states can affect HDL levels. Lecithin-cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT) esterifies HDL-free cholesterol in plasma, and HDL3 is formed that in turn is transformed to HDL2. At the same time, VLDL from the gut and the liver will be converted, under the influence of LPL, to HDL2 and LDL. Thus HDL2 is being formed by the breakdown of VLDL and from the transformation of HDL3 to HDL2. Insulin, exercise, alcohol, fats, drugs, and diet affect lipoprotein lipase and consequently influence levels of LDL and HDL2 indirectly. Progestogens increase and estrogens decrease hepatic endothelial lipase, thus affecting the HDL2 concentration. It is at this point that combination OCs influence HDL2. The balance between estrogen and progestogen in a given contraceptive determines the extent and direction of HDL2 concentration. A separate pathway in the liver also catabolizes HDL2 and HDL3. LDL is generated partly from catabolism of VLDL and is partly secreted from the liver. The removal of LDL is mediated by receptors in both the liver and peripheral tissues. It is here that the Brown-Goldstein theory plays a major role. If LDL receptors are present in an insufficient number or are defective, then the C will accumulate and atherosclerosis may follow. Thus two key enzymes, LCAT and LPL, control the production of HDL2 and LDL, whereas a third enzyme, hepatic endothelial lipase, catabolizes HDL2.

Effect of two oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene or 150 micrograms desogestrel upon various hormonal parameters

The effect of two oral contraceptives containing 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 75 micrograms gestodene or 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol + 150 micrograms desogestrel upon various hormonal parameters were measured in 11 women each on days 1, 10, and 21 of the first, second, third, sixth, and twelfth treatment cycle and compared to the levels on days 1, 10, and 21 of the preceding control cycle. There was no significant difference in the clinical effects or in the influence on the serum hormone parameters between both formulations. A significant decrease in the serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone was observed during each cycle which was dependent on the duration of intake. Contrary to this, prolactin was not significantly altered, but 6 out of the 22 women showed episodically elevated prolactin levels. Serum estradiol and progesterone were profoundly suppressed, except one woman who ovulated during the twelfth cycle probably due to a therapy with metamizol, trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole. The concentrations of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate were significantly and time-dependently reduced by 20 to 25% during each treatment cycle. There was also a significant decrease in the serum levels of testosterone by 20 to 30% and of free testosterone by 40 to 60%, while sex hormone-binding globulin increased by 250 to 300%. It could be observed that during the pill-free interval of 7 days the pituitary and ovarian function recovered, while the sex hormone-binding globulin levels remained elevated by 100%.

Divergent effects of two low-dose oral contraceptives on sex hormone-binding globulin and free testosterone

The effect of a triphasic combination of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel on the serum concentrations of total testosterone, free testosterone, and sex hormone-binding globulin as measured directly by radioimmunoassay and on the binding capacity of sex hormone-binding globulin was compared with that of a preparation containing ethinyl estradiol and desogestrel. Blood samples were taken on days 6, 11, 21, and 28 of a control cycle, the third cycle of treatment with either ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel or ethinyl estradiol-desogestrel (11 volunteers each), the third cycle of a 3-month washout period, and the third treatment cycle after crossover change of the preparations. There was a significant reduction in total testosterone by 16% during treatment with both preparations. Ethinyl estradiol-desogestrel increased the concentration (+175%) and binding capacity (+330%) of sex hormone-binding globulin to a much greater extent than with ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel (+92% and +160%). Contrary to this, a significant suppression of non-protein-bound testosterone by 35% was found during treatment with both oral contraceptives. The results demonstrate that an excessive elevation of the levels of sex hormone-binding globulin above the normal range does not cause a corresponding suppression of free testosterone. It is assumed that the decrease in the apparent binding affinity of high sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations to testosterone may be due to protein-protein interactions.

Evaluation of a new triphasic oral contraceptive in private practice

We evaluated the clinical and metabolic effects of a new triphasic regimen developed in the continuing attempt to reduce the dose of estrogen and progestogen in oral contraceptives. A combination of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNg) was used (six tablets with 30 micrograms EE + 50 micrograms LNg, five tablets with 40 micrograms EE + 75 micrograms LNg, and 10 tablets with 30 micrograms EE + 125 micrograms LNg), also known as Triphasil (Wyeth). In a private practice, 409 subjects participated in 7,286 treatment cycles. Three pregnancies occurred, all due to subject failure. Menstrual regulation was excellent and the incidence of side effects extremely low. Withdrawals from the study for possibly drug-related medical reasons totaled 9.0% through 56 cycles of treatment. Metabolic changes also were evaluated in 14 of these women over a 6-month period. The only statistically significant increase in carbohydrate values occurred at 6 months. The mean glucose level at 30 minutes of the oral glucose tolerance test was above the baseline mean value, but serum insulin levels showed no statistically significant deviation. Lipid values presented are total lipids, total cholesterol, triglycerides, alpha-, beta-, and pre-beta-lipoproteins, and high density and low density lipoprotein cholesterol. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean values at baseline and those during treatment for any lipid variable. These results indicate that this triphasic oral contraceptive has a high degree of efficacy, a low incidence of side effects, excellent cycle control, and high subject compliance, and would seem to indicate a minimal influence on the metabolism of lipids and carbohydrates in the small number of subjects studied.

A randomized cross-over comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives upon hormonal and metabolic parameters: I. Effects upon sexual hormone levels

The effect of a low-dose triphasic oral contraceptive (OC) containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel (EE/NG) upon serum levels of endogenous sexual hormones was compared to that of a preparation containing EE and desogestrel (EE/DG). Blood samples were taken on Day 6, 11, 21, and 28 of a control cycle and of the third cycle of treatment with either the EE/NG or EE/DG preparation (11 volunteers each). After a washout period of 3 months, the contraceptives were changed in a cross-over fashion. Blood samples were again taken on Day 6, 11, 21, and 28 of the third washout cycle and the third treatment cycle. There was no significant suppression of serum LH and FSH during treatment with EE/NG and EE/DG except on Day 21, while estradiol levels were significantly lowered. Similar to the gonadotropin concentrations, the estrogen levels showed great individual variations; although they were depressed in the majority of the women, there was a considerable stimulation of follicular activity in 36% of the women under EE/NG and 18% under EE/DG. Both EE/NG and EE/DG suppressed significantly serum progesterone, testosterone, and DHEA-S, while prolactin was unaffected. In three cases an escape ovulation seemed to have occurred, but no pregnancy was observed. The spottings (8/22 women) and breakthrough bleedings (6/22 women) did not correlate with the serum levels of estradiol. The results indicate that the suppression of gonadotropin secretion during treatment with low-dose OC is a time-dependent process which in some women may be at or below the threshold of safe ovulation inhibition.

Serum lipid and lipoprotein changes induced by new oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol plus levonorgestrel or desogestrel

Changes in serum lipid and lipoprotein levels were evaluated in a randomized prospective study conducted in matched healthy young women before and after 6 months' use of three oral contraceptives (OCs): Trigynon (preparation A, n = 13), a triphasic OC containing low doses of ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG); Marvelon (preparation B, n = 14), a monophasic OC containing low doses of EE + Desogestrel (DOG, a new progestogen derived from LNG); and Ovidol (preparation C, n = 11), a sequential OC containing higher doses (50 micrograms) of EE + DOG. After 6 months of use, total triglyceride levels were non-significantly increased by preparations A (+ 29% from basal values) and B (+21%), and very significantly increased by preparation C (+90%). Total cholesterol and phospholipids were unchanged by preparations A and B, whereas phospholipids were significantly increased by preparation C. However, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and their epidemiologically important ratios (HDL-chol:total-chol; LDL-chol:HDL-chol) were kept unchanged by all preparations tested. Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) was slightly but significantly increased by all three preparations whereas apolipoprotein B (Apo B) was significantly decreased by preparation B. All ratios Apo A-1:Apo B were accordingly ("favorably") increased, especially during treatment with preparation B. In conclusion, the triphasic OC containing low doses of LNG does not induce obvious, clinically significant, alterations of lipid metabolism, and it is also the case for the low-dose monophasic combination of EE + DOG. The higher-dose sequential preparation of EE + DOG behaves as a more estrogenic compound, increasing total triglyceride concentrations above the normal range.