The effect of intrauterine devices, the stainless steel ring, the copper T220, and releasing levonorgestrel, on the bleeding profile and the morphological structure of the human endometrium--a comparative study of three IUDs. A morphometric study of 96 cases

Vascular effect of levonorgestrel intrauterine system on heavy menstrual bleeding: is it associated with hemodynamic changes in uterine, radial, and spiral arteries?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and blood flow changes associated with the use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) in patients with idiopathic heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). LNG-IUD was inserted into a total of 91 patients (39.5 ± 5.4 years) who were diagnosed with HMB. Uterine volume, ovarian volume, uterine, radial and spiral artery blood flow, Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) scores, and other clinical and laboratory parameters were evaluated before and 12 months after insertion of LNG-IUD. Compared to pre-insertion values, LNG-IUD dramatically improved haemoglobin, PBAC scores, and endometrial thickness. Mean resistance indices of radial and spiral arteries significantly increased 12 months after insertion. Our study results suggest that a significant increase in the resistance indices of the intra-myometrial arteries in LNG-IUD users one year after insertion may be due to its local progestational effects, indicating a possible mechanism of LNG-IUD in reducing menstrual blood flow.Impact StatementsWhat is already known on this subject? The mechanisms of action of LNG-IUD on heavy menstrual bleeding include atrophy, decidualization and vascular changes of in the endometrium, resulting endometrial suppression. However, the exact mechanism to stop bleeding is not clear.What do the results of this study add? The present study suggests that one of the effects of the LNG-IUD on heavy menstrual bleeding is its ability to increase the resistance indexes of the intra-myometrial arteries.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These results will foster further studies on the effects of LNG-IUD on intra-myometrial arteries and will further assure clinicians on the vascular effect of LNG-IUD during management of heavy menstrual bleeding which includes hysterectomy as a final step.

Two Years Follow-Up of Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding after Insertion of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the long-term treatment of heavy menstrual blood loss in women unrelated to intrauterine pathology.

METHODS

One hundred and six parous women aged 33-48 years with recurrent heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) participated in this study. The women were followed up for 24 months and were assessed for intensity of bleeding both for pre- and post-insertion periods. An LNG-IUS was inserted in each patient within 7 days of the start of menstrual flow. The women were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months following the insertion of the intrauterine device.

RESULTS

One hundred and two women completed the follow-up period and had a significant reduction in the amount of menstrual blood loss. The LNG-IUS was well tolerated by all women. Pre-treatment of the use of the LNG-IUS, endometrial biopsy patterns for irregular proliferative endometrium and for atypical simple hyperplasia were 34/106 (32.08%) and 61/106 (57.55%) respectively and after treatment no abnormal pathologic findings were determined (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the LNG-IUS is effective for significantly reducing the amount of menstrual blood loss in women with HMB.

Different bleeding patterns with the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system: are they associated with changes in uterine artery blood flow?

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate if different bleeding patterns associated with the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) are associated with different uterine and endometrial vascularization patterns, as evidenced by ultrasound power Doppler analysis.

METHODOLOGY

A longitudinal study, with each subject acting as its own control was conducted between January 2010 and December 2012. Healthy volunteers with a history of heavy but cyclic and regular menstrual cycles were enrolled in the study. Ultrasonographic examination was performed before and after six months of LNG-IUS placement: uterine volume, endometrial thickness, and subendometrial and myometrial Doppler blood flow patterns have been evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 32 women were enrolled out of 186 initially screened. At six months of follow-up, all subjects showed a reduction in menstrual blood loss; for analysis, they were retrospectively divided into 3 groups: normal cycling women (Group I), amenorrheic women (Group II), and women with prolonged bleedings (Group III). Intergroup analysis documented a statistically significant difference in endometrial thickness among the three groups; in addition, mean pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) in the spiral arteries were significantly lower in Group I and Group III compared to Group II. This difference persisted also when comparing--within subjects of Group III--mean PI and RI mean values before and after insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

The LNG-IUS not only altered endometrial thickness, but--in women with prolonged bleedings--also significantly changed uterine artery blood flow. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and enable gynecologists to properly counsel women, improving initial continuation rates.

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in heavy menstrual bleeding: a benefit-risk review

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common problem in women of reproductive age and can cause irritation, inconvenience, self-consciousness and fear of social embarrassment. Our objective was to review and appraise literature identified from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to evaluate the clinical evidence and provide an update on the risks and benefits of using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the treatment of HMB. The LNG-IUS consistently reduces menstrual blood loss (MBL) in women with HMB, including those with underlying uterine pathology or bleeding disorders. The available data suggest that it reduces MBL to a greater extent than other medical therapies, including combined oral contraceptives, oral progestogens (both short- or long-cycle regimens), tranexamic acid and oral mefenamic acid. In addition, the LNG-IUS and endometrial ablation appear to reduce MBL to a similar extent. The adverse effects reported with the LNG-IUS in women with HMB are similar to those typically observed in women using the system for contraception. Uterine perforations were not reported in any of the studies reviewed, but expulsion rates may be higher than in the general population of LNG-IUS users. Overall, the LNG-IUS has a positive effect on most quality-of-life domains, at least comparable to those achieved with hysterectomy or endometrial ablation, and is consistently a cost-effective option across a variety of countries and settings. In conclusion, the LNG-IUS is an effective treatment option for women with HMB, including those with underlying organic pathology or bleeding disorders.

Safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the contraceptive and non-contraceptive uses of the LNG-IUS

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) provide highly effective, long-term, safe, reversible contraception, and are the most widely used reversible contraceptive method worldwide. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is a T-shaped IUD with a steroid reservoir containing 52 mg of levonorgestrel that is released at an initial rate of 20 μg daily. It is highly effective, with a typical-use first year pregnancy rate of 0.1% - similar to surgical tubal occlusion. It is approved for 5 years of contraceptive use, and there is evidence that it can be effective for up to 7 years of continuous use. After removal, there is rapid return to fertility, with 1-year life-table pregnancy rates of 89 per 100 for women less than 30 years of age. Most users experience a dramatic reduction in menstrual bleeding, and about 15% to 20% of women become amenorrheic 1 year after insertion. The device's strong local effects on the endometrium benefit women with various benign gynecological conditions such as menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, leiomyomata, adenomyosis, and endometriosis. There is also evidence to support its role in endometrial protection during postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy, and in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia.

Clinical profile of contraceptive progestins

The term progestogen has been widely utilized to indicate the general class of agents that includes both progesterone and its synthetic analogs, whereas the term progestin refers only to synthetic progestational steroids. The development of progestins has been influenced in a major way by the search for orally active hormonal contraceptives, since it is likely that hormonal contraceptives will continue to utilize a progestin, the only possible alternative being represented by the utilization of antiprogestins. Synthetic progestogens in clinical use today belong to three main chemical families: progesterone derivatives (progesterone, retro-progesterone, 19-norprogesterone and 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone); gonane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives (norethisterone, levonorgestrel, desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate); a spironolactone derivative. Biological potency of progestogens varies depending on the end-point measured, usually ovulation inhibition and endometrial transformation; with both these tests, the most active compounds are all gonane derivatives, with a potency over a 100 times that of the natural hormone. When administered in adequate doses, a progestin inhibits fertility by inhibiting ovulation. This action is mainly exerted at the hypothalamic level where, physiologically, progesterone decreases the number of LH pulses. When progestogens are delivered directly to the uterine cavity, their action seems to be purely local. It has been amply proven that--even when administered in doses that do not constantly inhibit ovulation--a progestin can still remain effective as a contraceptive by acting at the level of the cervical mucus and, at least in part, of the endometrium. Progestogens utilized today differ largely in their pharmacokinetics. In general, after intake, these compounds are rapidly absorbed and distributed so that peak serum concentrations are reached between 1 and 4 h. Third-generation progestins (desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate) have common characteristics: a higher affinity for progesterone receptors than their predecessors, a lower affinity for androgen receptors, a higher selectivity of action, a higher central inhibitory activity, a higher potency at the level of the endometrium, and an overall metabolic neutrality, in terms of effects on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. In general, progestins can induce two types of adverse effects: changes in lipid metabolism and bleeding irregularities. Whereas the newer compounds seem to have overcome the first of these adverse effects, the second remains untouched: to this day, proper cycle control can only be achieved with combined hormonal contraceptives.

Pregnancy during the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to evaluate the pregnancy rate with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and to analyze the outcome of pregnancies with the LNG IUS in situ in regular use.

STUDY DESIGN

Questionnaires from 17,360 users of the LNG IUS were analyzed. With the consent of women reporting pregnancy during the use of the LNG IUS, related hospital records were reviewed concerning the pregnancies.

RESULTS

Originally 132 pregnancies were reported. Medical records were reviewed from 108 of these women. In 64 pregnancies, conception occurred with the LNG IUS in situ. Thirty-three pregnancies were ectopic. The 5-year cumulative pregnancy rate per 100 users was 0.5 and the 5-year Pearl rate was 0.11.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy with the LNG IUS in situ is rare. Ectopic pregnancies constitute 53% of all pregnancies. Typical pregnancy symptoms occur during pregnancies with the LNG IUS. The importance to counsel about the risk of pregnancy before insertion is emphasized.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System in Contraception

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS) is a long-acting, fully reversible method of contraception. It is one of the most effective forms of contraception available, and combines the advantages of both hormonal and intrauterine contraception. The levonorgestrel-releasing IUS also gives the users many non-contraceptive benefits: the amount of menstrual bleeding and the number of days of menstrual bleeding are reduced, which makes it suitable for the treatment of menorrhagia (heavy menstrual blood loss). Dysmenorrhoea (painful menstruation) and premenstrual symptoms are also relieved. In addition, the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS provides protection for the endometrium during hormone replacement therapy. The local release of levonorgestrel into the uterine cavity results in a strong uniform suppression of the endometrial epithelium as the epithelium becomes insensitive to estradiol released from the ovaries. This accounts for the reduction in menstrual blood loss. All possible patterns of bleeding are seen among users of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS; however, most of the women who experience total amenorrhoea continue to ovulate. The first months of use are often characterised by irregular, scanty bleeding, which in most cases resolves spontaneously. The menstrual pattern and fertility return to normal soon after the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS is removed. The contraceptive efficacy is high with 5-year failure rates of 0.5-1.1 per 100 users. The absolute number of ectopic pregnancies is low, as is the rate per 1000 users. The levonorgestrel-releasing IUS is equally effective in all age groups and the bodyweight of the user is not associated with failure of the method. In Western cultures continuance rates among users of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS are comparable with those of other long-term methods of contraception. Premature removal of the device is most often associated with heavy menstrual bleeding and pain, as with other long-term methods of contraception, and is most common in the youngest age group. When adequately counselled about the benign nature of oligo- or amenorrhoea, most women are very willing to accept life without menstruation. The risk of premature removal can be markedly diminished with good pre-insertion counselling, which also markedly increases user satisfaction. User satisfaction is strongly associated with the information given at the time of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS insertion. Thus, the benefits of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS make it a very suitable method of contraception for most women.

Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy

BACKGROUND

In the 1970s a new approach to the delivery of hormonal contraception was researched and developed. It was suggested that the addition of a progestogen to a non-medicated contraceptive device improved its contraceptive action. An advantage of these hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUS) is that they are relatively maintenance free, with users having to consciously discontinue using them to become pregnant rather than taking a proactive daily decision to avoid conception.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the contraceptive efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) in comparison to other reversible contraceptive methods.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Literature was identified through database searches, reference lists and individuals/organisations working in the field. Searches covered the period from 1972 to November 2003.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing IUSs with other forms of reversible contraceptives and reporting on pre-determined outcomes in women of reproductive years. The primary outcomes were pregnancy due to method/user failure and continuation rate.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The quality assessment of studies and data extraction were completed independently by two blinded reviewers. A quality checklist was designed to identify general methodological and contraceptive specific factors which could bias results. Events per women months and single decrement life table rates were extracted where possible for pregnancy, continuation, adverse events and reasons for discontinuation. Events per total number of women at follow up were collected for hormonal side effects and menstrual disturbance. When appropriate, data were pooled at the same points of follow up to calculate rate ratios in order to determine the relative effectiveness of one method compared to another. For the single decrement life table rates, the rate differences were pooled to determine the absolute difference in effectiveness of one method compared to another. Interventions were only combined if the contraceptive methods were similar. Non-hormonal IUDs were divided into three categories for the purpose of comparison with IUSs: IUDs >250mm2 (i.e. CuT 380A IUD and CuT 380 Ag IUD), IUDs <=250mm2 (i.e. Nova-T, Multiload, CuT 200 and CuT 220 IUDs) and non-medicated IUDs.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-one RCTs comparing hormonally impregnated IUSs to a reversible contraceptive method met the inclusion criteria and it was possible to include eight of these in the meta-analyses, four comparing LNG-20 IUSs with non-hormonal IUDs, one comparing the LNG-20 IUS with Norplant-2 and three comparing Progestasert with non-hormonal IUDs. No significant difference was observed between the pregnancy rates for the LNG-20 users and those for the IUD >250mm2 users. However, women using the LNG-20 IUS were significantly less likely to become pregnant than those using the IUD <=250mm2. Women using the LNG-20 IUS were more likely to experience amenorrhoea and device expulsion than women using IUDs >250mm2. LNG-20 users were significantly more likely than all the IUD users to discontinue because of hormonal side effects and menstrual disturbance, which on further breakdown of the data was due to amenorrhoea. When the LNG-20 IUS was compared to Norplant-2, the LNG-20 users were significantly more likely to experience amenorrhoea and oligomenorrhoea, but significantly less likely to experience prolonged bleeding and spotting. No other significant differences were observed. Progestasert users were significantly less likely to become pregnant and less likely to continue on the method than non-medicated IUD users after one year, but no significant difference was noted for these two outcomes when Progestasert users were compared to IUD<=250mm2 users. The only other significant differences found in the meta-analyses were that Progestasert users were less likely to expel the device and more likely to discontinue the method because of menstrual bleeding and pain than users of IUDs <=250mm2. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONl the device and more likely to discontinue the method because of menstrual bleeding and pain than users of IUDs <=250mm2.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests LNG-20 IUS users are no more or less likely to have unwanted pregnancies than IUD >250mm2 and Norplant-2 users. The LNG-20 IUS was more effective in preventing either intrauterine or extrauterine pregnancies than IUDs <=250mm2. The contraceptive effectiveness of Progestasert was significantly better than non-medicated IUDs, but no difference was observed when compared to IUDs<=250mm2. Continuation of LNG-20 IUS use was similar to continuation of the non-hormonal IUDs and Norplant-2. Amenorrhoea was the main reason for the discontinuation for the LNG-20 IUS and women should be informed of this prior to starting this method.

Insertion of Mirena after Endometrial Resection in Patients with Adenomyosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of Mirena, a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device, after endometrial resection for treatment of menorrhagia caused by adenomyosis.

DESIGN

Open, randomized, observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Private hospital.

PATIENTS

Ninety-five women.

INTERVENTION

Endometrial resection, after which control patients received no further treatment and study patients had Mirena inserted immediately after the procedure.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The rate of amenorrhea after 1 year was significantly higher in the Mirena group. Nineteen percent of women in the control group had a second procedure to control bleeding compared with none in the Mirena group.

CONCLUSION

Insertion of Mirena after endometrial resection is effective treatment for menorrhagia caused by adenomyosis and has very few adverse effects.

The effect of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (20 micrograms/day) (LNG-IUD-20) on the morphological structure of human endometrium: a study of the endometrial factor VIII activity in the women before and after insertion of LNG-IUD-20 by the digital image analysis

The specimens of endometria were obtained from 18 women using an intrauterine device releasing levonorgestrel at 20 micrograms/day (LNG-IUD-20). An immunoperoxidase reaction, PAP method, with the antiserum of Factor VIII as the primary antibody, was carried out in the endometrial biopsies to detect the Factor VIII activity in the endometrial endothelium before and after insertion of LNG-IUD-20. The immunoperoxidase activity was quantitatively assessed by a computer digital image analyser. The results revealed that there were a lower Factor VIII activity in the endometrial endothelial cells after insertion of LNG-IUD-20 (p < 0.001) when compared with the control. From the results of the present study, it is suggested that the synthesis and release of endometrial endothelial Factor VIII might be inhibited by the insertion of LNG-IUD20.

A morphometric study on the endometrial activity of women before and after one year with LNG-IUD in situ

The endometrium was studied by morphometry in 34 healthy women before and after one year's use of an IUD releasing levonorgestrel at a rate 20 micrograms/24 hr (LNG-IUD-20). The effect was compared with that of an IUD releasing 2 micrograms levonorgestrel/24 hr (LNG-IUD-2). The appearance of suppressed endometrial proliferative activity and increased inflammatory reaction was similar in the two experimental groups, suggesting that the morphological alterations were independent of the LNG dosage. The result of this study, combined with clinical data, suggests that LNG-IUD-20 could replace LNG-IUD-2 without any additional side effects. The efficacy of LNG-IUD-20 is also likely to last for a longer period than the LNG-IUD-2.

Endometrial morphometry in users of intrauterine contraceptive devices and women with ovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a comparison with normal endometrium

Copper-bearing intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) are commonly associated with menorrhagia. They cause certain morphological changes in the endometrium. These have been extensively reported and the mechanisms of menorrhagia have been investigated in a number of studies. By contrast, ovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding has not been as widely studied and mechanisms of menorrhagia in these patients are still not well understood. In this study, we examined endometrial morphometry in a group of women using IUCD, a group of women with ovulatory dysfunctional bleeding, and a control group of women with entirely normal cycles. There was increased leukocytic infiltration of the endometrium in both groups of women with menorrhagia compared to control cases. In addition, IUCD use was associated with greater luteal phase glandular epithelial height, supporting the concept of a secretory function defect in glandular epithelium. Possible links are postulated between static morphometric observations and dynamic biochemical changes.

The non-contraceptive effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device

Clinical trials have consistently shown that the IUD that releases 20 micrograms levonorgestrel daily (LNG-IUD-20) has a contraceptive efficacy comparable to, if not surpassing, the Copper T380 and the Multiload Copper-375 IUDs. The focus of this review is the device's non-contraceptive effects--the beneficial ones, such as reduction of menorrhagia, a therapeutic effect on dysmenorrhea, and prevention of ectopic pregnancy, as well as the deleterious ones, such as amenorrhea, spotting and irregular bleeding, hormonal side-effects, and functional ovarian cysts. Also discussed are the possibility of a preventive effect on pelvic inflammatory disease, the effects of the IUD on postpartum/lactating women, fertility return after removal and other safety issues. In general, the LNG-IUD-20's non-contraceptive benefits are substantive, carry important medical and public health implications, and far outweigh the device's deleterious effects, which are either medically mild or transient in nature, and can usually be managed satisfactorily by counseling. A better understanding of these effects, both beneficial and deleterious, of this hormone-releasing IUD should lead to more effective patient counseling, which, in turn, should improve user quality of life, minimize unnecessary removals, and maximize continuation of use.

Observation of the activity of factor VIII in the endometrium of women pre- and post-insertion of three types of IUDs

The endometrial materials were obtained from 90 women who had been randomly inserted with three types of IUDs (Stainless steel ring, SS; copper T 220, TCu 220, and levonorgestrel-releasing device, LNG). An immunoperoxidase reaction, PAP method, with the antiserum of Factor VIII as the primary antibody, was carried out to detect the Factor VIII activity in the endometrial endothelium pre- (control) and post-insertion of the IUDs. The results revealed that: 1. There was a generalized lower Factor VIII activity in the endometrium of women post-insertion of IUDs (except LNG). 2. Comparison of the Factor VIII activity in the endometrium of women using different types of IUDs showed that the TCu type and the SS type decreased the activity significantly whereas the activity remained unchanged after 3-6 months' use of the LNG-IUD. The different types of IUDs seemed to influence the coagulation regulatory system in different ways; the lower Factor VIII activity, the more tendency to bleeding. 3. The Factor VIII activity in the endometrium of women using IUDs was lower in all phases of the menstrual cycle including the proliferative phase when the Factor VIII activity is normally high. It cannot be excluded that this could be a contributing factor to IUD-induced bleedings.

Ultrastructural comparative study on endometrium of Chinese women using intrauterine devices of stainless steel ring, copper T220, and releasing levonorgestrel: morphometry of microvessels

An electron microscopic morphometric study was performed for three kinds of IUDs, the stainless steel ring (SS), the copper T220 (TCu) and the WHO levonorgestrel IUD (LNG), for comparison of their effects on microvessels of the endometrium of women wearing the devices. The morphometry of plasmolemmal vesicles (PV) of the endothelial cell as well as the contracted and degenerated endothelial cell were undertaken. The results showed that all three IUDs led to significant changes in blood vessels, i.e., a higher percentage of contracted and degenerated cells than in the control group (p less than 0.01), and an increase in PV after insertion of the devices (p less than 0.01). The TCu caused more contracted endothelial cells than the SS (p less than 0.01) and the LNG (p less than 0.05). The levonorgestrel-releasing IUD resulted in a higher increase of PV than the SS and the TCu. For the differences between bleeding and non-bleeding groups, only the TCu showed a higher percentage of contracted cells (p less than 0.05).