GnRH agonists as contraceptive agents: predicted significantly reduced risk of breast cancer

Reduced mammographic density with use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-based chemoprevention regimen in BRCA1 carriers

PURPOSE

Women with a BRCA1 mutation (BRCA1(mut)) need risk reduction options beyond mastectomy and oophorectomy. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of hormonal chemoprevention with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHA) with low-dose add-back steroids in BRCA1(mut) carriers.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The 12-month open label clinical trial used the GnRHA deslorelin, ultra-low-dose estradiol (E(2)), and replacement testosterone, administered via daily intranasal spray in premenopausal women with a BRCA1(mut), and intermittent oral medroxyprogesterone acetate. The end points included mammographic percent density, bone mineral density, endometrial hyperplasia, symptom inventory, and quality of life (Medical Outcomes SF-36 survey).

RESULTS

Six of eight BRCA1(mut) women (mean age, 30.3 years; range, 25-36 years) completed the study. Mammographic percent density was significantly reduced at 12 months (median absolute mammographic percent density decrease, 8.3%; P = 0.043), representing a 29.2% median reduction in mammographic percent density. Bone mineral density remained within reference limits for all participants; there were no cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and menses resumed within a median of 67 days (range, 35-110 days) after last drug treatment day. The treatment was well tolerated; hypoestrogenic side effects were minimal and transient; and there were no significant changes in quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The GnRHA deslorelin, with low-dose add-back steroids, was well tolerated and significantly decreased mammographic percent density in BRCA1(mut) carriers. This regimen may reduce breast cancer risk and improve the usefulness of mammographic surveillance by reducing density. This is the first demonstration, to our knowledge, of a direct reduction of mammographic densities in young BRCA1(mut) carriers.

Prevention of cancers of the breast, endometrium and ovary

A central epidemiological feature of cancers of the breast, endometrium and ovary is the sharp slowing down in their rate of increase with age around the time of menopause. The incidence of these tumors by the age of 70 years would be between fourfold and eightfold increased if the rapid increase with age seen in young women continued into old age. These phenomena can be explained by the different effects of ovarian hormones on cell division rates in the relevant tissues. Models of these effects provide a plausible explanation of most of the known epidemiology of each of the cancers, including the increase in breast cancer risk from menopausal estrogen-progestin therapy. Some recent epidemiological findings in endometrial and ovarian cancer suggest new avenues for possible chemoprevention of these cancers.

Future possibilities in the prevention of breast cancer: luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists

The cyclic production of estrogen and progesterone by the premenopausal ovary accounts for the steep rise in breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. These hormones are breast cell mitogens. By reducing exposure to these ovarian hormones, agonists of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) given to suppress ovarian function may prove useful in cancer prevention. To prevent deleterious effects of hypoestrogenemia, the addition of low-dose hormone replacement to the LHRH agonist appears necessary. Pilot data with such an approach indicates it is feasible and reduces mammographic densities.

Prevention of rat mammary carcinoma utilizing leuprolide as an equivalent to oophorectomy

A clinical trial is currently under way to examine the effectiveness of leuprolide as a breast cancer chemopreventive agent and contraceptive. This trial, as well as similar proposed studies, is based on the assumption that leuprolide is as effective as surgical castration in preventing the onset of mammary tumors; however, this has not been well documented in the DMBA animal model. We directly compared leuprolide and oophorectomy in this model and examined a combined therapy of leuprolide/bromocriptine. Twenty-seven day old female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly allocated into one of eight groups. All rats received a 20-mg dose of DMBA at the age of 55 days. Group 1 (n = 10), no treatment; Group 2 (n = 9), leuprolide (100 microg/kg/day) for eight weeks beginning four weeks prior to DMBA; Group 3 (n = 10), oophorectomy four weeks prior to DMBA with replacement estrogen beginning four weeks following DMBA. Estrogen replacement was achieved with a 0.05-mg estradiol tablet releasing 0.833 microg/day over a 60-day period. Group 4 (n = 10), leuprolide (100 microg/kg/day) initiated two weeks prior to DMBA and continuing for two weeks following DMBA; Group 5 (n = 9), oophorectomy two weeks prior to DMBA with 0.05 mg of estradiol in depot form, releasing 0.833 microg/day, beginning four weeks following DMBA and continuing until week 16 of the study; Group 6 (n = 10), leuprolide (100 microg/kg/day) beginning two weeks prior to DMBA and continuing for the duration of the experiment; Group 7 (n = 10), leuprolide (100 microg/kg/day) for eight weeks beginning two weeks prior to DMBA; Group 8 (n = 9), leuprolide (100 microg/kg/day) and bromocriptine (83 microg/day) for eight weeks beginning two weeks prior to DMBA. At nineteen weeks (15 weeks post DMBA), animals were sacrificed and autopsies performed. One hundred percent of untreated animals developed tumors. No animals undergoing oophorectomy four weeks prior to DMBA or receiving leuprolide four weeks prior to and simultaneously with DMBA developed tumors. In animals pretreated two weeks prior to DMBA with leuprolide or oophorectomy, each group had one animal with tumor development. No tumors developed in the animals receiving ongoing injections of leuprolide. However, one tumor developed in those receiving leuprolide for the first eight weeks beginning two weeks prior to DMBA administration. One animal receiving both leuprolide and bromocriptine developed one tumor. We conclude that chemical oophorectomy (with leuprolide) is as effective as surgical oophorectomy in inhibiting DMBA induced carcinogenesis.

The endocrine prevention of breast cancer

A clear explanation for the high incidence of breast cancer in modern women is now possible. The risk of breast cancer rises steeply from menarche until menopause. Associated with the reproductive process, the ovary, including the corpus luteum, produces substantial amounts of estrogen and progesterone, both of which induce growth of the breast epithelium. This sex-steroid-driven breast epithelial cell proliferation increases the risk of carcinogenesis by accelerating the occurrence of somatic genetic errors. Postmenopausally, as there is little cell proliferation, the breast epithelium is more "resistant" to mutagenic effects, and breast cancer risk rises at a low rate. Unfortunately, the genetic errors accumulated during the premenopausal period are not lost following menopause, and breast cancer risk remains high. Sex-steroid antagonists, such as tamoxifen, may reduce breast cancer incidence both by blocking breast epithelial cell proliferation and by direct antitumor effects on clinically occult breast cancers. The rationale for a contraceptive designed to reduce breast cell proliferation by decreasing premenopausal sex-steroid exposure is presented.

The genetics of familial breast cancer and their practical implications

A small proportion of breast cancer (perhaps about 5%) and a higher proportion of early onset cases are due to the inheritance of mutations in dominant susceptibility genes which confer a high lifetime risk of the disease. This would equate to about 1250 cases per year in the U.K. and 9000 in the U.S.A. Even within these cases, there is genetic heterogeneity, i.e. there are several genes involved, each giving rise to different patterns of other cancers associated with the familial breast cancer. One such gene (p53) has been identified and a second (BRCA1) has been precisely mapped in the human genome, but further breast cancer predisposition genes remain to be identified. In addition, there are other genes which confer a lower risk of the disease, but may account for a larger proportion of cases, the most important example to date being ataxia telangiectasia. The identification of these genes will enable the entity of familial breast cancer to be more precisely defined and has implications for management of gene carriers with breast cancer and their relatives who are at risk. A major consideration in this new area of cancer genetics is that the identification of gene carriers may become possible on a large scale and this raises ethical and social issues.

Breast cancer prevention through modulation of endogenous hormones

The use of exogenous sex-steroids for hormonal contraception is important to the way of life of many modern women. The widespread use of hormonal contraceptives represents a unique opportunity to have a substantial positive impact on women's health. The observation that users of oral combination type contraceptives have a reduced risk of ovarian cancer should encourage the extension of contraceptive development to address the most important malignancy facing modern women, breast cancer. Epidemiological evidence strongly suggests that both estrogens and progestogens contribute to breast cancer risk, and account for the steep rise in risk seen during the premenopausal years. Studies of normal breast epithelial cell proliferation confirm that progestogens are breast mitogens, and explain why current contraceptives, which are progestogen dominant, do not prevent breast cancer. A long-acting depot contraceptive can be developed which releases: 1) an agonist of gonadotropin releasing hormone to suppress ovarian function; and 2) sex-steroids at doses below those in current contraceptives, and below those associated with ovulation. Such a contraceptive should provide substantial life-time protection against both breast and ovarian cancer, and would retain many of the other health benefits of current contraceptives.

Pilot trial of a gonadotropin hormone agonist with replacement hormones as a prototype contraceptive to prevent breast cancer

Combination oral contraceptive (COC) users have reduced risks of ovarian and endometrial cancer, but COCs have not reduced breast cancer risk. We have previously argued that a hormonal contraceptive with substantially lower doses of sex-steroids should reduce breast cancer risk by decreasing the breast epithelial cell proliferation below usual premenopausal levels. We report here the preliminary results of a pilot trial with such a prototype contraceptive consisting of an agonist of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRHA) administered with low doses of an oral estrogen (0.625 mg of conjugated estrogen, CE, for 6 days every week) and intermittent oral progestogen (10 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate, MPA, for 13 days every 4 months). Eighteen subjects at five-fold or greater increased breast cancer risk were entered and randomized -12 to the contraceptive arm and 6 to a control arm. The principal endpoints included tolerance of the regimen, vaginal bleeding patterns, and the regimen's effect on the endometrium, bone metabolism, and lipids. A symptom questionnaire was used to assess tolerance; the contraceptive subjects had fewer symptoms following initiation of the regimen. This results from the elimination of symptoms associated with the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, commonly referred to collectively as premenstrual syndrome, PMS. The few occurrences of hot flushes or vaginal dryness that did occur were eliminated by small increases in estrogen dose (0.9 mg CE). Scheduled vaginal bleeding occurred associated with most periods of progestogen administration. Unscheduled bleeding or spotting was infrequent and decreased with time on the regimen. A beneficial rise in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was evident in the contraceptive subjects. Despite the use of an estrogen dose which is known to prevent loss of bone mineral density in normal postmenopausal women, an annualized loss of 1.9% was seen in contraceptive subjects. It is hypothesized that this is secondary to inhibition of ovarian androgen production by the GnRHA, which may additionally account for changes in libido occasionally reported with GnRHA. The study continues with the addition of a small dose of androgen to replace that lost by the action of the GnRHA.

Hormonal chemoprevention of cancer in women

The use of oral contraceptives in the United States during the past three decades has led to a dramatic decline in the incidence of cancers of the ovary and endometrium. The magnitude of these declines was predictable both from epidemiologic data and from the biologic effects of oral contraceptives on these tissues. Although the incidence of breast cancer has not been substantially affected by current oral contraceptives, it may be possible to develop alternative forms of contraception that provide protection against all three cancers. The major goal of hormonal chemoprevention of cancer is to reduce cell proliferation in the relevant epithelial tissue. New chemopreventive agents such as tamoxifen exemplify the application of this principle.

The chemoprevention of breast cancer by reducing sex steroid exposure: perspectives from epidemiology

Mitogenesis is a major driving force in neoplastic development. Blocking the effect of breast cell mitogens by reducing the actual exposure of the breast to these mitogens is an obvious strategy for breast cancer prevention. The ovarian hormones, estrogens and progesterone, are major effective (direct or indirect) breast cell mitogens. A woman's exposure to ovarian estrogens and progesterone is drastically reduced by the use of combination-type oral contraceptives (COCs), but the synthetic estrogen and progestogen in the COCs effectively replace ovarian estrogens and progesterone, so that breast cell exposure to these hormones is not decreased. Doses of estrogen and progestogen in modern COCs are close to the minimum attainable while still retaining both contraceptive efficacy and ovarian suppression (so that endogenous estrogen and progesterone do not add to the dose of estrogen and progestogen from the COC). Considerably lower effective breast cell exposure to estrogen and progestogen can, however, be achieved by using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHA) to suppress ovarian function and compensate for the resulting hypoestrogenemia with low-dose hormone replacement therapy. Compared to modern COCs, estrogen exposure can be reduced by approximately 60%, and progestogen dose by more than 80%. Such a contraceptive is predicted to reduce lifetime breast cancer risk by more than 50% if used for 10 years. The possibility that a practical contraceptive could achieve such a major benefit is shown by the dramatic decline in the incidence of both ovarian and endometrial cancer in young women in the U.S. over the last 3 decades--a direct result of COC use.

The prevention of breast cancer through reduced ovarian steroid exposure

Analysis of epidemiologic data on cancers of the breast, ovary and endometrium; the effects of endogenous hormones on cell proliferation; and current carcinogenesis concepts, suggest that hormonal contraceptives can be developed that will reduce lifetime risk of all 3 cancers. The 'unopposed-estrogen hypothesis' accounts for endometrial cancer risk factors. Ovarian cancer risk is closely related to the total frequency of ovulation. The risk of breast cancer can be explained by an 'estrogen-plus-progestogen hypothesis'. On the basis of this analysis an hormonal contraceptive regimen has been developed consisting of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHA) plus continuous low-dose add-back estrogen and a short course of progestogen every fourth month. The total dose of add-back estrogen is estimated to be approximately 38% that in present-day low-dose combination-type oral contraceptives (COCs). The total dose of progestogen is approximately 15% that in COCs. This regimen prevents ovulation and should thus reduce ovarian cancer risk. It also reduces the exposure of the endometrium to unopposed estrogen, and the exposure of the breast to estrogen-plus-progestogen. It is estimated that use of such a regimen for 10 years will only reduce lifetime risk of endometrial cancer by one-sixth, but lifetime risk of ovarian cancer is estimated to be reduced by two-thirds, and lifetime risk of breast cancer is estimated to be reduced by one-half.

Toward the primary prevention of cancer

This is the threshold of an era when many of the most prevalent human cancers can, to a significant extent, be prevented through life-style changes or medical interventions. For lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, the major cause, cigarette smoking, is known and strategies for reducing smoking are slowly succeeding. Dietary changes can reduce the risk of developing large bowel cancer, the second most common cancer overall. The etiology of the major cancer in women, cancer of the breast, is sufficiently well understood that large-scale medical intervention trials are imminent. Recent changes in the incidence and mortality of these and the other major human cancers are reviewed with a brief explanation as to why these changes have occurred, followed by a summary of the state of knowledge regarding the major causes of cancer.