Duodenal ulcer: a disease in evolution

Risk Factors that Affect Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer Diseases in a Teaching Hospital

Background

This study was done to identify risk factors that affect the morbidity and mortality of patients operated for a perforated peptic ulcer in a resource-limited setting.

Methods

A two years (January 1, 2016 -December 30, 2018) retrospective cross-sectional study was done on patients admitted and operated for PPU at Yekatit 12 Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Results

A total of 93 patients were operated. The median age affected was 29 years (Range 15–75 years). Male to female ratio was 7.5:1. Chewing chat, smoking and alcohol use were seen in 22 (23.6%), 35(37.6%), and 34(36.5%), cases respectively. Only 23.6% gave previous history of dyspepsia. The median duration of illness was 48hours and the duodenal to gastric ulcer perforation ratio was 6.5:1. In majority of the cases (63.3%) the perforation diameter was =10mm (63.3%). Cellan-Jones repair of the perforations was done in 92.5% of cases. A total of 47 complications were seen in 25 cases. The total complications and mortality rates were 25(26.8%) and 6(6.5%) respectively. The most common postoperative complication was pneumonia (13.97%) followed by superficial surgical site infection (10.8%). Mortality rate was highest among patients >50yrs [AOR (95%CI) =2.4(230)]. Delayed presentation of >24 hours [AOR (95%CI) =4.3(1.4–13.5)] and a SBP =90mmhg [AOR (95%CI) =4.8(1–24)] were found to be significantly related with higher complication rate.

Conclusions

Patients who presented early and immediate corrective measures were instituted had better outcomes while those seen late developed unfavorable out-come with significantly higher complications. Therefore, early detection and treatment of PPU is essential.

Clinical profile and outcome of surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcers in Northwestern Tanzania: A tertiary hospital experience

BACKGROUND

Perforated peptic ulcer is a serious complication of peptic ulcers with potential risk of grave complications. There is paucity of published reports on perforated peptic ulcer disease in our local environment. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical presentation, management and outcome of patients with peptic ulcer perforation in our setting and to identify predictors of outcome of these patients.

METHODS

This was a combined retrospective and prospective study of patients who were operated for perforated peptic ulcers at Bugando Medical Centre between April 2006 and March 2011. Data were collected using a pre-tested and coded questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS computer software version 15.0. Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from relevant authority before the commencement of the study.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were studied. Males outnumbered females by a ratio of 1.3: 1. Their median age was 28 years and the modal age group was 21-30 years. The median duration of illness was 5.8 days. The majority of patients (69.0%) had no previous history of treatment for peptic ulcer disease. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alcohol and smoking was reported in 10.7%, 85.7% and 64.3% respectively. Eight (9.5%) patients were HIV positive with a median CD4 count of 220 cells/μl. Most perforations were located on the duodenum {90.4%) with the duodenal to gastric ulcers ratio of 12.7: 1. Graham's omental patch (Graham's omentopexy) of the perforations was performed in 83.3% of cases. Complication and mortality rates were 29.8% and 10.7% respectively. The factors significantly related to complications were premorbid illness, HIV status, CD 4 count < 200 cells/μl, treatment delay and acute perforation (P < 0.001). Mortality rate was high in patients who had age ≥ 40 years, delayed presentation (>24 hrs), shock at admission (systolic BP < 90 mmHg), HIV positivity, low CD4 count (<200 cells/μl), gastric ulcers, concomitant diseases and presence of complications (P < 0.001). The median overall length of hospital stay was 14 days. Excellent results using Visick's grading system were obtained in 82.6% of surviving patients.

CONCLUSION

Perforation of peptic ulcer remains a frequent clinical problem in our environment predominantly affecting young males not known to suffer from PUD. Simple closure with omental patch followed by Helicobacter pylori eradication was effective with excellent results in majority of survivors despite patients' late presentation in our center.

Surgical management of gastrointestinal bleeding

Severe gastrointestinal bleeding has historically been a clinical problem primarily under the purview of the general surgeon. Diagnostic advances made as the result of newer technologies, such as fiberoptic and video endoscopy, selective visceral arteriography, and nuclear scintigraphy, have permitted more accurate and targeted operations. More importantly, they have led to safe, effective nonoperative therapeutic interventions that have obviated the need for surgery in many patients. Today, most gastrointestinal bleeding episodes are initially managed by endoscopic or angiographic control measures. Such interventions are often definitive in obtaining hemostasis. Even temporary cessation or attenuation of massive bleeding in an unstable patient permits a safer, more controlled operative procedure by allowing an adequate period of preoperative resuscitation. Despite the less frequent need for surgical intervention, traditional operative approaches, such as suture ligation, lesion or organ excision, vagotomy, portasystemic anastomosis, and devascularization procedures, continue to be life-saving in many instances. The proliferation of laparoscopic surgery has fostered the application of minimally invasive techniques to highly selected patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Intraoperative endoscopy has greatly facilitated the accuracy of laparoscopic surgery by endoscopic localization of bleeding lesions requiring excision. It is anticipated that the evolving technologies pertinent to the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal bleeding will continue to promote collaboration and cooperation between gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons.

Sonographic diagnosis of recurrent ulcer penetrating the anterior abdominal wall

Penetration of a recurrent ulcer into the anterior abdominal wall after surgical treatment of peptic ulcer disease is a rare surgical emergency. Early diagnosis is essential, but there are no specific radiographic or endoscopic features. We report 2 cases of recurrent ulcer penetration into the anterior abdominal wall diagnosed preoperatively with transabdominal sonography. The ulcers appeared as cavity lesions, with hyperechoic bases that had destroyed the continuity of the stomach wall. Associated findings were a minimal amount of fluid around the ulcer cavity and a hypoechoic area considered secondary to inflammation or edema. The diagnoses were confirmed at laparotomy.

Predicting poor outcome in perforated peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

Despite modern medications for peptic ulcers, patients frequently require emergency surgery for complications of ulcer disease. Many of these patients have coexisting medical problems which not only predispose to perforated ulcer disease, but also influence the clinical outcome. This study reviews the outcome of a group of patients with perforated ulcer disease and examines the influence of a range of comorbidity factors on the outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all cases of perforated peptic occurring over a period of 9 years.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-nine perforated peptic ulcers in 147 patients were diagnosed between 1987 and 1996. Coexisting malignancy, use of immunosuppressives or corticosteroids, pre-operative shock and admission to intensive care were all significantly associated with reperforation by univariate analysis. However, logistic regression analysis indicated that none of these factors independently predicted reperforation which, therefore, occurs as a multifactorial event with all the above factors contributing. Death from perforated ulcer disease was related to pre-operative shock, malignancy, admission to intensive care and reperforation when examined by univariate analysis. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis showed that coexisting malignancy and reperforation were significant predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Perforated peptic ulcer disease remains a frequent clinical problem in patients with short dyspeptic histories, who may or may not have been using ulcerogenic medications. It is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among an often aged and otherwise unwell group of patients. Patients with underlying malignant disease, who may be immunosuppressed with corticosteroids or cytotoxics, are at increased risk of dying from perforated ulcer disease. Reperforation of an ulcer, following simple closure or conservative treatment, is also highly predictive of increased mortality.

Gastric outlet obstruction

Acquired gastric outlet obstruction is more commonly owing to malignancy than ulcer disease. Endoscopy is the preferred method for diagnosis. Surgical palliation for malignant disease has poor results and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Initial experiences with endoscopic palliation with expandable metallic endoprostheses appear promising. Peptic ulcer-induced gastric outlet obstruction can be treated safely with endoscopic balloon dilation. About 65% of patients have sustained symptom relief, but many require more than one dilation session. Outcomes may be improved with effective ulcer therapy with acid reduction and eradication of H. pylori. Surgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and should be reserved for endoscopic treatment failures.

Laparoscopic repair of duodenal ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux

The low morbidity and early recovery associated with laparoscopic procedures have heralded a new era for many types of surgery. In addition to the initial promising reports for duodenal ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux discussed above, there is a growing body of reports of gastric procedures performed laparoscopically, including omentopexy for perforated duodenal ulcer and laparoscopic repair of full-thickness stomach injury. Laws et al recently described the use of transthoracic vagotomy in recurrent peptic ulcer disease for four patients who had previously undergone a gastric drainage procedure. As with any new procedure, laparoscopic techniques for duodenal ulcer and Nissen fundoplication reviewed in this section need to be evaluated further for long-term effectiveness and comparability to existing therapy. At least one controlled multicenter trial is ongoing to compare the long-term results and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for duodenal ulcer with those of standard medical therapy, and as surgeons gain more experience with these laparoscopic procedures, it is likely that other similar trials will be initiated.

Do perforated duodenal ulcers need an acid-decreasing surgical procedure now that omeprazole is available?

If a chronic duodenal ulcer perforates, the choice of operation will depend on the patient's condition. Preoperative shock, concurrent medical diseases, severe generalized peritonitis, or the presence of an intra-abdominal abscess are contraindications to a definitive ulcer operation; hence, simple closure or omental patch closure is performed. Omeprazole can then be used to heal the ulcer in the early postoperative period, with long-term H2-blocker therapy to follow. The patient without a contraindication to a definitive operation should have a proximal gastric vagotomy in addition to an omental patch closure of the perforation. The addition of this procedure does not change the operative mortality rate in properly selected patients, does not cause the gastrointestinal sequelae associated with truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty or resection, and has a low rate of recurrent ulcer in experienced hands. The presence of a synchronous posterior "kissing" duodenal ulcer would prompt some to choose a vagotomy and pyloroplasty in preference to a proximal gastric vagotomy. The appropriate operation to perform after perforation of an acute duodenal ulcer in a patient with any of the contraindications listed above is simple closure or omental patch closure. In the stable nonseptic patient, the choice is not as clear. Boey and associates noted cumulative recurrent ulcer rates of 37% and 31% at 3 years in separate studies in which omental patch closure was used for perforated acute duodenal ulcers. This may reflect the asymptomatic nature of chronic duodenal ulcers in some patients prior to perforation, the failure of the surgeon to recognize the extent of periduodenal scarring at operation, or differences in the length of postperforation follow-up in series reporting perforations of acute or chronic ulcers. Jordan has suggested that all stable patients with perforated duodenal ulcers should undergo a proximal gastric vagotomy in addition to omental patch closure. In his hands, the addition of proximal gastric vagotomy has an operative mortality rate of 0 to 1%, a recurrent ulcer rate of 3% to 5%, and no adverse postoperative sequelae. He has noted that "this operation gives protection from further ulcer disease to those who need it and will produce no harm to the unidentifiable patients that might not have benefited from definitive surgery." Boey and Wong suggested that omental patch closure is indicated for "acute ulcers associated with drug ingestion or acute stress" in addition to those that occur in patients who are considered to be poor risk, while proximal gastric vagotomy should be added in the remaining patients with perforations of acute ulcers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Current surgical management of duodenal ulcers

The optimal treatment of duodenal ulcer disease today requires familiarity with a variety of operative approaches. Experience and judgment are needed to select the best procedure for the individual patient presenting with a specific ulcer complication. Improved medical therapy has relegated surgery largely to the role of emergency life-saving intervention. Nonetheless, the goal of surgery remains cure of the ulcer diathesis with avoidance of postoperative side effects. Toward this end, proximal gastric vagotomy has proved itself to be the operation of choice, not only for intractable pain, but also for perforation and perhaps for bleeding in selected good-risk patients. Its efficacy in the treatment of obstructing duodenal ulcer has not been demonstrated. Modifications of proximal gastric vagotomy, including the use of laparoscopic techniques, are currently being evaluated in patients with intractable duodenal ulcer pain.

The course of peptic ulcer disease

Peptic ulcer disease usually has periodic exacerbations and remissions. Pain can disappear without total healing of the ulcer crater and can be absent when an ulcer is present. Changes in the incidence of ulcer disease have been noted in recent years. Genetic predisposition, infection with H. pylori, and the use of anti-inflammatory drugs are involved in causation. Stress; the use of alcohol, tobacco and caffeine; and other diseases have been implicated as etiologic factors. Ulcer pain has a recognizable pattern, but the symptoms can be variable, particularly in older people and in patients taking ulcerogenic medications. The familiar complications of hemorrhage, perforation, and obstruction still occur, and nonulcer dyspepsia has not been fully explained. Duodenal ulcers have a disturbing tendency to return; new therapeutic approaches offer hope.

Highly selective vagotomy in the treatment of complicated duodenal ulcer

Highly selective vagotomy has been utilized urgently in 33 patients with bleeding duodenal ulcer, 16 patients with pyloric stenosis and six patients presenting with perforated ulcer. Five patients died after surgery for bleeding duodenal ulcer, and two patients rebled after surgery. Forty-eight patients were reviewed at a mean of 28 months with an excellent outcome being obtained in 45 patients. Two of the three patients with poor results had proven ulcer recurrence while the third patient required reoperation for recurrent pyloric stenosis. No patient has suffered diarrhoea after vagotomy. Highly selective vagotomy is an effective treatment for urgent management of complicated duodenal ulceration and is without troublesome post-vagotomy symptoms.

Trends in the surgical management of duodenal ulcer. A fifteen year study

The number of patients undergoing definitive duodenal ulcer operation at Charlotte Memorial Hospital and Medical Center declined by 75 percent from 1971 to 1985. The percentage of women making up the total study population increased to 40 percent in the period from 1981 through 1985. Average patient age also increased. Fewer gastric resections are now being performed and emergency operations are becoming more frequent, with bleeding being the most common indication. Splenic lacerations requiring splenectomy in patients undergoing vagotomy occurred in 3.1 percent of the study population during the 15 year study. The overall mortality rate for elective operations was 1.5 percent and for emergency operations, 17.2 percent. The incidence of acute duodenal ulcer perforation increased during this 15 year study. Duodenal ulcer operations have changed in number and in type as the manifestations of the disease have become altered by trends that began in the mid 1950s and became exaggerated by more effective ulcer therapy.

Chronic duodenal and gastric ulcer

During the past two decades, major advances have been made in our understanding of basic gastric physiology. Appreciation of cellular biology has contributed to rapid progress in gastric pharmacology. Clinicians may choose from a large and rapidly growing list of antiulcer drugs. The proper choice of medical or surgical therapy depends on knowledge of the pathophysiology of peptic ulceration and of the inherent limitations of each approach. Selective drug use, tailoring of medical regimens to individual clinical situations, and the combination of medical and surgical treatments will play prominent roles in the future management of peptic ulceration.

Is an antireflux procedure necessary in conjunction with parietal cell vagotomy in the absence of preoperative reflux?

During a 4 year period, we found no objective evidence that parietal cell vagotomy contributes to the production of gastroesophageal reflux. The fact that patients without reflux preoperatively achieved the same satisfactory clinical results whether parietal cell vagotomy was or was not accompanied by an antireflux procedure supports this view. Therefore, in the absence of reflux, we cannot recommend the prophylactic use of an antireflux procedure in combination with parietal cell vagotomy in the treatment of patients with duodenal ulcer. On the other hand, patients with duodenal ulcer should be evaluated for gastroesophageal reflux before operation because it is desirable to combine parietal cell vagotomy with an antireflux procedure if both conditions exist. Patients who have mild reflux preoperatively but no symptoms of reflux after parietal cell vagotomy alone, as in three of the four patients in Group IV, may have such symptoms subsequently. Therefore, we think that the combined procedure does not increase the morbidity over that of parietal cell vagotomy alone and recommend the combination of parietal cell vagotomy and an antireflux procedure for any patient undergoing operation for duodenal ulcer who also demonstrates an abnormal degree of gastroesophageal reflux.