Specificity of adenosine inhibition of cAMP-induced responses in Dictyostelium resembles that of the P site of higher organisms

Streamless aggregation of Dictyostelium in the presence of isopropylidenadenosin

Starving cells of Dictyostelium discoideum undergo a developmental cycle where cAMP is autocatalytically produced and relayed from cell to cell, resulting in the propagation of excitation waves over a spatially extended population. Later on the homogeneous cell layer transforms into a pattern of cell streams directed perpendicular to the cAMP waves. Here we chemically influence aggregation competent cells by isopropylidenadenosin (IPA), an adenosine derivative. It can be assumed, that IPA acts via specific adenosine binding sites localized in the cellular membrane. We find, however, that pattern formation and cellular aggregation under the influence of IPA differ considerably compared to experiments with adenosine. In particular, our observations point towards an inhibitory effect on adenylate cyclase (ACA), the key enzyme in the autocatalytic production process of cAMP inside the cell. Our results suggest the existence of a direct coupling (via intracellular affection) or indirect coupling (via inhibition of cAMP binding) of the specific adenosine receptors to the regulatory circuit that controls cyclic intra- and extracellular cAMP concentration.

Pharmacological profiling of the Dictyostelium adenylate cyclases ACA, ACB and ACG

Intracellular and secreted cAMPs play crucial roles in controlling cell movement and gene regulation throughout development of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. cAMP is produced by three structurally distinct ACs (adenylate cyclases), ACA, ACG and ACB, which have distinctive but overlapping patterns of expression and, as concluded from gene disruption studies, seemingly overlapping functions. In addition to gene disruption, acute pharmacological abrogation of protein activity can be a powerful tool to identify the protein's role in the biology of the organism. We analysed the effects of a range of compounds on the activity of ACA, ACB and ACG to identify enzyme-specific modulators. Caffeine, which was previously used to specifically block ACA function, also inhibited cAMP accumulation by ACB and ACG. IPA (2',3'-O-isopropylidene adenosine) specifically inhibits ACA when measured in intact cells, without affecting ACB or ACG. All three enzymes are inhibited by the P-site inhibitor DDA (2',5'-dideoxyadenosine) when assayed in cell lysates, but not in intact cells. Tyrphostin A25 [alpha-cyano-(3,4,5-trihydroxy)cinnamonitrile] and SQ22536 [9-(tetrahydro-2'-furyl)adenine] proved to be effective and specific inhibitors for ACG and ACA respectively. Both compounds acted directly on enzyme activity assayed in cell lysates, but only SQ22536 was also a specific inhibitor when added to intact cells.

Evolutionary origin of cAMP-based chemoattraction in the social amoebae

Phenotypic novelties can arise if integrated developmental pathways are expressed at new developmental stages and then recruited to serve new functions. We analyze the origin of a novel developmental trait of Dictyostelid amoebae: the evolution of cAMP as a developmental chemoattractant. We show that cAMP's role of attracting starving amoebae arose through recruitment of a pathway that originally evolved to coordinate fruiting body morphogenesis. Orthologues of the high-affinity cAMP receptor (cAR), cAR1, were identified in a selection of species that span the Dictyostelid phylogeny. The cAR1 orthologue from the basal species Dictyostelium minutum restored aggregation and development when expressed in an aggregation-defective mutant of the derived species Dictyostelium discoideum that lacks high-affinity cARs, thus demonstrating that the D. minutum cAR is a fully functional cAR. cAR1 orthologues from basal species are expressed during fruiting body formation, and only this process, and not aggregation, was disrupted by abrogation of cAR1 function. This is in contrast to derived species, where cAR1 is also expressed during aggregation and critically regulates this process. Our data show that coordination of fruiting body formation is the ancestral function of extracellular cAMP signaling, whereas its derived role in aggregation evolved by recruitment of a preexisting pathway to an earlier stage of development. This most likely occurred by addition of distal cis-regulatory regions to existing cAMP signaling genes.

Analysis of 5' nucleotidase and alkaline phosphatase by gene disruption in Dictyostelium

In Dictyostelium discoideum a phosphatase with a high pH optimum is known to increase in activity during cell differentiation and become localized to a narrow band of cells at the interface of prespore and prestalk cells. However, it was not clear if this activity is due to a classical "alkaline phosphatase" with broad range substrate specificity or to a "5'nucleotidase" with high substrate preference for 5'AMP. We attempted to disrupt the genes encoding these two phosphatase activities in order to determine if the activity that is localized to the interface region resides in either of these two proteins. During aggregation of 5nt null mutants, multiple tips formed rather than the normal single tip for each aggregate. In situ phosphatase activity assays showed that the wt and the 5nt gene disruption clones had normal phosphatase activity in the area between prestalk and prespore cell types, while the alp null mutants did not have activity in this cellular region. Thus, the phosphatase activity that becomes localized to the interface of the prestalk and prespore cells is alkaline phosphatase.

Dictyostelium development-socializing through cAMP

Starving Dictyostelium amoebae use cAMP as a chemoattractant to gather into aggregates, as a hormone-like signal to induce cell differentiation, and as an intracellular messenger to control stalk- and spore cell maturation and germination of spores. In this chapter we describe the respective roles of the three adenylyl cyclases ACA, ACB and ACG in controlling cAMP signaling during development and we discuss how cAMP signals are processed by the cells to trigger the large repertoire of gene regulatory events that is under control of this signal molecule.

Functional promiscuity of gene regulation by serpentine receptors in Dictyostelium discoideum

Serpentine receptors such as smoothened and frizzled play important roles in cell fate determination during animal development. In Dictyostelium discoideum, four serpentine cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptors (cARs) regulate expression of multiple classes of developmental genes. To understand their function, it is essential to know whether each cAR is coupled to a specific gene regulatory pathway or whether specificity results from the different developmental regulation of individual cARs. To distinguish between these possibilities, we measured gene induction in car1 car3 double mutant cell lines that express equal levels of either cAR1, cAR2, or cAR3 under a constitutive promoter. We found that all cARs efficiently mediate both aggregative gene induction by cAMP pulses and induction of postaggregative and prespore genes by persistent cAMP stimulation. Two exceptions to this functional promiscuity were observed. (i) Only cAR1 can mediate adenosine inhibition of cAMP-induced prespore gene expression, a phenomenon that was found earlier in wild-type cells. cAR1's mediation of adenosine inhibition suggests that cAR1 normally mediates prespore gene induction. (ii) Only cAR2 allows entry into the prestalk pathway. Prestalk gene expression is induced by differentiation-inducing factor (DIF) but only after cells have been prestimulated with cAMP. We found that DIF-induced prestalk gene expression is 10 times higher in constitutive cAR2 expressors than in constitutive cAR1 or cAR3 expressors (which still have endogenous cAR2), suggesting that cAR2 mediates induction of DIF competence. Since in wild-type slugs cAR2 is expressed only in anterior cells, this could explain the so far puzzling observations that prestalk cells differentiate at the anterior region but that DIF levels are actually higher at the posterior region. After the initial induction of DIF competence, cAMP becomes a repressor of prestalk gene expression. This function can again be mediated by cAR1, cAR2, and cAR3.

Sensory transduction in eukaryotes. A comparison between Dictyostelium and vertebrate cells

The organization of multicellular organisms depends on cell-cell communication. The signal molecules are often soluble components in the extracellular fluid, but also include odors and light. A large array of surface receptors is involved in the detection of these signals. Signals are then transduced across the plasma membrane so that enzymes at the inner face of the membrane are activated, producing second messengers, which by a complex network of interactions activate target proteins or genes. Vertebrate cells have been used to study hormone and neurotransmitter action, vision, the regulation of cell growth and differentiation. Sensory transduction in lower eukaryotes is predominantly used for other functions, notably cell attraction for mating and food seeking. By comparing sensory transduction in lower and higher eukaryotes general principles may be recognized that are found in all organisms and deviations that are present in specialised systems. This may also help to understand the differences between cell types within one organism and the importance of a particular pathway that may or may not be general. In a practical sense, microorganisms have the advantage of their easy genetic manipulation, which is especially advantageous for the identification of the function of large families of signal transducing components.

Control of cAMP-induced gene expression by divergent signal transduction pathways

A compilation of literature data and recent experiments led to the following conclusions regarding cyclic adenosine 3':5' monophosphate (cAMP) regulation of gene expression. Several classes of cAMP-induced gene expression can be discriminated by sensitivity to stimulation kinetics. The aggregation-related genes respond only to nanomolar cAMP pulses. The prestalk-related genes respond both to nanomolar pulses and persistent micromolar stimulation. The prespore specific genes respond only to persistent micromolar stimulation. The induction of the aggregation- and prestalk-related genes by nanomolar cAMP pulses may share a common transduction pathway, which does not involve cAMP, while involvement of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3)/Ca2+ pathway is unlikely. Induction of the expression of prespore and prestalk-related genes by micromolar cAMP stimuli utilizes divergent signal processing mechanisms. cAMP-induced prespore gene expression does not involve cAMP and probably also not cyclic guanosine 3'.5' monophosphate (cGMP) as intracellular intermediate. Involvement of cAMP-induced phospholipase C (PLC) activation in this pathway is suggested by the observation that IP3 and 1,2-diacylglycerol (DAG) can induce prespore gene expression, albeit in a somewhat indirect manner and by the observation that Li+ and Ca2+ antagonists inhibit prespore gene expression. Cyclic AMP induction of prestalk-related gene expression is inhibited by IP3 and DAG and promoted by Li+, and is relatively insensitive to Ca2+ antagonists, which indicates that PLC activation does not mediate prestalk-related gene expression. Neither prespore nor prestalk-related gene expression utilizes the sustained cAMP-induced pHi increase as intracellular intermediate.

Opposite effects of adenosine on two types of cAMP-induced gene expression in Dictyostelium indicate the involvement of at least two different intracellular pathways for the transduction of cAMP signals

Adenosine promotes the cAMP-induced increase of mRNAs, probed with the cDNAs D11 and D14, which are preferentially expressed in prestalk cells, while it inhibits cAMP-induced prespore gene expression. Half-maximal inhibition of prespore gene expression occurs at about 300 muM, while prestalk stimulation by adenosine occurs at about 100-fold lower concentrations and requires the presence of cAMP. These results indicate that adenosine interferes with the transduction to cAMP to gene expression and suggest the involvement of two different adenosine target sites. Our data furthermore indicate that the transduction of extracellular cAMP to prespore gene or prestalk gene expression occurs via divergent pathways.

Lithium respecifies cyclic AMP-induced cell-type specific gene expression in Dictyostelium

We investigated the effect of LiCl on pattern formation and cAMP-regulated gene expression in Dictyostelium discoideum. In intact slugs, 5 mM LiCl induces an almost complete redifferentiation of prespore into prestalk cells. We found that LiCl acts by interfering with the transduction of extracellular cAMP to cell-type-specific gene expression; LiCl inhibits the induction of prespore-specific gene expression by cAMP, while it promotes the induction of prestalk-associated gene expression by cAMP. Our results indicate that two divergent pathways transduce the extracellular cAMP signal to, respectively, prestalk and prespore gene expression.

Stalk cell formation in monolayers of Dictyostelium discoideum V12-M2

Stalk cell formation in low-cell-density monolayers of Dictyostelium discoideum, strain V12-M2, occurs following the sequential addition of cyclic AMP and the differentiation-inducing factor (DIF). Both cyclic AMP and DIF are essential for the appearance of the prestalk-specific isozyme alkaline phosphatase-II, which suggests that both factors are necessary for prestalk cell formation. The available evidence suggests that the cyclic AMP requirement for stalk cell formation is mediated through the cell surface cyclic AMP receptor. However, stalk cell formation is inhibited by caffeine and this inhibition is reversed by the cell-permeable analogue 8-Br-cyclic AMP, which suggests in addition a possible involvement for elevated intracellular cyclic AMP concentrations in stalk cell formation. During in vivo development cells first become independent of cyclic AMP at the tipped aggregate stage, but the acquisition of cyclic AMP independence is advanced by several hours when cells are incubated in the presence of cyclic AMP for 2 hours. Cells do not become independent of DIF until the culmination stage of development, which suggests the possibility that DIF is required for the conversion of prestalk cells to stalk cells. There is an absolute requirement for DIF for stalk cell formation in low-density monolayers of prestalk cells but only part of population exhibits a requirement for cyclic AMP, which suggests that the prestalk cell population consists of two distinct cell types. Stalk cell formation from prespore cells is totally dependent on both cyclic AMP and DIF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Postaggregative differentiation induction by cyclic AMP in Dictyostelium: intracellular transduction pathway and requirement for additional stimuli

Cyclic AMP induces postaggregative differentiation in aggregation competent cells of Dictyostelium by interacting with cell surface cAMP receptors. We investigated the transduction pathway of this response and additional requirements for the induction of postaggregative differentiation. Optimal induction of postaggregative gene expression requires that vegetative cells are first exposed to 2-4 hr of nanomolar cAMP pulses, and subsequently for 4-6 hr to steady-state cAMP concentrations in the micromolar range. Cyclic AMP pulses, which are endogenously produced before and during aggregation, induce full responsiveness to cAMP as a morphogen. The transduction pathway from the cell surface cAMP receptor to postaggregative gene expression may involve Ca2+ ions as intracellular messengers. A cAMP-induced increase in intracellular cAMP or cGMP levels is not involved in the transduction pathway.