Source modeling of esophageal evoked potentials

Rapid balloon distension as a tool to study cortical processing of visceral sensations and pain

BACKGROUND

The processing of discomfort and pain in the central nervous system is normally studied with experimental methods, but it is mandatory that they are reliable over time to ensure that any interventions will result in valid results. We investigated reliability of rapid balloon distension in the rectum to elicit cortical evoked potentials (CEPs) to study the reliability of central processing of visceral sensation and discomfort/pain.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers had two series of rectal balloon distensions performed on two separate days. Individualized balloon pressure, corresponding to pain detection threshold or to the maximum possible distension (30 psi), was used. Within- and between days reliability was measured in terms of amplitudes and latencies of the CEP global field power, topography and underlying brain networks.

KEY RESULTS

There were two prominent peaks in the CEP recordings at mean latencies of 157 and 322 ms. There were no differences in latencies or amplitudes (p = 0.3) and they passed the Bland-Altman test for reproducibility. There were no differences in topographies (p > 0.7). Brain source connectivity revealed the cingulate-operculum network as the most consistent network within and between subjects. There were no differences in the location of brain sources in this network (p = 0.9) and the source coordinates were reproducible. Finally, the cingulate source generally had higher strength than operculum source (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

A reliable method to study central mechanisms underlying visceral sensation and pain was established. The method may improve our understanding of visceral pain and could be an objective method for studying efficacy of analgesics on visceral pain.

Functional reorganization of brain networks in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

The underlying pain mechanisms of chronic pancreatitis (CP) are incompletely understood, but recent research points to involvement of pathological central nervous system processing involving pain-relevant brain areas. We investigated the organization and connectivity of brain networks involved in nociceptive processing in patients with painful CP.

METHODS

Contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) were recorded in 15 patients with CP and in 15 healthy volunteers. The upper abdominal area (sharing spinal innervation with the pancreatic gland) was used as a proxy of 'pancreatic stimulation', while stimulation of a heterologous region remote to the pancreas (right forearm) was used as a control. Subjective pain scores were assessed by visual analogue scale. The brain source organization and connectivity of CHEPs components were analysed.

RESULTS

After pancreatic area stimulation, brain source analysis revealed abnormalities in the cingulate/operculo-insular network. A posterior shift of the operculo-insular source (p = 0.004) and an anterior shift of the cingulate source (p < 0.001) were seen in CP patients, along with a decreased strength of the cingulate source (p = 0.01). The operculo-insular shift was positively correlated with the severity of patient clinical pain score (r = 0.61; p = 0.03). No differences in CHEPs characteristics or source localizations were seen following stimulation of the right forearm.

CONCLUSIONS

CP patients showed abnormal cerebral processing after stimulation of the upper abdominal area. These changes correlated to the severity of pain the patient was experiencing. Since the upper abdominal area shares spinal innervation with the pancreatic gland, these findings likely reflect maladaptive neuroplastic changes, which are characteristic of CP.

Brain source connectivity reveals the visceral pain network

INTRODUCTION

Several brain structures have been consistently found to be involved in visceral pain processing. However, recent research questions the specificity of these regions and it has been suggested that it is not singular activations of brain areas, but their cross-communication that results in perception of pain. Moreover, frequency at which neurons are firing could be what separates pain from other sensory modalities which otherwise involve the same anatomical locations. In this test/retest study, we identified the network of sources and their frequencies following visceral pain.

METHODS

62-channel evoked potentials following electrical stimulation in oesophagus were recorded in twelve healthy volunteers on two separate days. Multichannel matching pursuit (MMP) and dipolar source localisation were used. Multiple sources responsible for one MMP component were considered to act synchronously as each MMP component is mono-frequency and has a single topography. We first identified components that were reproducible within subjects over recording sessions. These components were then analysed across subjects.

RESULTS

MMP and source localisation showed three main brain networks; an early network at ~8.3 Hz and ~3.5 Hz involving brainstem, operculum, and pre-frontal cortex peaking at ~77 ms. This was followed by an operculum, amygdale, mid-cingulate, and anterior-cingulate network at ~4.5 Hz. Finally, there was an operculum and mid-cingulate network that persisted over the entire time interval, peaking at 245.5±51.4 ms at ~2.1 Hz.

CONCLUSION

This study gives evidence of operculum's central integrative role for perception of pain and shows that MMP is a reliable method to study upstream brain activity.

Accuracy of heartbeat perception is reflected in the amplitude of the heartbeat-evoked brain potential

Neurotransmission from the heart to the brain results in a heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP). In this study, the influence of the ability to detect one's heartbeats based on the HEP was examined. According to their results in a heartbeat perception task, subjects were classified as good (n=18) or poor (n=26) heartbeat perceivers. EEG, EOG, and ECG were recorded while participants attended to their heartbeats. The R-wave of the ECG served as a trigger for EEG averaging. In the latency range of 250-350 ms after the ECG R-wave, the HEP amplitude at the right central location was significantly higher in good heartbeat perceivers. A significantly positive correlation was observed between the heartbeat perception score and the mean HEP amplitude. Our results confirm that the accuracy of heartbeat perception is reflected in the amplitude of the HEP. Thus, the HEP may be a suitable research tool for the study of brain processes related to visceral perception.

Pain in chronic pancreatitis: the role of reorganization in the central nervous system

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In various chronic pain conditions cortical reorganization seems to play a role in the manifestations. The aim of this study was to investigate cortical reorganization in patients with pain caused by chronic pancreatitis.

METHODS

Twelve healthy subjects and 10 patients with chronic pancreatitis were included. The esophagus, stomach, and duodenum were stimulated electrically at the pain threshold using a nasal endoscope. The electroencephalogram was recorded from 64 surface electrodes and event-related brain potentials (EPs) were obtained.

RESULTS

As compared with healthy subjects, the patient group showed decreased latencies of the early EP components (N1, P < .001; P1, P = .02), which is thought to reflect the exogenous brain pain processing specifically. Source analysis showed that the dipolar activities corresponding to the early EPs were located consistently in the bilateral insula, in the anterior cingulate gyrus, and in the bilateral secondary somatosensory area. The bilateral insular dipoles were localized more medial in the patient group than in the healthy subjects after stimulation of all 3 gut segments (P < .01). There also were changes in the cingulate cortex where the neuronal source was more posterior in patients than in controls to stimulation of the esophagus (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that pain in chronic pancreatitis leads to changes in cortical projections of the nociceptive system. Such findings also have been described in somatic pain disorders, among them neuropathic pain. Taken together with the clinical data this suggests a neuropathic component in pancreatic pain, which may influence the approach to treatment.

The "human visceral homunculus" to pain evoked in the oesophagus, stomach, duodenum and sigmoid colon

The oesophagus, stomach, duodenum and sigmoid colon were electrically stimulated in 12 healthy volunteers with a thin nasal endoscope. The painful cortical evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded from 64 surface electrodes. The early EPs with latencies < 200 ms were studied and the corresponding dipole sources were calculated. The electrical current intensities needed to evoke pain were highest in the stomach and duodenum, compared to the other segments (F = 7.8; P < 0.001; post hoc analysis P < 0.05). The EP latencies after stimulation of the stomach and sigmoid colon were shorter compared with those to stimulation of the oesophagus and duodenum (all P values < 0.001). The EP amplitudes were higher to oesophagus stimulation (all P values < 0.001 except for the early positivity). The potential fields obtained after stimulation of the most distal segments (duodenum and sigmoid colon) were in general distributed more posteriorly compared to those recorded in the more proximal regions. The EP topographies to stimulation of all gut tracts were explained by a bilateral source in the second somatosensory (SII) area, by a dipole in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and by a bilateral generator in the insular cortex. However, the position of the sources significantly changed depending on the stimulated gut tract. Moreover, while the SII and ACC sources were initially activated to oesophagus and stomach stimulation, the ACC and insular activities were the earliest ones after stimulation of the lower gut segments. The findings reflect differences in pathways and brain processing of visceral nociceptive inputs coming from either upper or lower gut and may improve our understanding of the brain-gut axis in health and disease.

Cortical changes to experimental sensitization of the human esophagus

Topographical organization in the neocortex shows experience-dependent plasticity. We hypothesized that experimental sensitization of the esophagus results in changes of the topographical distribution of the evoked potentials and the corresponding dipole source activities to painful stimulation. An endoscopic method was used to deliver 35 electrical stimuli at the pain threshold to a fixed area of the mucosa in 10 healthy volunteer men and women. The stimulations were repeated after 30 min (reproducibility experiment), and after 60 min following perfusion of 200 ml 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (sensitization experiment). During stimulation the electroencephalogram was recorded from 64 surface electrodes. The sensitization resulted in a decrease in the pain threshold (F=6.2; P=0.004). The topographic distribution of the evoked potentials showed reproducible negative (N1, N2) and positive (P1, P2) components. After acid perfusion a reduced latency and a change in localization was seen for the P1 subdivided into frontal and occipital components (F=29.5, P<0.001; F=53.7, P<0.001). Furthermore the sensitization resulted in a reduction of the latency for P2 (F=6.2, P=0.009). The source analysis showed consistent dipolar activity in the bilateral opercular-insular cortex before and after acid perfusion. For the anterior cingulate dipole there was a reduction in latency (P=0.03) and a posterior shift (P=0.0002) following acid perfusion. The findings indicate that short-term sensitization of the esophagus results in central neuroplastic changes involving the cingulate gyrus, which also showed pathological activation in functional diseases of the gut, thus reflecting the importance of this region in visceral pain and hyperalgesia.

Neurophysiologic assessment of esophageal sensory processing in noncardiac chest pain

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Esophageal hypersensitivity is thought to be important in the generation and maintenance of symptoms in noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). In this study, we explored the neurophysiologic basis of esophageal hypersensitivity in a cohort of NCCP patients.

METHODS

We studied 12 healthy controls (9 women; mean age, 37.1 +/- 8.7 y) and 32 NCCP patients (23 women; mean age, 47.2 +/- 10 y). All had esophageal manometry, esophageal evoked potentials to electrical stimulation, and NCCP patients had 24-hour ambulatory pH testing.

RESULTS

The NCCP patients had reduced pain thresholds (PT) (72.1 +/- 19.4 vs 54.2 +/- 23.6, P = .02) and increased P1 latencies (P1 = 105.5 +/- 11.1 vs 118.1 +/- 23.4, P = .02). Subanalysis showed that the NCCP group could be divided into 3 distinct phenotypic classifications. Group 1 had reduced pain thresholds in conjunction with normal/reduced latency P1 latencies (n = 9). Group 2 had reduced pain thresholds in conjunction with increased (>2.5 SD) P1 latencies (n = 7), and group 3 had normal pain thresholds in conjunction with either normal (n = 10) or increased (>2.5 SD, n = 3) P1 latencies.

CONCLUSIONS

Normal esophageal evoked potential latencies with reduced PT, as seen in group 1 patients, is indicative of enhanced afferent transmission and therefore increased esophageal afferent pathway sensitivity. Increased esophageal evoked potential latencies with reduced PT in group 2 patients implies normal afferent transmission to the cortex but heightened secondary cortical processing of this information, most likely owing to psychologic factors such as hypervigilance. This study shows that NCCP patients with esophageal hypersensitivity may be subclassified into distinct phenotypic subclasses based on sensory responsiveness and objective neurophysiologic profiles.

Brain structures involved in interoceptive awareness and cardioafferent signal processing: a dipole source localization study

Afferent signals from the body play an important role for emotional and motivational aspects of behavior. Nevertheless, little is known about the cortical and subcortical structures involved in interoceptive processes. Recently, a functional MRI study demonstrated that insula, somatomotor, and cingulated cortices are activated when subjects focus attention on their heartbeats. Aside from the use of imaging data, cardiac awareness has frequently been studied by using the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP), a brain wave that appears contingent on the heartbeat. The present study aimed at localizing sources of the HEP. Multichannel EEG was recorded in 44 subjects while they performed a heartbeat perception task. This task was used to quantify interoceptive awareness and to subdivide the subjects into good and poor heartbeat perceivers. Analyses showed highest HEP amplitudes over frontal and frontocentral electrode locations in the time range of later than 200 ms after R-wave onset. By means of a BESA dipole-source-analysis, four sources of the HEP were identified which were located in the anterior cingulate, the right insula, the prefrontal cortex, and the left secondary somatosensory cortex. Good heartbeat perceivers showed both significantly higher HEP amplitudes and higher dipole strength than poor heartbeat perceivers in all four cortical sources. We conclude that the identified structures are involved in the processing of cardiac signals, whereby anterior cingulate and right insula seem to serve as interoceptive centers for cardioception.

Cortical neuroplastic changes to painful colon stimulation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

The aim of this study was to model the cerebral generators following painful electrical stimulation of the sigmoid colon in 10 healthy controls and 10 patients with visceral pain due to the irritable bowel syndrome. The evoked brain potentials to 30 painful electrical stimuli from the sigmoid colon were recorded from 31 surface electrodes and subjected to electrical dipole source modelling. Two dipoles in the bilateral insular cortex, one dipole in the anterior cingulate gyrus and two dipoles in the bilateral second somatosensory area were found. The anterior cingulate dipole showed a more posterior position in patients than in control subjects. This finding suggests that the cortical representation of painful stimuli can be modified in presence of chronic visceral pain and that this change involves the anterior cingulate gyrus.

Sensory testing of the esophagus

Originally, sensory testing of the esophagus included the acid perfusion test and the edrophonium test, which were developed to assess patients with non-cardiac chest pain. In the last 2 decades interest in functional esophageal disorders has increased and thus further understanding of the underlying mechanisms of esophageal pain required development of new sensory testing techniques. Balloon distension using a computerized electronic device, electrical stimulation and impedance planimetry have generated important information about esophageal sensory thresholds for pain in different disease states. Intraluminal ultrasonography has been used to determine the physiologic changes of the muscle wall of the esophagus during perception of typical esophageal symptoms. Central evaluation of patients undergoing esophageal stimulation has recently been introduced to assess cerebral activation in different esophageal disorders. However, many studies using esophageal sensory testing are afflicted with significant design flaws, making interpretation of the results very difficult. This is primarily due to lack of recognition of factors that can modulate esophageal sensation.

Dipolar source modelling of brain potentials evoked by painful electrical stimulation of the human sigmoid colon

The aim of the study was to compare the cerebral generators following painful stimulation of the sigmoid colon and the abdominal skin in 11 healthy subjects. The evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded from 31 surface electrodes following painful electrical stimuli of the sigmoid colon, and of the referred pain area on the abdomen. Current dipole models estimating the EPs amplitude and topography were calculated. For colon stimulation, the earliest cortical activities were described by dipoles in the bilateral insula and in the anterior cingulate cortex, while both secondary somatosensory areas were activated later. When the skin was stimulated, early bilateral dipoles in the primary and secondary somatosensory areas were estimated, followed by a dipole in the frontal region. This suggests that painful cutaneous and visceral stimuli are processed differently in the brain.

Identification of the optimal parameters for recording cortical potentials evoked by mechanical stimulation of the human oesophagus

Cortical evoked potentials (CEP) have been recorded in response to both electrical stimulation (ES) and mechanical stimulation (MS) of the oesophagus. While the optimal parameters for recording reproducible oesophageal CEP to ES have recently been established, they have not yet been determined for MS, and reported CEP to MS show considerable variability. This study aimed to identify the optimal parameters required to record reproducible MS induced CEP. CEP were recorded from the vertex (Cz) in six subjects (one female; age range 23-47 years). MS was performed 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter by rapidly inflating a 2-cm long silicone balloon at a frequency of 0.2 Hz. The rise time to maximum inflation was 165 ms. In order to determine the minimum number of stimuli required to produce optimal signal-to-noise quality, we acquired data in runs of 25, 50, 100 and 300 stimuli and to determine the stimulation intensity that produced the shortest latency and the largest amplitude CEP, we averaged four runs of 50 stimuli at five different intensities ranging from sensory threshold to pain. CEP reproducibility was then assessed in three subjects on three separate occasions using parameters determined from these measurements. We found that optimal signal-to-noise quality was achieved by averaging four runs of 50 stimuli; that P1 latency was shortest and P1-N1 amplitude largest at intensities of 75% and pain threshold and that highly reproducible CEP were obtained in all individuals. We conclude that it is possible to obtain highly reproducible oesophageal CEP to MS which can now be compared to those obtained by ES in order to identify which is most suitable for clinical studies.

The electrical and magnetical cerebral responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the esophagus and the location of their cerebral sources

OBJECTIVES

After electrical stimulation of the esophagus cerebral responses are recordable, their cortical source is under discussion. Brain mapping using electroencephalography recordings demonstrated partially controversial results. Sources of evoked responses can be localized more easily using magnetoencephalography than electroencephalography.

METHODS

We examined 22 volunteers by recording electrical somatosensory potentials after electrical stimulation of the esophagus. In 9 of these 22 subjects additional recording of magnetic fields was performed and the sources of the evoked magnetic fields were computed.

RESULTS

The evoked potentials after electrical stimulation of the esophagus had a similar latency as the previously published data. The source localization done by magnetoencephalography suggest that first a region of the postcentral gyrus is activated which is temporo-lateral to the primary somatosensory cortex of the pharynx. This region is suggested to be the primary somatosensory region of the esophagus. This source was followed by a source in the parietal operculum thought being part of the secondary somatosensory cortex. Simultaneously the insular cortex was activated pointing to a parallel neuronal pathway to the central autonomic nervous system.

CONCLUSION

After electrical stimulation of the esophagus somatosensory cortical areas of the temporal postcentral gyrus and the operculum are activated. In parallel activation of the insular cortex as part of the central autonomic network was found.

Cortical activation during oesophageal stimulation: a neuromagnetic study

We investigated the neuromagnetic responses to mechanical stimulation of the oesophagus. In six healthy right-handed volunteers (mean age 31.6 years) the proximal and distal oesophagus were stimulated by electronically controlled pump-inflation of a silicone balloon once every 4.5-5.5 sec (dwell time 145 msec). The balloon volume was adjusted to induce different sensation levels (i) just above threshold of perception, (ii) strong sensation and (iii) painful sensation. Evoked magnetic brain responses were recorded time-locked to stimulus onset with a Neuromag-122TM whole-head neuromagnetometer and modelled as equivalent current diploe (ECD) sources. ECDs were superimposed on individual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Magnetic brain responses following distal oesophageal stimulation were adequately explained by a time-varying 2-4 dipole model with unilateral or bilateral sources in second somatosensory cortex and later sources in the frontal cortex. With increasing stimulus intensities, latencies of the sources decreased and amplitudes increased. Proximal oesophageal stimulation led to activation of source areas spatially similar to those of distal oesophageal stimulation but with shorter response latencies. Both painful and nonpainful mechanical stimulation of the oesophagus activate the second somatosensory cortex (SII). Evidence for topographic organization of oesophageal afferents in SII is poor.

Identification of the optimal parameters for recording cortical evoked potentials to human oesophageal electrical stimulation

Cortical evoked potentials in response to stimulation of the oesophagus may prove to be a powerful technique for assessing the oesophageal afferent pathway in health and disease. However, in order to maximize the potential of this technique it is essential that the optimal parameters for recording oesophageal CEP are established. The aim was to determine the optimal parameters required to record reproducible CEP. CEP were recorded from the vertex in eight subjects (age range 23-44 years). Electrical stimulation was performed 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter using a bipolar ring electrode at 0.2 Hz. Protocol 1: to determine the stimulation intensity which generates the largest amplitude and shortest latency, two runs of 50 stimuli were applied at increasing intensities. Protocol 2: to determine the number of stimuli for optimal signal to noise ratio, 10 runs of 50 stimuli were recorded. Individual runs were averaged. Protocol 3: to determine the optimal inter-run interval, CEP evoked by 200 stimuli were averaged using randomly chosen inter-run intervals. Protocol 4: CEP reproducibility using parameters determined from Protocols 1-3 was assessed in three subjects on three separate occasions. The results were as follows: Protocol 1; P1 latency was shortest and P1-N1 amplitude largest at an intensity of 75% above threshold. Protocol 2; optimal signal-to-noise was achieved by averaging four runs of 50 stimuli. Protocol 3; the optimal interstudy interval was 10 min. Protocol 4; highly reproducible CEP were obtained in all individuals. Using these optimal parameters, it is possible to obtain highly reproducible oesophageal CEP to ES which can now be used for clinical study.

Cortical localisation of magnetic fields evoked by oesophageal distension

Magnetoencephalographic source localisation techniques were used to measure oesophageal evoked magnetic fields from the cerebral cortex in 3 subjects. By using rapid balloon distension as a stimulus, a comparison of proximal and distal oesophageal cortical representation was made. The distal oesophagus was represented bilaterally in the insular cortex and SII as well as the inferior aspect of SI. The proximal oesophagus was represented unilaterally in superior and inferior SI, insular cortex and SII. Significantly, the superior portion of SI was consistently activated in subjects following stimulation of the proximal oesophagus, but similar activation was not found in response to distal stimulation. This may reflect the contribution from somatic afferent fibres in the striate muscle of the proximal segment. In conclusion, vagal afferents appear to contribute more to cortical activation following stimulation of the distal rather than the proximal oesophagus, while spinal afferents appear to be activated by both proximal and distal oesophageal stimulation.