Effects of clorgyline and deprenil on corticosterone levels in rats

Chronic treatment with enhancer drugs modifies the gene expression of selected parameters related to brain plasticity in rats under stress conditions

Selegiline, also known as L-deprenyl, and (2R)-1-(1-benzofuran-2-yl)-N-propylpentane-2-amine (BPAP) were found to induce enhancement of monoamine neurotransmission in low and very low doses. In addition, these enhancers may modify glutamatergic neurotransmission. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that under stress conditions, chronic treatment with enhancer drugs has a positive impact on the glutamatergic system and other parameters related to brain plasticity, stress-related systems, and anxiety behavior. We exposed male Wistar rats to a chronic mild stress procedure combined with chronic treatment with two synthetic enhancer drugs. The gene expression of GluR1, an AMPA receptor subunit was reduced by repeated treatment with deprenyl in the hippocampus and with both BPAP and deprenyl in the prefrontal cortex. A significant reduction of NMDA receptor subunit GluN2B expression was observed in the hippocampus but not in the prefrontal cortex. Deprenyl treatment led to an enhancement of hippocampal BDNFmRNA concentrations in stress-exposed rats. Treatment with enhancer drugs failed to induce significant changes in stress hormone concentrations or anxiety behavior. In conclusion, the present study in chronically stressed rats showed that concomitant treatment with enhancer drugs did not provoke substantial neuroendocrine changes, but modified gene expression of selected parameters associated with brain plasticity. Observed changes may indicate a positive influence of enhancer drugs on brain plasticity, which is important for preventing negative consequences of chronic stress and enhancement of stress resilience. It may be suggested that the changes in glutamate receptor subunits induced by enhancer drugs are brain region-specific and not dose-related.

Differential effects of clorgyline on sensitization to quinpirole in rats tested in small and large environments

RATIONALE

Cotreatment with clorgyline shifts the development of sensitization to the D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonist quinpirole from locomotion to mouthing, an effect apparently unrelated to the monoamine oxidase inhibition property of clorgyline. This phenomenon was demonstrated in rats examined in small activity chambers. However, like with other psychostimulant drugs, sensitization to quinpirole is modulated by environmental context. It is not known whether the clorgyline cotreatment effect is likewise influenced by the environment.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the generality of the clorgyline effect on behavioral sensitization by evaluating the effects of clorgyline cotreatment on sensitization to quinpirole in two different environments: a small activity chamber and a large open field.

METHODS

Male rats received eight injections of quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg, twice weekly) in an open field or activity chamber; one group in each environment received a constant infusion of clorgyline (1 mg/kg/day via osmotic minipumps) while the other group served as the sham surgery control. For quinpirole injection 7 or 8, rats were tested in the alternate environment.

RESULTS

In activity chambers, clorgyline cotreatment switched sensitization to quinpirole from locomotion to mouthing. In the open field, clorgyline cotreatment increased mouthing and expanded the explored space without a change in path stereotypy or the amount of locomotion compared to treatment with quinpirole alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Structure of the environment can modulate the clorgyline cotreatment effect on behavioral sensitization to quinpirole. The behavioral profiles produced by clorgyline cotreatment in the two environments resembled the behavioral effects observed with quinpirole and D1 agonist cotreatment. It is suggested that clorgyline cotreatment produces a behavioral profile characteristic of enhanced dopamine D1 and D2 receptor costimulation.

Hypophysectomy does not block sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole or its modulation by the MAOI clorgyline

Repeated administration of the dopamine agonist quinpirole induces behavioral sensitization in rats that is characterized by a four- to eight-fold increase in the amount of locomotion compared to an acute dose of quinpirole, in the absence of any increases in mouthing behavior. The monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor, clorgyline, switches behavioral sensitization to quinpirole from that of locomotion to self-directed mouthing. The mechanism by which clorgyline produces this switch in behavioral sensitization is unknown, but is independent of the known effects of clorgyline, namely, inhibition of MAO, inhibition of striatal dopamine uptake, or stimulation of sigma and I(2) receptors. Because clorgyline also inhibits hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function, and increased HPA activity facilitates the behavioral effects of psychostimulant drugs, the effects of clorgyline on quinpirole sensitization are possibly due to an inhibition of HPA function. Therefore, the present study examined whether HPA activity is required for sensitization to quinpirole, and whether clorgyline exerts its effects on quinpirole sensitization via inhibition of HPA function. Control and hypophysectomized rats were administered clorgyline (1 mg/kg, s.c.) or vehicle 90 min before each injection of quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg x 8, twice weekly) or saline. To assess the level of sensitization reached by control and hypophysectomized rats, test injections of quinpirole (0.0, 0.07, and 0.2 mg/kg) were administered. Chronic quinpirole administration produced equivalent levels of locomotor sensitization in control and hypophysectomized rats. Clorgyline was equally effective in blocking the development of locomotor sensitization in control and hypophysectomized rats, and in sensitizing self-directed mouthing. The present study suggests that (1). HPA function is not necessary for the development of quinpirole sensitization and, (2). clorgyline does not produce its effects on behavioral sensitization to quinpirole via an inhibition of HPA activity. Moreover, the observation that quinpirole sensitization develops normally in the absence of any pituitary endocrine function suggests that pituitary-gonadal and pituitary-thyroid axes activity are also not necessary for quinpirole sensitization to occur.

Effects of autoshaping procedures on 3H-8-OH-DPAT-labeled 5-HT1a binding and 125I-LSD-labeled 5-HT2a binding in rat brain

Effects of experience with Pavlovian autoshaping procedures on lever-press autoshaping conditioned response (CR) performance and 3H-8-OH-DPAT-labeled binding of 5-HT(1a) receptors as well as 125I-LSD-labeled binding of 5-HT(2a) receptors were evaluated in four groups of male Long-Evans hooded rats. Two groups of rats (Group Paired High CR and Group Paired Low CR) received Pavlovian autoshaping procedures wherein the presentation of a lever (conditioned stimulus, CS) was followed by the response-independent presentation of food (unconditioned stimulus, US). Rats in Group Paired High CR (n=12) showed more rapid CR acquisition and higher asymptotic levels of lever-press autoshaping CR performance relative to rats in Group Low CR (n=12). Group Omission (n=9) received autoshaping with an omission contingency, such that performing the lever-press autoshaping CR resulted in the cancellation the food US, while Group Random (n=9) received presentations of lever CS and food US randomly with respect to one another. Though Groups Omission and Random did not differ in lever-press autoshaping CR performance, Group Omission showed significantly lower levels of 3H-8-OH-DPAT-labeled 5-HT(1a) binding in post-synaptic areas (frontal cortex, septum, caudate putamen), as well as significantly higher plasma corticosterone levels than Group Random. In addition, Group Random showed higher levels of 3H-8-OH-DPAT-labeled 5-HT(1a) binding in pre-synaptic somatodendritic autoreceptors on dorsal raphe nucleus relative to each of the other three groups. Autoradiographic analysis of 125I-LSD-labeled 5-HT(2a) receptor binding revealed no significant differences between Groups Paired High CR and Paired Low CR or between Groups Omission and Random in any brain regions.

The new generation of monoamine oxidase inhibitors

Irreversible and unspecific inhibitors of MAO were the first modern antidepressants, but after an initial success they fell into discredit due to adverse side effects. In the past two decades interest in MAO inhibitors has been renewed because of progress in basic research, a milestone being the finding that there are two subtypes of MAO, MAO-A and MAO-B. These are distinct proteins with high amino acid homology, coded by separate genes both located on the short arm of the human chromosome X. The enzyme subforms show different substrate specificities in vitro and different distributions within the central nervous system and in peripheral organs. In the central nervous system of man MAO-A seems to be mainly involved in the metabolism of 5 HT and noradrenaline, whereas 2-phenylethylamine and probably dopamine are predominantly deaminated by MAO-B. In the intestinal tract tyramine is mainly metabolized by MAO-A. These characteristics indicate distinct physiological functions of the two MAO-subforms. Several irreversible and reversible non-hydrazine inhibitors with relative selectivities for one of the MAO-subforms have been developed. They belong to various chemical classes with different modes of enzyme inhibition. These range from covalent mechanism based interaction (e.g. by propargyl- and allylamine derivatives) to pseudosubstrate inhibition (e.g. by 2-aminoethyl-carboxamides) and non-covalent interaction (e.g. by brofaromine, toloxatone and possibly moclobemide). The most important pharmacological effects of the new types of MAO inhibitors are those observed in neuropsychiatric disorders. The inhibitors of MAO-A show a favorable action in various forms of mental depression. The drugs seem to have about the same activity as other types of antidepressants, including tricyclic and related compounds as well as classical MAO inhibitors. The onset of action of the MAO-A inhibitors is claimed to be relatively fast. Other possible indications of these drugs include disorders with cognitive impairment, e.g. dementia of the Alzheimer type. In subjects with Parkinson's disease the MAO-B inhibitor L-deprenyl exerts a L-dopa-sparing effect, prolongs L-dopa action and seems to have a favorable influence regarding on-off disabilities. The action is in general transitory (months to several years). In addition L-deprenyl has been shown to delay the necessity for L-dopa treatment in patients with early parkinsonism. Whether the drug influence the progression of the disease is still a matter of debate. L-deprenyl also appears to have some antidepressant effect (especially in higher doses) and to exert a beneficial influence in other disorders, e.g. dementia of the Alzheimer type.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)