Diazepam enhances the inhibitory action of adenosine on transmission at the frog neuromuscular junction

Adjusting the brakes to adjust neuronal activity: Adenosinergic modulation of GABAergic transmission

About 50 years elapsed from the publication of the first full paper on the neuromodulatory action of adenosine at a 'simple' synapse model, the neuromuscular junction (Ginsborg and Hirst, 1972). In that study adenosine was used as a tool to increase cyclic AMP and for the great surprise, it decreased rather than increased neurotransmitter release, and for a further surprise, its action was prevented by theophylline, at the time only known as inhibitor of phosphodiesterases. These intriguing observations opened the curiosity for immediate studies relating the action of adenine nucleotides, known to be released together with neurotransmitters, to that of adenosine (Ribeiro and Walker, 1973, 1975). Our understanding on the ways adenosine uses to modulate synapses, circuits, and brain activity, vastly expanded since then. However, except for A_2A receptors, whose actions upon GABAergic neurons of the striatum are well known, most of the attention given to the neuromodulatory action of adenosine has been focusing upon excitatory synapses. Evidence is growing that GABAergic transmission is also a target for adenosinergic neuromodulation through A₁ and A_2A receptors. Some o these actions have specific time windows during brain development, and others are selective for specific GABAergic neurons. Both tonic and phasic GABAergic transmission can be affected, and either neurons or astrocytes can be targeted. In some cases, those effects result from a concerted action with other neuromodulators. Implications of these actions in the control of neuronal function/dysfunction will be the focus of this review.

Ophidian envenomation strategies and the role of purines

Snake envenomation employs three well integrated strategies: prey immobilization via hypotension, prey immobilization via paralysis, and prey digestion. Purines (adenosine, guanosine and inosine) evidently play a central role in the envenomation strategies of most advanced snakes. Purines constitute the perfect multifunctional toxins, participating simultaneously in all three envenomation strategies. Because they are endogenous regulatory compounds in all vertebrates, it is impossible for any prey organism to develop resistance to them. Purine generation from endogenous precursors in the prey explains the presence of many hitherto unexplained enzyme activities in snake venoms: 5'-nucleotidase, endonucleases (including ribonuclease), phosphodiesterase, ATPase, ADPase, phosphomonoesterase, and NADase. Phospholipases A(2), cytotoxins, myotoxins, and heparinase also participate in purine liberation, in addition to their better known functions. Adenosine contributes to prey immobilization by activation of neuronal adenosine A(1) receptors, suppressing acetylcholine release from motor neurons and excitatory neurotransmitters from central sites. It also exacerbates venom-induced hypotension by activating A(2) receptors in the vasculature. Adenosine and inosine both activate mast cell A(3) receptors, liberating vasoactive substances and increasing vascular permeability. Guanosine probably contributes to hypotension, by augmenting vascular endothelial cGMP levels via an unknown mechanism. Novel functions are suggested for toxins that act upon blood coagulation factors, including nitric oxide production, using the prey's carboxypeptidases. Leucine aminopeptidase may link venom hemorrhagic metalloproteases and endogenous chymotrypsin-like proteases with venom L-amino acid oxidase (LAO), accelerating the latter. The primary function of LAO is probably to promote prey hypotension by activating soluble guanylate cyclase in the presence of superoxide dismutase. LAO's apoptotic activity, too slow to be relevant to prey capture, is undoubtedly secondary and probably serves principally a digestive function. It is concluded that the principal function of L-type Ca(2+) channel antagonists and muscarinic toxins, in Dendroaspis venoms, and acetylcholinesterase in other elapid venoms, is to promote hypotension. Venom dipeptidyl peptidase IV-like enzymes probably also contribute to hypotension by destroying vasoconstrictive peptides such as Peptide YY, neuropeptide Y and substance P. Purines apparently bind to other toxins which then serve as molecular chaperones to deposit the bound purines at specific subsets of purine receptors. The assignment of pharmacological activities such as transient neurotransmitter suppression, histamine release and antinociception, to a variety of proteinaceous toxins, is probably erroneous. Such effects are probably due instead to purines bound to these toxins, and/or to free venom purines.

Enhancement by benzodiazepines of the inhibitory effect of adenosine on skeletal neuromuscular transmission

1. Interactions of benzodiazepines with adenosine on the neuromuscular transmission were studied in mouse diaphragm preparations. 2. In tubocurarine (0.6-0.8 microM)-partially paralyzed preparations, diazepam (35 microM) and Ro 5-4864 (3-30 microM), a peripheral type benzodiazepine receptor agonist, potentiated the inhibitory effect of adenosine on indirect twitch responses. 3. The central type receptor agonist, clonazepam did not affect the inhibitory effect of adenosine. 4. The peripheral benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, PK11195 (1-10 microM) attenuated the adenosine inhibition and antagonized the potentiation by Ro 5-4864. 5. Ro 5-4864 failed to enhance further the inhibitory effect of adenosine in the presence of dipyridamole, an adenosine uptake inhibitor that also potentiated adenosine inhibition. 6. Neither Ro 5-4864 nor PK 11195 affected the inhibition produced by a stable adenosine analogue, 2-chloroadenosine, which is not a substrate for the adenosine uptake system. 7. Ro 5-4864 did not affect endplate potentials (e.p.ps) in the absence of adenosine, but reduced the amplitude of e.p.ps in the presence of adenosine without affecting miniature e.p.ps. 8. It is suggested that benzodiazepines potentiate the adenosine-effected presynaptic inhibition of neuromuscular transmission by an inhibition of adenosine uptake through activation of peripheral type benzodiazepine receptors.

Improvement by diazepam of neuromuscular transmission blocked by anticholinesterase agents in mouse diaphragms

Effects of diazepam on the neuromuscular transmission blocked by neostigmine were studied in isolated mouse phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparations. Diazepam, in the absence of neostigmine, had no significant effect on the neuromuscular transmission at concentrations lower than 100 microM, except to enhance muscle contractility. Single and train pulses-evoked endplate potentials (e.p.p.s) and miniature e.p.p.s (m.e.p.p.s) were also unaffected. At concentrations of 175 microM or higher, diazepam caused an axonal conduction block. However, neostigmine-induced twitch potentiation, spontaneous fasciculation and tetanic fade were antagonized by diazepam at 3.5-35 microM. Diazepam did not decrease the amplitude of neostigmine-augmented e.p.p.s and m.e.p.p.s but slightly reduced their decay time. The incidence of regenerative depolarization of endplates induced by repetitive stimulation in the presence of neostigmine, was decreased from 92% to 35% junctions and the duration shortened from 650 ms to 230 ms. The amplitude of train e.p.p.s was increased. It is suggested that diazepam reverses the muscle paralysis induced by anticholinesterase agents by inhibiting the regenerative release of acetylcholine.