Selective vasoconstriction by alniditan in the carotid vascular bed of anaesthetized dogs

Nonclinical safety assessment of a synthetic peptide thrombopoietin agonist: effects on platelets, bone homeostasis, and immunogenicity and the implications for clinical safety monitoring of adverse bone effects

RWJ-800088 is a novel, potent polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetic that increases platelet levels and protects against thrombocytopenia. A nonclinical safety program was customized for this peptide that takes into account its protein-like structure, synthetic chemical nature, agonist pharmacologic activity, and mode of administration. In repeat-dose toxicity studies, the salient findings were dose-related increases in circulating platelet counts, mean platelet volume, and megakaryocytes in the bone marrow with no antibody formation. Reversible myelofibrosis and hyperostosis were observed in rats, but not dogs, when the circulating platelet levels exceeded 3× those of vehicle controls. The bone effects were due to the exaggerated pharmacologic effect and excessive stimulation and elevation of megakaryocytes by TPO, which results in intramedullary proliferation of fibroblasts and mesenchymal cells followed by osseous metaplasia. These findings support the use of platelet elevations of >3× as a stopping criterion to prevent potential adverse bone-related effects in humans.

Peripheral pacemakers and patterns of slow wave propagation in the canine small intestine in vivo

In an anesthetized, open-abdomen, canine model, the propagation pattern of the slow wave and its direction, velocity, amplitude, and frequency were investigated in the small intestine of 8 dogs. Electrical recordings were made using a 240-electrode array from 5 different sites, spanning the length of the small intestine. The majority of slow waves propagated uniformly and aborally (84%). In several cases, however, other patterns were found including propagation in the oral direction (11%) and propagation block (2%). In addition, in 69 cases (3%), a slow wave was initiated at a local site beneath the electrode array. Such peripheral pacemakers were found throughout the entire intestine. The frequency, velocity, and amplitude of slow waves were highest in the duodenum and gradually declined along the intestine reaching lowest values in the distal ileum (from 17.4+/-1.7 c/min to 12.2+/-0.7 c/min; 10.5+/-2.4 cm/s to 0.8+/-0.2 cm/s, and 1.20+/-0.35 mV to 0.31+/-0.10 mV, respectively; all p<0.001). Consequently, the wavelength of the slow wave was strongly reduced from 36.4+/-0.8 cm to 3.7 +/- 0.1 cm (p<0.001). We conclude that the patterns of slow wave propagation are usually, though not always, uniform in the canine small intestine and that the gradient in the wavelength will influence the patterns of local contractions.

Longitudinal and circumferential spike patches in the canine small intestine in vivo

In an open-abdominal anesthetized and fasted canine model of the intact small intestine, the presence, location, shape, and frequency of spike patches were investigated. Recordings were performed with a 240-electrode array (24 x 10, 2-mm interelectrode distance) from several sites sequentially, spanning the whole length of the small intestine. All 240 electrograms were recorded simultaneously during periods of 5 min and were analyzed to reconstruct the origin and propagation of individual spikes. At every level in the small intestine, spikes propagated in all directions before stopping abruptly, thereby activating a circumscribed area termed a "patch." Two types of spikes were found: longitudinal spikes, which propagated predominantly in the longitudinal direction and occurred most often in the duodenum, and a second type, circumferential spikes, which propagated predominantly in the circular direction and occurred much more frequently in the jejunum and ileum. Circumferential spikes conducted faster than longitudinal spikes (17 +/- 6 and 7 +/- 2 cm/s, respectively; P < 0.001). Circumferential spikes originated in >90% of all cases from the antimesenteric border, whereas longitudinal spikes were initiated all around the circumference of the intestinal tube. Finally, the spatial sequence of spike patches after the slow wave was very irregular in the upper part of the intestine but much more regular in the lower part. In conclusion, spikes and spike patches occur throughout the small intestine, whereas their type, sites of origin, extent of propagation, and frequencies of occurrence differ along the length of the small intestine, suggesting differences in local patterns of motility.

In vivo measurement of QT prolongation, dispersion and arrhythmogenesis: application to the preclinical cardiovascular safety pharmacology of a new chemical entity

In addition to in silico and in vitro measurements, cardiac electrophysiology in experimental animals plays a decisive role in the selection of a potential 'cardio-safe' new chemical entity (NCE). The present synopsis critically reviews such in vivo techniques in experimental animals. In anaesthetized guinea-pigs, surface ECG recordings readily identify the typical effects of Class I to IV anti-arrhythmic compounds and of If blockers such as zatebradine on ECG intervals and morphology, but also of non-cardiovascular NCEs affecting cardiac electrical activity via ion channels or neurogenic mechanisms. QT/RR plots indicate that bradycardia is a dominant effect of IKr blockers (dual modulation by IKr of sinus node activity and ventricular repolarization). Nevertheless, correction of QT with Bazett's formula usually distinguishes between drug-induced heart rate reduction and real prolongation of ventricular repolarization (QTc). The anaesthetized guinea-pig model thus is a useful tool for first line in vivo testing of an NCE for effects on cardiac electrophysiology, in particular when combined with measurements of drug levels in plasma and heart tissues. In anaesthetized dogs, advanced ECG analyses identify drug-induced effects on atrial and ventricular intervals, on temporal and transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization and on incidences of early after-depolarizations. This can be combined with complete haemodynamic, pulmonary and pharmacokinetic analyses in one preparation. However, compound doses/plasma levels needed for effects on ventricular repolarization in this model are substantially higher than those identified in guinea-pigs, at least for IKr blocking compounds. Therefore, we use this 'information-rich' canine model as a second line approach. In awake, trained and appropriately instrumented dogs, readings of surface ECG in combination with cardio-haemodynamic and behavioural assessments can be performed after the administration of an NCE via the expected therapeutic route, including oral medication. However, at higher doses the compound under scrutiny may induce overall behavioural side-effects, related to its primary pharmacological action, such as gastrokinetic repercussions or CNS-mediated sedation or excitation. Such primary pharmacological effects are bound to compromise the evaluation of real drug-induced changes on cardiac electrophysiology, readily identified by resource-friendly setups in smaller animals. Therefore, we use such paradigms as an imperative, final cardiovascular check-up, before a 'First in Man' administration of the NCE. In anaesthetized, methoxamine-challenged rabbits, arrhythmogenic effects of IKr blockers (torsades de pointes) and of dual channel INa/IKr blockers (conduction disturbances) are readily identified. Drug-induced QT dispersion rather than a 'simple' QTc prolongation determines the ventricular arrhythmogenic effect of IKr blockers. The latter effect also depends on the rate of drug delivery (plasma levels vs. heart level, equilibrium throughout the myocardium). Therefore, we use models sensitized for arrhythmogenesis to document further the profile of a comparatively 'cardio-safe' NCE. We conclude that the interpretation of an integrated profile of activity of an NCE on in vitro and in vivo cardiovascular parameters, in comparison with the characteristics of its primary pharmacology and target disease, determines its eventual selection via a scientific, rather than a 'checklist' or 'menu' approach to cardiovascular safety pharmacology. Appropriate tests in experimental animals play a key role in this process.

The efficacy and safety of sc alniditan vs. sc sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase-III trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a single subcutaneous injection of placebo, 2 doses of alniditan (1.4 mg and 1.8 mg) and 6 mg of sumatriptan in subjects with acute migraine. A total of 114 investigators from 13 different countries screened 2021 subjects. In total 924 patients were treated with placebo (157), alniditan 1.4 mg (309), alniditan 1.8 mg (141) and sumatriptan 6 mg (317). The lower number of subjects in the alniditan 1.8 mg group is due to the termination of this trial arm after the incidence of a serious adverse event and a subsequent protocol amendment. The number of subjects who were pain free at 2 h (primary endpoint) was: 22 (14.1%) with placebo, 174 (56.3%) with alniditan 1.4 mg, 87 (61.7%) with alnditan 1.8 mg and 209 (65.9%) with sumatriptan 6 mg. Alniditan 1.4 mg was significantly better (P < 0.001) than placebo and sumatriptan was significantly better (P = 0.015) than alniditan 1.4 mg. The number of responders (reduction of headache severity from moderate or severe headache before treatment to mild or absent at 2 h), was 59 (37.8%) on placebo, 250 (80.9%) on alniditan 1.4 mg, 120 (85.1%) on alniditan 1.8 mg, and 276 (87.1%) on sumatriptan. Response was significantly higher (P < 0.001) with alniditan 1.4 mg than with placebo, and significantly lower (P = 0.036) with alniditan 1.4 mg than with sumatriptan. Recurrence rates were: 22 (37.3%) with placebo, 87 (34.8%) with alniditan 1.4 mg, 35 (29.2%) with alniditan 1.8 mg and 108 (39.1%) with sumatriptan. Adverse events occurred in 577/924 (62.4%) subjects, i.e. in 62/157 (39.5%) with placebo, 214/309 (69.3%) with alniditan 1.4 mg, 91/141 (64.5%) with alniditan 1.8 mg and 210/317 (66.2%) with sumatriptan 6 mg. Sumatriptan was significantly better than alniditan 1.4 mg for pain free at 2 h. The difference, however, was small and clinically not important. For alniditan, a dose-dependent adverse event relationship was seen. The safety profile of alniditan 1.4 mg was similar to that of sumatriptan.

Treatment of migraine attacks with intranasal alniditan: an open study

In this open phase-II clinical tolerability trial 17 neurologists enrolled a total of 112 patients and instructed them to administer a maximum of two doses of intranasal alniditan, a 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist, for the treatment of three consecutive migraine attacks of moderate to severe intensity. A second dose of the trial medication was allowed within 1-24 h after the first administration. At 1 h after intranasal administration, 70/103 (68%) patients had responded to treatment (reduction from severe or moderate headache before treatment to mild or no headache) after their first migraine attack, 65/94 (69%) after their second and 52/75 (71%) after their third. In 187/270 (69%) of all attacks, patients were considered responders at 1 h. The median time to onset of effect was 30 min. The migraine headache recurred in 44% (attack 1), 55% (attack 2) and 44% (attack 3) after 4-5 h. Sixty-eight per cent of the patients reported nasal irritation, 19% taste disturbance and 44% throat irritation. Alniditan 2 mg, administered via the intranasal route, was effective in relieving migraine headaches in over two-thirds of the patients at 1 h.

No contractile effect for 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F receptor agonists in human and bovine cerebral arteries: similarity with human coronary artery

1. Using subtype-selective 5-HT1 receptor agonists and/or the 5-HT1 receptor antagonist GR127935, we characterized in vitro the 5-HT receptor that mediates the contraction of human and bovine cerebral arteries. Further, we investigated which sumatriptan-sensitive receptors are present in human coronary artery by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). 2. Agonists with affinity at the 5-HT1B receptor, such as sumatriptan, alniditan and/or IS-159, elicited dose-dependent contraction in both human and bovine cerebral arteries. They behaved as full agonists at the sumatriptan-sensitive 5-HT1 receptors in both species. In contrast, PNU-109291 and LY344864, selective agonists at 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F receptors, respectively, were devoid of any significant vasocontractile activity in cerebral arteries, or did not affect the sumatriptan-induced vasocontraction. The rank order of agonist potency was similar in both species and could be summarized as 5-HT = alniditan > sumatriptan = IS-159 >>> PNU-109291 = LY344864. 3. In bovine cerebral arteries, the 5-HT1 receptor antagonist GR127935 dose-dependently inhibited the vasoconstrictions elicited by both 5-HT and sumatriptan, with respective pA2 values of 8.0 and 8.6. 4. RT-PCR studies in human coronary arteries showed a strong signal for the 5-HT1B receptor while message for the 5-HT1F receptor was weak and less frequently detected. Expression of 5-HT1D receptor mRNA was not detected in any sample. 5. The present results demonstrate that the triptan-induced contraction in brain vessels is mediated exclusively by the 5-HT1B receptor, which is also present in a majority of human coronary arteries. These results suggest that selective 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F receptor agonists might represent new antimigraine drugs devoid of cerebro- and cardiovascular effects.

Effects of alniditan on neurogenic oedema in the rat dura mater and on contraction of rat basilar artery

The non-indole 5-HT receptor agonist, alniditan (R 91274), was tested and compared to sumatriptan in an in vivo model of neurogenic inflammation within the meninges of rats and in rat basilar artery in a Mulvany-Halpern chamber in vitro. Alniditan dose dependently attenuated the neurogenic inflammation and was more potent than sumatriptan. The alniditan response was blocked by the 5-HT(1B/D) receptor antagonist, GR 127935 (2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl-[1,2, 4]oxadiazol-3-yl)-biphenyl-4-carboxylic acid [4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-phenyl]-amide), but not by ketanserin, indicating that the effect is mediated through 5-HT(1B/D) receptors. Alniditan did not attenuate substance P-induced inflammation, suggesting that the mediating receptors are located prejunctionally. In vitro alniditan exhibited less vasoconstrictive effects on the rat basilar artery than did sumatriptan, although at a very high concentration (1 mM), alniditan caused intensive constriction, most likely through a mechanism independent from 5-HT receptor activation.

Pharmacokinetic profile of alniditan nasal spray during and outside migraine attacks

AIMS

To compare the pharmacokinetic profile of intranasal alniditan during and outside migraine attacks, and to investigate the relationship between initial rise of alniditan plasma concentration, and headache improvement.

METHODS

Twenty-seven migraine patients (age: 18-65 years) were randomized to receive alniditan 2 mg or 4 mg, and investigated both during and outside a migraine attack. Maximal plasma concentrations (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and the area under the curve over 2 h (AUC(0,2 h)), were calculated from the individual plasma concentration-time profile, obtained from 10 blood samples in each patient, during each of the two administrations.

RESULTS

Alniditan was rapidly absorbed into the systemic circulation (tmax=11 min). All investigated pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, tmax, AUC(0,2 h)) were similar during and outside migraine attacks, both in the 2 mg (n = 13) and the 4 mg group (n = 14). In the 4 mg group, during attacks, mean plasma alniditan concentration at 5 min after administration (Ct=5) in responders (21+/-16 ng ml(-1); n=10) was significantly higher than the Ct=5 in nonresponders (3+/-3 ng ml(-1); P=0.01; n=4). However, the Cmax and AUC(0,2 h) in responders (33+/-18 ng ml(-1) and 12+/-6 ng ml(-1) h) were also significantly higher than the Cmax and AUC(0,2 h) in nonresponders (13+/-9 ng ml(-1); P=0.048 and 5+/-3 ng ml(-1) h; P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Absorption of alniditan nasal spray was not affected by migraine attacks, although 95% confidence intervals were wide. Early rise of plasma concentrations and the amount of drug in the circulation were related to headache improvement in the higher dose group.

The antimigraine agent alniditan selectively constricts porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses via 5-HT1B/1D receptors

In previous studies, we have shown that several 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, including sumatriptan, potently constrict porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses. This effect seems to be of high predictive value for antimigraine activity. In the present experiments, we studied the effects of a new non-indole 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist, alniditan, on systemic and carotid haemodynamics in anaesthetised pigs. In control animals, no significant changes in either systemic or carotid haemodynamics were observed after four consecutive i.v. injections of physiological saline (0.5 ml each, every 20 min; n = 4). On the other hand, i.v. doses of alniditan (3, 10, 30 and 100 microg kg(-1) in 0.5 ml saline, every 20 min; n = 6) dose-dependently decreased total carotid conductance (maximum change: -31 +/- 6%) by a selective vasoconstrictor action on arteriovenous anastomoses (maximum change: -72 +/- 5%); the nutrient vascular bed dilated in response to alniditan (maximum change: +103 +/- 39%). The dose of alniditan that decreased arteriovenous anastomotic conductance by 50% was 24 +/- 8 microg kg(-1) (64 +/- 20 nmol kg(-1)). Alniditan produced a slight bradycardia (maximum change: -4 +/- 1%) and a more pronounced hypotensive effect (maximum change: -23 +/- 5%). In six animals pre-treated with the potent and selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist, GR127935, the alniditan-induced changes in carotid haemodynamics were clearly antagonised, whereas the bradycardia and hypotension remained unaffected. These results suggest that alniditan selectively constricts porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses mainly via 5-HT1B/1D receptors and should be able to abort migraine headaches. The latter has indeed been confirmed in initial clinical studies in man.

Agonistic properties of alniditan, sumatriptan and dihydroergotamine on human 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors expressed in various mammalian cell lines

1. Alniditan, a novel migraine abortive agent, is a potent 5-HT1B/5-HT1D receptor agonist of nM affinity. We compared the agonistic properties of alniditan, sumatriptan and dihydroergotamine on the cloned human 5-HT1B receptor expressed at 200 fmol mg(-1) protein (Bmax) in non-induced L929sA cells, at 740 fmol mg(-1) protein in HEK 293 and at 2300 fmol mg(-1) protein in mIFNbeta-induced L929sA cells, and on the human cloned 5-HT1D receptor expressed in C6 glioma cells (Bmax 780 fmol mg(-1) protein). 2. Sodium butyrate treatment increased the expression level of human (h)5-HT1B receptors in HEK 293 cells and h5-HT1D receptors in C6 glioma cells approximately 3 fold, the binding affinities of [3H]-5-HT and [3H]-alniditan were unaffected. 3. Agonistic properties were evaluated based on inhibition of cyclic AMP accumulation in the cells after stimulation of adenylyl cyclase by forskolin or isoproterenol. Alniditan, sumatriptan and dihydroergotamine were full agonists at the hS-HT1B receptor (IC50 values were 1.7, 20 and 2 nM, respectively in HEK 293 cells) and hS-HT1D receptors (IC50 values of 1.3, 2.6 and 2.2 nM, respectively). At the h5-HT1B receptor the agonist potency of the compounds slightly increased with higher receptor density. The opposite was seen for antagonists (ocaperidone, risperidone and ritanserin). 4. This comparative study demonstrated that alniditan was 10 times more potent than sumatriptan at the h5-HT1B receptor, and twice as potent at the h5-HT1D receptor. Dihydroergotamine was more potent an agonist at the h5-HT1B receptor when expressed at high and low level in L929sA cells (but not in HEK 293 cells), and was less potent at the hS-HT1D receptor.