PK 11195 antagonizes the positive inotropic response of the isolated rat heart to diazepam but not the negative inotropic response

Cardiovascular manifestations of sedatives and analgesics in the critical care unit

There are numerous sedatives and analgesics used in critical care medicine today; these medications are used on critically ill patients, many of whom have heart disease, including coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure. The purpose of this review is to recognize the effects of these medications on the heart. Studies that evaluated the effects of sedatives and analgesics on normal individuals or on those with heart disease were reviewed. Current choices for sustained sedation in the critically ill include the benzodiazepines, morphine, propofol, and etomidate. Each of these medications has their particular advantages and disadvantages. Benzodiazepines provide the greatest amnesia and cardiovascular safety but they can cause significant hypotension in the hemodynamically unstable patient. Morphine provides analgesia and cardioprotective activity after ischemia, although the large observational study CRUSADE showed increased mortality rate in those patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction who received morphine. Propofol is the most easily titratable drug with cardioprotective features, but its use must be accompanied with great attention to possible development of propofol infusion syndrome, which is a deadly disease, especially in patients with head injury and those with septic shock receiving vasopressors. Etomidate has a rapid onset effect and short period of action with great hemodynamic stability even in patients with shock and hypovolemia, but the incidence of adrenal insufficiency during infusion, not bolus doses, may cause deterioration in the circulatory stability. In conclusion, the sedatives and analgesics mentioned here have characteristics that give them a cardiovascular safety profile useful in critically ill patients. However, use of these drugs on an individual basis is dependent on each agent's safety and efficacy.

Morphological alterations induced by loud noise in the myocardium: the role of benzodiazepine receptors

Noise represents an environmental stress factor affecting several organs and apparati, including the cardiovascular system. In experimental animals undergoing noise exposure, subcellular myocardial changes have been reported, especially at mitochondrial level; in particular, after 6 hours of exposure only the atrium exhibited significant mitochondrial alterations, whereas after 12 hours as well as subchronic exposure both atrium and ventricle were damaged. The first part of the present article overviews the experimental evidence on effects of noise on the myocardium. In the second part, the review analyzes the role of benzodiazepine receptors and the potential efficacy of benzodiazepine ligands in preventing the mitochondrial damage induced by noise exposure. Drugs acting at both central and peripheral benzodiazepine receptors significantly prevent this damage. Differences in the amount and the duration of the protective effect might depend on variability in the potency and pharmacokinetics of the specific drug. The effects of the combined treatment with selective and non-selective peripheral benzodiazepine ligands on noise stimulation are discussed at biochemical level reviewing studies on the effects of noise exposure on mitochondrial fractions.

Central and peripheral benzodiazepine ligands prevent mitochondrial damage induced by noise exposure in the rat myocardium: an ultrastructural study

Noise represents an environmental stress factor affecting several organs and apparatuses, including the cardiovascular system. In experimental animals undergoing noise exposure, subcellular myocardial changes have been reported, especially at the mitochondrial level. In previous studies we found that diazepam, acting at both central and peripheral benzodiazepine receptors, prevented the onset of this myocardial damage. In the present study, we investigated the specific role played by central and/or peripheral benzodiazepine receptors in preventing noise-induced myocardial alterations. In particular, the effect of clonazepam as a selective ligand for central sites, in comparison with the efficacy of ligands selective for peripheral sites, such as Ro 5-4864 and PK-11195, was evaluated. Rats were pretreated with the test drugs 30 min before exposure to noise for 6 or 12 hr and then sacrificed. After fixing, samples of right atrium and ventricle were taken and processed for either transmission or scanning electron microscopy. After 6 hr of noise exposure, only the atrium exhibited significant mitochondrial alterations, whereas after 12 hr both atrium and ventricle were damaged. As expected, diazepam prevented noise-induced mitochondrial injury at both 6 and 12 hr. By contrast, clonazepam was effective only after 6 hr. The peripheral ligand PK-11195 attenuated mitochondrial damage at both 6 and 12 hr, whereas Ro 5-4864 was effective only after 12 hr. In the present study, we confirm that noise exposure induces mitochondrial damage in the rat myocardium. Drugs acting at both central and peripheral benzodiazepine receptors significantly prevent this damage. Differences in the amount and in the duration of the protective effect might depend on variability in the potency and in the pharmacokinetics of the specific drugs.

Cardiac effects of benzodiazepine receptor agonists and antagonists in the isolated rat heart: a comparative study

Effects of PK 11195 and flumazenil on cardiac responses to diazepam, clonazepam and zolpidem were compared. Coronary flow rate was increased at relatively low doses of diazepam and decreased at higher doses. Clonazepam induced a dose-dependent increase, and zolpidem a decrease of coronary flow rate. PK 11195 reduced the diazepam-induced increase of coronary flow rate, and flumazenil was ineffective. Neither antagonist evoked substantial changes in the decrease of coronary flow rate. PK 11195, and less so flumazenil, antagonized the clonazepam-induced increase. PK 11195 and flumazenil only in their highest doses suppressed and respectively potentiated the zolpidem-induced decrease. Inotropy showed a biphasic response in the presence of diazepam, i.e. an initial transient decrease, followed by a dose-dependent increase in two steps. Clonazepam induced a similar response. Zolpidem increased the inotropy. The negative inotropic response induced by diazepam did not change significantly in the presence of PK 11195 or flumazenil. The positive inotropic response was suppressed by PK 11195, and less so by flumazenil. The negative response to clonazepam was antagonized by both PK 11195 and flumazenil; the positive response was not significantly changed. In the presence of lower doses of PK 11195, the zolpidem-induced response was potentiated, whereas higher doses produced reversal; flumazenil potentiated the response. In conclusion, the results support earlier suggestions, involving receptor mechanisms with cardiac effects of benzodiazepines. Both agonists and antagonists (inter)act in a different manner, suggesting that rather ambiguous receptor mechanisms are involved in benzodiazepine effects in the heart.

Flunarizine but not theophylline modulates inotropic responses of the isolated rat heart to diazepam

Diazepam (2 x 10(-5)-6 x 10(-4) M) induced a concentration-dependent positive inotropic effect on the perfused rat heart which was preceded by a transient concentration-dependent negative inotropic response. The influence of the Ca(2+)-entry blocking drug, flunarizine, and the adenosine receptor blocking drug, theophylline on these inotropic responses was studied. Flunarizine in concentrations of 10(-9)-10(-6) M antagonized the positive inotropic response to diazepam significantly; the negative inotropic response was reduced as well. At the lower concentrations of diazepam the negative inotropic response was completely abolished in the presence of flunarizine. The actions of the Ca(2+)-entry blocker were related to the concentrations used. Theophylline in concentrations up to 5 x 10(-5) M did not interfere with either inotropic response to diazepam. The results suggest that Ca2+ currents in the myocardium are involved with the response of the isolated heart to diazepam. It is concluded that the finding that the negative inotropic effect of diazepam was almost abolished by flunarizine suggests that the site of this response most be associated with Ca(2+)-current mechanisms.