Ontogeny and localization of alpha A- and alpha B-crystallins during regeneration of the eye lens

Lens regenerates by means of similar processes and timeline in adults and larvae of the newt Cynops pyrrhogaster

BACKGROUND

It is widely accepted that juvenile animals can regenerate faster than adults. For example, in the case of lens regeneration of the newt Cynops pyrrhogaster, larvae and adults require approximately 30 and 80 days for completion of lens regeneration, respectively. However, when we carefully observed lens regeneration in C. pyrrhogaster at the cellular level using molecular markers in the present study, we found that lens regeneration during the larval stage proceeded at similar speed and by means of similar steps to those in adults.

RESULTS

We could not find any drastic difference between regeneration at these two stages, except that the size of the eyes was very different.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations suggested that larvae could regenerate a lens of the original size within a shorter time than adults because the larval lens was smaller than the adult lens, but the speed of regeneration was not faster in larvae. In addition, by repeatedly observing the regeneration in one individual transgenic newt that expressed fluorescence specifically in lens fiber cells in vivo and comparing the regeneration process at the embryonic, larval, and postmetamorphosis stages, we confirmed that the regeneration speed was the same at each of these stages in the same individual.

The cellular and molecular bases of vertebrate lens regeneration

Lens regeneration takes place in some vertebrates through processes of cellular dedifferentiation and transdifferentiation, processes by which certain differentiated cell types can give rise to others. This review describes the principal forms of lens regeneration that occur in vivo as well as related in vitro systems of transdifferentiation. Classic experimental studies are reviewed that define the tissue interactions that trigger these events in vivo. Recent molecular analyses have begun to identify the genes associated with these processes. These latter studies generally reveal tremendous similarities between embryonic lens development and lens regeneration. Different models are proposed to describe basic molecular pathways that define the processes of lens regeneration and transdifferentiation. Finally, studies are discussed suggesting that fibroblast growth factors play key roles in supporting the process of lens regeneration. Retinoids, such as retinoic acid, may also play important roles in this process.

Expression of crystallin genes in embryonic and regenerating newt lenses

The spatio-temporal expression of three crystallin genes (alphaA, betaB1 and gamma) in the developing and regenerating lenses of newt was compared by in situ hybridization in lens differentiation in normal development with during regeneration. In normal development, all crystallin transcripts were first detected at the same stage in the posterior region of the lens vesicle (McDevitt's lens development stage V) and continued during lens fiber differentiation of the posterior cells into the primary lens fiber cell differentiation (McDevitt's lens development stage VII-VIII). At later stages, the expression of the three genes was restricted to the secondary lens fibers and gradually became undetectable in primary lens fibers (McDevitt's lens development stage X). The signal for gamma-crystallin was never detected in lens epithelium at any stage, whereas signals for alphaA- and betaB1-crystallin were detected in the lens epithelium at the stage when the primary lens fiber mass was formed. During lens regeneration, signals for the three crystallins were first detected at the same stage at the ventral margin of a regenerating lens vesicle (Sato's lens regeneration stage IV). The expression patterns of three crystallin genes were similar to those in normal development (Sato's lens regeneration stage V-X). The expression pattern of the crystallin genes in normal lens development fundamentally resembles that during lens regeneration, suggesting the absence of unique expression programs of crystallin genes for lens regeneration not found in ontogeny.

Fibroblast growth factor receptors and regeneration of the eye lens

If the eye lens of the adult newt, Notophthalmus viridescens, is removed, a new lens will regenerate and only from the dorsal, not the ventral, iris. The source, pigmented epithelial cells, would normally no longer divide, but upon lentectomy they do re-enter the cell cycle and form lens. The cause for this capability is unknown, but the mitogenic Fibroblast Growth Factors and their receptors may be involved. We have demonstrated that FGF receptors are present and operative in lens regeneration, since receptor-directed mitotoxins inhibit regeneration; heterogeneity and differential density in FGF-binding and receptor localization in iris sectors is also present. We propose that the spatial distribution of FGF receptors, especially the amphibian homolog of FGFR-3, is important in initiation of regeneration of eye lens.

Differentiation and angiogenic growth factor message in two mammalian lens epithelial cell lines

Lens epithelial cells in culture can sometimes be induced to form spheroid aggregates termed lentoid bodies, composed of cells exhibiting various characteristics of the more highly differentiated lens fiber cells. However, lentoid bodies are often slow to form, and the ability to produce them declines with serial subculture. It was therefore of interest to establish and/or characterize lens epithelial cell lines capable of forming lentoid bodies. The differentiation state was assessed in lentoid bodies formed by each of two lens epithelial cell lines, the transformed alpha TN4 cell line from mouse and the nontransformed N/N1135A cell line from rabbit. Lentoid and monolayer cultures of each cell line were examined for transcripts of the lens-specific alpha A-crystallin ("alpha A"), gamma D-crystallin ("gamma D"; formerly gamma 1-crystallin) and MP26 genes. alpha TN4 lentoid bodies contained 2.5 times the alpha A RNA found in monolayer cells, but lacked detectable gamma D and MP26 RNA. None of the three markers were detected in either lentoid or monolayer N/N1135A cultures grown under the conditions described. Lentoid body formation alone, therefore, does not indicate the extent of differentiation occurring. At least some of the changes in cell adhesion occurring during lentoid body formation involve laminin-like and fibronectin-like interactions, and are reminiscent of those observed during embryonic lens formation. Finally, vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA was absent from the lens but present in alpha TN4 cells, suggesting a mechanism whereby the lens tumors of the founder mouse became vascularized.

Presence and foveal enrichment of rod opsin in the "all cone" retina of the American chameleon

The retinal photoreceptors of the eye of the American chameleon, Anolis carolinensis, have been considered to be exclusively cones. Its retina is unusual for possessing two foveas (areas associated with heightened visual acuity), with the major, central fovea deeply incised and very densely packed with photoreceptors. Immunoblotting and light- and electron microscopic-immunocytochemistry, using several opsin monoclonal antibodies previously found specific for rods, demonstrated the presence and localization of this protein in the Anolis retina. This visual pigment appears sparsely in a subpopulation of photoreceptors in the periphery but overwhelmingly in the central fovea. Complementary results with cone-specific antibody and lectin binding corroborated this spatial organization. These results, as well as those with geckos, suggest that photoreceptor morphology is not an accurate guide among the lacertilians to visual pigment content, and that this phylogenetic grouping may constitute a crossroads in vertebrate photoreceptor evolution.