Hydrodynamic properties of protein S1 from Escherichia coli ribosome

Comparative Analysis of Aggregation of Thermus thermophilus Ribosomal Protein bS1 and Its Stable Fragment

Functionally important multidomain bacterial protein bS1 is the largest ribosomal protein of subunit 30S. It interacts with both mRNA and proteins and is prone to aggregation, although this process has not been studied in detail. Here, we obtained bacterial strains overproducing ribosomal bS1 protein from Thermus thermophilus and its stable fragment bS1(49) and purified these proteins. Using fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, and high-performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometric analysis of products of protein limited proteolysis, we demonstrated that disordered regions at the N- and C-termini of bS1 can play a key role in the aggregation of this protein. The truncated fragment bS1(49) was less prone to aggregation compared to the full-size bS1. The revealed properties of the studied proteins can be used to obtain protein crystals for elucidating the structure of the bS1 stable fragment.

The number of domains in the ribosomal protein S1 as a hallmark of the phylogenetic grouping of bacteria

The family of ribosomal proteins S1 contains about 20% of all bacterial proteins including the S1 domain. An important feature of this family is multiple copies of structural domains in bacteria, the number of which changes in a strictly limited range from one to six. In this study, the automated exhaustive analysis of 1453 sequences of S1 allowed us to demonstrate that the number of domains in S1 is a distinctive characteristic for phylogenetic bacterial grouping in main phyla. 1453 sequences of S1 were identified in 25 out of 30 different phyla according to the List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature. About 62% of all records are identified as six-domain S1 proteins, which belong to phylum Proteobacteria. Four-domain S1 are identified mainly in proteins from phylum Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. Records belonging to these phyla are 33% of all records. The least represented two-domain S1 are about 0.6% of all records. The third and fourth domains for the most representative four- and six-domain S1 have the highest percentage of identity with the S1 domain from polynucleotide phosphorylase and S1 domains from one-domain S1. In addition, for these groups, the central part of S1 (the third domain) is more conserved than the terminal domains.

Repeats in S1 Proteins: Flexibility and Tendency for Intrinsic Disorder

An important feature of ribosomal S1 proteins is multiple copies of structural domains in bacteria, the number of which changes in a strictly limited range from one to six. For S1 proteins, little is known about the contribution of flexible regions to protein domain function. We exhaustively studied a tendency for intrinsic disorder and flexibility within and between structural domains for all available UniProt S1 sequences. Using charge–hydrophobicity plot cumulative distribution function (CH-CDF) analysis we classified 53% of S1 proteins as ordered proteins; the remaining proteins were related to molten globule state. S1 proteins are characterized by an equal ratio of regions connecting the secondary structure within and between structural domains, which indicates a similar organization of separate S1 domains and multi-domain S1 proteins. According to the FoldUnfold and IsUnstruct programs, in the multi-domain proteins, relatively short flexible or disordered regions are predominant. The lowest percentage of flexibility is in the central parts of multi-domain proteins. Our results suggest that the ratio of flexibility in the separate domains is related to their roles in the activity and functionality of S1: a more stable and compact central part in the multi-domain proteins is vital for RNA interaction, terminals domains are important for other functions.

Structural dynamics of protein S1 on the 70S ribosome visualized by ensemble cryo-EM

Bacterial ribosomal protein S1 is the largest and highly flexible protein of the 30S subunit, and one of a few core ribosomal proteins for which a complete structure is lacking. S1 is thought to participate in transcription and translation. Best understood is the role of S1 in facilitating translation of mRNAs with structured 5' UTRs. Here, we present cryo-EM analyses of the 70S ribosome that reveal multiple conformations of S1. Based on comparison of several 3D maximum likelihood classification approaches in Frealign, we propose a streamlined strategy for visualizing a highly dynamic component of a large macromolecular assembly that itself exhibits high compositional and conformational heterogeneity. The resulting maps show how S1 docks at the ribosomal protein S2 near the mRNA exit channel. The globular OB-fold domains sample a wide area around the mRNA exit channel and interact with mobile tails of proteins S6 and S18. S1 also interacts with the mRNA entrance channel, where an OB-fold domain can be localized near S3 and S5. Our analyses suggest that S1 cooperates with other ribosomal proteins to form a dynamic mesh near the mRNA exit and entrance channels to modulate the binding, folding and movement of mRNA.

Compact globular structure of Thermus thermophilus ribosomal protein S1 in solution: sedimentation and calorimetric study

Ribosomal protein S1 of Thermus thermophilus overexpressed in Escherichia coli cells has been isolated and subjected to studies by analytical sedimentation and differential scanning microcalorimetry techniques. It has been demonstrated that the protein of 60 kDa sediments at s020,w = 4.6 S and has the diffusion coefficient D020,w = 6.7 x 10(-7) cm2/s in 25 mm HEPES-NaOH buffer, pH 7.5 (similarly to bovine serum albumin of 66 kDa that sediments at s0 20,w = 4.4 S and D020,w =6.0 x 10(-7) cm2/s), indicating its compact globular conformation under these conditions. The microcalorimetry study has shown the presence of a cooperative tertiary structure melting at 90 degrees C, but with several (probably three) independent cooperative domains. In the presence of 100 mm NaCl the protein becomes more asymmetric (s020,w = 3.1 S) but does not lose its cooperativity and thermostability, this suggesting just the weakening of interdomain ionic interactions. The compact globular conformation of protein S1 seems to be most likely within the ribosome.

Relaxation time, interthiol distance, and mechanism of action of ribosomal protein S1

The two sulfhydryl groups of ribosomal protein S1 from Escherichia coli have been labeled with fluorescent maleimides and the distance between them has been determined by nonradiative energy transfer. This distance was found to be approximately 27 A for both free S1 and S1 bound to 30 S subunits. This value probably represents an upper limit. The position of the fluorescence emission maximum indicates that both sulfhydryl groups are in a relatively hydrophobic environment. When poly(U) is added to labeled S1, either free or in 30 S subunits, the emission maximum shifts to the red by about 3 nm but without a detectable change in the interthiol distance. S1 labeled at one or both of its sulfhydryl groups retains most of its ability to enhance poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis. About the same concentration of poly(U) is required to give the maximum shift in fluorescence as is required to give maximum polyphenylalanine synthesis, indicating that S1 binds poly(U) during translation. The peptide initiation inhibitor aurintricarboxylic acid almost completely quenches the fluorescence from either labeled sulfhydryl groups in S1 bound to ribosomes or free in solution. This quenching probably is due to energy transfer from the labeled sulfhydryls to bound aurintricarboxylic acid. Fluorescence anisotropy measurements indicated that the C-terminal domain of S1 is relatively rigid, but retains some independent movement when attached to ribosomes. The overall data are consistent with a model in which a region near the two sulfhydryl groups in the elongated C-terminal domain functions to sequester and bind mRNA to the ribosome during peptide synthesis.

Ribosomal proteins: their structure and spatial arrangement in prokaryotic ribosomes

During the last 15 years of ribosomal protein study, enormous progress has been made. Each of the proteins from E. coli ribosomes has been isolated, sequenced, and immunologically and physically characterized. Ribosomal proteins from other sources (e.g., from some bacteria, yeast, and rat) have been isolated and studied as well. Several proteins have recently been crystallized, and from the X-ray studies it is expected that much important information on the three-dimensional structure will be forthcoming. Many other proteins can probably be crystallized if suitable preparative procedures and crystallization conditions are found. Tremendous progress has also been made in deciphering the architecture of the ribosome. A battery of different methods has been used to provide the nearest neighbor distances of the ribosomal proteins in situ. Definitive measurements are now emanating from neutron-scattering experiments which also promise to give reasonably accurate radii of gyration of the proteins in situ. In turn, refined immune electron microscopy results supplement the neutron-scattering data and also position the proteins on the subunits themselves. This cannot be done by the other methods. Determination of the three-dimensional RNA structure within the ribosome is still in its infancy. Nonetheless, it is expected that by combining the data from protein-RNA and from RNA-RNA cross-linking studies, the structure of the RNA in situ can be unraveled. Of great interest is the fact that ribosomal subunits and ribosomes themselves have now been crystallized, and low-resolution structural maps have already been obtained. However, to grow suitable crystals and to resolve the ribosomal structure at a sufficiently high resolution remains a great challenge and task to biochemists and crystallographers.

Primary structure of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 and features of its functional domains

The complete covalent structure of ribosomal protein S1 of Escherichia coli has been determined and predictions made of its secondary structure. Protein S1 (E. coli MRE 600) is a single-chain, acidic protein with 557 amino acid residues of the composition Asp43, Asn23, Thr25, Ser25, Glu60, Gln14, Pro10, Gly48, Ala48, Val67, Met6, Ile30, Leu45, Tyr6, Phe17, His8, Lys43, Arg30, Trp7, Cys2 and an Mr of 61159. The two -SH groups of S1 are located in the central region of the chain at positions 292 and 349, the latter being the reactive group whose modification results in the reported loss of the nucleic-acid-unfolding ability of S1. The central region also contains the majority of the tryptophan, histidine and methionine residues of S1 and is predicted to have a secondary structure dominated by beta-sheets and turns. A direct proof for the location of the nucleic-acid-binding domain of S1 in the central region has recently been obtained [Subramanian et al. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem. 119, 245-249]. The N-terminal region of S1, which contains the ribosome-binding domain has a relatively high predicted alpha-helix content and no preponderance of basic amino acids. The facile trypsin-sensitive site in S1 is located at Arg-171, approximately at the border between the N-terminal and central regions. The acidic and basic amino acids of S1 (32.8% of all residues) are distributed throughout the chain, often in small clusters of between two and six residues. The amino acid sequence of S1 contains three 24-residue stretches with strong internal homology. Two of the stretches are located in the central, RNA-binding region, suggesting a possible role in the RNA-binding and helix-destabilizing functions of S1. A fragment of Mr 10(4) from the central region of S1 gives an anomalously high apparent Mr by dodecylsulfate gel electrophoresis, indicating a stable structural element therein and accounting for the apparent high Mr of S1 as determined by gel electrophoresis.

Primary structure of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 and of its gene rpsA

The primary structure of proteins S1, the largest protein component of the Escherichia coli ribosome, has been elucidated by determining the amino acid sequence of the protein (from E. coli MRE600) and the nucleotide sequence of the S1 gene (rpsA, of a K-12 strain). The two methods gave results in perfect agreement except of two positions where possible strain specific differences were found. Protein S1 (MRE600) is composed of 557 amino acid residues (no modified amino acids were detected) and has Mr 61,159. The DNA sequence for protein S1 (K-12) suggests 556 amino acid residues. A computer survey of the sequence revealed three regions in S1 with a high degree of internal homology. The ribosome binding domain of S1 (NH2 terminus) does not show any preponderance of basic amino acids. The two cysteine and the majority of tryptophan residues of S1 as well as two od the three homologous regions were located in its middle region which contains the nucleic acid binding domain. The pattern of degenerate codon usage in the S1 gene is nonrandom and similar to that reported for other ribosomal protein genes.

Fragments of ribosomal protein S1 and its mutant form m1-S1. Localization of nucleic-acid-binding domain in the middle region of S1

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 and its mutant, shorter, form m1-S1 were cleaved at internal methionyl residues to yield, respectively, six and five fragments of Mr ranging from 1000 to 24000. Methods are described to isolate the fragments in pure form. Four of the fragments (designated F2a, F2b, F3 and F4) contain between 86 and 215 amino acids and are therefore as large as other ribosomal proteins. Fragment F2a, derived from the N-terminal region, has previously been shown to contain the major ribosome binding domain of S1 [S. Giorginis and A. R. Subramanian (1980) J. Mol. Biol. 141, 393--408]. Here we show that the RNA binding domain of S1 is essentially contained in F3 derived from the middle region of S1 and carrying the nonreactive--SH group. The reactive--SH group of S1, whose activity is modified by ligand binding, was localized in F2b, a fragment with little RNA binding capacity. The characteristic RNA binding domain and a weak ribosome binding domain of S1 have previously been localized in the large trypsin-resistent core S1-F1 [T. Suryanarayana and A. R. Subramanian (1979) J. Mol. Biol. 127, 41--54]. Together these data indicate that two of the key functional domain of S1 are located in two regions of the molecule separated by an open, exposed segment. The present study also revealed that the nonreactive--SH group of S1 becomes reactive in m1-S1 by the loss of the remote C-terminal region in the latter.

Mechanism of the interaction between ribosomal protein S1 and oligonucleotides

The interaction of the ribosomal protein S1 from E. coli MRE 600 with oligonucleotides was studied by hydrodynamic, spectrophotometric, and kinetic methods. UV-difference spectra which are induced by the complex formation could be separated into a hyperchromic contribution originating from the nucleic acid moiety and a hypochromic contribution from the protein. Systematic determination of binding and rate constants was carried out by the temperature-jump relaxation technique. From the quantitative evaluation of the relaxation times and the relaxation amplitudes, the following conclusions could be drawn: The stoichiometry of the complex formation is one mole S1 per one mole oligonucleotide. The binding constant K, the recombination rate constant kR, and the dissociation rate constant kD, respectively, were measured at different temperatures. The values at 10 degrees C are K = 2 x 10(6) M-1, kR = 1.3 x 10(8) M-1S-1, kD = 65 s-1 for A(pA) 12 and K = 7.5 x 10(5) M-1, kR = 6.8 x 10(7) M-1S-1, kD = 90 S-1 for U(pU) 12. Discrepancies with data reported elsewhere are discussed. The stacking-unstacking equilibrium of the free oligonucleotide is frozen if the oligonucleotide is bound to the protein. The conformational change of the oligonucleotide does not occur in the form of a preequilibrium, but is induced after the primary binding step.

Protein S1 from Escherichia coli ribosomes: an improved isolation procedure and shape determination by small-angle X-ray scattering

Ribosomal protein S1 from Escherichia coli was studied in solution by small-angle X-ray scattering and the following parameters were obtained. The radius of gyration R = 8.0 +/- 0.2 nm; largest diameter D = 28 nm; molecular weight = (8--9) x 10(4). The data also yielded (with the assumption of a rigid particle with almost constant electron density) two radii of gyration of cross-section Rq1 = 2.5 +/- 0.1 nm and Rq2 = 1.05 +/- 0.05 nm and molecular volume = 140 nm3. The experimental scattering curve of S1 was compared with the theoretical scattering curves for several rigid triaxial homogeneous bodies and the closest fit was given by that of a flat elliptical cylinder with the dimensions of 4.5 nm and 0.88 nm for the two semiaxes and 26.5 nm for height. The results from the present X-ray scattering studies and those from limited proteolytic digestion of protein S1 [J. Mol. Biol. 127, 41--54, (1979)] support the notion that the structure of protein S1 is organized into two distinct subdomains within its elongated overall shape. Protein S1 was purified for this study by an efficient procedure which yielded 12 mg S1/g ribosomes. The isolated protein was fully active in functional tests both before and after X-ray irradiation.

A new method for the purification of 30S ribosomal proteins from Escherichia coli using nondenaturing conditions

A new method for the purification of Escherichia coli (A19) 30S ribosomal proteins has been developed that avoids the use of denaturing conditions such as urea, acetic acid, and lyophilization. In this way the majority of the proteins from the small ribosomal subunit can be obtained in 5--100 mg quantities and at greater than or equal to 90% purity. This has been achieved by the initial "splitting" of the proteins into two main groups with LiCl followed by fractionating on ion-exchange and gel-filtration columns, in the absence of urea and in the presence of salt. The proteins prepared by this nondenaturing procedure were soluble at high ionic strength and less soluble, being aggregated, at low salt concentrations. This behavior was exactly the opposite of that exhibited by proteins prepared with methods using denaturing conditions. These new methods have enabled additional ribosomal RNA-binding proteins to be found and potential protein-proteins complexes to be isolated. Preliminary evidence that these proteins may retain a more native structure is presented.