The primary structure of protein 44 from the large subunit of yeast ribosomes

Large Scale Mass Spectrometry-based Identifications of Enzyme-mediated Protein Methylation Are Subject to High False Discovery Rates

All large scale LC-MS/MS post-translational methylation site discovery experiments require methylpeptide spectrum matches (methyl-PSMs) to be identified at acceptably low false discovery rates (FDRs). To meet estimated methyl-PSM FDRs, methyl-PSM filtering criteria are often determined using the target-decoy approach. The efficacy of this methyl-PSM filtering approach has, however, yet to be thoroughly evaluated. Here, we conduct a systematic analysis of methyl-PSM FDRs across a range of sample preparation workflows (each differing in their exposure to the alcohols methanol and isopropyl alcohol) and mass spectrometric instrument platforms (each employing a different mode of MS/MS dissociation). Through (13)CD3-methionine labeling (heavy-methyl SILAC) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells and in-depth manual data inspection, accurate lists of true positive methyl-PSMs were determined, allowing methyl-PSM FDRs to be compared with target-decoy approach-derived methyl-PSM FDR estimates. These results show that global FDR estimates produce extremely unreliable methyl-PSM filtering criteria; we demonstrate that this is an unavoidable consequence of the high number of amino acid combinations capable of producing peptide sequences that are isobaric to methylated peptides of a different sequence. Separate methyl-PSM FDR estimates were also found to be unreliable due to prevalent sources of false positive methyl-PSMs that produce high peptide identity score distributions. Incorrect methylation site localizations, peptides containing cysteinyl-S-β-propionamide, and methylated glutamic or aspartic acid residues can partially, but not wholly, account for these false positive methyl-PSMs. Together, these results indicate that the target-decoy approach is an unreliable means of estimating methyl-PSM FDRs and methyl-PSM filtering criteria. We suggest that orthogonal methylpeptide validation (e.g. heavy-methyl SILAC or its offshoots) should be considered a prerequisite for obtaining high confidence methyl-PSMs in large scale LC-MS/MS methylation site discovery experiments and make recommendations on how to reduce methyl-PSM FDRs in samples not amenable to heavy isotope labeling. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with the data identifier PXD002857.

Identification of arginine- and lysine-methylation in the proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its functional implications

Background

The methylation of eukaryotic proteins has been proposed to be widespread, but this has not been conclusively shown to date. In this study, we examined 36,854 previously generated peptide mass spectra from 2,607 Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins for the presence of arginine and lysine methylation. This was done using the FindMod tool and 5 filters that took advantage of the high number of replicate analysis per protein and the presence of overlapping peptides.

Results

A total of 83 high-confidence lysine and arginine methylation sites were found in 66 proteins. Motif analysis revealed many methylated sites were associated with MK, RGG/RXG/RGX or WXXXR motifs. Functionally, methylated proteins were significantly enriched for protein translation, ribosomal biogenesis and assembly and organellar organisation and were predominantly found in the cytoplasm and ribosome. Intriguingly, methylated proteins were seen to have significantly longer half-life than proteins for which no methylation was found. Some 43% of methylated lysine sites were predicted to be amenable to ubiquitination, suggesting methyl-lysine might block the action of ubiquitin ligase.

Conclusions

This study suggests protein methylation to be quite widespread, albeit associated with specific functions. Large-scale tandem mass spectroscopy analyses will help to further confirm the modifications reported here.

Identification of two SET domain proteins required for methylation of lysine residues in yeast ribosomal protein Rpl42ab

We show that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal protein Rpl42ab (the identical product of the RPL42A and RPL42B genes) is monomethylated at Lys-40 and Lys-55. The methylation of Lys-40 is dependent upon the Ybr030w gene product; the methylation of Lys-55 is dependent upon the Set7 gene product. Ybr030w and SET7 genes both encode SET domain containing proteins homologous to known protein lysine methyltransferases, suggesting that their products are the specific enzymes responsible for the monomethylation of the two sites in Rpl42ab. We thus designate Ybr030w as Rkm3 and Set7 as Rkm4. Yeast strains with deletions in both the Ybr030w and SET7 genes produce unmethylated Rpl42ab. A slow growth phenotype was seen for the SET7 deletion strain and the double knock-out when grown in low concentrations of the eukaryotic protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide. These results suggest that modification of Rpl42ab at Lys-55 can fine-tune its structure to avoid inhibition. An intact mass fragmentation approach ("top down mass spectrometry") was used to quantitate the extent of methylation of Rpl42ab. In wild-type strains, it was found that 78% was monomethylated at both Lys-40 and Lys-55 and that 22% was a mixture of species with either Lys-40 or Lys-55 monomethylated. The top down approach was also used to reevaluate the methylation sites of Rpl12ab. We found that the yeast Rpl12ab protein is dimethylated at the N-terminal proline residue, trimethylated at Lys-3 by Rkm2, and monomethylated at Arg-66.

Methylation of proteins involved in translation

Methylation is one of the most common protein modifications. Many different prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins are methylated, including proteins involved in translation, including ribosomal proteins (RPs) and translation factors (TFs). Positions of the methylated residues in six Escherichia coli RPs and two Saccharomyces cerevisiae RPs have been determined. At least two RPs, L3 and L12, are methylated in both organisms. Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic elongation TFs (EF1A) are methylated at lysine residues, while both release factors are methylated at glutamine residues. The enzymes catalysing methylation reactions, protein methyltransferases (MTases), generally use S-adenosylmethionine as the methyl donor to add one to three methyl groups that, in case of arginine, can be asymetrically positioned. The biological significance of RP and TF methylation is poorly understood, and deletions of the MTase genes usually do not cause major phenotypes. Apparently methylation modulates intra- or intermolecular interactions of the target proteins or affects their affinity for RNA, and, thus, influences various cell processes, including transcriptional regulation, RNA processing, ribosome assembly, translation accuracy, protein nuclear trafficking and metabolism, and cellular signalling. Differential methylation of specific RPs and TFs in a number of organisms at different physiological states indicates that this modification may play a regulatory role.

7 Non-histone protein lysine methyltransferases: Structure and catalytic roles

Non-histone protein lysine methyltransferases (PKMTs) represent an exceptionally diverse and large group of PKMTs. Even accepting the possibility of multiple protein substrates, if the number of different proteins with methylated lysyl residues and the number of residues modified is indicative of individual PKMTs there are well over a hundred uncharacterized PKMTs. Astoundingly, only a handful of PKMTs have been studied, and of these only a few with identifiable and well-characterized structure and biochemical properties. Four representative PKMTs responsible for trimethyllysyl residues in ribosomal protein LI 1, calmodulin, cytochrome c, and Rubisco are herein examined for enzymological properties, polypeptide substrate specificity, functional significance, and structural characteristics. Although representative of non-histone PKMTs, and enzymes for whichcollectively there is a large amount of information, individually each of the PKMTs discussed in this chapter suffers from a lack of at least some critical information. Other than the obvious commonality in the AdoMet substrate cofactor and methyl group transfer, these enzymes do not have common structural features, polypeptide substrate specificity, or protein sequence. However, there may be a commonality that supports the hypothesis that methylated lysyl residues act as global determinants regulating specific protein-protein interactions.

Natural cycloheximide resistance in yeast. The role of ribosomal protein L41

The yeast Kluyveromyces lactis is resistant to high concentrations (1 mg/ml) of the antibiotic cycloheximide. Using in vitro translation studies it was confirmed that this extreme resistance is a property of ribosomes. The resistance determinant from K. lactis was cloned into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the determinant demonstrated that resistance was conferred by the K. lactis ribosomal protein L41. K. lactis was shown to contain only one copy of the gene that encodes this protein and the gene was located to chromosome III. In contrast, S. cerevisiae was found to contain multiple copies of the gene for the corresponding ribosomal protein L41 which mapped to two of the three chromosomes V, XIV and VIII. Since the cycloheximide-resistance gene of K. lactis causes essentially complete protection against inhibition by the drug, it is likely to be particularly useful as a selective marker in eukaryotic gene transfer studies.

Two different genes from Schwanniomyces occidentalis determine ribosomal resistance to cycloheximide

Two genes (SCR1 and SCR2) encoding natural cycloheximide resistance in the budding yeast Schwanniomyces occidentalis have been cloned by expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Both genes determine resistance to the inhibitory action of cycloheximide on the ribosome, SCR1 and SCR2 are present as single copies in Schwanniomyces occidentalis, where they map on chromosomes II and V, respectively. The nucleotide sequence of SCR2 contains an open reading frame of 321 nucleotides which is interrupted by an intron of 452 nucleotides. It encodes a polypeptide of 106 amino acids of molecular mass 12.25 kDa and pI 11.19. The deduced amino acid sequence shows a high degree of similarity to the L41 protein of the 60S ribosomal subunit from several eukaryotic organisms. The intron and the 5' non-coding region of SCR2 possess conserved elements which are typical of yeast ribosomal protein genes. A single amino acid change determines the resistance or sensitive phenotype to cycloheximide of the 80S ribosome since replacement of Gln56 in L41 from Schwanniomyces with Pro, by site-directed mutagenesis, confers cycloheximide sensitivity. SCR2 may serve as a practical yeast cloning marker if integrated in a multicopy plasmid.

Drastic alteration of cycloheximide sensitivity by substitution of one amino acid in the L41 ribosomal protein of yeasts

Cycloheximide is one of the antibiotics that inhibit protein synthesis in most eukaryotic cells. We have found that a yeast, Candida maltosa, is resistant to the drug because it possesses a cycloheximide-resistant ribosome, and we have isolated the gene responsible for this. In this study, we sequenced this gene and found that the gene encodes a protein homologous to the L41 ribosomal protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, whose amino acid sequence has already been reported. Two genes for L41 protein, named L41a and L41b, independently present in the genome of S. cerevisiae, were isolated. L41-related genes were also isolated from a few other yeast species. Each of these genes has an intron at the same site of the open reading frame. Comparison of their deduced amino acid sequences and their ability to confer cycloheximide resistance to S. cerevisiae, when introduced in a high-copy-number plasmid, suggested that the 56th amino acid residue of the L41 protein determines the sensitivity of the ribosome to cycloheximide; the amino acid is glutamine in the resistant ribosome, whereas that in the sensitive ribosome is proline. This was confirmed by constructing a cycloheximide-resistant strain of S. cerevisiae having a disrupted L41a gene and an L41b gene with a substitution of the glutamine codon for the proline codon.

Sequence and genetic analysis of NHP2: a moderately abundant high mobility group-like nuclear protein with an essential function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In order to determine the biological functions of moderately abundant, high mobility group (HMG)-like nuclear proteins, a genetic approach has been taken. The gene for one such protein, NHP2, has been cloned and characterized from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. NHP2 has been called 'HMG-like' because of the physical/chemical properties it shares with the HMG proteins from higher eukaryotic cells. However, nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that NHP2 could encode a 17.1 kilodalton basic protein which was not significantly homologous to any previously sequenced HMG proteins. Thus NHP2 defines a new member of the HMG class of proteins. A search of protein databases showed that the amino acid sequence of NHP2 shared significant identities with two ribosomal proteins; the acidic ribosomal protein S6 from Halobacterium marismorium and protein L7a from mammals. The biological relevance of these homologies is unclear since previous biochemical results indicated that NHP2 was not a ribosomal protein. S1 nuclease analysis indicated that the gene contained no introns but had multiple transcription initiation sites 20 to 40 bases before the ATG codon. Finally, NHP2 has been shown to have a critical role in the cell; when a diploid yeast strain deleted of one copy of the NHP2 gene was sporulated and dissected, only half of the spores grew into normal colonies. The rest of the spores germinated, but only formed microcolonies containing 12 to 40 cells. None of the spores which grew into normal-sized colonies contained the mutant NHP2 gene, thus demonstrating that the NHP2 protein has an essential physiological function.

Synthesis of ribosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The assembly of a eucaryotic ribosome requires the synthesis of four ribosomal ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules and more than 75 ribosomal proteins. It utilizes all three RNA polymerases; it requires the cooperation of the nucleus and the cytoplasm, the processing of RNA, and the specific interaction of RNA and protein molecules. It is carried out efficiently and is exquisitely sensitive to the needs of the cell. Our current understanding of this process in the genetically tractable yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is reviewed. The ribosomal RNA genes are arranged in a tandem array of 100 to 200 copies. This tandem array has led to unique ways of carrying out a number of functions. Replication is asymmetric and does not initiate from every autonomously replicating sequence. Recombination is suppressed. Transcription of the major ribosomal RNA appears to involve coupling between adjacent transcription units, which are separated by the 5S RNA transcription unit. Genes for many ribosomal proteins have been cloned and sequenced. Few are linked; most are duplicated; most have an intron. There is extensive homology between yeast ribosomal proteins and those of other species. Most, but not all, of the ribosomal protein genes have one or two sites that are essential for their transcription and that bind a common transcription factor. This factor binds also to many other places in the genome, including the telomeres. There is coordinated transcription of the ribosomal protein genes under a variety of conditions. However, the cell seems to possess no mechanism for regulating the transcription of individual ribosomal protein genes in response either to a deficiency or an excess of a particular ribosomal protein. A deficiency causes slow growth. Any excess ribosomal protein is degraded very rapidly, with a half-life of 1 to 5 min. Unlike most types of cells, yeast cells appear not to regulate the translation of ribosomal proteins. However, in the case of ribosomal protein L32, the protein itself causes a feedback inhibition of the splicing of the transcript of its own gene. The synthesis of ribosomes involves a massive transfer of material across the nuclear envelope in both directions. Nuclear localization signals have been identified for at least three ribosomal proteins; they are similar but not identical to those identified for the simian virus 40 T antigen. There is no information about how ribosomal subunits are transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Primary structure of rat ribosomal protein L36a

The amino acid sequence of rat ribosomal protein L36a, which may form part of the peptidyl transferase center, was deduced from the sequence of nucleotides in a recombinant cDNA and confirmed from the amino-terminal amino acid sequence of the protein. Ribosomal protein L36a contains 105 amino acids (the amino-terminal methionine is removed after translation of the mRNA) and has a molecular weight of 12,311. Hybridization of the cDNA to digests of nuclear DNA suggests that there are multiple copies of the L36a gene. Rat ribosomal protein L36a is homologous to a protein HL44 present in ribosomes of humans and protein 44 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomes.

Characterisation of an mRNA encoding a human ribosomal protein homologous to the yeast L44 ribosomal protein

We describe the isolation and characterisation of a full-length cDNA sequence (pZH-21) of a human ribosomal protein (rp) mRNA isolated from a cDNA library constructed from the human ZR-75-1 mammary tumour cell-line. The predicted protein is highly basic and shows 72% homology at the amino acid (aa) level with yeast rp L44. Comparative RNA blotting of ZR-75-1 poly(A)+ RNA isolated from cells cultured in the presence of the anti-oestrogen tamoxifen demonstrates the presence of a number of mRNA species whose concentration is elevated co-ordinately 5-6-fold in the presence of 17beta-oestradiol. Insulin in the presence of tamoxifen, also enhanced rp mRNA levels suggesting increased levels are a reflection of cell proliferation as opposed to specific hormonal regulation. Genomic analysis demonstrates the presence of a family of related human sequences, and homology with rat and guinea pig rp genes, but not yeast DNA. The conservation of rp aa sequence, in the absence of detectable homology at the nucleotide (nt) level, points to an important common functional role of the L44 protein in ribosome structure and function in man and yeast.

Structure and evolution of ribosomes

Ribosomes are multicomponent particles on which biosynthesis of proteins occurs in all organisms. The best-known ribosome, namely that of E. coli, consists of three RNA's and 53 different proteins. All proteins have been isolated and characterized by chemical, physical, and immunological methods. the primary sequences of 49 E. coli ribosomal proteins have so far been determined. Studies of the shape, as well as of the secondary and tertiary structure, of the proteins are in progress. Various techniques, 3.g., immune electron microscopy and cross-linking of neighboring components in situ, give information about the architecture of the ribosomal particle. The first technique resulted in illustrative and detailed knowledge now only on the shape of the ribosomal subunits but also about the location of many proteins on the surface of the particles. The analysis of cross-links between ribosomal proteins and/or RNA's has in several cases been pursued to the level of elucidating which amino acids and/or nucleotides are cross-linked together in situ. Reconstitution of a fully active E. coli 50S ribosomal subunit from its isolated RNA and protein components can be accomplished by means of a two-step incubation procedure. From the analysis of the intermediates occurring during the reconstitution process it has been concluded that the in vitro reconstitution process resembles that in vivo assembly of 50S subunits in many respects. E. coli mutants with alterations in almost all ribosomal proteins have been isolated. Their biochemical and genetic analyses are very useful tools for obtaining information about the structure, function, and biosynthesis of ribosomes, as well as about the location of the genes for these proteins on the chromosome. From comparative electrophoretic, immunological, protein-chemical, and reconstitution studies on ribosomes from various species it has become clear that their is little homology between ribosomal proteins from prokaryotes and those from eukaryotes. This finding is surprising since there is no essential difference in the way in which pro-and eukaryotic ribosomes function in protein biosynthesis.

Isolation and characterization of twenty-three ribosomal proteins from large subunits of yeast

The proteins of large ribosomal subunits from Saccharomyces cerevisiae were separated into 25 fractions by chromatography on columns of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). Twenty-three proteins were then purified from the 12 CMC fractions by filtration through Sephadex G-75, Sephadex G-100, and Sephacryl S-200, and/or by phosphocellulose column chromatography. The isolated proteins are YP 1, YP 2, YP 9, YP 11, YP 13', YP 16, YP 18, YP 26, YP 39, YP 41, YP 42, YP 42', YP 44, YP 45, YP 47', YP 52a, YP 53, YP 55, YP 59, YP 62, YP 68, YP A1, and YP A2. The molecular weight and amino acid composition of these proteins are presented.