5 S RNA-like structures in large ribosomal subunit RNAs of fungal mitochondria

Discovery and characterization of Acanthamoeba castellanii mitochondrial 5S rRNA

Although 5S rRNA is a highly conserved and universal component of eubacterial, archaeal, chloroplast, and eukaryotic cytoplasmic ribosomes, a mitochondrial DNA-encoded 5S rRNA has so far been identified only in land plants and certain protists. This raises the question of whether 5S rRNA is actually required for and used in mitochondrial translation. In the protist Acanthamoeba castellanii, BLAST searches fail to reveal a 5S rRNA gene in the complete mitochondrial genome sequence, nor is a 5S-sized RNA species detectable in ethidium bromide-stained gels of highly purified mitochondrial RNA preparations. Here we show that an alternative visualization technique, UV shadowing, readily detects a novel, mitochondrion-specific small RNA in A. castellanii mitochondrial RNA preparations, and that this RNA species is, in fact, a 5S rRNA encoded by the A. castellanii mitochondrial genome. These results emphasize the need for caution when interpreting negative results that suggest the absence of 5S rRNA and/or a mitochondrial DNA-encoded 5S rRNA sequence in other (particularly protist) mitochondrial systems.

Molecular genetics of the peptidyl transferase center and the unusual Var1 protein in yeast mitochondrial ribosomes

Mitochondria possess their own ribosomes responsible for the synthesis of a small number of proteins encoded by the mitochondrial genome. In yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the two ribosomal RNAs and a single ribosomal protein, Var1, are products of mitochondrial genes, and the remaining approximately 80 ribosomal proteins are encoded in the nucleus. The mitochondrial translation system is dispensable in yeast, providing an excellent experimental model for the molecular genetic analysis of the fundamental properties of ribosomes in general as well as adaptations required for the specialized role of ribosomes in mitochondria. Recent studies of the peptidyl transferase center, one of the most highly conserved functional centers of the ribosome, and the Var1 protein, an unusual yet essential protein in the small ribosomal subunit, have provided new insight into conserved and divergent features of the mitochondrial ribosome.

A proposal for the conformation of loop E in Escherichia coli 5S rRNA

A proposal is advanced for the conformation of the loop E region of prokaryotic 5S rRNAs based on spectroscopic data obtained from pAD3 RNA, a construct that includes helix IV, helix V, and loops D and E from Escherichia coli 5S rRNA. Even though loop E juxtaposes bases that cannot form Watson-Crick base pairs, it resembles an A-form double helix; its nucleotides relate to each other spectroscopically in a helix-like way and are in the anti conformation. The ends of loop E, which is palindromic, have the same conformation. Working in from either end towards the center of the loop, a closing GC is followed by a side-by-side GA and then by a reversed Hoogsteen AU, a pattern resembling that found at one end of eukaryotic loop E. The center of the loop consists of three nucleotide pairs, which appear to be an asymmetric GG pair, a Watson-Crick-like AG, and a GU stabilized by a single hydrogen bond.

The mitochondrial genome of the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Sequence of the large-subunit ribosomal RNA gene, comparison of potential secondary structure in fungal mitochondrial large-subunit rRNAs and evolutionary considerations

The DNA sequence of the mitochondrial large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe has been determined. In the direction of transcription, this gene is located between the gene coding for subunit II of cytochrome oxidase and a cluster of three tRNA genes. Both the 5' and 3' ends of the LSU rRNA have been mapped precisely: whereas the 5' end can be assigned unambiguously to a single nucleotide position, multiple 3' ends occur within a run of eight U residues. Based on these results, the S. pombe LSU rRNA is between 2818 and 2826 nucleotides long. A sequence motif immediately upstream of the 5' end of the gene resembles that of the mitochondrial promoter motif of Saccharomyces cerevisiae; however, the sequence at the 3' end of the gene is not similar to any of the motifs implicated as processing signals in other mitochondrial systems. Unlike its counterparts in S. cerevisiae and Aspergillus nidulans, the mitochondrial LSU rRNA gene of S. pombe does not contain an intron. Comparison of potential secondary structure among the three fungal mitochondrial and Escherichia coli LSU rRNAs has defined a common secondary structure core, held together by long-range hydrogen-bonding interactions. A 5.8S-like structure is present within the 5'-terminal region of all three fungal mitochondrial LSU rRNAs; in contrast, no 4.5S-like structure is evident at the 3' end of these molecules. An evolutionary evaluation of highly conserved regions of a small set of LSU rRNA sequences suggests that S. pombe mitochondria diverged from a mitochondrial proto-fungal branch earlier than either A. nidulans or S. cerevisiae mitochondria. This result, considered in conjunction with the patterns of genome organization and codon usage in fungal mitochondria, points to a slower evolutionary clock speed in the mitochondrial genome of S. pombe.

Evolution of the mitochondrial protein synthetic machinery

Comparative analysis of the components of the mitochondrial translational apparatus reveals a remarkable variability. For example the mitochondrial ribosomal rRNAs, display a three-fold difference in size in different organisms as a result of insertions or deletions, which affect specific areas of the rRNA molecule. This suggests that such areas are either not essential for mitoribosome function or that they can be replaced by proteins. Also mitochondrial tRNAs and mitoribosomal proteins are much less conserved than their cytoplasmic counterparts. Not only do the mitochondrial translational molecules vary in properties, also the location of the genes from which they are derived is not the same in all cases: mitochondrial tRNA genes which usually are found in the mtDNA, may have a nuclear location in protozoa and, conversely, only in fungi one finds a mitoribosomal protein gene in the organellar genome. The high rate of change of the components of the mitochondrial protein synthesizing machinery is accompanied by a number of unique features of the translation process: (i) the mitochondrial genetic code differs substantially from the standard code in a species-specific manner; (ii) special codon-anticodon recognition rules are followed; (iii) unusual mechanisms of translational initiation may exist. These observations suggest that the evolutionary pressures that have shaped the present day mitochondrial translational apparatus have been different in different organisms and also distinct from those acting on the cytoplasmic machinery. In spite of the interspecies variability, however, many features of the mitochondrial and bacterial protein synthetic apparatus show a clear resemblance, providing support for the hypothesis of a prokaryotic endosymbiont ancestry of mitochondria.

Identification and assignment of base pairs in three helical stems of Torulopsis utilis ribosomal 5S RNA and its RNase T1 and RNase T2 cleaved fragments via 500-MHz proton homonuclear overhauser enhancements

Imino proton resonances in the downfield region (10-14 ppm) of the 500-MHz 1H NMR spectrum of Torulopsis utilis 5S RNA are identified (A X U, G X C, or G X U) and assigned to base pairs in helices I, IV, and V via analysis of homonuclear Overhauser enhancements (NOE) from intact T. utilis 5S RNA, its RNase T1 and RNase T2 digested fragments, and a second yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) 5S RNA whose nucleotide sequence differs at only six residues from that of T. utilis 5S RNA. The near-identical chemical shifts and NOE behavior of most of the common peaks from these four RNAs strongly suggest that helices I, IV, and V retain the same conformation after RNase digestion and that both T. utilis and S. cerevisiae 5S RNAs share a common secondary and tertiary structure. Of the four G X U base pairs identified in the intact 5S RNA, two are assigned to the terminal stem (helix I) and the other two to helices IV and V. Seven of the nine base pairs of the terminal stem have been assigned. Our experimental demonstration of a G X U base pair in helix V supports the 5S RNA secondary structural model of Luehrsen and Fox [Luehrsen, K. R., & Fox, G.E. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 2150-2154]. Finally, the base-pair proton peak assigned to the terminal G X U in helix V of the RNase T2 cleaved fragment is shifted downfield from that in the intact 5S RNA, suggesting that helices I and V may be coaxial in intact T. utilis 5S RNA.

The evolution of eukaryotic ribosomal DNA

Mutations occur randomly throughout the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequence. Molecular drive (unequal crossing-over, gene conversion, and transposition) spreads these variations through the multiple copies of rDNA. Forces of selection act upon the variants to favor and fix them or disfavor and eliminate them. Selection has not permitted changes in regions within rRNA vital for its function; these sequences are evolutionarily conserved between diverse species. Possible functions for some of these conserved sequences are discussed. The secondary structure of rRNA is also highly conserved during evolution. However, eukaryotic rRNA is larger than prokaryotic rRNA due to blocks of "expansion segments". Arguments are put forward that expansion segments might not play any functional role. Other examples are reviewed of rDNA sequence insertion or deletion, including introns and the internal transcribed spacer 2.