The excess GTP hydrolyzed during mistranslation is expended at the stage of EF-Tu-promoted binding of non-cognate aminoacyl-tRNA

The Reverse Side of a Coin: "Factor-Free" Ribosomal Protein Synthesis In Vitro is a Consequence of the In Vivo Proofreading Mechanism

This paper elucidates a close connection between two well-known facts that until now have seemed independent: (i) the quality control ("proofreading") of the emerging amino acid sequence, occurring during the normal, elongation-factor-dependent ribosomal biosynthesis, which is performed by removing those Aa-tRNAs (aminoacyl tRNAs) whose anticodons are not complementary to the exhibited mRNA codons, and (ii) the in vitro discovered existence of the factor-free ribosomal synthesis of polypeptides. It is shown that a biological role of proofreading is played by a process that is exactly opposite to the step of factor-free binding of Aa-tRNA to the ribosome-exposed mRNA: a factor-free removal of that Aa-tRNA whose anticodon is not complementary to the ribosome-exhibited mRNA codon.

Translational fidelity and mistranslation in the cellular response to stress

Faithful translation of mRNA into the corresponding polypeptide is a complex multistep process, requiring accurate amino acid selection, transfer RNA (tRNA) charging and mRNA decoding on the ribosome. Key players in this process are aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), which not only catalyse the attachment of cognate amino acids to their respective tRNAs, but also selectively hydrolyse incorrectly activated non-cognate amino acids and/or misaminoacylated tRNAs. This aaRS proofreading provides quality control checkpoints that exclude non-cognate amino acids during translation, and in so doing helps to prevent the formation of an aberrant proteome. However, despite the intrinsic need for high accuracy during translation, and the widespread evolutionary conservation of aaRS proofreading pathways, requirements for translation quality control vary depending on cellular physiology and changes in growth conditions, and translation errors are not always detrimental. Recent work has demonstrated that mistranslation can also be beneficial to cells, and some organisms have selected for a higher degree of mistranslation than others. The aims of this Review Article are to summarize the known mechanisms of protein translational fidelity and explore the diversity and impact of mistranslation events as a potentially beneficial response to environmental and cellular stress.

Fidelity of aminoacyl-tRNA selection on the ribosome: kinetic and structural mechanisms

The ribosome discriminates between correct and incorrect aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs), or their complexes with elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP, according to the match between anticodon and mRNA codon in the A site. Selection takes place at two stages, prior to GTP hydrolysis (initial selection) and after GTP hydrolysis but before peptide bond formation (proofreading). In part, discrimination results from different rejection rates that are due to different stabilities of the respective codon-anticodon complexes. An important additional contribution is provided by induced fit, in that only correct codon recognition leads to acceleration of rate-limiting rearrangements that precede chemical steps. Recent elucidation of ribosome structures and mutational analyses suggest which residues of the decoding center may be involved in signaling formation of the correct codon-anticodon duplex to the functional centers of the ribosome. In utilizing induced fit for substrate discrimination, the ribosome resembles other nucleic acid-programmed polymerases.

tRNA-ribosome interactions

Direct measurements of the rates of dissociation of dipeptidyl-tRNA from the ribosome show that hyperaccurate SmP and SmD ribosomes have unstable A-site binding of peptidyl-tRNA, while P-site binding is extremely stable in relation to the wild type. Error-prone Ram ribosomes, on the other hand, have stable A-site and unstable P-site binding of peptidyl-tRNA. At least for these mutant ribosomes, we conclude that stabilization of peptidyl-tRNA in one site destabilizes binding in the other. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) undergoes a dramatic structural transition from its GDP-bound form to its active GTP-bound form, in which it binds aa-tRNA (aminoacyl-tRNA) in ternary complex. The effects of substitution mutations at three sites in domain I of EF-Tu, Gln124, Leu120, and Tyr160, all of which point into the domain I-domain III interface in both the GTP and GDP conformations of EF-Tu, were examined. Mutations at each position cause large reductions in aa-tRNA binding. An attractive possibility is that the mutations alter the domain I-domain III interface such that the switching of EF-Tu between different conformations is altered, decreasing the probability of aa-tRNA binding. We have previously found that two GTPs are hydrolyzed per peptide bond on EF-Tu, the implication being that two molecules of EF-Tu may interact on the ribosome to catalyze the binding of a single aa-tRNA to the A-site. More recently we found that ribosomes programmed with mRNA constructs other than poly(U), including the sequence AUGUUUACG, invariably use two GTPs per peptide bond in EF-Tu function. Other experiments measuring the protection of aa-tRNA from deacylation or from RNAse A attack show that protection requires two molecules of EF-Tu, suggesting an extended ternary complex. To remove remaining ambiguities in the interpretion of these experiments, we are making direct molecular weight determinations with neutron scattering and sedimentation-diffusion techniques.

GTP consumption of elongation factor Tu during translation of heteropolymeric mRNAs

The stoichiometry of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP in the complex with aminoacyl-tRNA and the consumption of GTP during peptide bond formation on the ribosome were studied in the Escherichia coli system. The ribosomes were programmed either with two different heteropolymeric mRNAs coding for Met-Phe-Thr-Ile ... (mMFTI) or Met-Phe-Phe-Gly ... (mMFFG) or with poly(U). The composition of the complex of EF-Tu, GTP, and Phe-tRNA(Phe) was studied by gel chromatography. With equimolar amounts of factor and Phe-tRNA(Phe), a pentameric complex, (EF-Tu.GTP)2.Phe-tRNA(Phe), was observed, whereas the classical ternary complex, EF-Tu.GTP.Phe-tRNA(Phe), was found only when Phe-tRNA(Phe) was in excess. Upon binding of the purified pentameric complex to ribosomes carrying fMet-tRNA(fMet) in the peptidyl site and exposing a Phe codon in the aminoacyl site, only one out of two GTPs of the pentameric complex was hydrolyzed per Phe-tRNA bound and peptide bond formed, regardless of the mRNA used. In the presence of EF-G, the stoichiometry of one GTP hydrolyzed per peptide bond formed was found on mMFTI when one or two elongation cycles were completed. In contrast, on mMFFG, which contains two contiguous Phe codons, UUU-UUC, two GTP molecules of the pentameric complex were hydrolyzed per Phe incorporated into dipeptide, whereas the incorporation of the second Phe to form tripeptide consumed only one GTP. Thus, generally one GTP is hydrolyzed by EF-Tu per aminoacyl-tRNA bound and peptide bond formed, and more than one GTP is hydrolyzed only when a particular mRNA sequence, such as a homopolymeric stretch, is translated. The role of the additional GTP hydrolysis is not known; it may be related to frameshifting of peptidyl-tRNA during translocation.

Toward a model for the interaction between elongation factor Tu and the ribosome

In the elongation cycle of bacterial protein synthesis the interaction between elongation factor-Tu (EF-Tu).guanosine triphosphate (GTP), aminoacyl-transfer RNA (aa-tRNA), and messenger RNA-programmed ribosomes is associated with the hydrolysis of GTP. This interaction determines the selection of the proper aa-tRNA for incorporation into the polypeptide. In the canonical scheme, one molecule of GTP is hydrolyzed in the EF-Tu-dependent binding of aa-tRNA to the ribosome, and a second molecule is hydrolyzed in the elongation factor-G (EF-G)-mediated translocation of the polypeptide from the ribosomal A site to the P site. Substitution of Asp138 with Asn in EF-Tu changed the substrate specificity from GTP to xanthosine triphosphate and demonstrated that the EF-Tu-mediated reactions involved the hydrolysis of two nucleotide triphosphates for each Phe incorporated. This stoichiometry of two is associated with the binding of the correct aa-tRNA to the ribosome.

How many EF-Tu molecules participate in aminoacyl-tRNA binding and peptide bond formation in Escherichia coli translation?

We have observed that two EF-Tu.GTP cycles are required to make one peptide bond during steady-state translation in an accurate and fast poly(U) translation system prepared from Escherichia coli. We have also found that there are two complexes of EF-Tu.GTP bound to one molecule of aminoacyl-tRNA under our experimental conditions. We suggest, on the basis of these data, that aminoacyl-tRNA enters the ribosomal A-site in a pentameric complex together with two EF-Tu and two GTP molecules. When the tRNA is delivered to the ribosome two GTP molecules are hydrolyzed. It is possible that the functional role of such an EF-Tu dimer is related to the function of the two L7/L12 dimers in the large ribosomal subunit.