Expression and functional assembly into bacterial ribosomes of a nuclear-encoded chloroplast ribosomal protein with a long NH2-terminal extension

Evolution of Ribosomal Protein S14 Demonstrated by the Reconstruction of Chimeric Ribosomes in Bacillus subtilis

Ribosomal protein S14 can be classified into three types. The first, the C+ type has a Zn²⁺ binding motif and is ancestral. The second and third are the C- short and C- long types, neither of which contain a Zn²⁺ binding motif and which are ca. 90 residues and 100 residues in length, respectively. In the present study, the C+ type S14 from Bacillus subtilis ribosomes (S14BsC+) were completely replaced by the heterologous C- long type of S14 from Escherichia coli (S14Ec) or Synechococcus elongatus (S14Se). Surprisingly, S14Ec and S14Se were incorporated fully into 70S ribosomes in B. subtilis However, the growth rates as well as the sporulation efficiency of the mutants harboring heterologous S14 were significantly decreased. In these mutants, the polysome fraction was decreased and the 30S and 50S subunits accumulated unusually, indicating that cellular translational activity of these mutants was decreased. In vitro analysis showed a reduction in the translational activity of the 70S ribosome fraction purified from these mutants. The abundance of ribosomal proteins S2 and S3 in the 30S fraction in these mutants was reduced while that of S14 was not significantly decreased. It seems likely that binding of heterologous S14 changes the structure of the 30S subunit, which causes a decrease in the assembly efficiency of S2 and S3, which are located near the binding site of S14. Moreover, we found that S3 from S. elongatus cannot function in B. subtilis unless S14Se is present.IMPORTANCE S14, an essential ribosomal protein, may have evolved to adapt bacteria to zinc-limited environments by replacement of a zinc-binding motif with a zinc-independent sequence. It was expected that the bacterial ribosome would be tolerant to replacement of S14 because of the previous prediction that the spread of C- type S14 involved horizontal gene transfer. In this study, we completely replaced the C+ type of S14 in B. subtilis ribosome with the heterologous C- long type of S14 and characterized the resulting chimeric ribosomes. Our results suggest that the B. subtilis ribosome is permissive for the replacement of S14, but coevolution of S3 might be required to utilize the C- long type of S14 more effectively.

Different consequences of incorporating chloroplast ribosomal proteins L12 and S18 into the bacterial ribosomes of Escherichia coli

We have incorporated chloroplast ribosomal proteins (R-proteins) L12 and S18 into Escherichia coli ribosomes and examined the hybrid ribosomes for their ability to form polysomes in vivo and perform poly(U)-dependent poly(Phe) synthesis in vitro. The rye chloroplast S18 used for the experiment is a highly divergent protein (170 amino acid residues; E. coil S18, 74 residues), containing a repeating, chloroplast-specific, heptapeptide motif, and has amino acid sequence identity of only 35% to E. coli S18. When expressed in E. coli, chloroplast S18 was assembled in E. coli ribosomes. The latter formed polysomes in vivo at about the same rate as the host ribosomes, indicating that the replacement of E. coli S18 with its chloroplast homologue has only a minor, if any, effect on function. The L12 protein is much more conserved in sequence and chain length, and is known to have a very important function. The Arabidopsis chloroplast L12 used in the experiment was incorporated into E. coli 50S subunits that associated with the 30S subunits to form ribosomes, but the latter were unable to form polysomes. This result indicates functional inactivation of E. coil ribosomes by a chloroplast R-protein. To further confirm this result, we overproduced chloroplast L12 through the use of a secretion vector and purified the protein to homogeneity. Chloroplast L12 could be efficiently incorporated in vitro into L7/12-lacking E. coli ribosomes, but the hybrid ribosomes were totally inactive in poly(U)-dependent poly(Phe) synthesis. Computer modeling of the spatial structure of all known chloroplast L12 proteins (using E. coli L12 coordinates) indicated a 'chloroplast loop' present only in chloroplast L12. The presence of this loop might have a role in the observed inactivation. Taken together with previously reported results (summarized in this paper), it would appear that the features of chloroplast R-proteins concerned with specific functions are more divergent than their assembly properties. We have previously described methods suitable for overproduction and purification of chloroplast R-proteins that are encoded in organellar DNA (approximately 20), but that gave poor yield for those encoded in the nuclear DNA (approximately 45). Here we describe a method that overcomes this problem and allows the purification of nucleus-encoded chloroplast R-proteins in milligram quantities.

In vivo assembly of plasmid-expressed ribosomal protein S7 of Thermus thermophilus into Escherichia coli ribosomes and conditions of its overexpression

Researchers still have great difficulty in isolating individual ribosomal proteins from the ribosome in quantities high enough for structural research. To this end, when studying protein S7, we created an E. coli overproducer of the recombinant protein S7 of Thermus thermophilus. The vector for expression was pQE-32 having a strong promoter of E. coli phage T5 and six triplets of His at the 5'-end. This N-terminal six His tag of the fusion protein is responsible for binding to Ni-NTA-resin and allows purifying the protein in one step. The yield of the recombinant protein was 20% and more of the total cellular proteins. In addition we have shown that the recombinant thermophilic protein is incorporated in vivo into the ribosome of E. coli despite the fact that these proteins (thermophilic and mesophilic) have a rather low homology, only 52%. This fact provides a base for the system to study functions of individual proteins.

Heterologous expression of the highly conserved acidic ribosomal phosphoproteins from Dictyostelium (changed from Dictyosteliumm) discoideum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The genes encoding the acidic ribosomal phosphoproteins DdP1 and DdP2 from Dictyostelium discoideum have been cloned into yeast plasmid vectors under the control of the inducible GAL1 promoter. These constructions have been used to transform S. cerevisiae strains D45 and D67 lacking the equivalent ribosomal components. The D. discoideum genes are properly transcribed when cells are grown in the presence of the inducer galactose and the mRNAs incorporated into polysomes. However, the heterologous ribosomal proteins are not able to rescue the growth deficiency in S. cerevisiae caused by the absence of their own ribosomal proteins. When the heterologous proteins are analyzed using specific antibodies, only protein DdP1 is found in the ribosomes of the transformed S. cerevisiae D67 strain. No other heterologous protein is found in any other transformed strain, suggesting that the heterologous acidic ribosomal components are rapidly degraded when they are not bound to the ribosomes. The results indicate that D. discoideum DdP1 protein is able to interact with the yeast ribosome, though the interaction is functionally inefficient. Protein DdP2, in spite of having a higher sequence similarity to its yeast counterparts, is completely inactive in S. cerevisiae. Since the P proteins from both organisms have extensive amino acid sequence similarity ranging from 60% to 70%, these results warns about establishing a direct relationship between the extent of amino acid sequence similarity and the capacity of heterologous proteins to be functional in host species. Moreover, our data suggest that evolution affected the interaction of the acidic proteins with the ribosome rather than the structural features responsible for their primary functions.

Chloroplast ribosomes and protein synthesis

Consistent with their postulated origin from endosymbiotic cyanobacteria, chloroplasts of plants and algae have ribosomes whose component RNAs and proteins are strikingly similar to those of eubacteria. Comparison of the secondary structures of 16S rRNAs of chloroplasts and bacteria has been particularly useful in identifying highly conserved regions likely to have essential functions. Comparative analysis of ribosomal protein sequences may likewise prove valuable in determining their roles in protein synthesis. This review is concerned primarily with the RNAs and proteins that constitute the chloroplast ribosome, the genes that encode these components, and their expression. It begins with an overview of chloroplast genome structure in land plants and algae and then presents a brief comparison of chloroplast and prokaryotic protein-synthesizing systems and a more detailed analysis of chloroplast rRNAs and ribosomal proteins. A description of the synthesis and assembly of chloroplast ribosomes follows. The review concludes with discussion of whether chloroplast protein synthesis is essential for cell survival.

Molecular genetics of chloroplast ribosomal proteins

Chloroplasts contain a complete translational apparatus which, in land plants, synthesizes the 80 or so polypeptides encoded by the organelle's own small genome. Recent molecular genetic studies have revealed much about the chloroplast ribosomal proteins (RPs). Some of these proteins are encoded by the chloroplast genome and others by the nuclear genome. Many of these genes have now been cloned and characterized, including some that have no prokaryotic homologues.