Elucidation of the poly-L-proline binding site in Acanthamoeba profilin I by NMR spectroscopy

Abrogation of prenucleation, transient oligomerization of the Huntingtin exon 1 protein by human profilin I

Human profilin I reduces aggregation and concomitant toxicity of the polyglutamine-containing N-terminal region of the huntingtin protein encoded by exon 1 (htt^ex1) and responsible for Huntington's disease. Here, we investigate the interaction of profilin with htt^ex1 using NMR techniques designed to quantitatively analyze the kinetics and equilibria of chemical exchange at atomic resolution, including relaxation dispersion, exchange-induced shifts, and lifetime line broadening. We first show that the presence of two polyproline tracts in htt^ex1, absent from a shorter huntingtin variant studied previously, modulates the kinetics of the transient branched oligomerization pathway that precedes nucleation, resulting in an increase in the populations of the on-pathway helical coiled-coil dimeric and tetrameric species (τ_ex ≤ 50 to 70 μs), while leaving the population of the off-pathway (nonproductive) dimeric species largely unaffected (τ_ex ∼750 μs). Next, we show that the affinity of a single molecule of profilin to the polyproline tracts is in the micromolar range (K _diss ∼ 17 and ∼ 31 μM), but binding of a second molecule of profilin is negatively cooperative, with the affinity reduced ∼11-fold. The lifetime of a 1:1 complex of htt^ex1 with profilin, determined using a shorter huntingtin variant containing only a single polyproline tract, is shown to be on the submillisecond timescale (τ _ex ∼ 600 μs and K _diss ∼ 50 μM). Finally, we demonstrate that, in stable profilin-htt^ex1 complexes, the productive oligomerization pathway, leading to the formation of helical coiled-coil htt^ex1 tetramers, is completely abolished, and only the pathway resulting in "nonproductive" dimers remains active, thereby providing a mechanistic basis for how profilin reduces aggregation and toxicity of htt^ex1.

Profilin2a-phosphorylation as a regulatory mechanism for actin dynamics

Profilin is a major regulator of actin dynamics in multiple specific processes localized in different cellular compartments. This specificity is not only meditated by its binding to actin but also its interaction with phospholipids such as phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate (PIP₂ ) at the membrane and a plethora of proteins containing poly-L-proline (PLP) stretches. These interactions are fine-tuned by posttranslational modifications such as phosphorylation. Several phospho-sites have already been identified for profilin1, the ubiquitously expressed isoform. However, little is known about the phosphorylation of profilin2a. Profilin2a is a neuronal isoform important for synapse function. Here, we identified several putative profilin2a phospho-sites in silico and tested recombinant phospho-mimetics with regard to their actin-, PLP-, and PIP₂ -binding properties. Moreover, we assessed their impact on actin dynamics employing a pyrene-actin polymerization assay. Results indicate that distinct phospho-sites modulate specific profilin2a functions. We could identify a molecular switch site at serine residue 71 which completely abrogated actin binding-as well as other sites important for fine-tuning of different functions, for example, tyrosine 29 for PLP binding. Our findings suggest that differential profilin2a phosphorylation is a sensitive mechanism for regulating its neuronal functions. Moreover, the dysregulation of profilin2a phosphorylation may contribute to neurodegeneration.

Computational modeling highlights the role of the disordered Formin Homology 1 domain in profilin-actin transfer

Formins accelerate actin polymerization, assumed to occur through flexible Formin Homology 1 (FH1) domain-mediated transfer of profilin-actin to the barbed end. To study FH1 properties and address sequence effects, including varying length/distribution of profilin-binding proline-rich motifs, we performed all-atom simulations of a set of representative FH1 domains of formins: mouse mDia1 and mDia2, budding yeast Bni1 and Bnr1, and fission yeast Cdc12, For3, and Fus1. We find FH1 has flexible regions between high-propensity polyproline helix regions. A coarse-grained model retaining sequence specificity, assuming rigid polyproline segments, describes their size. Multiple bound profilins or profilin-actin complexes expand mDia1-FH1, which may be important in cells. Simulations of the barbed end bound to Bni1-FH1-FH2 dimer show that the leading FH1 can better transfer profilin or profilin-actin, with decreasing probability as the distance from FH2 increases.

Potential role of salt-bridges in the hinge-like movement of apicomplexa specific β-hairpin of Plasmodium and Toxoplasma profilins: A molecular dynamics simulation study

Profilin is one of the actin-binding proteins that regulate dynamics of actin polymerization. It plays a key role in cell motility and invasion. It also interacts with several other proteins notably through its poly-L-proline (PLP) binding site. Profilin in apicomplexa is characterized by a unique mini-domain consisting of a large β-hairpin extension and an acidic loop which is relatively longer in Plasmodium species. Profilin is essential for the invasive blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum. In the current study, unbound profilins from Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), Toxoplasma gondii (Tg), and Homo sapiens (Hs) were subjected to molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for a timeframe of 100 ns each to understand the conformational dynamics of these proteins. It was found that the β-hairpin of profilins from Pf and Tg shows a hinge-like movement. This movement in Pf profilin may possibly be driven by the loss of a salt-bridge within profilin. The impact of this conformational change on actin binding was assessed by docking three dimensional (3D) structures of profilin from Pf and Tg with their corresponding actins using ClusPro2.0. The stability of docked Pf profilin-actin complex was assessed through a 50 ns MD simulation. As Hs profilin I does not have the apicomplexa specific mini-domain, MD simulation was performed for this protein and its dynamics was compared to that of profilins from Pf and Tg. Using an immunoinformatics approach, potential epitope regions were predicted for Pf profilin. This has a potential application in the design of vaccines as they mapped to its unique mini-domain.

Actin and Actin-Binding Proteins

Organisms from all domains of life depend on filaments of the protein actin to provide structure and to support internal movements. Many eukaryotic cells use forces produced by actin polymerization for their motility, and myosin motor proteins use ATP hydrolysis to produce force on actin filaments. Actin polymerizes spontaneously, followed by hydrolysis of a bound adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Dissociation of the γ-phosphate prepares the polymer for disassembly. This review provides an overview of the properties of actin and shows how dozens of proteins control both the assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. These players catalyze nucleotide exchange on actin monomers, initiate polymerization, promote phosphate dissociation, cap the ends of polymers, cross-link filaments to each other and other cellular components, and sever filaments.

Review of the mechanism of processive actin filament elongation by formins

We review recent structural and biophysical studies of the mechanism of action of formins, proteins that direct the assembly of unbranched actin filaments for cytokinetic contractile rings and other cellular structures. Formins use free actin monomers to nucleate filaments and then remain bound to the barbed ends of these filaments as they elongate. In addition to variable regulatory domains, formins typically have formin homology 1 (FH1) and formin homology 2 (FH2) domains. FH1 domains have multiple binding sites for profilin, an abundant actin monomer binding protein. FH2 homodimers encircle the barbed end of a filament. Most FH2 domains inhibit actin filament elongation, but FH1 domains concentrate multiple profilin-actin complexes near the end of the filament. FH1 domains transfer actin very rapidly onto the barbed end of the filament, allowing elongation at rates that exceed the rate of elongation by the addition of free actin monomers diffusing in solution. Binding of actin to the end of the filament provides the energy for the highly processive movement of the FH2 as a filament adds thousands of actin subunits. These biophysical insights provide the context to understand how formins contribute to actin assembly in cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Profilin oligomerization and its effect on poly (L-proline) binding and phosphorylation

Profilin is a cytoskeletal protein that interacts specifically with actin, phosphoinositides and poly (l-proline). Experimental results and in silico studies revealed that profilin exists as dimer and tetramer. Profilin oligomers possess weak affinity to poly (l-proline) due to unavailability of binding sites in dimers and tetramers. Phosphorylation studies indicate that profilin dimers are not phosphorylated while teramers are preferentially phosphorylated over monomers. In silico studies revealed that PKC phosphorylation site, S137 is buried in dimer while it is accessible in tetramer.

Nitration of profilin effects its interaction with poly (L-proline) and actin

Profilin from bovine spleen was nitrated with peroxynitrite; immunoblotting and spectrophotometric quantitation of nitrotyrosine residues suggested nitration of a single tyrosine residue in profilin with a stoichiometry of 0.6 mol of nitrotyrosine/mole of profilin. A decrease in the nitrotyrosine immunoreactivity of nitroprofilin during digestion with carboxypeptidase Y indicated that nitrotyrosine is located at the C-terminus of profilin. Nitroprofilin interaction with ligands such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, actin and poly (l-proline) was analyzed by monitoring the tryptophan fluorescence. Scatchard plot and binding isotherm data obtained revealed no significant difference in affinity of nitroprofilin to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (K(d) of 4.8 +/- 0.5 muM for profilin, and K(d) of 5.7 +/- 0.6 muM for nitroprofilin), while poly (l-proline) binding studies revealed a twenty-fold increase in the affinity of profilin to poly (l-proline) upon nitration (K(d) of 21.8 +/- 1.7 muM for profilin, and K(d) of 1.1 +/- 0.1 muM for nitroprofilin). Actin polymerization studies involving pyrene-labeled actin indicated that profilin nitration inhibits the actin sequestering property of profilin. The critical actin monomer concentration (C(c)) was 150 and 250 nM in the presence of nitroprofilin and profilin, respectively. Thus, nitric oxide and free radicals produced under different conditions could alter the functions of profilin through nitration, such as its interaction with actin and poly (l-proline).

Incompatibility with formin Cdc12p prevents human profilin from substituting for fission yeast profilin: insights from crystal structures of fission yeast profilin

Expression of human profilin-I does not complement the temperature-sensitive cdc3-124 mutation of the single profilin gene in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, resulting in death from cytokinesis defects. Human profilin-I and S. pombe profilin have similar affinities for actin monomers, the FH1 domain of fission yeast formin Cdc12p and poly-L-proline (Lu, J., and Pollard, T. D. (2001) Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1161-1175), but human profilin-I does not stimulate actin filament elongation by formin Cdc12p like S. pombe profilin. Two crystal structures of S. pombe profilin and homology models of S. pombe profilin bound to actin show how the two profilins bind to identical surfaces on animal and yeast actins even though 75% of the residues on the profilin side of the interaction differ in the two profilins. Overexpression of human profilin-I in fission yeast expressing native profilin also causes cytokinesis defects incompatible with viability. Human profilin-I with the R88E mutation has no detectable affinity for actin and does not have this dominant overexpression phenotype. The Y6D mutation reduces the affinity of human profilin-I for poly-l-proline by 1000-fold, but overexpression of Y6D profilin in fission yeast is lethal. The most likely hypotheses to explain the incompatibility of human profilin-I with Cdc12p are differences in interactions with the proline-rich sequences in the FH1 domain of Cdc12p and wider "wings" that interact with actin.

Model of formin-associated actin filament elongation

Formin FH2 domains associate processively with actin-filament barbed ends and modify their rate of growth. We modeled how the elongation rate depends on the concentrations of profilin and actin for four different formins. We assume that (1) FH2 domains are in rapid equilibrium among conformations that block or allow actin addition and that (2) profilin-actin is transferred rapidly to the barbed end from multiple profilin binding sites in formin FH1 domains. In agreement with previous experiments discussed below, we find an optimal profilin concentration with a maximal elongation rate that can exceed the rate of actin alone. High profilin concentrations suppress elongation, largely because free profilin displaces profilin-actin from FH1. The model supports a common polymerization mechanism for the four formin FH1FH2 constructs with differences attributed to varying parameter values. The mechanism does not require ATP hydrolysis by polymerized actin, but we cannot exclude that formins accelerate hydrolysis.

Recognition of Proline-Rich Motifs by Protein-Protein-Interaction Domains

Protein-protein interactions are essential in every aspect of cellular activity. Multiprotein complexes form and dissociate constantly in a specifically tuned manner, often by conserved mechanisms. Protein domains that bind proline-rich motifs (PRMs) are frequently involved in signaling events. The unique properties of proline provide a mechanism for highly discriminatory recognition without requiring high affinities. We present herein a detailed, quantitative assessment of the structural features that define the interfaces between PRM-binding domains and their target PRMs, and investigate the specificity of PRM recognition. Together with the analysis of peptide-library screens, this approach has allowed the identification of several highly conserved key interactions found in all complexes of PRM-binding domains. The inhibition of protein-protein interactions by using small-molecule agents is very challenging. Therefore, it is important to first pinpoint the critical interactions that must be considered in the design of inhibitors of PRM-binding domains.

Molecular Fragment Replacement Approach to Protein Structure Determination by Chemical Shift and Dipolar Homology Database Mining

A novel approach is described for determining backbone structures of proteins that is based on finding fragments in the protein data bank (PDB). For each fragment in the target protein, usually chosen to be 7-10 residues in length, PDB fragments are selected that best fit to experimentally determined one-bond heteronuclear dipolar couplings and that show agreement between chemical shifts predicted for the PDB fragment and experimental values for the target fragment. These fragments are subsequently refined by simulated annealing to improve agreement with the experimental data. If the lowest-energy refined fragments form a unique structural cluster, this structure is accepted and side chains are added on the basis of a conformational database potential. The sequential backbone assembly process extends the chain by translating an accepted fragment onto it. For several small proteins, with extensive sets of dipolar couplings measured in two alignment media, a unique final structure is obtained that agrees well with structures previously solved by conventional methods. With less dipolar input data, large, oriented fragments of each protein are obtained, but their relative positioning requires either a small set of translationally restraining nuclear Overhauser enhancements (NOEs) or a protocol that optimizes burial of hydrophobic groups and pairing of beta-strands.

Mutational analysis of human profilin I reveals a second PI(4,5)-P2 binding site neighbouring the poly(L-proline) binding site

BACKGROUND

Profilin is a small cytoskeletal protein which interacts with actin, proline-rich proteins and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)-P2). Crystallography, NMR and mutagenesis of vertebrate profilins have revealed the amino acid residues that are responsible for the interactions with actin and poly(L-proline) peptides. Although Arg88 of human profilin I was shown to be involved in PI(4,5)-P2-binding, it was suggested that carboxy terminal basic residues may be involved as well.

RESULTS

Using site directed mutagenesis we have refined the PI(4,5)-P2 binding site of human profilin I. For each mutant we assessed the stability and studied the interactions with actin, a proline-rich peptide and PI(4,5)-P2 micelles. We identified at least two PI(4,5)-P2-binding regions in human profilin I. As expected, one region comprises Arg88 and overlaps with the actin binding site. The second region involves Arg136 in the carboxy terminal helix and neighbours the poly(L-proline) binding site. In addition, we show that adding a small protein tag to the carboxy terminus of profilin strongly reduces binding to poly(L-proline), suggesting local conformational changes of the carboxy terminal alpha-helix may have dramatic effects on ligand binding.

CONCLUSIONS

The involvement of the two terminal alpha-helices of profilin in ligand binding imposes important structural constraints upon the functions of this region. Our data suggest a model in which the competitive interactions between PI(4,5)-P2 and actin and PI(4,5)-P2 and poly(L-proline) regulate profilin functions.

Synthesis of (3R)-carboxy pyrrolidine (a beta-proline analogue) and its oligomer

A decamer of a beta-amino acid analogue of L-proline, (3R)-carboxy pyrrolidine (beta-proline), was synthesized from a readily available (R)-glycidol. It was found to possess a rigid secondary structure, as evidenced by its CD spectrum. The beta-proline decamer, however, failed to bind to profilin, whereas the corresponding alpha-L-proline decamer bound tightly to this protein.

Characterization and localization of profilin in pollen grains and tubes of Lilium longiflorum

Pollen tubes show a rapid and dramatically polarized growth in which the actin cytoskeleton appears to play a central role. In order to understand the regulation of actin we characterized its associated protein, profilin, in pollen tubes of Lilium longiflorum. By using purified polyclonal antibodies prepared against bean root profilin [Vidali et al., 1995: Plant Physiol. 108:115-123] we detected in pollen grains and tubes two profilin polypeptides with molecular masses of 14.4 and 13.4 KDa, and an identical isoelectric point of 5.05. Profilin comprises approximately 0.47% of the total grain protein, with actin being approximately 1.4%. We were unable to detect a statistically significant profilin increase after germination, while the actin increased approximately 68%. We also spatially localized the distribution of profilin using immunocytochemistry of fixed cells at both the light and electron microscope level, and by fluorescent analog cytochemistry on live cells. The results show that profilin is evenly distributed throughout the cytoplasm and does not specifically associate with any cellular structure.

Localization of actobindin, profilin I, profilin II, and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) in Acanthamoeba castellanii

Specific polyclonal antisera were raised against purified Acanthamoeba actobindin and synthetic peptides corresponding to regions of maximum charge differences in Acanthamoeba profilin I and profilin II. Immunofluorescence studies with these antibodies showed profilin I to be distributed throughout the Acanthamoeba cytoplasm, except for lamellipodia, with the highest fluorescence intensity in cortical regions in which monomeric actin also was present, as shown by labeling with fluorescent DNase. In contrast, profilin II appeared to be uniformly associated with the plasma membrane except at sites of pseudopod extension, where the concentration was frequently decreased, in addition to cortical regions. Immunofluorescence studies using a monoclonal antibody specific for phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) suggested that its distribution is mostly limited to the plasma membrane. In contrast to the distribution of profilin II, PIP2 immunofluorescence was prominent at the leading edge of cells, including the plasma membrane of lamellipodia. Quantitative immunoelectron microscopy showed that profilin II was approximately 36 times more likely to localize to the plasma membrane than profilin I. Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy localized actobindin to the base of lamellipodia. The differential localization of the three actin monomer-binding proteins suggests that they have different biologic functions in Acanthamoeba and is consistent with the hypotheses that (1) profilin I functions predominantly as an actin monomer-binding protein; (2) profilin II regulates, or is regulated by, PIP2; and (3) actobindin inhibits nucleation of new filaments and facilitates elongation of existing polarized filaments in actively motile regions.

Differential colocalization of profilin with microfilaments in PtK2 cells

Profilins are thought to be involved in the control of actin dynamics in eukaryotic cells. In accordance with this concept, profilin was found to be colocalized with the cortical microfilament webs in leading lamellae of locomoting and spreading fibroblasts. However, so far, there is little information on the distribution of profilin in other cell types. In this study, we report on the colocalization of profilin with various microfilament suprastructures in the epithelial cell line PtK2. This cell line, which is derived from rat kangaroo, contains a profilin sharing an N-terminal epitope with bovine and human profilin I, as seen by immunoblotting with monoclonal antibodies. By using immunofluorescence in conjunction with conventional fluorescence microscopy and confocal laser-scanning microscopy, we found profilin in ruffling areas of the peripheral lamellae and nascent stress fibers of spreading cells, whereas the peripheral belts of stationary cells growing in epithelioid sheets lacked profilin staining. In these cells, profilin was primarily distributed in a fine reticular or vesicular network that was not related to the microfilament system. Conspicuously low levels of profilins was not related to the contractile ring of mitotic cells. This was found for different fixation protocols and antibodies of the IgG and IgM type, respectively, indicating that lack of staining of the cleavage furrow was not due to antibody penetration problems. Depending on the fixation protocol, the nuclear matrix appeared strongly positive or negative for profilin. Cells microinjected with birch pollen profilin and labeled with a birch profilin-specific monoclonal antibody corroborated the results obtained with the endogeneous protein: The injected profilin was targeted to the cortical web and to nascent stress fibers of spreading cells but not to the cleavage ring of mitotic cells. These results suggest that high concentrations of a profilin I homologue are preferentially located with those microfilament suprastructures in PtK2 cells that are subject to rapid modulation by external signals.

Dissection of functional domains by expression of point-mutated profilins in Dictyostelium mutants

Profilin is a ubiquitous cytoskeletal protein whose function is fundamental to the maintenance of normal cell physiology. By site-directed mutagenesis of profilin II from Dictyostelium discoideum the point mutations K114E and W3N were generated by PCR thus changing actin and poly-(L)-proline-binding activity respectively. W3N profilin is no longer able to bind to poly-(L)-proline concomitant with a slight reduction in actin binding. The K114E profilin exhibited a profound decrease in its ability to interact with actin, whereas binding to poly-(L)-proline was essentially unchanged. Binding to phospholipids was indistinguishable from the wild-type profilin. The in vivo properties of the point-mutated profilins were studied by expressing either W3N or K114E in profilin-minus D. discoideum mutants which have defects in the F-actin content, cytokinesis and development (Haugwitz et al., Cell 79, 303-314, 1994). Expression of K114E or W3N displayed a reduction in the F-actin content, normal cell morphology, and the transformants were capable of undergoing complete development. Interestingly, only cells that drastically overexpressed W3N could restore the aberrant phenotype, whereas the mutant protein K114E with its fully functional poly-(L)-proline binding and its strongly reduced actin-binding activities rescued the phenotype at low concentrations. Wild-type and both mutated profilins are enriched in phagocytic cups during uptake of yeast particles. These data suggest a) that a functional poly-(L)-proline-binding activity is more important for suppression of the mutant phenotype than the G-actin binding activity of profilin, and b) that the enrichment of profilin in highly active phagocytic cups might be independent of either poly-(L)-proline or actin-binding activities.

Profilin is predominantly associated with monomeric actin in Acanthamoeba

We used biochemical fractionation, immunoassays and microscopy of live and fixed Acanthamoeba to determine how much profilin is bound to its known ligands: actin, membrane PIP(2), Arp2/3 complex and polyproline sequences. Virtually all profilin is soluble after gentle homogenization of cells. During gel filtration of extracts on Sephadex G75, approximately 60% of profilin chromatographs with monomeric actin, 40% is free and none voids with Arp2/3 complex or other large particles. Selective monoclonal antibodies confirm that most of the profilin is bound to actin: 65% in extract immunoadsorption assays and 74–89% by fluorescent antibody staining. Other than monomeric actin, no major profilin ligands are detected in crude extracts. Profilin-II labeled with rhodamine on cysteine at position 58 retains its affinity for actin, PIP(2) and poly-L-proline. When syringe-loaded into live cells, it distributes throughout the cytoplasm, is excluded from membrane-bounded organelles, and concentrates in lamellapodia and sites of endocytosis but not directly on the plasma membrane. Some profilin fluorescence appears punctate, but since no particulate profilin is detected biochemically, these spots may be soluble profilin between organelles that exclude profilin. The distribution of profilin in fixed human A431 cells is similar to that in amoebas. Our results show that the major pool of polymerizable actin monomers is complexed with profilin and spread throughout the cytoplasm.

Profilin in Phaseolus vulgaris is encoded by two genes (only one expressed in root nodules) but multiple isoforms are generated in vivo by phosphorylation on tyrosine residues

Actin-binding proteins such as profilins participate in the restructuration of the actin cytoskeleton in plant cells. Profilins are ubiquitous actin-, polyproline-, and inositol phospholipid-binding proteins, which in plants are encoded by multigene families. By 2D-PAGE and immunoblotting, we detected as much as five profilin isoforms in crude extracts from nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris. However, by immunoprecipitation and gel electrophoresis of in vitro translation products from nodule RNA, only the most basic isoform of those found in nodule extracts, was detected. Furthermore, a bean profilin cDNA probe hybridised to genomic DNA digested with different restriction enzymes, showed either a single or two bands. These data indicate that profilin in P. vulgaris is encoded by only two genes. In root nodules only one gene is expressed, and a single profilin transcript gives rise to multiple profilin isoforms by post-translational modifications of the protein. By in vivo 32P-labelling and immunoprecipitation with both, antiprofilin and antiphosphotyrosine-specific antibodies, we found that profilin is phosphorylated on tyrosine residues. Since chemical (TLC) and immunological analyses, as well as plant tyrosine phosphatase (AtPTP1) treatments of profilin indicated that tyrosine residues were phosphorylated, we concluded that tyrosine kinases must exist in plants. This finding will focus research on tyrosine kinases/tyrosine phosphatases that could participate in novel regulatory functions/pathways, involving not only this multifunctional cytoskeletal protein, but other plant proteins.

Effects of single amino acid substitutions in the actin-binding site on the biological activity of bovine profilin I

For a detailed analysis of the profilin-actin interaction, we designed several point mutations in bovine profilin I by computer modeling. The recombinant proteins were analyzed in vitro for their actin-binding properties. Mutant proteins with a putatively higher affinity for actin were produced by attempting to introduce an additional bond to actin. However, these mutants displayed a lower affinity for actin than wild-type profilin, suggesting that additional putative bonds created this way cannot increase profilin's affinity for actin. In contrast, mutants designed to have a reduced affinity for actin by eliminating profilin-actin bonds displayed the desired properties in viscosity assays, while their binding sites for poly(L)proline were still intact. The profilin mutant F59A, with an affinity for actin reduced by one order of magnitude as compared to wild-type profilin, was analyzed further in cells. When microinjected into fibroblasts, F59A colocalized with the endogenous profilin and actin in ruffling areas, suggesting that profilins are targeted to and tethered at these sites by ligands other than actin. Profilin null cells of Dictyostelium were transfected with bovine wild-type profilin I and F59A. Bovine profilin I, although expressed to only approximately 10% of the endogenous profilin level determined for wild-type Dictyostelium, caused a substantial rescue of the defects observed in profilin null amoebae, as seen by measuring the growth of colony surface areas and the percentage of polynucleated cells. The mutant protein was much less effective. These results emphasize the highly conserved biological function of profilins with low sequence homology, and correlate specifically their actin-binding capacity with cell motility and proliferation.

Structure determination and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae profilin

The structure of profilin from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been determined by X-ray crystallography at 2.3 A resolution. The overall fold of yeast profilin is similar to the fold observed for other profilin structures. The interactions of yeast and human platelet profilins with rabbit skeletal muscle actin were characterized by titration microcalorimetry, fluorescence titrations, and nucleotide exchange kinetics. The affinity of yeast profilin for rabbit actin (2.9 microM) is approximately 30-fold weaker than the affinity of human platelet profilin for rabbit actin (0.1 microM), and the relative contributions of entropic and enthalpic terms to the overall free energy of binding are different for the two profilins. The titration of pyrene-labeled rabbit skeletal actin with human profilin yielded a Kd of 2.8 microM, similar to the Kd of 2.0 microM for the interaction between yeast profilin and pyrene-labeled yeast actin. The binding data are discussed in the context of the known crystal structures of profilin and actin, and the residues present at the actin-profilin interface. The affinity of yeast profilin for poly-L-proline was determined from fluorescence measurements and is similar to the reported affinity of Acanthamoeba profilin for poly-L-proline. Yeast profilin was shown to catalyze adenine nucleotide exchange from yeast actin almost 2 orders of magnitude less efficiently than human profilin and rabbit skeletal muscle actin. The in vivo and in vitro properties of yeast profilin mutants with altered poly-L-proline and actin binding sites are discussed in the context of the crystal structure.

Interactions of Acanthamoeba profilin with actin and nucleotides bound to actin

Three methods, fluorescence anisotropy of rhodamine-labeled profilin, intrinsic fluorescence and nucleotide exchange, give the same affinity, Kd = 0.1 microM, for Acanthamoeba profilins binding amoeba actin monomers with bound Mg-ATP. Replacement of serine 38 with cysteine created a unique site where labeling with rhodamine did not alter the affinity of profilin for actin. The affinity for rabbit skeletal muscle actin is about 4-fold lower. The affinity for both actins is 5-8-fold lower with ADP bound to actin rather than ATP. Pyrenyliodoacetamide labeling of cysteine 374 of muscle actin reduces the affinity for profilin 10-fold. The affinity of profilin for nucleotide-free actin is approximately 3-fold higher than for Mg-ATP-actin and approximately 24-fold higher than for Mg-ADP-actin. As a result, profilin binding reduces the affinity of actin 3-fold for Mg-ATP and 24-fold for Mg-ADP. Mg-ATP dissociates 8 times faster from actin-profilin than from actin and binds actin-profilin 3 times faster than actin. Mg-ADP dissociates 14 times faster from actin-profilin than from actin and binds actin-profilin half as fast as actin. Thus, profilin promotes the exchange of ADP for ATP. These properties allow profilin to bind a high proportion of unpolymerized ATP-actin in the cell, suppressing spontaneous nucleation but allowing free barbed ends to elongate at more than 500 subunits/second.

Structure of the profilin-poly-L-proline complex involved in morphogenesis and cytoskeletal regulation

Profilin, a ubiquitous low molecular weight (13,000-15,000 M(r)) actin binding protein, regulates the formation of F-actin structures in vivo, and is localized to specific cellular regions through interaction with proline-rich sequences. Here we report the 2.2 A X-ray structure of the complex between human platelet profilin (HPP) and a decamer of L-proline (L-Pro10). The L-Pro10 peptide adopts a left-handed type II poly-L-proline helix (PPII) and binds to a highly conserved patch of aromatic amino acids on the surface of profilin. The peptide and actin binding sites reside on orthogonal surfaces, and L-Pro10 binding does not result in a conformational rearrangement of HPP. This structure suggests a mechanism for the localization of profilin and its actin-related activities to sites of actin filament assembly in vivo.

Birch pollen profilin: structural organization and interaction with poly-(L-proline) peptides as revealed by NMR

The secondary structure of birch pollen profilin, a potent human allergen, was elucidated by multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), as a prerequisite to study the interaction of this profilin with ligands for its poly-(L-proline) (PLP)-binding site. The chemical shifts of the 15N-labeled backbone amide groups were used to monitor complex formation with various PLP peptides. Titration with deca-L-proline (P10) yielded a KD of 0.2 mM. P8 was the shortest PLP to provoke a significant reaction. (GP5)3G bound significantly, confirming the interaction between profilins and the protein VASP containing this motif. Birch profilin interacted also with GP6GP5, found in the cyclase-associated protein (CAP), a suspected profilin ligand.

Characterization of a mutant profilin with reduced actin-binding capacity: effects in vitro and in vivo

We are investigating structure-function relationships in profilin and actin by site-specific mutagenesis using a yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, expression system to produce wild-type and mutant proteins. This paper shows that deleting proline 96 and threonine 97, which are located close to the major actin binding site on profilin, did not significantly alter the interaction between profilin and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, nor did it affect the profilin:poly(L-proline) interaction. The mutant protein, however, had a lower capacity to bind to actin in vitro than wild-type profilin, though it showed a slightly increased profilin-enhanced nucleotide exchange on the actin. When microinjected into Swiss 3T3 mouse fibroblasts or porcine aortic endothelial cells, the mutant profilin did not change the organization of the microfilament system like the wild-type profilin did. This provides further evidence that profilin controls microfilament organization in the cell by interacting directly with actin.

The mammalian profilin isoforms display complementary affinities for PIP2 and proline-rich sequences

We present a study on the binding properties of the bovine profilin isoforms to both phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and proline-rich peptides derived from vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and cyclase-associated protein (CAP). Using microfiltration, we show that compared with profilin II, profilin I has a higher affinity for PIP2. On the other hand, fluorescence spectroscopy reveals that proline-rich peptides bind better to profilin II. At micromolar concentrations, profilin II dimerizes upon binding to proline-rich peptides. Circular dichroism measurements of profilin II reveal a significant conformational change in this protein upon binding of the peptide. We show further that PIP2 effectively competes for binding of profilin I to poly-L-proline, since this isoform, but not profilin II, can be eluted from a poly-L-proline column with PIP2. Using affinity chromatography on either profilin isoform, we identified profilin II as the preferred ligand for VASP in bovine brain extracts. The complementary affinities of the profilin isoforms for PIP2 and the proline-rich peptides offer the cell an opportunity to direct actin assembly at different subcellular localizations through the same or different signal transduction pathways.

The crystal structure of a major allergen from plants

BACKGROUND

Profilins are small eukaryotic proteins involved in modulating the assembly of actin microfilaments in the cytoplasm. They are able to bind both phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate and poly-L-proline (PLP) and thus play a critical role in signaling pathways. Plant profilins are of interest because immunological cross-reactivity between pollen and human profilin may be the cause of hay fever and broad allergies to pollens.

RESULTS

The determination of the Arabidopsis thaliana profilin isoform I structure, using multiwavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD) to obtain structure-factor phases, is reported here. The structure of Arabidopsis profilin is similar to that of previously determined profilin structures. Conserved amino acid residues in profilins from plants, mammals, and lower eukaryotes are critically important in dictating the geometry of the PLP-binding site and the overall polypeptide fold. The main feature distinguishing plant profilins from other profilins is a solvent-filled pocket located in the most variable region of the fold.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of the structures of SH3 domains with those of profilins from three distinct sources suggests that the mode of PLP binding may be similar. A comparison of three profilin structures from different families reveals only partial conservation of the actin-binding surface. The proximity of the semi-conserved actin-binding site and the binding pocket characteristic of plant profilins suggests that epitopes encompassing both features are responsible for the cross-reactivity of antibodies between human and plant profilins thought to be responsible for type I allergies.

The molecular basis for allergen cross-reactivity: crystal structure and IgE-epitope mapping of birch pollen profilin

BACKGROUND

The profilins are a group of ubiquitous actin monomer binding proteins that are responsible for regulating the normal distribution of filamentous actin networks in eukaryotic cells. Profilins also bind polyphosphoinositides, which can disrupt the profilin-action complex, and proline-rich ligands which localize profilin to sites requiring extensive actin filament accumulation. Profilins represent cross-reactive allergens for almost 20 % of all pollen allergic patients.

RESULTS

We report the X-ray crystal structure of birch pollen profilin (BPP) at 2.4 resolution. The major IgE-reactive epitopes have been mapped and were found to cluster on the N- and C-terminal alpha helices and a segment of the protein containing two strands of the beta sheet. The overall fold of this protein is similar to that of the mammalian and amoeba profilins, however, there is a significant change in the orientation of the N-terminal alpha helix in BPP. This change in orientation alters the topography of a hydrophobic patch on the surface of the molecule, which is thought to be involved in the binding of proline-rich ligands.

CONCLUSIONS

Profilin has been identified as an important cross-reactive allergen for patients suffering from multivalent type I allergy. The prevalent epitopic areas are located in regions with conserved sequence and secondary structure and overlap the binding sites for natural profilin ligands, indicating that the native ligand-free profilin acts as the original cross-sensitizing agent. Structural homology indicates that the basic features of the G actin-profilin interaction are conserved in all eukaryotic organisms, but suggests that mechanistic differences in the binding of proline-rich ligands may exist. The structure of BPP provides a molecular basis for understanding allergen cross-reactivity.

Structural requirements and thermodynamics of the interaction of proline peptides with profilin

The binding to poly(L-proline) is used for the affinity purification of profilins, but little is known about the structural and thermodynamic aspects of the interaction. We used changes in the intrinsic fluorescence of profilin, CD spectroscopy, and isothermal titration calorimetry to assess how the size and composition of synthetic proline-rich peptides influence binding to Acanthamoeba and human profilins. Although a 6 residue type II poly(L-proline) helix can span the binding site, highest affinity binding is achieved by proline oligomers > or = 10 residues. Binding is stereospecific since (D-proline)11 does not bind. In 75 mM KCI the dissociation equilibrium constant for poly(L-proline) is about 10 microM proline decamer units for amoeba profilin and 20-30 microM for human profilin. Consistent with a significant hydrophobic component of the interaction, delta Cp is negative and higher salt concentrations enhance the affinity. No protons dissociate or bind during the interaction. Binding of poly(L-proline) is favored both entropically and enthalpically. Substitution of glycine in proline undecamers reduces affinity by about 1 kcal mol-1 for each substitution due to increased rotational freedom of the free peptides. Substitution of alanine has a similar effect. Disorder in the free peptides imparts an unfavorable entropic cost for immobilizing the substituted peptides on the binding site on profilin.

Molecular and structural analysis of a continuous birch profilin epitope defined by a monoclonal antibody

The interaction of a mouse monoclonal antibody (4A6) and birch profilin, a structurally well conserved actin- and phosphoinositide-binding protein and cross-reactive allergen, was characterized. In contrast to serum IgE from allergic patients, which shows cross-reactivity with most plants, monoclonal antibody 4A6 selectively reacted with tree pollen profilins. Using synthetic overlapping peptides, a continuous hexapeptide epitope was identified. The exchange of a single amino acid (Gln-47 --> Glu) within the epitope was found to abolish the binding of monoclonal antibody 4A6 to other plant profilins. The NMR analyses of the birch and the nonreactive timothy grass profilin peptides showed that the loss of binding was not due to major structural differences. Both peptides adopted extended conformations similar to that observed for the epitope in the x-ray crystal structure of the native birch profilin. Binding studies with peptides and birch profilin mutants generated by in vitro mutagenesis demonstrated that the change of Gln-47 to acidic amino acids (e.g. Glu or Asp) led to electrostatic repulsion of monoclonal antibody 4A6. In conclusion the molecular and structural analyses of the interaction of a monoclonal antibody with a continuous peptide epitope, recognized in a conformation similar to that displayed on the native protein, are presented.

NMR analysis of interacting soluble forms of the cell-cell recognition molecules CD2 and CD48

The T cell glycoprotein, CD2, is one of the best characterized molecules mediating recognition at the cell surface. The ligands of murine and human CD2 are CD48 and CD58, respectively, and interactions between these molecules have been shown to influence antigen recognition and T cell activation. The CD58 binding site of human CD2 has been characterized in mutational studies, and here we use heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy to identify the rat CD48 binding site of the N-terminal domain of rat CD2 (CD2d1). The NMR spectrum of bacterially expressed CD2d1, assigned initially at pH 4.3 in the course of determining the three-dimensional solution structure of this domain [Driscoll, P.C., et al. (1991) Nature 353, 762-765], has been reassigned as a two-dimensional 15N-1H heteronuclear single-quantum coherence (HSQC) spectrum at neutral pH. The CD48 binding surface was identified by monitoring perturbations in the line widths and chemical shifts of cross peaks in the HSQC spectrum of CD2d1 during titrations with a soluble form of CD48 expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. This first solution NMR analysis of interacting cell surface molecules shows that the ligand binding site extends across an area of ca. 700-800 A2 of the GFCC'C" face corresponding almost exactly to lattice contacts in crystals of soluble CD2 first proposed as a model of the interaction of CD2 with its ligands. The analysis finds no evidence for any large-scale structural changes in domain 1 of CD2 to accompany CD48 binding. Comparisons of the human and rat CD2 ligand binding sites suggest that species- and ligand-specific binding may be determined by as few as three amino acid residues, corresponding to Thr37, Leu38, and Glu41 in rat CD2 (Lys42, Lys43, and Gln46 in human CD2).

Site-directed mutagenesis enabled preparation of a functional fluorescent analog of profilin: biochemical characterization and localization in living cells

The preparation of fluorescent profilin analogs for binding and spectroscopic studies, in vitro and in vivo, has been hampered by the poor chemical reactivity of this protein in its native form. We have addressed this problem by labeling a mutant, chemically reactive form of profilin. Site-directed mutagenesis was first used to replace a serine residue in a non-essential domain with a reactive cysteine residue. The mutant protein was expressed in Escherichia coli and reacted with tetramethylrhodamine iodoacetamide. In vitro assays indicated that the fluorescent profilin maintained its ability to bind actin, polyproline, and PIP2, to inhibit actin polymerization, and to stimulate actin nucleotide exchange. Fluorescence spectroscopy showed that neither the excitation nor the emission of the analog was sensitive to the interaction with actin or polyproline. However, binding of PIP2 caused a 75% quenching of the fluorescent signal, suggesting a dramatic change in the immediate environment of the probe. When the fluorescent profilin was microinjected into living NRK cells, it became localized at cell-cell junctions and discrete sites near the anterior end, where it colocalized with aggregates of unpolymerized actin. Different engineered forms of profilin with fluorophores located at defined sites should greatly facilitate the study of its interactions with various ligands and cellular structures.

Localization of a binding site for phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate on human profilin

Profilin is a small 12-15-kDa actin-binding protein, which in eukaryotic organisms is ubiquitous and necessary for normal cell growth and function. Although profilin's interactions with its three known ligands (actin monomers, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), and poly-L-proline (PLP)) have been well characterized in vitro, its precise role in cells remains largely unknown. By binding to clusters of PIP2, profilin is able to inhibit the hydrolysis of PIP2 by phospholipase C gamma 1 (PLC gamma 1). This ability is the result of profilin's affinity for PIP2, but the specific residues of profilin's amino acid sequence involved in the binding of PIP2 are not known. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we sought to localize regions of profilin important for this interaction by generating the following mutants of human profilin (named according to the wild-type amino acid altered, its position, and the amino acid substituted in its place): Y6F, D8A, L10R, K25Q, K53I, R74L, R88L, R88L/K90E, H119D, G121D, and K125Q. With the exception of L10R, all of the mutants were successfully expressed in Escherichia coli and purified by affinity chromatography on PLP-Sepharose. Only Y6F and K25Q demonstrated moderately less stringent binding to PLP, indicating that most of the mutations did not induce marked alterations of profilin's structure. When tested for their relative abilities to inhibit the hydrolysis of PIP2 by PLC gamma 1, most of the mutants were indistinguishable from wild-type profilin. Exceptions included D8A, which demonstrated increased inhibition of PLC gamma 1, and R88L, which demonstrated decreased inhibition of PLC gamma 1. To assess the importance of the region surrounding residue 88 of human profilin, three synthetic decapeptides selected to correspond to non-overlapping stretches of the human profilin sequence were tested for their abilities to inhibit PLC gamma 1. We found that only te decapeptide that matched the peptide stretch centered around residue 88 was able to inhibit PLC gamma 1 activity substantially and was able to do so at nearly wild-type profilin levels. Taken together with the finding that mutating residue 88 resulted in decreased inhibition of PLC gamma 1 activity, these data provide strong evidence that this region of human profilin represents an important binding site for PIP2.

Tau domains, phosphorylation, and interactions with microtubules

We consider the interactions of tau protein with microtubules from two points of view, phosphorylation and domain structure. Tau can be phosphorylated at many sites and by several kinases, notably by proline-directed kinases (MAPK, GSK-3, cdk5) which generate Alzheimer-like antibody epitopes. Other kinases phosphorylate Ser 262, a site that has a particularly pronounced influence on the affinity of tau for microtubules. All of these sites can be cleared by phosphatases PP-2a and calcineurin. The site Ser262 lies within the repeat domain of tau. However, when probing the domains of tau for their effects on microtubule binding, nucleation, assembly, or bundling, the repeat domain has only a weak influence. Whereas the repeat domain of tau binds to microtubules with low affinity, repeat-less tau binds strongly yet unproductively in terms of microtubule assembly. Productive binding of tau to microtubules depends on the combination of (some) repeats with the flanking regions, as if the flanking regions acted as "jaws" for the proper positioning of tau on the microtubule surface.

Distinct biochemical characteristics of the two human profilin isoforms

The biochemical characteristics of a new human profilin isoform are described. We refer to this recently described isoform as profilin II (isoelectric point 5.9) in comparison to profilin I (pI 8.4). We expressed both isoforms in bacteria and compared their actin-binding properties, binding to poly(L-proline), affinities for phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P2], and their effects on nucleotide exchange on actin. Profilin I and profilin II have similar affinities for PtdIns(4,5)P2 and poly(L-proline), and both accelerate nucleotide exchange on monomeric actin to the same extent. However, the affinity of profilin I for monomeric actin is about five times higher than the affinity of profilin II for actin. Potential structural differences of profilin I and profilin II that might explain the difference in actin binding are discussed.

Refined solution structure of human profilin I

Profilin is a ubiquitous eukaryotic protein that binds to both cytosolic actin and the phospholipid phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate. These dual competitive binding capabilities of profilin suggest that profilin serves as a link between the phosphatidyl inositol cycle and actin polymerization, and thus profilin may be an essential component in the signaling pathway leading to cytoskeletal rearrangement. The refined three-dimensional solution structure of human profilin I has been determined using multidimensional heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. Twenty structures were selected to represent the solution conformational ensemble. This ensemble of structures has root-mean-square distance deviations from the mean structure of 0.58 A for the backbone atoms and 0.98 A for all non-hydrogen atoms. Comparison of the solution structure of human profilin to the crystal structure of bovine profilin reveals that, although profilin adopts essentially identical conformations in both states, the solution structure is more compact than the crystal structure. Interestingly, the regions that show the most structural diversity are located at or near the actin-binding site of profilin. We suggest that structural differences are reflective of dynamical properties of profilin that facilitate favorable interactions with actin. The global folding pattern of human profilin also closely resembles that of Acanthamoeba profilin I, reflective of the 22% sequence identity and approximately 45% sequence similarity between these two proteins.

Actin monomer binding proteins

Small actin monomer binding proteins are essential components of the actin polymerization machinery. Originally thought of as passive buffers that prevent polymerization of actin monomers, recent discoveries elucidate how some actin monomer binding proteins can promote as well as inhibit polymerization, and how they cooperate to regulate actin assembly.

Interaction of plant profilin with mammalian actin

The mode of interaction of birch and bovine profilins with actin was compared using a number of techniques. Birch profilin was purified from pollen or as a recombinant protein from Escherichia coli, using poly(L-proline) affinity chromatography and a monoclonal antibody for the identification of the isolated product. On two-dimensional gels, the genuine and recombinant proteins were identical in molecular mass and isoelectric point and revealed that birch profilin, in contrast to the basic profilins found in mammals, is an acidic protein, analogous to maize profilins. Bovine profilin was obtained from calf thymus. In viscometric assays, the birch protein was seen to modulate actin filament formation analogous to animal profilin. Birch profilin increased the critical concentration required for muscle and brain actin polymerization in a concentration-dependent manner, supporting the notion of the formation of a heterologous complex between the plant protein and animal actin. The effect was Mg(2+)-sensitive, as had been described for homologous complexes. The dissociation constants obtained for the plant/vertebrate and the vertebrate/vertebrate system were both in the micromolar range. The affinity of birch profilin for muscle actin was slightly lower than that for nonmuscle (brain) actin. A binary complex of birch profilin and skeletal muscle actin could be isolated by gel chromatography. Cross-linking experiments with actin, birch profilin, the G-actin binding peptide thymosin beta 4 and gelsolin segment 1, the N-terminal fragment of an actin capping protein, showed that profilin competed with thymosin beta 4, but had no effect on segment 1 binding to actin. These data indicate that the actin-binding domains in plant and animal profilins are functionally highly conserved, although the overall sequence similarity is less than 25%.

X-ray structures of isoforms of the actin-binding protein profilin that differ in their affinity for phosphatidylinositol phosphates

We determined the structures of Acanthamoeba profilin I and profilin II by x-ray crystallography at resolutions of 2.0 and 2.8 A, respectively. The polypeptide folds and the actin-binding surfaces of the amoeba profilins are very similar to those of bovine and human profilins. The electrostatic potential surfaces of the two Acanthamoeba isoforms differ. Two areas of high positive potential on the surface of profilin II are candidate binding sites for phosphatidylinositol phosphates. The proximity of these sites to the actin binding site provides an explanation for the competition between actin and lipids for binding profilin.