Sequence and evolutionary conservation of the murine Gbx-2 homeobox gene

Real-time PCR quantification of gene expression in embryonic mouse tissue

The Gbx family of transcription factors consists of two closely related proteins GBX1 and GBX2. A defining feature of the GBX family is a highly conserved 60 amino acid DNA-binding domain, which differs by just two amino acids. Gbx1 and Gbx2 are co-expressed in several areas of the developing central nervous system including the forebrain, anterior hindbrain, and spinal cord, suggesting the potential for genetic redundancy. However, there is a spatiotemporal difference in expression of Gbx1 and Gbx2 in the forebrain and spinal cord. Gbx2 has been shown to play a critical role in positioning the midbrain/hindbrain boundary and developing anterior hindbrain, whereas gene-targeting experiments in mice have revealed an essential function for Gbx1 in the spinal cord for normal locomotion. To determine if Gbx2 could potentially compensate for a loss of Gbx1 in the developing spinal cord, we performed real-time PCR to examine levels of Gbx2 expression in Gbx1(-/-) spinal cord at embryonic day (E) 13.5, a developmental stage when Gbx2 is rapidly downregulated. We demonstrate that Gbx2 expression is elevated in the spinal cord of Gbx1(-/-) embryos.

Elongation factor 1 alpha1 and genes associated with Usher syndromes are downstream targets of GBX2

Gbx2 encodes a DNA-binding transcription factor that plays pivotal roles during embryogenesis. Gain-and loss-of-function studies in several vertebrate species have demonstrated a requirement for Gbx2 in development of the anterior hindbrain, spinal cord, inner ear, heart, and neural crest cells. However, the target genes through which GBX2 exerts its effects remain obscure. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with direct sequencing (ChIP-Seq) analysis in a human prostate cancer cell line, we identified cis-regulatory elements bound by GBX2 to provide insight into its direct downstream targets. The analysis revealed more than 286 highly significant candidate target genes, falling into various functional groups, of which 51% are expressed in the nervous system. Several of the top candidate genes include EEF1A1, ROBO1, PLXNA4, SLIT3, NRP1, and NOTCH2, as well as genes associated with the Usher syndrome, PCDH15 and USH2A, and are plausible candidates contributing to the developmental defects in Gbx2(-/-) mice. We show through gel shift analyses that sequences within the promoter or introns of EEF1A1, ROBO1, PCDH15, USH2A and NOTCH2, are directly bound by GBX2. Consistent with these in vitro results, analyses of Gbx2(-/-) embryos indicate that Gbx2 function is required for migration of Robo1-expressing neural crest cells out of the hindbrain. Furthermore, we show that GBX2 activates transcriptional activity through the promoter of EEF1A1, suggesting that GBX2 could also regulate gene expression indirectly via EEF1A. Taken together, our studies show that GBX2 plays a dynamic role in development and diseases.

Evolutionarily conserved function of Gbx2 in anterior hindbrain development

The amino acid sequence across the DNA-binding homeodomain of Gbx2 is highly conserved across multiple species. In mice, Gbx2 is essential for establishment of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB), and in development of anterior hindbrain structures, rhombomeres (r) 1-r3, and the r2/r3-derived cranial nerve V. In contrast, studies in zebrafish have implicated gbx1 in establishment of the MHB. Therefore, we tested potential roles for gbx2 in anterior hindbrain development in zebrafish. gbx2 knockdown with antisense morpholino results in increased cell death in r2, r3, and r5 and a truncation of the anterior hindbrain, similar to the defect in Gbx2(-/-) mice. Moreover, there is abnormal clustering of cranial nerve V cell bodies in r2 and r3 indicative of defects in aspects of anterior hindbrain patterning. These phenotypes can be rescued by expression of the mouse GBX2 protein. These results suggest that gbx2/Gbx2 has an evolutionarily conserved role in anterior hindbrain development.

A family of RS domain proteins with novel subcellular localization and trafficking

We report the sequence, conservation and cell biology of a novel protein, Psc1, which is expressed and regulated within the embryonic pluripotent cell population of the mouse. The Psc1 sequence includes an RS domain and an RNA recognition motif (RRM), and a sequential arrangement of protein motifs that has not been demonstrated for other RS domain proteins. This arrangement was conserved in a second mouse protein (BAC34721). The identification of Psc1 and BAC34721 homologues in vertebrates and related proteins, more widely throughout evolution, defines a new family of RS domain proteins termed acidic rich RS (ARRS) domain proteins. Psc1 incorporated into the nuclear speckles, but demonstrated novel aspects of subcellular distribution including localization to speckles proximal to the nuclear periphery and localization to punctate structures in the cytoplasm termed cytospeckles. Integration of Psc1 into cytospeckles was dependent on the RRM. Cytospeckles were dynamic within the cytoplasm and appeared to traffic into the nucleus. These observations suggest a novel role in RNA metabolism for ARRS proteins.

Isolation and expression of the homeobox gene Gbx1 during mouse development

In zebrafish, gbx1 and otx2 are among the earliest genes expressed in the neuroectoderm, dividing it into an anterior and a posterior domain with a common border that marks the midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB) primordium. Here, we describe the sequence and expression pattern of Gbx1 in mouse. The first transcripts are found at embryonic day 7.75 in the hindbrain. Later on, expression of Gbx1 is detectable in the hindbrain (rhombomeres 2 to 7), spinal cord, optic vesicles, and in the ventral telencephalon. In mouse, Gbx1 expression is not observed at the MHB as is the case during early zebrafish development. We suggest that an evolutionary switch occurred: in mouse Gbx2 is involved in the early specification of the MHB primordium, whereas in zebrafish, gbx1 is required instead of gbx2.

Craniofacial development in the talpid3 chicken mutant

The talpid(3) chicken mutant has a pleiotropic phenotype including polydactyly and craniofacial abnormalities. Limb polydactyly in talpid(3) suggests a gain of Hedgehog (Hh) signaling, whereas, paradoxically, absence of midline facial structures suggests a loss of Hh function. Here we analyze the status of Shh signaling in the talpid(3) mutant head. We show that Shh expression domains are lost from the talpid(3) head--in hindbrain, midbrain, zona limitans intrathalamica, and stomodeal ectoderm--and that direct targets of Hedgehog signaling, Ptc1, Ptc2, and Gli1, are also absent even in areas associated with primary Shh expression. These data suggest that the talpid(3) mutation leads to defective activation of the Shh pathway and, furthermore, that tissue-to-tissue transduction of Shh expression in the developing head depends on Hh pathway activation. Failure to activate the Shh pathway can also explain absence of floor plate and Hnf-3beta and Netrin-1 expression in midbrain and hindbrain and absence of Fgf-8 expression in commissural plate. Other aspects of gene expression in the talpid(3) head, however, suggest misspecification, such as maintenance of floor plate-like gene expression in telencephalon. In branchial arches and lower jaw, where Shh is expressed, changes in expression of genes involved in patterning and mesodermal specification suggest both gain and loss of Hedgehog function. Thus, analysis of gene expression in talpid(3) head shows that, as in talpid(3) limb, expression of some genes is lost, while others are ectopically expressed. Unlike the limb, many head regions depend on Hh induction of a secondary domain of Shh expression, and failure of this induction in talpid(3), together with the inability to activate the Shh pathway, explain the loss-of-function head phenotype. This gene expression analysis in the talpid(3) head also confirms and extends knowledge of the importance of Shh signaling and the balance between activation and repression of Shh targets in many aspects of craniofacial morphogenesis.

Cloning, expression and relationship of zebrafish gbx1 and gbx2 genes to Fgf signaling

The organizer at the midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB) forms at the interface between Otx2 and Gbx2 expressing cell populations, but how these gene expression domains are set up and integrated with the remaining machinery controlling MHB development is unclear. Here we report the isolation, mapping, chromosomal synteny and spatiotemporal expression of gbx1 and gbx2 in zebrafish. We focus in particular on the expression of these genes during development of the midbrain-hindbrain territory. Our results suggest that these genes function in this area in a complex fashion, as evidenced by their highly dynamic expression patterns and relation to Fgf signaling. Analysis of gbx1 and gbx2 expression during formation of the MHB in mutant embryos for pax2.1, fgf8 and pou2 (noi, ace, spg), as well as Fgf-inhibition experiments, show that gbx1 acts upstream of these genes in MHB development. In contrast, gbx2 activation requires ace (fgf8) function, and in the hindbrain primordium, also spg (pou2). We propose that in zebrafish, gbx genes act repeatedly in MHB development, with gbx1 acting during the positioning period of the MHB at gastrula stages, and gbx2 functioning after initial formation of the MHB, from late gastrulation stages onwards. Transplantation studies furthermore reveal that at the gastrula stage, Fgf8 signals from the hindbrain primordium into the underlying mesendoderm. Apart from the general involvement of gbx genes in MHB development reported also in other vertebrates, these results emphasize that early MHB development can be divided into multiple steps with different genetic requirements with respect to gbx gene function and Fgf signaling. Moreover, our results provide an example for switching of a specific gene function of gbx1 versus gbx2 between orthologous genes in zebrafish and mammals.

Directed differentiation of pluripotent cells to neural lineages: homogeneous formation and differentiation of a neurectoderm population

During embryogenesis the central and peripheral nervous systems arise from a neural precursor population, neurectoderm, formed during gastrulation. We demonstrate the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells to neurectoderm in culture, in a manner which recapitulates embryogenesis, with the sequential and homogeneous formation of primitive ectoderm, neural plate and neural tube. Formation of neurectoderm occurs in the absence of extraembryonic endoderm or mesoderm and results in a stratified epithelium of cells with morphology, gene expression and differentiation potential consistent with positionally unspecified neural tube. Differentiation of this population to homogeneous populations of neural crest or glia was also achieved. Neurectoderm formation in culture allows elucidation of signals involved in neural specification and generation of implantable cell populations for therapeutic use.

The homeobox genes Lhx7 and Gbx1 are expressed in the basal forebrain cholinergic system

The specific combination of homeobox genes is proposed to be decisive in the terminal differentiation of neuronal systems. In order to identify combined expression of homeobox genes in the ventral forebrain, a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction strategy using degenerated primers was employed. We identified, amongst others, Lhx7 and Gbx1, displaying a marked overlapping expression in septal and pallidal areas. Gbx1 and Lhx7 were both expressed in those adult brain nuclei that collectively form the basal forebrain cholinergic system, a prime target of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Indeed, we detected Lhx7 within cholinergic neurons, whereas the related Lhx6 gene was found in adjacent neurons. From these data we suggest that combined expression of Lhx7 and Gbx1 plays a role in the development of the cholinergic system of the basal forebrain. It is speculated that both genes remain participating in molecular processes in the adult cholinergic neurons, and can be employed to study regulation and survival of these neurons under normal and pathological conditions.

The two Xenopus Gbx2 genes exhibit similar, but not identical expression patterns and can affect head formation

Gbx2 homeobox genes are important for formation and function of the midbrain/hindbrain boundary, namely the isthmic organizer. Two Gbx2 genes were identified in Xenopus laevis, differing in 13 amino acids, including a change in the homeodomain. Xgbx2a is activated earlier during gastrulation and reaches higher levels of expression while Xgbx2b is expressed later, at lower levels and has an additional domain in the ventral blood islands. Their overexpression results in microcephalic embryos with shortened axes and defects in brain and notochord formation. Both genes encode functionally homologous proteins, which differ primarily in their temporal and spatial expression patterns.

Otxgenes in the development and evolution of the vertebrate brain

Most of the gene candidates for the control of developmental programmes that underlie brain morphogenesis in vertebrates are the orthologues of Drosophila genes coding for signalling molecules or transcription factors. Among these, the orthodenticle group, including the Drosophila orthodenticle (otd) and the vertebrate Otx1 and Otx2 genes, is mostly involved in fundamental processes of anterior neural patterning. In mouse, Drosophila and intermediate species otd/Otx genes have shown a remarkable similarity in expression pattern suggesting that they could be part of a conserved control system operating in the brain and different from that coded by the HOX complexes controlling the hindbrain and spinal cord. In order to verify this hypothesis, a series of mouse models have been generated in which the functions of the murine Otx genes were: (i) fully inactivated, (ii) replaced with each other, and (iii) replaced with the Drosophila otd gene. The data obtained highlight a crucial role for the Otx genes in specification, regionalization and terminal differentiation of rostral central nervous system and lead to hypothesize that modification of their regulatory control may have influenced the morphogenesis and evolution of the brain.

Otx genes in brain morphogenesis

Most of the gene candidates for the control of developmental programmes that underlie brain morphogenesis in vertebrates are the homologues of Drosophila genes coding for signalling molecules or transcription factors. Among these, the orthodenticle group includes the Drosophila orthodenticle (otd) and the vertebrate Otx1 and Otx2 genes, which are mostly involved in fundamental processes of anterior neural patterning. These genes encode transcription factors that recognise specific target sequences through the DNA binding properties of the homeodomain. In Drosophila, mutations of otd cause the loss of the anteriormost head neuromere where the gene is transcribed, suggesting that it may act as a segmentation "gap" gene. In mouse embryos, the expression patterns of Otx1 and Otx2 have shown a remarkable similarity with the Drosophila counterpart. This suggested that they could be part of a conserved control system operating in the brain and different from that coded by the HOX complexes controlling the hindbrain and spinal cord. To verify this hypothesis a series of mouse models have been generated in which the functions of the murine genes were: (i) fully inactivated, (ii) replaced with each others, (iii) replaced with the Drosophila otd gene. Otx1-/- mutants suffer from epilepsy and are affected by neurological, hormonal, and sense organ defects. Otx2-/- mice are embryonically lethal, they show gastrulation impairments and fail in specifying anterior neural plate. Analysis of the Otx1-/-; Otx2+/- double mutants has shown that a minimal threshold level of the proteins they encode is required for the correct positioning of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB). In vivo otd/Otx reciprocal gene replacement experiments have provided evidence of a general functional equivalence among otd, Otx1 and Otx2 in fly and mouse. Altogether these data highlight a crucial role for the Otx genes in specification, regionalization and terminal differentiation of rostral central nervous system (CNS) and lead to hypothesize that modification of their regulatory control may have influenced morphogenesis and evolution of the brain.

Homeobox genes in the Australian lungfish, Neoceratodus forsteri

The aim of the present study was to determine whether the postulated gnathostome duplication from four to eight Hox clusters occurred before or after the split between the actinopterygian and sarcopterygian fish by characterizing Hox genes from the sarcopterygian lungfish, Neoceratodus forsteri. Since lungfish have extremely large genomes, we took the approach of extracting pure high molecular weight (MW) genomic DNA to act as a template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the conserved homeobox domain of the highly conserved Hox genes. The 21 clones thus obtained were sequenced and translated in a BLASTX protein database search to designate Hox gene identity. Fourteen of the clones were from Hox genes, two were Hox pseudogenes, four were Gbx genes, and one most closely resembled the homeobox gene, insulin upstream factor 1. The Hox genes identified were from all four tetrapod clusters A, B, C, and D, confirming their presence in lungfish, and there is no evidence to suggest more than these four functional Hox clusters, as is the case in teleosts. A comparison of Hox group 13 amino acid sequences of lungfish, zebrafish, and mouse provides firm evidence that the expansion of Hox clusters, as seen in zebrafish, occurred after separation of the actinopterygian and sarcopterygian lineages. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 285:140-145, 1999.

Expression of Gbx-2 during early development of the chick embryo

Gbx-2 is required for the normal development of the anterior hindbrain. Since much of our understanding of the normal development of this region derives from studies of avian embryos, we have determined the expression of Gbx-2 in chick embryos at stages relevant to the regionalization of the hindbrain. As the neural plate forms transcripts already have a clear anterior limit of expression and, subsequently, occupy a domain extending from the extreme posterior midbrain to the rhombomere 3/4 boundary. Subsequently, expression is restricted to the isthmus, a dorsal stripe of expression extending throughout the hindbrain in the ventricular region and the cells adjacent to rhombomere boundaries. Transcripts were also detected in pharyngeal endoderm, the otic placode and vesicle, pharyngeal arches and somites.

Blocking N-cadherin function disrupts the epithelial structure of differentiating neural tissue in the embryonic chicken brain

The cell adhesion molecule N-cadherin is ubiquitously expressed in the early neuroepithelium, with strongest expression in the ependymal lining. We blocked the function of N-cadherin during early chicken brain development by injecting antibodies against N-cadherin into the tectal ventricle of embryos at 4-5 d of incubation [embryonic day 4 (E4)-E5]. N-cadherin blockage results in massive morphological changes in restricted brain regions. At approximately E6, these changes consist of invaginations of pieces of the ependymal lining and the formation of neuroepithelial rosettes. The rosettes are composed of central fragments of ependymal lining, surrounded by an inner ventricular layer and an outer mantle layer. Radial glia processes are radially arranged around the ependymal centers of the rosettes. The normal layering of the neural tissue is thus preserved, but its coherent epithelial structure is disrupted. The observed morphological changes are restricted to specific brain regions such as the tectum and the dorsal thalamus, whereas the ventral thalamus and the pretectum are almost undisturbed. At E10-E11, analysis of late effects of N-cadherin blockage reveals that in the dorsal thalamus, gray matter is fragmented and disorganized; in the tectum, additional layers have formed at the ventricular surface. Together, these results indicate that N-cadherin function is required for the maintenance of a coherent sheet of neuroepithelium in specific brain regions. Disruption of this sheet results in an abnormal morphogenesis of brain gray matter.

Expression and regulation of Lhx6 and Lhx7, a novel subfamily of LIM homeodomain encoding genes, suggests a role in mammalian head development

LIM-homeobox containing (Lhx) genes encode trascriptional regulators which play critical roles in a variety of developmental processes. We have identified two genes belonging to a novel subfamily of mammalian Lhx genes, designated Lhx6 and Lhx7. Whole-mount in situ hybridisation showed that Lhx6 and Lhx7 were expressed during mouse embryogenesis in overlapping domains of the first branchial arch and the basal forebrain. More specifically, expression of Lhx6 and Lhx7 was detected prior to initiation of tooth formation in the presumptive oral and odontogenic mesenchyme of the maxillary and mandibular processes. During tooth formation, expression was restricted to the mesenchyme of individual teeth. Using explant cultures, we have shown that expression of Lhx6 and Lhx7 in mandibular mesenchyme was under the control of signals derived from the overlying epithelium; such signals were absent from the epithelium of the non-odontogenic second branchial arch. Furthermore, expression studies and bead implantation experiments in vitro have provided strong evidence that Fgf8 is primarily responsible for the restricted expression of Lhx6 and Lhx7 in the oral aspect of the maxillary and mandibular processes. In the telencephalon, expression of both genes was predominantly localised in the developing medial ganglionic eminences, flanking a Fgf8-positive midline region. We suggest that Fgf8 and Lhx6 and Lhx7 are key components of signalling cascades which determine morphogenesis and differentiation in the first branchial arch and the basal forebrain.

The mouse homeobox gene, Gbx2: genomic organization and expression in pluripotent cells in vitro and in vivo

The Gbx2 homeodomain is widely conserved in metazoans. We investigated the mouse Gbx2 locus by isolation and characterization of genomic clones and by physical localization to the genome. The Gbx2 gene contained a single intron that separated the proposed functional protein domains. This organization was conserved with human GBX2. Physical localization of Gbx2 to Chromosome 1C5-E1 indicated that the genomic relationship between the linked Gbx2 and En1 genes differs between mouse and human, making it unlikely to be of functional significance. We also extended the known expression pattern of Gbx2 beyond the gastrulation stage embryo and the developing CNS to pluripotent cells in vitro and in vivo. Gbx2 expression was demonstrated in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells but was downregulated in differentiated cell populations. In the embryo, Gbx2 expression was detected before primitive streak formation, in the inner cell mass of the preimplantation embryo. Gbx2 is therefore a candidate control gene for cell pluripotency and differentiation in the embryo.

Specification of the anterior hindbrain and establishment of a normal mid/hindbrain organizer is dependent on Gbx2 gene function

Analysis of mouse embryos homozygous for a loss-of-function allele of Gbx2 demonstrates that this homeobox gene is required for normal development of the mid/hindbrain region. Gbx2 function appears to be necessary at the neural plate stage for the correct specification and normal proliferation or survival of anterior hindbrain precursors. It is also required to maintain normal patterns of expression at the mid/hindbrain boundary of Fgf8 and Wnt1, genes that encode signaling molecules thought to be key components of the mid/hindbrain (isthmic) organizer. In the absence of Gbx2 function, isthmic nuclei, the cerebellum, motor nerve V, and other derivatives of rhombomeres 1–3 fail to form. Additionally, the posterior midbrain in the mutant embryos appears to be extended caudally and displays abnormalities in anterior/posterior patterning. The failure of anterior hindbrain development is presumably due to the loss of Gbx2 function in the precursors of the anterior hindbrain. However, since Gbx2 expression is not detected in the midbrain it seems likely that the defects in midbrain anterior/posterior patterning result from an abnormal isthmic signaling center. These data provide genetic evidence for a link between patterning of the anterior hindbrain and the establishment of the mid/hindbrain organizer, and identify Gbx2 as a gene required for these processes to occur normally.

Cloning and expression analysis of cadherin-10 in the CNS of the chicken embryo

A full-length cDNA of a novel cadherin of chicken (cad10) was cloned. The deduced amino acid sequence of the putative cytoplasmic domain of this molecule is highly homologous to a previously published cytoplasmic fragment of human cadherin-10, a type II cadherin. An in situ hybridization analysis in chicken embryos shows that cad10 expression starts at about 4 days' incubation (E4) and persists at least until the hatching stage. In the central nervous system (CNS), cad10 expression is spatially restricted at all stages of development. At early stages, expression reflects the neuromeric organization of the brain. For example, in the alar plate of the diencephalon, cad10 expression is restricted to the dorsal thalamic neuromere. A number of cad10-expressing brain nuclei are formed in this neuromeric domain during later development. Specific cad10-expressing gray matter structures are also found in all other major divisions of the brain. Many of these structures are known to be functionally connected to each other. The cad10 expression pattern is distinct from that of other cadherins. These results support the idea that cadherins provide a molecular code for the regionalization of the embryonic CNS at the different stages of development.

Expression of the cell adhesion molecule axonin-1 in neuromeres of the chicken diencephalon

Axonin-1/TAG-1, a member of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily of adhesion molecules, has been shown to be selectively expressed by a subset of neurons and fiber tracts in the developing nervous system of vertebrates. Axonin-1/TAG-1 is thought to play a role in the outgrowth, guidance, and fasciculation of neurites. In the present study, we map the expression of axonin-1 in the diencephalon of the chicken brain at early and intermediate stages of development [2-8 days of incubation; embryonic day (E)2-E8] by immunohistochemical methods. Results show that axonin-1 is first expressed at about E2.5 by postmitotic neurons scattered throughout most of the diencephalon. During the neuromeric stage of brain development (about E3-E5), axonin-1+ nerve cell bodies are predominantly found in two neuromeric subdivisions: 1) in the alar plate of the precommissural pretectum and dorsal thalamus and 2) in the posterior preoptic region of the hypothalamus. The axonin-1+ fiber bundles emerging from these areas grow across segmental boundaries. For example, axonin-1+ neurites originating in the dorsal thalamus cross the zona limitans intrathalamica at a right angle to project to the striatum. Later, the axonin-1+ neuromere areas give rise to particular axonin-1+ gray and white matter structures. Most of these structures correspond to the structures described to express TAG-1 in rodents. In conclusion, axonin-1 can be used as a marker to study aspects of the transition from the early neuromeric structure to the mature anatomy of the chicken brain.

Restricted expression of cadherin-8 in segmental and functional subdivisions of the embryonic mouse brain

We have cloned full-length cDNA of a novel mouse cadherin ("mCad8"). The deduced amino acid sequence of the mature form of mCad8 shows 98.2% identity with the sequence of human cadherin-8. The expression of mCad8 was studied by in situ hybridization in mouse embryos of 9.5-14 days gestation (E9.5-E14). Results show that mCad8 expression is restricted to particular subdivisions of the early central nervous system (CNS) and to the thymus. In the CNS, mCad8 expression was observed from E11.5. In the telencephalon, mCad8 is expressed by the ventricular layer of the ganglionic eminence, by cortical areas, and by cells at the caudato-pallial angle. In the diencephalon, the margins of one mCad8-positive area correspond to the borders of the ventral thalamic neuromere, as confirmed by mapping the expression of gene regulatory proteins (Dlx-2, Pax-6, and Gbx-2). In the rhombencephalon, two large groups of mCad8-expressing cells were seen in the pons and in an area of the lateral basal plate of the myelencephalon. These groups of cells extend from the intermediate zone to the mantle zone at E12.5 and later form the anlage of the pontine and the facial nuclei. In conclusion, the expression of mCad8 reflects, in part, the neuromeric organization of the early embryonic CNS. In the mantle layer, mCad8 is expressed by developing gray matter structures, such as brain nuclei, suggesting a role for mCad8 in brain morphogenesis.

Anterior primitive endoderm may be responsible for patterning the anterior neural plate in the mouse embryo

BACKGROUND

After implantation, the basic body plan of the mammalian embryo is established during gastrulation when the epithelial founder tissue of the fetus, the epiblast, gives rise to new tissues by ingression through the primitive streak. Formation of the primitive streak defines the caudal aspect of the embryo and thus the anteroposterior axis. Further patterning of this axis has been attributed to signals produced by tissues arising from the primitive streak, and in particular the mesendoderm located along the midline of the embryo is thought to be responsible for the correct anteroposterior subdivision of the neurectoderm as it begins to form the central nervous system (CNS).

RESULTS

In situ hybridization studies show that the onset of expression of the homeobox-containing gene Hesx1 coincides with the formation of the primitive streak, but occurs on the opposite side of the embryo, in a small domain of anterior endoderm. Lineage tracing using a lipophilic fluorescent label shows that the first endoderm cells to express Hesx1 are not destined to contribute to the future embryo, but instead belong to the primitive endoderm lineage and will be displaced by definitive endoderm arising from the primitive streak during gastrulation. Approximately 24 hours after Hesx1 transcripts are first detected in the endoderm, they start to appear in adjacent ectoderm that gives rise to the most anterior component of the developing CNS, the prosencephalon, which continues to express Hesx1. Eventually, Hesx1 transcripts are detectable only in Rathke's pouch as the pituitary starts to develop. Removal of endoderm cells expressing Hesx1 during the earlier stages of gastrulation either prevents or severely curtails the later expression of Hesx1 in ectoderm and neurectoderm, but does not affect gene expression in more caudal regions of the developing CNS.

CONCLUSIONS

As overt anterior pattern is present in the visceral embryonic endoderm prior to formation of any axial mesendoderm, a mechanism for bestowing anterior pattern must exist which is independent of primitive streak descendants. Furthermore, correct molecular patterning of the most rostral neurectoderm appears to depend on the presence of this anterior visceral embryonic endoderm during the early stages of gastrulation. We propose that primitive endoderm is responsible for the initial induction of rostral identity in the embryo, and in particular for the correct definition of the future prosencephalic neurectoderm. Subsequently, this identity will be reinforced and maintained by axial mesendoderm when it displaces the visceral embryonic endoderm during the course of gastrulation.

Checklist: vertebrate homeobox genes

Up to now around 170 different homeobox genes have been cloned from vertebrate genomes. A compilation of the various isolates from mouse, chick, frog, fish and man is presented in the form of a concise checklist, including the designations from the original publications. Putative homologs from different species are aligned, and key characteristics of embryonic or adult expression domains, as well as mutant phenotypes are briefly indicated.

The Xenopus laevis homeobox gene Xgbx-2 is an early marker of anteroposterior patterning in the ectoderm

In a search for homeobox genes expressed during early Xenopus development, we have isolated a gene which appears to be the Xenopus cognate of the mouse Gbx-2 gene. Expression of Xgbx-2 is first detectable by in situ hybridization at the midgastrula stage when it is predominantly expressed in the dorsolateral ectoderm, with a gap in expression at the dorsal midline. By the end of gastrulation and during neurulation, Xgbx-2 is expressed dorsolaterally in the neural ectoderm and laterally and ventrally in the epidermis with sharp anterior expression borders in both tissues. The anteriormost expression in the neural ectoderm persists throughout the early stages of development, and was mapped to the region of rhombomere 1, with an anterior expression border in the region of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Thus Xgbx-2 is expressed anterior to the Hox genes. Xgbx-2 expression is induced by retinoic acid (RA) in animal caps, and RA treatment of whole embryos expands and enhances Xgbx-2 expression in the ectoderm. We suggest a role for Xgbx-2 in establishing the midbrain-hindbrain boundary, which appears to separate early neurectodermal regions expressing genes that are positively and negatively regulated by RA.