Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a clinical controversy

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: past, present and future

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome and the concept of a causal relationship to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, despite the controversy, has presented a clinically relevant conflict for decades. Historically surgeons, and now gastroenterologists have expended tremendous efforts towards trying to better understand the dilemma that is confounded by unique patient phenotypes. Areas covered: This review encompasses the literature from a century of experience on the topic of post-cholecystectomy syndrome. Relevant historical and anecdotal experiences are examined in the setting of insights from evaluation of recently available controlled data. Expert commentary: Historical observations and recent data suggest that patients with post-cholecystectomy syndrome can be categorized as follows. Patients with sphincter of Oddi stenosis will most often benefit from treatment with sphincterotomy. Patients with classic biliary pain and some objective evidence of biliary obstruction may have a sphincter of Oddi disorder and should be considered for endoscopic evaluation and therapy. Patients with atypical post-cholecystectomy pain, without any evidence consistent with biliary obstruction, and/or with evidence for another diagnosis or dysfunction should not undergo ERCP.

[Sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia]

Sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia is a functional disorder of the papillary region which can lead to clinical symptoms due to functional obstruction of biliary and pancreatic outflow. Based on the severity of the clinical symptoms the disorder can be graded into three types (biliary and pancreatic types I-III). The manometric diagnosis of this disorder using sphincter of Oddi manometry is hampered by the relatively high risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Although papillary manometry is often carried out in North America, in Europe this is the exception rather than the rule. Manometrically, sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia is characterized by an increased pressure in the biliary and/or the pancreatic sphincter segments and can be treated by endoscopic papillotomy. This overview counterbalances the arguments for primary invasive diagnostics and a pragmatic clinical approach, i.e. papillotomy should be directly carried out when a sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia is clinically suspected. For patients with biliary or pancreatic type I, endoscopic papillotomy is the treatment of choice. In biliary type II sphincter of Oddi manometry could be helpful for clinical decision-making; however, the exact risk-benefit ratio is still difficult to assess. In type III patient selection and the low predictive value of manometry for treatment success questions the clinical usefulness of sphincter of Oddi manometry.

Can patient and pain characteristics predict manometric sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with clinically suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction?

BACKGROUND

Biliopancreatic-type postcholecystectomy pain, without significant abnormalities on imaging and laboratory test results, has been categorized as "suspected" sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) type III. Clinical predictors of "manometric" SOD are important to avoid unnecessary ERCP, but are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess which clinical factors are associated with abnormal sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM).

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional.

SETTING

Tertiary.

PATIENTS

A total of 214 patients with suspected SOD type III underwent ERCP and pancreatic SOM (pSOM; 85% dual SOM), at 7 U.S. centers (from August 2008 to March 2012) as part of a randomized trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Pain and gallbladder descriptors, psychosocial/functional disorder questionnaires.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Abnormal SOM findings. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed associations between clinical characteristics and outcome.

RESULTS

The cohort was 92% female with a mean age of 38 years. Baseline pancreatic enzymes were increased in 5%; 9% had minor liver enzyme abnormalities. Pain was in the right upper quadrant (RUQ) in 90% (48% also epigastric); 51% reported daily abdominal discomfort. Fifty-six took narcotics an average of 33 days (of the past 90 days). Less than 10% experienced depression or anxiety. Functional disorders were common. At ERCP, 64% had abnormal pSOM findings (34% both sphincters, 21% biliary normal), 36% had normal pSOM findings, and 75% had at least abnormal 1 sphincter. Demographic factors, gallbladder pathology, increased pancreatobiliary enzymes, functional disorders, and pain patterns did not predict abnormal SOM findings. Anxiety, depression, and poorer coping were more common in patients with normal SOM findings (not significant on multivariate analysis).

LIMITATIONS

Generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and pain factors and psychological comorbidity do not predict SOM results at ERCP in suspected type III SOD. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00688662.).

Endoscopic approach to the patient with motility disorders of the bile duct and sphincter of Oddi

Since its original description by Oddi in 1887, the sphincter of Oddi has been the subject of much study. Furthermore, the clinical syndrome of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) and its therapy are controversial areas. Nevertheless, SOD is commonly diagnosed and treated by physicians. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and current diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of SOD.

The diagnosis and management of Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a benign pathological syndrome. The clinical manifestations may be a consequence of an anatomical stenosis or sphincter dysmotility. Manometry is invasive and has an associated morbidity. Non-invasive investigations have been evaluated to ameliorate risk but have unknown efficacy. The review aims to critically appraise current evidence for the diagnosis and management of SOD.

METHODS

A systematic review of articles containing relevant search terms was performed.

RESULTS

Manometry is the current gold standard in selecting which patients are likely to benefit from endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). It can, however, be misleading. Several non-invasive investigations were identified. These have poor sensitivities and specificities compared to manometry. There is a paucity of data examining the investigation's specific ability to select patients for ES. Outcomes of ES for Type I SOD are favourable irrespective of manometry. Types II and III SOD may respond to an initial trial of medical therapy. Manometry may predict response to ES in Type II SOD, but not in Type III.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-invasive investigations currently lack sufficient sensitivities and specificities for routine use in diagnosing SOD. Type I SOD should be treated with ES without manometry. Manometry may be useful for Type II SOD. However, whilst data is lacking a therapeutic trial of Botox(TM) or trial stenting may bean alternative. Careful and thorough patient counselling is essential. Type III SOD is associated with high complications from manometry and poor outcomes from ES. Alternative diagnoses should be thoroughly sought and its management should be medical.

Challenges in planning and initiating a randomized clinical study of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a controversial topic, especially in patients with no objective findings on laboratory or imaging studies (SOD type III). The value of ERCP manometry with sphincterotomy is unproven and carries significant risks.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the process of planning and initiating a randomized sham-controlled study to establish whether patients with SOD respond to sphincter ablation, and whether the outcomes are predicted by the pain patterns, presence or absence of other functional GI or psychosocial problems, or the results of manometry.

DESIGN

Planning a trial to establish which patients with "suspected SOD" (if any) respond to endoscopic sphincter ablation.

SETTING

Meetings and correspondence by a planning group of gastroenterologists and clinical research specialists hosted at the Medical University of South Carolina.

PATIENTS

Clarifying subject characteristics and inclusion and exclusion criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

Defining the questionnaires, therapies, randomizations, and numbers of subjects required by outcome measures. Defining the metrics of success and failure.

RESULTS

The planning resulted in funding for the proposed study as a cooperative agreement with the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of data required several consensus decisions in designing the protocol.

CONCLUSION

The planning process was challenging, and some changes were needed after initiation.

Postcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS)

The term postcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS) comprises a heterogeneous group of symptoms and findings in patients who have previously undergone cholecystectomy. Although rare, these patients may present with abdominal pain, jaundice or dyspeptic symptoms. Many of these complaints can be attributed to complications including bile duct injury, biliary leak, biliary fistula and retained bile duct stones. Late sequelae include recurrent bile duct stones and bile duct strictures. With the number of cholecystectomies being performed increasing in the laparoscopic era the number of patients presenting with PCS is also likely to increase. We briefly explore the syndrome and its main aetiological theories.

Pancreatic sphincterotomy: Technique, indications, and complications

Pancreatic sphincterotomy serves as the cornerstone of endoscopic therapy of the pancreas. Historically, its indications have been less well-defined than those of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, yet it plays a definite and useful role in diseases such as chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. In the appropriate setting, it may be used as a single therapeutic maneuver, or in conjunction with other endoscopic techniques such as pancreatic stone extraction or stent placement. The current standard of practice utilizes two different methods of performing pancreatic sphincterotomy: a pull-type sphincterotome technique without prior stent placement, and a needle-knife sphincterotome technique over an existing stent. The complications associated with pancreatic sphincterotomy are many, although acute pancreatitis appears to be the most common and the most serious of the early complications. As such, it continues to be reserved for those endoscopists who perform a relatively high-volume of therapeutic pancreaticobiliary endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography.

Characterization of functional biliary pain and dyspeptic symptoms in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: Effect of papillotomy

AIM: To characterize functional biliary pain and other gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in postcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS) patients with and without sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) proved by endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry (ESOM), and to assess the post-endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) outcome.

METHODS: We prospectively investigated 85 cholecystectomized patients referred for ERCP because of PCS and suspected SOD. On admission, all patients completed our questionnaire. Physical examination, laboratory tests, abdominal ultrasound, quantitative hepatobiliary scintigraphy (QHBS), and ERCP were performed in all patients. Based on clinical and ERCP findings 15 patients had unexpected bile duct stone disease and 15 patients had SOD biliary typeI. ESOM demonstrated an elevated basal pressure in 25 patients with SOD biliary-type III. In the remaining 30 cholecystectomized patients without SOD, the liver function tests, ERCP, QHBS and ESOM were all normal. As a control group, 30 ‘asymptomatic’ cholecystectomized volunteers (attended to our hospital for general cardiovascular screening) completed our questionnaire, which is consisted of 50 separate questions on GI symptoms and abdominal pain characteristics. Severity of the abdominal pain (frequency and intensity) was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS). In 40 of 80 patients having definite SOD (i.e. patients with SOD biliary typeIand those with elevated SO basal pressure on ESOM), an EST was performed just after ERCP. In these patients repeated questionnaires were filled at each follow-up visit (at 3 and 6 mo) and a second look QHBS was performed 3 mo after the EST to assess the functional response to EST.

RESULTS: The analysis of characteristics of the abdominal pain demonstrated that patients with common bile duct stone and definite SOD had a significantly higher score of symptomatic agreement with previously determined biliary-like pain features than patient groups of PCS without SOD and controls. In contrary, no significant differences were found when the pain severity scores were compared in different groups of PCS patients. In patients with definite SOD, EST induced a significant acceleration of the transpapillary bile flow; and based on the comparison of VASs obtained from the pre- and post-EST questionnaires, the severity scores of abdominal pain were significantly improved, however, only 15 of 35 (43%) patients became completely pain free. Post-EST severity of abdominal pain by VASs was significantly higher in patients with predominant dyspepsia at initial presentation as compared to those without dyspeptic symptoms.

CONCLUSION: Persistent GI symptoms and general patient dissatisfaction is a rather common finding after EST in patients with SOD, and correlated with the presence of predominant dyspeptic symptoms at the initial presentation, but does not depend on the technical and functional success of EST.

Systematic review: sphincter of Oddi dysfunction--non-invasive diagnostic methods and long-term outcome after endoscopic sphincterotomy

BACKGROUND

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a benign, functional gastrointestinal disorder for which invasive endoscopic therapy with potential complications is often recommended.

AIMS

To review the available evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive methods that have been used to establish the diagnosis and to estimate the long-term outcome after endoscopic sphincterotomy.

METHODS

A systematic review of English language articles and abstracts containing relevant terms was performed.

RESULTS

Non-invasive diagnostic methods are limited by their low sensitivity and specificity, especially in patients with Type III sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography appears to be useful in excluding other potential causes of symptoms, and morphine-provocated hepatobiliary scintigraphy also warrants further study. Approximately 85%, 69% and 37%, of patients with biliary Types I, II and III sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, respectively, experience sustained benefit after endoscopic sphincterotomy. In pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, approximately 75% of patients report symptomatic improvement after pancreatic sphincterotomy, but the studies have been non-controlled and heterogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, particularly those with biliary Type III, should be carefully evaluated before considering sphincter of Oddi manometry and endoscopic sphincterotomy. Further controlled trials are needed to justify the invasive management of patients with biliary Type III and pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Calcium channel antagonists and inhibition of human sphincter of Oddi contractions

OBJECTIVE

Nifedipine has been used in the treatment of sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia, a biliary disease characterized by upper abdominal pains and increased pressure in the sphincter. The effects of other calcium channel antagonists on sphincter of Oddi have not been elucidated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We compared the effects of three calcium blockers with differing smooth muscle selectivity (verapamil, nifedipine and felodipine) on human sphincter of Oddi contractions. Transverse sections of the sphincter obtained from five patients undergoing Whipple resection were studied in an organ bath chamber in vitro.

RESULTS

All three calcium blockers significantly (>50%) inhibited the acetylcholine-induced and KCl-induced sphincter contractions in a dose-dependent manner. Both nifedipine and felodipine were more potent than verapamil in inhibiting the acetylcholine-induced contractions, whereas only nifedipine, but not felodipine, reduced the KCl-elicited contractions more than verapamil.

CONCLUSIONS

The smooth muscle selective calcium channel antagonists are potent inhibitors of human sphincter of Oddi contractions. Although nifedipine is, to date, the only agent studied in clinical settings, other dihydropyridines are also likely to be useful in sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia.

Diagnosing and treating Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a critical literature review and reevaluation

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a pathologic syndrome, without considering etiology, physiopathology, or anatomic aspects of the condition. The clinical manifestations of the syndrome may be a consequence of an "organic stenosis" of the tract or a consequence of "abnormal motility" of the sphincter. Until some years ago, the gold standard technique for studying and treating this pathologic condition was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Two criteria for defining patients in the Milwaukee classification are related to this procedure. The Milwaukee classification was introduced to use clinical and radiologic criteria to define patients with Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction to choose the best treatment. Subsequently, great emphasis has been placed on manometry of the sphincter performed by endoscopic cannulation. The enormous increase of cholecystectomies by means of laparoscopic technique has increased the number of patients who return to their reference-surgeon with a post-cholecystectomy pain and possible Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The aim of this paper is to review the literature and to evaluate an up-to-date flow chart for diagnosing and treating the syndrome by using alternative diagnostic procedures that are less invasive than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Key issues in sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

SOD is a challenging condition that is difficult to diagnose and treat. The high failure rate of endoscopic and surgical treatment reflects the difficulties in establishing accurate diagnosis and the lack of specific objective criteria by which appropriate therapy could be determined. In general, sphincter ablation should be offered for type I patients. An initial trial of medical therapy is appropriate for type II patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms and for all type III patients. SOM is highly recommended for type II patients and is mandatory for all type III patients if sphincter ablation is contemplated. Other causes of abdominal pain such as chronic pancreatitis or functional disorders should be considered in patients not benefiting from sphincter ablation. All procedures on the sphincter should be undertaken with caution after meticulous investigation, and patient selection should be based on strict objective criteria.

Incomplete response to endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: evidence for a chronic pain disorder

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) remains controversial. Although some studies have shown a positive impact on patient symptoms after treatment, these reports have been largely qualitative and evaluated on short-term response. The aim of our study was to quantitatively measure the long-term outcomes of endoscopic therapy in patients with SOD.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with suspected SOD underwent selective sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) of the biliary and/or pancreatic sphincter. Each patient completed a telephone-based survey measuring symptomatic pain before and after SOM +/- ES. The questioner was blinded to the results of SOM. The patients with normal SOM or SOD but who did not undergo ES served as controls.

RESULTS

Of these 33 patients (27 women, mean age 48.7 yr, range 13-74), 19 (57.5%) were found to have SOD (12 biliary, six pancreatic, one both). The average follow-up was 18.1 months (range 7-34). Of the patients with SOD, 17 (89%) underwent ES. At follow-up of the 19 patients undergoing ES, five were taking narcotics for persistent pain, two were taking antidepressants, and 15 identified the endoscopic therapy as the reason for their relief. Of the 14 controls, seven were taking narcotics, seven were taking antidepressants, and two identified the endoscopy as the reason for their relief; some patients were taking both antidepressants and narcotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients found to have SOD who undergo ES are more likely to be improved on long-term follow-up when compared with patients with suspected SOD but normal manometry without ES. However, almost uniformly, despite ES, patients continue to have pain, which is consistent with most chronic pain disorders and which suggests a multifactorial cause for the pain.

Acalculous biliary pain: new concepts for an old entity

Biliary pain is commonly reported in household surveys with the presumed cause being gallstones. When gallstones are absent or other abnormalities as a potential cause of similar pain do not exist, a different approach is necessary. Although trans-abdominal ultrasound can detect stones down to 3-5 mm, the advent of endoscopic ultrasound provides an even better definition for microlithiasis of < 3 mm. Duodenal aspiration of bile can further detect cholesterol microlithiasis or bilirubin granules, another potential source of biliary-type pain and perhaps even pancreatitis. Only in this way can acalculous gallbladder disease be clearly defined. The percentage of cholecystokinin-stimulated gallbladder emptying has been reputed to be the most sensitive diagnostic test for 'biliary dyskinesia', but abnormality of gallbladder emptying can be due to a smooth muscle defect of the gallbladder itself or heightened tone in the sphincter of Oddi. The value of surgical intervention has not been clearly established. The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, however, has increased the number of patients with acalculous biliary disease who undergo surgery. Surgery is best done using impaired gallbladder emptying as the criterion for operation with improved outcome. Often, following cholecystectomy, biliary pain does not resolve the so-called 'post cholecystectomy syndrome'. Absence of the gallbladder as a pressure reservoir leaves the sphincter of Oddi as the prime determinant of bile duct pressure. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction also exists in patients with an intact biliary tract and may become evident following cholecystectomy. Biliary manometry has clarified who might benefit from sphincterotomy. Choledochoscintigraphy is a non-invasive preliminary test. Advent of visceral hypersensitivity and better definition of this entity has shown, that in some of these patients with type III sphincter of Oddi, dysfunction appears to reside in duodenal hyperalgesia. It is clear that improved criteria are required to perform gallbladder emptying and better techniques to detect visceral hypersensitivity. Nonetheless, functional biliary pain in the absence of gallstone disease is a definite entity and a challenge for clinicians.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and other functional biliary disorders: evaluation and treatment

Functional biliary disorders encompass the conditions of SOD and gallbladder dysmotility, both of which result in clinical pain syndromes. Obtaining objective diagnostic and outcomes data for both disorders has been an ongoing challenge over the last two decades. SOD, although initially believed to be strictly a biliary disorder, has now been implicated in recurrent pancreatitis. The biliary-type classification allows a clinician to stratify patients who would benefit from SOM and endoscopic sphincterotomy. Further study into the impact of endoscopic therapy for recurrent pancreatitis is needed. By the same token, the dilemma of postcholecystectomy abdominal pain, whether classified as biliary or pancreatic type III, remains challenging. The current limitations of knowledge highlight the need for prospective randomized studies to evaluate the clinical significance of SOM abnormalities to facilitate treatment of these patients.

Clinical significance of sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia

Sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia (SOD) is a functional disorder of the papilla region that can lead to clinical symptoms and functional obstruction of biliary and pancreatic outflow. Based on the severity of the clinical symptoms, the disorder is classified as one of three types (biliary or pancreatic type I-III). Diagnosis of SOD is hampered by the relative risk of endoscopic sphincter manometry to cause pancreatitis. Manometrically, SOD is characterized by increased pressure in the biliary or pancreatic sphincter segment and can be treated with endoscopic papillotomy. This review is an attempt to balance the arguments for invasive diagnosis with a pragmatic clinical approach in which papillotomy is performed if clinical suspicion and patient presentation support a dysfunction of the papilla. For patients with biliary or pancreatic type I, endoscopic papillotomy is the treatment of choice. In biliary type II, SO manometry may be helpful for clinical decision making; however, the ratio of risks to benefits is difficult to assess based on the present data. In type III SOD, patient selection and the low predictive value of manometry for treatment success raise questions about the clinical usefulness of SO manometry.

The relationship of bile duct crystals to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Bile duct crystals collected either from the duodenum after gallbladder contraction or directly from bile duct aspiration are surrogates for gallbladder stones and microlithiasis. Whether bile crystals also serve as surrogates for bile duct stones or microlithiasis that forms in the bile duct after cholecystectomy is not known based on current data. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD), due either to muscular spasm or sphincter fibrosis, is a cause of bile duct obstruction. Almost all of the literature on SOD involves patients who have had a prior cholecystectomy. Intuitively, obstruction at the SO following cholecystectomy would seem to lead to biliary stasis and predispose patients to bile duct microlithiasis. However, a recent study did not find bile duct crystals in patients with manometrically diagnosed SOD. The reason for this is unknown, although we hypothesize that cholesterol and bilirubinate crystals are not surrogates for brown pigment stones commonly found in patients following cholecystectomy.

Sonography of the common bile duct and the gallbladder during ceruletid infusion

In the present study, we investigated a new sonographic test to confirm or exclude partial common bile duct (CBD) obstruction, hereinafter called "dynamic cholangio-cholecysto sonography (DCCS)." Healthy controls (6) and patients with low- to intermediate probability for partial CBD obstruction (17) were investigated. DCCS started with three baseline masurements of gallbladder volume and CBD diameter, which were then repeated every 2 to 3 min for 45 min during a 30-min infusion of ceruletid. According to CBD diameter change during gallbladder contraction, DCCS was considered positive (> 1 mm), negative (< 0.5 mm) or equivocal (remainder). After DCCS, all patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) and all but one patient had endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). A follow-up examination was performed at least 4 weeks after ERCP. Based on these results, an outcome score was calculated to classify the patients as having a flow-relevant CBD obstruction or not. DCCS was true positive in 4 patients (sensitivity 66%, positive predictive value 100%). DCCS was false-negative in 1 patient and equivocal in another patient. DCCS was true-negative in 9 patients (specifity 82%, negative predictive value 90%). Two patients without flow-relevant CBD obstruction had equivocal DCCS test results. DCCS might be used as a noninvasive test for further workup of patients with low- to intermediate probability of flow relevant CBD obstruction, helping to avoid unnecessary ERCP and to serve as an additional indication for ERCP and EST.

Comparison of sphincter of Oddi manometry, fatty meal sonography, and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in the diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) afflicts approximately 1% to 5% of patients after cholecystectomy. The diagnostic standard for SOD is sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM), a technically difficult, invasive test that is frequently complicated by pancreatitis. A sensitive and accurate noninvasive imaging modality is thus needed for the diagnosis of SOD. Quantitative hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and fatty meal sonography (EMS) are frequently used for this purpose, but results vary. This study compared SOM, HBS, and EMS in the diagnosis of SOD in a large group of patients.

METHODS

Three hundred four consecutive patients after cholecystectomy (38 men, 266 women, age 17-72 years) suspected to have SOD were evaluated by SOM, FMS, and HBS. SOM was considered abnormal if any of the following were observed: (1) increased basal pressure (greater than 40 mm Hg), (2) increased phasic activity with amplitude greater than 350 mm Hg, (3) frequency of contractions greater than 8 per minute, (4) greater than 50% of propagation sequences retrograde, and (5) paradoxical response to cholecystokinin. FMS was considered abnormal if ductal dilation was greater than 2 mm at 45 minutes after fatty meal ingestion. Quantitative HBS was performed with sequential images obtained every 5 minutes for 90 minutes to monitor excretion of the radionuclide. Time-to-peak, halftime, and downslope were calculated according to predetermined ranges.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of SOD was made in 73 patients (24%) by using SOM as the reference standard. HBS was abnormal in 86 whereas EMS was abnormal in 22 patients. A true-positive result was obtained in 15 patients by EMS and 36 patients with HBS. EMS and HBS gave false-positive results, respectively, in 7 and 50 patients. Sensitivity of EMS was 21% and for HBS 49%, whereas specificities were 97% and 78%, respectively. EMS, HBS, or both were abnormal in 90% of patients with Geenen-Hogan Type I SOD, 50% with Type II, and 44% of Type III. Of the 73 patients who underwent sphincterotomy, 40 had a long-term response. Of those with SOD, 11 of 13 patients (85%) with an abnormal HBS and EMS had a good long-term response.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, the largest reported to date, correlation of FMS and HBS with SOM in the diagnosis of SOD was poor. When HBS and EMS are used together, a slight increase in sensitivity can be expected. The accuracy of EMS and HBS in the diagnosis of SOD decreases across the spectrum from Type I to Type III SOD. EMS and HBS, nonetheless, may by of assistance in predicting long-term response to endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with elevated sphincter of Oddi basal pressure.

Cholecystokinin-Stimulated mebrofenin (99mTc-Choletec) hepatobiliary scintigraphy in asymptomatic postcholecystectomy individuals: assessment of specificity, interobserver reliability, and reproducibility

OBJECTIVES

Cholecystokinin-stimulated hepatobiliary scintigraphy (CCK-HBS) is a noninvasive method reported to be highly accurate in the diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Our primary aim was to assess the specificity of CCK-HBS by evaluating its ability to exclude disease in 20 asymptomatic postcholecystectomy individuals. Secondary aims were to assess the interobserver reliability in scoring the CCK-HBS examinations between three blinded observers and to assess reproducibility of CCK-HBS repeated in the same individuals.

METHODS

Twenty asymptomatic postcholecystectomy individuals with normal liver serum chemistries underwent CCK-HBS on two separate occasions. Three nuclear medicine specialists read each CCK-HBS study in a blinded fashion.

RESULTS

There was good agreement between the three observers reading the same scans for both the first scan (kappa = 0.554) and the second scan (kappa = 0.507). There was poor agreement between the first and second scans on the same patient, read by the same nuclear medicine specialist (kappa = 0.062-0.385). The overall specificity of the CCK-HBS score was 77.5%; however, the specificity was only 60% when a true negative was defined as two negative CCK-HBS examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative CCK-HBS is of poor specificity in asymptomatic postcholecystectomy individuals. Hence, it is of questionable value in excluding sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients suspected to suffer from this disorder.

Efficacy of biliary scintigraphy in suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) can pose diagnostic challenges for the physician. SOD is classified into types I, II, and III, but clinical outcome after sphincterotomy for suspected types II and III SOD has been unpredictable. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of types II and III SOD is important because of the increased risk of sphincterotomy in patients with SOD. Endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry (ESOM) is the gold standard for diagnosis of SOD; however, it is associated with significant morbidity and is not an appropriate screening test. Quantitative hepatobiliary scintigraphy (QHBS) has demonstrated good sensitivity as a screening test for SOD in patients following cholecystectomy; however, studies using this methodology are criticized for poor design and patient selection. Recent publications address these criticisms and provide evidence that QHBS and ESOM are comparable diagnostic tools after exclusion of organic biliary obstruction. QHBS can effectively replace invasive ESOM in the diagnostic algorithm of SOD.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: two case reports and a review of the literature

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is an underdiagnosed but important clinical condition. It should be considered in the differential diagnosis of biliary pain when the gallbladder sonogram shows no evidence of gallbladder disease. Hepatobiliary scanning (Tc-99m dimethyl iminodiacetic acid) may provide valuable information in the evaluation of these patients and may be helpful in monitoring response to treatment.

Reliability of visual and quantitative hepatobiliary scintigraphy in the follow-up of patients who have undergone cholecystectomy and transduodenal sphincteroplasty

A noninvasive scintigraphic technique to assess the efficacy of a surgical procedure (e.g., cholecystectomy and transduodenal sphincteroplasty) depends on the development of reliable and accurate qualitative or quantitative diagnostic criteria that allow early recognition of the occurrence and site of complications. For this purpose, the authors divided biliary flow into a four-step progression process and analyzed transit times from the peripheral vein to the gallbladder, common bile duct, and duodenum and the transit time from the common bile duct to the duodenum. These quantitative parameters were assessed in nine healthy volunteers and 31 asymptomatic patients who had previous cholecystectomy to validate their reliability. The results indicate that the four-step Tc-99m HIDA progression analysis provides a reliable, noninvasive evaluation of biliary flow, so that it can be applied to patients who have had cholecystectomy.

The utility of liver function test abnormalities concomitant with biliary symptoms in predicting a favorable response to endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with presumed sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

We sought to study the utility of liver function test abnormalities concomitant with biliary symptoms in predicting a favorable response to endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with Geenen class II sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical course and liver function test results of 24 Geenen-Hogan class II postcholecystectomy patients with biliary colic secondary to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction who did not undergo sphincter of Oddi manometry before treatment with endoscopic sphincterotomy.

RESULTS

Twenty of the 24 patients had an average of 1.4 episodes of abnormal liver function tests associated with biliary colic; eight patients had dilated common bile duct on cholangiogram. Eighteen of the 20 patients with abnormal liver function tests (90%) were pain-free after sphincterotomy; in contrast, only one of four patients (25%) without liver function test changes responded to sphincterotomy. Fisher exact analysis showed that abnormal liver function tests was a significant predictor for favorable response to sphincterotomy with a two-tail p value of 0.018. Of the eight patients with bile duct dilatation, six (75%) responded favorably to sphincterotomy, whereas 13 of 16 patients (81%) without dilatation also responded to sphincterotomy. Analysis of common bile duct dilatation as a predictive factor showed no significance (p=1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the occurrence of abnormal liver function tests during biliary colic may be used to select patients for endoscopic sphincterotomy. Sphincter of Oddi manometry may not be needed in these cases.

Effects of trimebutine on sphincter of Oddi motility in patients with post-cholecystectomy pain

BACKGROUND

Trimebutine is an opiate modulator of the gastrointestinal motility that interacts with enkephalinergic receptors.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of trimebutine (50 mg intravenous injection) on the motility of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) as assessed by endoscopic manometry.

METHODS

Endoscopic manometry was performed on 15 cholecystectomized patients who presented with symptoms suggestive of SO dysfunction. Prior to the endoscopic manometry, endoscopic ultrasonography was performed in order to rule out the possible presence of a bile duct stone.

RESULTS

Injecting trimebutine resulted in a significant increase in the SO antegrade phasic contraction rate (P = 0.02). Trimebutine decreased the basal pressure of the SO (32.5 vs. 27.5 mmHg), but the difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.11). The effects of trimebutine differed depending on the basal SO motility anomalies involved, but the period of latency was similar (mean 89 s: range 30-240 s). The basal anomalies were an increased basal SO pressure of > 40 mmHg in three patients, a tachyoddia (frequency of phasic contractions (PC) > 10/min) in six patients, prolonged PC (> 10 s) in two patients and an absence of phasic contraction in one patient. The basal pressure of the SO decreased in the three patients presenting with SO hyperpressure, but returned to a normal value in one case. The frequency of the PC decreased to normal in three out of the six patients with tachyoddia. The duration of the PC returned to normal in the two patients with prolonged PC whereas their frequencies increased. Prolonged PC developed in the patient without any detectable phasic contraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Trimebutine modulates SO motility in various ways depending on the basal SO motility anomaly observed after cholecystectomy. This regulatory effect suggests the existence of encephalinergic control of SO motility.

Diagnosis and treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a challenge from both the diagnostic and therapeutic point of view. There is much ongoing debate about the accuracy and usefulness of various diagnostic tests, as there is about the effectiveness of proposed therapeutic alternatives.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the past 15 years' literature was undertaken, using the Medline database and cross-referencing of major articles on the subject.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Endoscopic and surgical treatments result in similar outcomes, with considerable failure rates. The latter reflect the difficulties in accurate diagnosis and a lack of sound objective criteria for selecting patients for intervention. In addition, in some patients sphincter of Oddi dysfunction may be only part of a generalized motility disorder of the gastrointestinal tract.

Somatization disorder in sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a biliary disorder with a recognized pathophysiology and demonstrated surgical treatment. We sought to examine whether women with SOD were overrepresented on measures of somatization, sexual and physical abuse, socially compliant attitudes, and familial psychiatric illness.

METHOD

We matched 33 women with SOD to 33 normal controls by age, sex, and race, and, with a case-controlled cross-sectional questionnaire, compared the groups on the study variables. Statistics included a chi 2 for categorical variables, t tests for scores of somatization and attitudes of social desirability, and Pearson correlation coefficients for post hoc associations of variables. Bonferroni corrections were used with chi 2 values to reduce capitalization by chance.

RESULTS

SOD patients exhibited excessive nongastroenterological somatic complaints compared with controls (p < .0001). There was a statistical increase in reports of childhood sexual, but not physical, abuse in the SOD women (p < .02) compared with controls. The severity of the abuse correlated strongly with the severity of somatic complaints. There were no differences in social desirability attitudes or family psychiatric histories of the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that SOD is associated with a high degree of somatization in adulthood, and a mean rate more than four times that of controls in self-reports of sexual abuse in childhood. The severity of childhood sexual abuse is correlated with the severity of somatization in later life. A psychological model for this disorder is suggested by the data. Increased psychiatric attention is indicated in the treatment of women with this disorder.

Does intrabiliary pressure predict basal sphincter of Oddi pressure? A study in patients with and without gallbladders

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic measurement of sphincter of Oddi pressure is a technically difficult procedure requiring significant expertise. Intrabiliary pressure is technically easy to measure. Furthermore, since it is believed that the pathogenesis of pain in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is attributable to increased intrabiliary pressure, its measurement may be more clinically relevant than measurement of sphincter of Oddi pressure.

METHODS

Intrabiliary pressures were blindly measured in 54 patients who had sphincter of Oddi manometry for abdominal pain.

RESULTS

In all patients intrabiliary pressure was significantly higher in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction than those with normal sphincter of Oddi pressure (19.6 +/- 2.2 vs 9.6 +/- 1.2 mm Hg; p < 0.01). These findings were similar when patients were stratified according to presence of intact gallbladder (19.3 +/- 1.6 vs 8.8 +/- 1.4; p < 0.01) and to patients without a gallbladder (20.1 +/- 3.8 vs 12/1 +/- 1.3; p = .034). There was positive correlation between intrabiliary pressure and sphincter of Oddi basal pressure. This correlation was significant both in patients with and without gallbladders.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that increased intrabiliary pressure may be a useful surrogate marker of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Evidence continues to accumulate indicating that sphincter of Oddi dysfunction may give rise to cholestasis, pancreatitis, or upper abdominal pain syndromes. Diagnosis of such dysfunction may be inferred from noninvasive tests or more precisely defined by manometric studies. Both the biliary and pancreatic sphincters are commonly involved. If medical therapy is ineffective, sphincter ablation via endoscopy or laparotomy should be considered for highly symptomatic patients. Complication rates of invasive techniques remain relatively high and risk:benefit ratio should be carefully considered. Future research as to etiology, more defined pathophysiology, more accurate noninvasive evaluation, and optimal therapies are awaited.

Review article: the relative effectiveness of somatostatin and octreotide therapy in pancreatic disease

Somatostatin and octreotide inhibit basal and stimulated pancreatic secretion, stimulate reticuloendothelial system activity, modulate the cytokine cascade and are cytoprotective with respect to the pancreas. These effects of somatostatin and octreotide suggest that both drugs may be useful either in the treatment of pancreatic disorders, or in preventing acute pancreatitis following procedures on the pancreas. In recent years it has become clear that somatostatin is a useful and effective therapy for severe acute pancreatitis and in preventing complications following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), whereas octreotide has no beneficial effect and may be deleterious in both these indications. The differences in the therapeutic efficacy of somatostatin and octreotide in acute pancreatitis and ERCP appears to be related to their differential effects on sphincter of Oddi motility--the native hormone relaxing, and the analogue increasing, its contractility. Consequently, any beneficial effects of octreotide in both acute pancreatitis and ERCP are offset by the increased contractility of the sphincter of Oddi, which results in retention of activated enzymes within the pancreas and further autodigestion of the gland. Somatostatin and octreotide are equally effective in promoting the closure of pancreatic fistulae. However, the time to closure after commencement of therapy is much more variable and longer in patients treated with subcutaneous octreotide than those receiving intravenous somatostatin, possibly as a result of fluctuations in pancreatic enzyme secretion between consecutive administrations of the hormone. Furthermore, the initial potent inhibitory effect of octreotide on pancreatic secretion is lost after 7 days of continuous subcutaneous administration. Therefore, in terms of cost-effectiveness, somatostatin would appear to be the treatment of choice for pancreatic fistulae. Octreotide markedly reduces the complication rates after elective pancreatic surgery. It remains to be established whether somatostatin is as effective as octreotide in this indication.

Effect of gastric distension and duodenal fat infusion on biliary sphincter of Oddi motility in healthy volunteers

Although sphincter of Oddi (SO) dysfunction has been implicated in the pathogenesis of postcholecystectomy syndrome and pancreatitis, little is known about normal physiologic stimuli, such as intraduodenal fat on human SO motility. Furthermore, gastric distension that frequently accompanies endoscopic manometry has been shown in animal studies to affect SO motility. We evaluated the effects of intraduodenal fat and gastric distension on SO basal pressure. Asymptomatic volunteers had SO manometry performed while sequentially performing gastric distension and intraduodenal fat perfusion. Five subjects (ages 29.8 +/- 4.8 years, range 22-35 years) had a mean basal sphincter of Oddi pressure of 23.4 +/- 5 mm Hg (range 17-31 mm Hg). Injection of air into the stomach caused no appreciable change in either intragastric pressure or SO pressure. Intraduodenal fat infusion resulted in a decrease in mean SO basal pressure from 23.4 +/- 5.0 to 4.4 +/- 4.4 mm Hg (P = 0.004). These results demonstrate that gastric distension does not affect SO basal pressure and that intraduodenal fat infusion reduces SO basal pressure.

Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Botulinum toxin is a potent inhibitor of the release of acetylcholine from nerve endings. It has previously been shown that it can effectively reduce lower oesophageal sphincter pressures both in animals and humans with achalasia. This study examined the hypothesis that locally injected botulinum toxin could also reduce sphincter of Oddi pressure in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Two patients with postcholecystectomy pain syndrome were diagnosed with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (by biliary manometry in one patient and by hepatobiliary scanning criteria in the other). Botulinum toxin was injected into the sphincter of Oddi, by a sclerotherapy needle passed through a duodenoscope. In the first patient, intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin reduced sphincter pressure by about 50%, an effect that was sustained for at least four months. In the second patient, intrasphincteric injection caused about a 50% improvement in bile flow, with normalisation of scintigraphy. Neither patient showed any sustained improvement in pain despite these objective findings. Both patients eventually had endoscopic sphincterotomy, which also did not result in symptomatic improvement in either patient. No side effects were seen. Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin is a simple and effective means of lowering sphincter of Oddi pressure. This technique has potential for being useful clinically.

Hepatoduodenal bile transit in cholecystectomized subjects. Relationship with sphincter of Oddi function and diagnostic value

The hepatic hilum-duodenum transit time (HHDT) was evaluated in cholecystectomized subjects to assess its relationship with the motor function of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) and its diagnostic accuracy in the detection of SO dysfunction. The study was performed in asymptomatic controls and symptomatic patients with SO dysfunction before and after sphincterotomy. HHDT showed a direct correlation with manometric SO maximal basal pressure (r = 0.77; P < 0.001) but not with SO phasic activity. In sphincterotomized subjects HHDT did not differ from that of the asymptomatic subjects, and HHDT, which was prolonged before sphincterotomy, normalized after sphincterotomy. HHDT had a 100% specificity and an 83% sensitivity in diagnosing SO dysfunction when compared to SO manometry. In conclusion, the cholescintigraphic HHDT is mainly related to the SO maximal basal pressure, presenting an elevated specificity and a satisfactory sensitivity in the diagnosis of SO dysfunction in cholecystectomized subjects.

Sympathetic suppression attenuates anomalous responses to morphine in unexplained pain after cholecystectomy

Anomalous responses to morphine are common in patients with unexplained pain in the upper abdomen after cholecystectomy and may be linked to activation of the sympathetic nervous system. The hypothesis that sympathetic suppression would attenuate anomalous responses to morphine was tested by a randomized, cross-over trial using a standard challenge with morphine, with and without pretreatment with clonidine (300 micrograms orally, 1 h prior to the administration of morphine). In 13 of the 15 patients who completed the study, pre-treatment with clonidine decreased plasma concentrations of noradrenaline, dopamine and adrenaline by 56, 15 and 25% respectively. This was associated with a significant reduction in morphine-induced pain (p = 0.02) and nausea (p = 0.04) and attenuated increases in plasma aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity (p = 0.03). Clonidine attenuates anomalous responses to morphine, perhaps through effects on sympathetic nervous activity or plasma concentrations of catecholamines.

The treatment of ampullary stenosis by endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST)

A total of 247 patients with a diagnosis of ampullary stenosis were treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Through the study period from 1983 to 1990, 70% of patients had remission of all symptoms and 82% of patients had most symptoms ameliorated. Four times as many precuts were required for patients with ampullary stenosis compared with a similar number of patients with common bile duct stones. When retained common bile duct stones are ruled out, ampullary stenosis is the most common cause for recurrent episodes of "biliary-like-colic" in postcholecystectomy patients. Ampullary stenosis should not be dismissed as a possible diagnosis just because the bile duct is not dilated or stones or "sludge" are not identified with medical imaging. The implications for the patient and the institution of an overnight stay, rather than a 5-to-10-day stay with "open" surgery, add further impetus to continue with this approach.

Long-term outcome after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with biliary colic and suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Seventy-three highly selected patients (35 type II, 38 type III) with intractable biliary-type pain were studied with biliary manometry after a baseline endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was normal or showed only duct dilatation. No differences between the two groups were noted in regard to baseline sphincter hypertension (60% versus 55%), improvement after endoscopic sphincterotomy at mean follow-up of 3 years, or post-procedure pancreatitis rates (15% versus 16%). Although not statistically significant, a tendency for patients with bile ducts > or = 12 mm to have sustained clinical improvement after sphincterotomy was noted in comparison with patients having ducts < 12 mm; an inverse correlation between improvement in symptoms and presence of an intact gallbladder at baseline was also seen. The authors suggest that the current classification, which divides patients with recurrent right upper quadrant pain into types I, II, and III, is inadequate to define either incidence of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction or subsequent response to endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Pathophysiology of the sphincter of Oddi

Pathophysiology of the sphincter of Oddi--or sphincter of Oddi dysfunction--manifests as either a biliary-type pain syndrome or recurrent pancreatitis. Imaging studies are unreliable, and direct endoscopic manometry is used to diagnose this entity. Milwaukee biliary classification, in addition to manometry, helps guide therapy. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in selected patients achieves permanent relief of symptoms. Endoscopic therapy for recurrent pancreatitis is still experimental.

Paraneoplastic chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction as a rare complication of bronchial carcinoid

This report describes paraneoplastic visceral neuropathy including achalasia, gastroparesis, subileus and constipation in a 59 year old patient with metastasising atypical bronchial carcinoid. Achalasia was successfully treated by cardiomyotomy and fundoplication; additionally, extramucosal pylorectomy was undertaken to improve gastric emptying. Endoscopic papillotomy was necessary because of a functional stenosis of the sphincter of Oddi with development of obstructive jaundice. Symptoms of intestinal pseudoobstruction did not improve with cisapride or corticosteroid treatment. Histological examination of gastrointestinal specimens revealed a lymphocytic infiltration of the myenteric plexus associated with loss of neurones. The rheumatoid factor was positive, there was evidence of circulating immune complexes and antibodies to Sm-antigen were present, suggesting a possible autoimmune pathogenesis.

Delayed biliary drainage is common in asymptomatic post-cholecystectomy volunteers

A commonly used diagnostic criterion for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is delayed drainage of contrast media from the bile ducts at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), which is defined as the persistence of contrast greater than 45 min after injection. We performed ERC in 11 asymptomatic post-cholecystectomy volunteers for the purpose of evaluating biliary drainage time. In an attempt to more accurately quantify emptying, concomitant scintigraphy was performed at the time of ERC and contrast drainage. Sufficient contrast mixed with technetium-99m sulfur colloid to completely fill out the intra-hepatic tree was injected (mean volume, 9 ml) and the volunteers remained in the prone position during imaging. The length of time from cholecystectomy, bile duct size, volume of contrast injected, and scintigraphic T1/2s did not correlate with drainage time at ERC. At 45 min after injection the degree of residual contrast filling was scored as: empty in three volunteers, almost empty in one, one-fourth full in 5, and one-half full in two. Therefore, 7 of the 11 asymptomatic volunteers (63%) had delayed drainage. Even if more stringent criteria for delayed drainage were used (ducts one-half filled), 2 of the 11 (18%) had abnormal drainage. The frequent occurrence of delayed drainage in these asymptomatic post-cholecystectomy volunteers challenges the validity of the 45-min delayed drainage criterion for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Paradoxical response to cerulein on sphincter of Oddi in the patient with gastrectomy

Sphincter of Oddi motility was measured in 55 gallstone patients either through the sinus tract of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage or through the T tube. The influence of cholecystectomy and gastrectomy on the sphincter of Oddi was analyzed by comparing responses in patients with or without surgery to the administration of cerulein and the ingestion of dry egg yolk. When comparing cholecystectomized patients to nonsurgical subjects, cholecystectomy revealed no influence on the response to cerulein and feeding. Both groups showed relaxation of contraction waves after provocations. On the other hand, two thirds of the postgastrectomy patients showed an acceleration in the contractions of the sphincter of Oddi after provocations (one third showed no change), while all of the nongastrectomy group saw the disappearance of the wave after cerulein administration and 83% revealed complete suppression of the wave after feeding. It is suspected that this paradoxical response to CCK on the sphincter of Oddi is a lithogenic factor after gastrectomy.

Efficacy of nifedipine therapy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross over trial

1. Twenty-eight patients who fulfilled entry criteria for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction were randomly allocated to receive nifedipine and placebo in a cross over design with 12 week treatment periods separated by a 2 week wash-out. 2. All patients had episodic pain resembling biliary pain, had previously undergone cholecystectomy, had elevated alkaline phosphatase during episodes of pain and had elevated basal pressure on sphincter of Oddi manometry. 3. Compared with placebo, significant decreases in cumulative pain score, number of pain episodes, oral analgesic tablets consumed and emergency room visits were observed during nifedipine treatment. 4. Overall 21 patients improved during nifedipine therapy while seven patients did not. None of the following predicted response to nifedipine therapy: enzyme levels, morphine-Prostigmine test, fatty meal sonography, common duct diameter and pressure, sphincter of Oddi phasic pressure, frequency and duration of phasic waves and maximal fall in the basal pressure at sphincter of Oddi manometry after sublingual administration of nifedipine. However patients with predominant antegrade propagation of phasic contractions of sphincter of Oddi did significantly better on nifedipine than those with abnormal propagation of phasic contractions. 5. Nifedipine therapy orally in maximal tolerated doses relieves pain in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction who have elevated basal pressure and sphincter of Oddi phasic contractions of predominantly antegrade nature.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and unexplained abdominal pain: clinical and manometric study

Unexplained, biliary-type abdominal pain is often attributed to an abnormal pressure profile of the sphincter of Oddi. In spite of this assumption, the true prevalence of this type of motor dysfunction among cholecystectomized patients with unexplained abdominal pain is not known. We studied 64 postcholecystectomy patients who were thought to have sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Radiologically, other than a dilated common bile duct in some, they had no anatomic derangement of their pancreatobiliary tract to explain their symptoms. They were categorized into three groups on the basis of four objective findings suggesting abnormal biliary emptying mechanism. Basal sphincter of Oddi pressure, frequency of phasic contractions, and proportion of retrograde contractions were determined in all patients. Twenty-six (41%) of the patients demonstrated at least one motor abnormality, 16 (25%) had two, and 10 (16%) had all three abnormal parameters. The pressure profile of the sphincter was normal in 38 or 59% of the patients. Seventy-three percent (73%) of the patients in group I, who had three or four of the objective findings for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, demonstrated at least one motor abnormality. Sixty percent of this group demonstrated an increased basal sphincter of Oddi pressure. On the other hand, only 19% of the patients in group III, who had none of the objective findings, revealed a motor abnormality. Increased basal sphincter of Oddi pressure was noted in 7% of this group. We conclude that, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, as diagnosed manometrically, explains the recurrent biliary type abdominal pain in a minority of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)