A simple biological index for detection of alcoholic liver disease in drinkers

Performance of common imaging techniques vs serum biomarkers in assessing fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive biomarkers have been developed to predict hepatitis B virus (HBV) related fibrosis owing to the significant limitations of liver biopsy. Both serum biomarkers and imaging techniques have shown promising results and may improve the evaluation of liver fibrosis. However, most of the previous studies focused on the diagnostic effects of various imaging techniques on fibrosis in all chronic liver diseases.

AIM

To compare the performance of common imaging methods and serum biomarkers for prediction of significant fibrosis caused only by HBV infection.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on the records available in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases until December 2018. We systematically assessed the effectiveness of two serum biomarkers and three imagine techniques in predicting significant fibrosis solely caused by HBV infection. The serum biomarkers included aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4). The three imaging techniques included acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI), FibroScan, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Three parameters, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratio, and the summary sensitivity and specificity, were used to examine the accuracy of all tests for liver fibrosis.

RESULTS

Out of 2831 articles evaluated for eligibility, 204 satisfied the predetermined inclusion criteria for this current meta-analysis. Eventually, our final data contained 81 studies. The AUSROCs of serum biomarkers of APRI and FIB-4 were both 0.75. For imaging techniques (ARFI, FibroScan, and MRE), the areas were 0.89, 0.83, and 0.97, respectively. The heterogeneities of ARFI and FibroScan were statistically significant (I² > 50%). The publication bias was not observed in any of the serum biomarkers or imaging methods.

CONCLUSION

These five methods have attained an acceptable level of diagnostic accuracy. Imaging techniques, MRE in particular, demonstrate significant advantages in accurately predicting HBV-related significant fibrosis, while serum biomarkers are admissible methods.

Assessing the Non-tumorous Liver: Implications for Patient Management and Surgical Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic resection is performed for various benign and malignant liver tumors. Over the last several decades, there have been improvements in the surgical technique and postoperative care of patients undergoing liver surgery. Despite this, liver failure following an extended hepatic resection remains a critical potential postoperative complication. Patients with underlying parenchymal liver diseases are at particular risk of liver failure due to impaired liver regeneration with an associated mortality risk as high as 60 to 90%. In addition, live donor liver transplantation requires a thorough presurgical assessment of the donor liver to minimize the risk of postoperative complications.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Recently, cross-sectional imaging assessment of diffuse liver diseases has gained momentum due to its ability to provide both anatomical and functional assessments of normal and abnormal tissues. Various imaging techniques are being employed to assess diffuse liver diseases including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound (US). MRI has the ability to detect abnormal intracellular and molecular processes and tissue architecture. CT has a high spatial resolution, while US provides real-time imaging, is inexpensive, and readily available. We herein review current state-of-the-art techniques to assess the underlying non-tumorous liver. Specifically, we summarize current approaches to evaluating diffuse liver diseases including fatty liver alcoholic or non-alcoholic (NAFLD, AFLD), hepatic fibrosis (HF), and iron deposition (ID) with a focus on advanced imaging techniques for non-invasive assessment along with their implications for patient management. In addition, the role of and techniques to assess hepatic volume in hepatic surgery are discussed.

Prospects in non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis: Liquid biopsy as the future gold standard?

Liver fibrosis is the result of persistent liver injury, and is characterized by sustained scar formation and disruption of the normal liver architecture. The extent of fibrosis is considered as an important prognostic factor for the patient outcome, as an absence of (early) treatment can lead to the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Till date, the most sensitive and specific way for the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis remains liver biopsy, an invasive diagnostic tool, which is associated with high costs and discomfort for the patient. Over time, non-invasive scoring systems have been developed, of which the measurements of serum markers and liver stiffness are validated for use in the clinic. These tools lack however the sensitivity and specificity to detect small changes in the progression or regression of both early and late stages of fibrosis. Novel non-invasive diagnostic markers with the potential to overcome these limitations have been developed, but often lack validation in large patient cohorts. In this review, we will summarize novel trends in non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis development and will discuss their (dis-)advantages for use in the clinic.

Liver fibrosis: a compilation on the biomarkers status and their significance during disease progression

Liver fibrosis occurs in response to different etiologies of chronic liver injury. Diagnosing degree of liver fibrosis is a crucial step in evaluation of severity of the disease. An invasive liver biopsy is the gold standard method associated with pain and complications. Biomarkers to detect liver fibrosis include direct markers of extracellular matrix turnover and indirect markers as a reflection of liver dysfunction. Although a single marker may not be useful for successful management, a mathematical equation combining tests might be effective. The main purpose of this review is to understand the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers and scoring systems for liver fibrosis. Advances in -omics approach have generated clinically significant biomarker candidates for liver fibrosis that need further evaluation.

Abnormalities of Lipoprotein Levels in Liver Cirrhosis: Clinical Relevance

Progressive lipoprotein impairment occurs in liver cirrhosis and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The present review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the prognostic value of lipoprotein abnormalities in liver cirrhosis and to address the need of a better prognostic stratification of patients, including lipoprotein profile assessment. Low levels of lipoproteins are usual in cirrhosis. Much evidence supports the prognostic role of hypolipidemia in cirrhotic patients. In particular, hypocholesterolemia represents an independent predictor of survival in cirrhosis. In cirrhotic patients, lipoprotein impairment is associated with several complications: infections, malnutrition, adrenal function, and spur cell anemia. Alterations of liver function are associated with modifications of circulating lipids. Decreased levels of lipoproteins significantly impact the survival of cirrhotic patients and play an important role in the pathogenesis of some cirrhosis-related complications.

Systematic review of the diagnostic performance of serum markers of liver fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a significant cause of death and morbidity. Detection of liver fibrosis at an early stage could provide opportunities for more optimal management. Serum markers of liver fibrosis offer an alternative to biopsy. Evidence of the performance of biomarkers in ALD is needed and a systematic review to evaluate available studies was conducted.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched. Studies were included if they evaluated paired samples of biopsy and serum, and presented data as sensitivity, specificity, or ROC curves.

RESULTS

15 studies were included- median participant number = 146 (range 44-1034). Studies differed with respect to patient populations. 6 single markers were evaluated (mostly Hyaluronic Acid), and ten combined panels. Biomarkers could discriminate between people with severe fibrosis/cirrhosis with high diagnostic accuracy- HA (median AUROC 0.79 range 0.69-0.93), panels (median AUROC 0.83 range 0.38-0.95). Significant heterogeneity precluded pooling. Performance was poorer for detecting less severe fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There are limited numbers of small studies evaluating the accuracy of biomarkers in identifying fibrosis on biopsy in ALD. Some showed promise (both HA alone and some panels) in the identification of cirrhosis/severe fibrosis and could be used to rule it out in heavy drinkers. Biomarkers less accurate with less severe fibrosis.

Usefulness of non-invasive markers for predicting significant fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease

The purpose of this prospective study was to verify and compare the strengths of various blood markers and fibrosis models in predicting significant liver fibrosis. One hundred fifty-eight patients with chronic liver disease who underwent liver biopsy were enrolled. The mean age was 41 yr and male patients accounted for 70.2%. The common causes of liver disease were hepatitis B (67.7%) and C (16.5%) and fatty liver (9.5%). Stages of liver fibrosis (F0-4) were assessed according to the Batts and Ludwig scoring system. Significant fibrosis was defined as > or =F2. Sixteen blood markers were measured along with liver biopsy, and estimates of hepatic fibrosis were calculated using various predictive models. Predictive accuracy was evaluated with a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Liver biopsy revealed significant fibrosis in 106 cases (67.1%). On multivariate analysis, alpha2-macroglobulin, hyaluronic acid, and haptoglobin were found to be independently related to significant hepatic fibrosis. A new predictive model was constructed based on these variables, and its area under the ROC curve was 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.96). In conclusion, alpha2-macroglobulin, hyaluronic acid, and haptoglobin levels are independent predictors for significant hepatic fibrosis in chronic liver disease.

Development of hypoxemia in alcoholic liver disease

The aim of this study was to investigate the arterial hypoxemia in Japanese patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) with regard to alcohol consumption and/or disease severity. Hypoxemia was observed in 78% patients with ALD and in all 46 patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis (ALC) and 33 (56%) of 59 patients with noncirrhotic alcoholic liver disease (NCALD) (P < 0.0001). The partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) was 71.1 +/- 5.2 mm Hg in ALC and 78.7 +/- 6.3 mm Hg in NCALD (P < 0.0001). The oxygen consumption in ALD was significantly higher than that in control subjects (P < 0.0001), and a high oxygen consumption was seen in 88% of the patients with ALD, in all 46 ALC patients, and in 46 (78%) of 59 NCALD patients (P < 0.01). Following abstinence from alcohol, the PaO2 and oxygen consumption significantly recovered after day 2 (P < 0.0001), whereas the prothrombin index did not change in either NCALD or ALC patients. Multivariate analysis showed that alcohol consumption and oxygen consumption were significant independent predictors of PaO2. In conclusion, the present findings suggest that increased oxygen consumption due to alcohol ingestion is principally responsible for the hypoxemia in ALD patients.

Intra-laboratory analytical variability of biochemical markers of fibrosis (Fibrotest) and activity (Actitest) and reference ranges in healthy blood donors

Combinations of tests comprising alpha2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein Al, gamma-glutamyltransferase, total bilirubin (Fibrotest) and alanine aminotransferase (Actitest) are being developed as alternatives to liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to assess in the same laboratory the impact of parameter assay variations on Fibrotest and Actitest results and intra-patient reproducibility of the two tests. The stability of the samples for each test was studied after storage at -80 degrees C and -20 degrees C. Within-run, between-run and total imprecision for each parameter assay, and for Fibrotest and Actitest results, were determined. Transferability of assay results between different analyzers was studied. Intra-patient reproducibility was assessed in 55 hospitalized patients. Fibrotest and Actitest reference ranges were determined in 300 blood donors (reference group). The stability of the parameters was affected by serum storage at -20 degrees C only. The impact of parameter analytical variability on Fibrotest and Actitest results was less than 10% and intra-patient reproducibility was acceptable (p > 0.05). The transferability between different analyzers of results of assays performed under the same standardized and calibration conditions was excellent. Fibrotest and Actitest reference ranges in blood donors were (mean+/-SE) 0.075+/-0.004 and 0.068+/-0.004, respectively. The low intra-laboratory and intra-patient variability in Fibrotest and Actitest results confirm Fibrotest and Actitest reliability.

Histopathologic and biochemical liver test abnormalities in chronic asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic alcoholics: a review

PURPOSE

To review the medical literature regarding the histopathologic and biochemical liver test abnormalities in chronic asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic alcoholics.

METHODS

Review of articles in the MEDLINE and LILACS databases regarding serum levels and prevalence of alterations in aspartate-aminotransferase, alanine-aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin, in relation to liver histopathology, with or without discrimination of types of histopathologic alteration.

RESULTS

Global mean prevalence rates of aspartate-aminotransferase and alanine-aminotransferase alterations were 86.3% and 51.1%; in cases with steatosis they were 79.1% and 38.5%; and in cases of hepatitis, 90.1% and 58%. In all studies, prevalence rates of aspartate-aminotransferase alterations were significantly higher with lower variability than those of alanine-aminotransferase. Mean aspartate-aminotransferase levels were higher than 2N (N is the upper normal limit of the method employed) in all cases with hepatitis histopathology, while those of alanine-aminotransferase were 1.48N, in the same cases. Prevalence of alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin abnormalities were 74.5% and 74.9% globally; in cases of steatosis, they were 70.9% and 67.9%; and in cases of hepatitis, 75.9% and 77.7%. Mean alkaline phosphatase levels were above the upper normal limit in all cases, but those of total bilirubin were above normal in 4 of 7 hepatitis studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of aspartate-aminotransferase alteration was consistently related to presence of histopathologic abnormalities; an enzyme level higher than 2N suggests the diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis.

Prothrombin index is an indirect marker of severe liver fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

The non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis is based mainly on biochemical markers. The main aim was to validate whether the prothrombin index is an indirect marker of the severity of liver fibrosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The predictive value of the prothrombin index for liver fibrosis was first assessed in 243 patients with chronic liver disease, then validated in 193 other patients with chronic liver disease. The reproducibility of measurement of the prothrombin index in different laboratories was evaluated in 82 other patients.

RESULTS

In the first group, the prothrombin index was predicted accurately by serum hyaluronate (R(2)= 0.67 at the first step by multiple regression). The relationship between the prothrombin index and the area of fibrosis was not influenced significantly by non-fibrotic pathological lesions. The prothrombin index began to decrease when the Metavir fibrosis score was 2 versus 3 for albumin. In the second group, the prothrombin index and the histological fibrosis score were well correlated (r= -0.70, P< 10(-4)). Prothrombin index < or =80% or < or =70% diagnosed severe fibrosis or cirrhosis, respectively, and prothrombin index > or =105% or > or =100% excluded a diagnosis of severe fibrosis or cirrhosis, respectively, at the 95% probability level. The prothrombin indices measured in different laboratories were similar (78+/-18% v. 78+/-14%) and well correlated (r= 0.91, P< 10(-4)).

CONCLUSIONS

The prothrombin index was well correlated with pathological liver fibrosis score, had a high diagnostic accuracy for severe fibrosis or cirrhosis especially due to alcohol, and was not influenced by other pathological lesions. The prothrombin index was reproducible. Thus, the prothrombin index expressed as a percentage is an accurate, reproducible, inexpensive and easily available marker of severe liver fibrosis.

Prothrombin index decrease: a useful and reliable marker of extensive fibrosis?

Non-invasive serum markers of extensive liver fibrosis are required in clinical practice for several reasons: (1) although histological analysis is considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of extensive fibrosis and cirrhosis, the rate of false-negative results is approximately 15-20%; (2) liver biopsy is an invasive method with a 1/10 000 mortality rate, even though occurrence of death is exceptional in patients with diffuse liver disease; (3) patients with chronic viral hepatitis have to undergo multiple liver biopsies during follow-up to assess the progression of tissue injury. In this leading article, we briefly overview the recent progress in non-invasive serum markers for the prediction of the extent of liver fibrosis. Among those serum markers, we focused on prothrombin index, which seems to be a reliable and non-expansive marker for the diagnosis of extensive fibrosis.

Serum laminin and type IV collagen are accurate markers of histologically severe alcoholic hepatitis in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Severe alcoholic hepatitis occurs mainly in patients with cirrhosis, and has a high death rate. Corticosteroid therapy has been particularly advocated as reducing mortality in patients with severe histologic lesions. However, identification of these patients is difficult, requiring transvenous liver biopsy. Extracellular matrix serum markers have been proposed as non-invasive diagnostic tools in alcoholic liver disease. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of 5 extracellular matrix serum markers, i.e. laminin (Lam), N-terminal peptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), type I (CI), type III (CIII) and type IV (CIV) collagens in identifying patients with severe histologic alcoholic hepatitis from among those with cirrhosis and suspected alcoholic hepatitis.

METHODS

We studied 80 consecutive patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and clinical suspicion of alcoholic hepatitis referred for transvenous liver biopsy. Clinical severity of alcoholic hepatitis was assessed according to Maddrey's score. Histological severity was scored using the sum of the 3 following items: polynuclear infiltration (0-3); hepatocytes alterations (0-3); Mallory bodies (0-2). According to this score, patients were divided into 3 groups: mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-8) alcoholic hepatitis. Serum levels of the 5 extracellular matrix serum markers were measured at the time of biopsy using radioimmunoassays. Diagnostic value for histologically severe alcoholic hepatitis of the 5 extracellular matrix serum markers was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Histological alcoholic hepatitis was present in 67 patients (mean alcoholic hepatitis score: 3.4+/-2.3). Maddrey's score was 66% sensitive and 69% specific for the diagnosis of severe histologic alcoholic hepatitis. The serum Lam and CIV concentrations were the most accurate in identifying correctly patients with severe histologic alcoholic hepatitis. At a cut-off of 4.1 UI/ml, Lam was 90% sensitive and 77% specific, whereas at a cut-off of 150 ng/ml, CIV was 89% sensitive and 77% specific. Combination of markers did not result in improved diagnostic value.

CONCLUSION

In patients with cirrhosis, determination of serum Lam or CIV could represent a simple and accurate non-invasive method for identification of patients with histologically severe alcoholic hepatitis eligible for corticosteroid treatment.

Laboratory markers of ethanol intake and abuse: a critical appraisal

Laboratory markers for ethanol intake and abuse and chronic alcoholism currently in use have been critically reviewed. The merits and pitfalls of each test have been evaluated. The clinical use of the new test of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin has been particularly emphasized. Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin currently provides the highest specificity and sensitivity of all commonly used markers of alcoholism.