Persistent lack of somatostatin receptors in gastric mucosa of healing ulcers in rats

An overview of acetic acid ulcer models--the history and state of the art of peptic ulcer research

Four types of experimental chronic ulcer models, named acetic acid ulcer models, have been developed to examine the healing process of peptic ulcers, screen anti-ulcer drugs, and better evaluate the adverse effects of various anti-inflammatory drugs on the gastrointestinal mucosa. The model easily and reliably produces round, deep ulcers in the stomach and duodenum, allowing acetic acid ulcer production in mice, rats, Mongolian gerbils, guinea pigs, cats, dogs, miniature pigs, and monkeys. These ulcer models highly resemble human ulcers in terms of both pathological features and healing process. The models have been established over the past 35 years and are now used throughout the world by basic and clinical scientists. One of the characteristic features of acetic acid ulcers in rats is the spontaneous relapse of healed ulcers >100 d after ulceration, an endoscopically confirmed phenomenon. Indomethacin significantly delays the healing of acetic acid ulcers, probably by reducing endogenous prostaglandins and inhibiting angiogenesis in ulcerated tissue. Helicobacter pylori significantly delays healing of acetic acid ulcers and causes relapse of healed ulcers at a high incidence in Mongolian gerbils. Anti-secretory drugs (e.g. omeprazole), prostaglandin analogs, mucosal defense agents (e.g. sucralfate), and various growth factors all significantly enhance healing of acetic acid ulcers. Gene therapy with epidermal growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor applied to the base of acetic acid ulcers in rats is effective in enhancing ulcer healing. Since an inhibitor of nitric oxide syntase prevents ulcer healing, nitric oxide might be involved in the mechanism underlying ulcer healing. We conclude that acetic acid ulcer models are quite useful for various studies related to peptic ulcers.

Expression of functional neurokinin-1 receptors in regenerative glands during gastric wound healing in rodents

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although functions of the neurokinin-1 receptor have been well explored in neurogenic inflammation and immunoinflammatory responses, little is known about neurokinin-1 receptors during gastric wound healing. The aim of this study was to assess whether neurokinin-1 receptors play a role in gastric wound healing.

METHODS

In vitro neurokinin-1 receptor autoradiography and immunohistochemistry were performed to identify, locate, and quantify neurokinin-1 receptors during wound healing in rodents with cryoulcers in the gastric corpus and antrum. Moreover, to assess the functionality of these receptors, the effect of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist NKP608 on gastric wound healing was quantified in vivo in wild-type and cyclooxygenase-2(-/-) mice.

RESULTS

Regenerative glands of the mucosal ulcer margin of rat cryoulcers of the gastric corpus showed strong expression of neurokinin-1 receptors in binding studies between days 3 and 22, with little expression on days 29-84. In addition, strong immunoreactivity for neurokinin-1 receptors was detected on the cell membrane of these regenerative glands. Expression of neurokinin-1 receptors in regenerative glands was confirmed in the rat antrum and the mouse gastric corpus. Moreover, in vivo functional tests during gastric ulcer healing showed that cell proliferation in the regenerative epithelia of the ulcer margin was significantly decreased by NKP608 compared with placebo; furthermore, gastric ulcer healing was significantly delayed by NKP608 both in wild-type and cyclooxygenase-2(-/-) mice.

CONCLUSIONS

This report shows the time-limited overexpression of neurokinin-1 receptors in the mucosal repair tissue of the corpus and antrum. Our in vitro and in vivo data suggest that neurokinin-1 receptors are involved in gastric wound healing.

Somatostatin receptors

In 1972, Brazeau et al. isolated somatostatin (somatotropin release-inhibiting factor, SRIF), a cyclic polypeptide with two biologically active isoforms (SRIF-14 and SRIF-28). This event prompted the successful quest for SRIF receptors. Then, nearly a quarter of a century later, it was announced that a neuropeptide, to be named cortistatin (CST), had been cloned, bearing strong resemblance to SRIF. Evidence of special CST receptors never emerged, however. CST rather competed with both SRIF isoforms for specific receptor binding. And binding to the known subtypes with affinities in the nanomolar range, it has therefore been acknowledged to be a third endogenous ligand at SRIF receptors. This review goes through mechanisms of signal transduction, pharmacology, and anatomical distribution of SRIF receptors. Structurally, SRIF receptors belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled (GPC) receptors, sharing the characteristic seven-transmembrane-segment (STMS) topography. Years of intensive research have resulted in cloning of five receptor subtypes (sst(1)-sst(5)), one of which is represented by two splice variants (sst(2A) and sst(2B)). The individual subtypes, functionally coupled to the effectors of signal transduction, are differentially expressed throughout the mammalian organism, with corresponding differences in physiological impact. It is evident that receptor function, from a physiological point of view, cannot simply be reduced to the accumulated operations of individual receptors. Far from being isolated functional units, receptors co-operate. The total receptor apparatus of individual cell types is composed of different-ligand receptors (e.g. SRIF and non-SRIF receptors) and co-expressed receptor subtypes (e.g. sst(2) and sst(5) receptors) in characteristic proportions. In other words, levels of individual receptor subtypes are highly cell-specific and vary with the co-expression of different-ligand receptors. However, the question is how to quantify the relative contributions of individual receptor subtypes to the integration of transduced signals, ultimately the result of collective receptor activity. The generation of knock-out (KO) mice, intended as a means to define the contributions made by individual receptor subtypes, necessarily marks but an approximation. Furthermore, we must now take into account the stunning complexity of receptor co-operation indicated by the observation of receptor homo- and heterodimerisation, let alone oligomerisation. Theoretically, this phenomenon adds a novel series of functional megareceptors/super-receptors, with varied pharmacological profiles, to the catalogue of monomeric receptor subtypes isolated and cloned in the past. SRIF analogues include both peptides and non-peptides, receptor agonists and antagonists. Relatively long half lives, as compared to those of the endogenous ligands, have been paramount from the outset. Motivated by theoretical puzzles or the shortcomings of present-day diagnostics and therapy, investigators have also aimed to produce subtype-selective analogues. Several have become available.

Cholecystokinin-B/gastrin receptors enhance wound healing in the rat gastric mucosa

Although physiological functions of the CCK-B/gastrin receptor are well explored, little is known about its role during healing. Here, we evaluated the role of this receptor in the rat oxyntic mucosa following the introduction of a cryoulcer. In this model, we located and quantified CCK-B/gastrin receptors by reverse transcriptase PCR and receptor autoradiography. Rats with cryoulcers were treated with placebo, omeprazole, the CCK-B/gastrin receptor antagonist YF-476, omeprazole plus YF-476, gastrin-17, and gastrin 17 plus YF-476. During wound healing, CCK-B/gastrin receptors were specifically expressed and localized to the regenerative mucosal ulcer margin. This high expression was limited in time, and the pattern of expression of CCK-B/gastrin receptors correlated closely with the proliferative activity of the regenerative mucosa. Functionally, omeprazole and gastrin-17 caused profound hypergastrinemia, increased cell proliferation in the mucosal ulcer margin and accelerated the late ulcer healing phase. These effects were completely reversed by cotherapy with YF-476. These in vivo and vitro data suggest that CCK-B/gastrin receptors in regenerative rat gastric oxyntic mucosa enhance trophic effects during wound healing.

Mechanisms of ulcer healing and effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Ulceration of the gastroduodenal mucosa occurs frequently in humans, particularly in patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease. In order for healing to occur, mucosal damage stimulates secretion of growth factors in the adjacent mucosa and ulcer bed. Peptic ulcer healing is accomplished by the filling of the mucosal defect with cells that migrate from the ulcer margin and by connective tissue, including microvessels originating from granulation tissue. Peptic ulcer healing is accelerated both in humans and experimental models by gastric acid inhibition, which enhances cell migration and maturation of the granulation tissue. In experimental models, peptic ulcer healing can also be accelerated by oral administration of basic fibroblast growth factor, which increases angiogenesis in the ulcer bed, or by nitric oxide-releasing compounds, which improve gastric blood flow. Clinical and experimental data indicate that traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) delay the healing of peptic ulcers by interfering with the action of growth factors, decreasing epithelial cell proliferation in the ulcer margin, decreasing angiogenesis in the ulcer bed, and slowing maturation of the granulation tissue. In order to reduce the gastroduodenal side-effects of NSAIDs, selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors have been developed, which inhibit the inducible COX-2 isoform in inflammatory tissue but have only limited effect on the constitutive COX-1 isoform in the stomach. It has been reported that the selective COX-2 inhibitor L-745,337 has a reduced liability for gastrointestinal ulceration. In our chronic experimental gastric ulcer model in rats, however, delay of gastric ulcer healing with L-745,337 was comparable to that with ordinary NSAIDs. It has also been reported that nitric oxide-releasing NSAIDs have a low relative risk of gastrointestinal ulceration but, again, in our chronic gastric ulcer model, nitric oxide did not reverse NSAID-induced deleterious effects on ulcer healing. In contrast, the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole has been shown to reverse NSAID-induced deleterious effects on gastric ulcer healing in our model. Comparable results have also been reported in humans. Histologic analysis has shown that omeprazole reverses the effects of NSAIDs on cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and maturation of the granulation tissue. In conclusion, only highly effective gastric acid inhibition reliably reverses NSAID-induced delay of gastric ulcer healing.