Primary chemoprevention strategies for colorectal cancer: ursodeoxycholic acid and other agents

The role of bile acids in cellular invasiveness of gastric cancer

Background

Bile acids have been implicated in the development of digestive tract malignancy by epidemiological, clinical and animal studies. The growth and transformation signaling by most of the bile acids is thought to be related to the induced cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression and increased production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). The highly hydrophobic bile acids such as chenodeoxycholic acid (CD) and deoxycholic acid can promote carcinogenesis and stimulate the invasion of colon cancer cells. On the contrary, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a less hydrophobic stereoisomer of CD, inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in colon cancer cells. We examined the effects of bile acid on human gastric cancer cells MKN-74.

Methods

Early-passage human gastric cancer MKN-74 cells were used for drug treatment, preparation of whole cell lysates, subcellular extracts and Western blot analysis. The levels of PGE2 released by the cells were measured by enzyme inummoassay to indicate COX-2 enzymatic activity. Cellular invasion assay was performed in Boyden chamber.

Results

Exposure of CD led to activation of protein kinase C (PKC) alpha, increased COX-2 expression and increased PGE2 synthesis. The induced COX-2 protein expression could be detected within 4 h exposure of 200 μM CD, and it was dose- and time-dependent. PGE2 is the product of COX-2, and has been reported to cause tumor invasion and angiogenesis in animal study. Safingol (SAF), a PKC inhibitor, suppressed the COX-2 protein expression and PGE2 production by CD in MKN-74. Furthermore, UDCA suppressed PGE2 production by CD but did not affect COX-2 protein expression induced by CD. Using a Boyden chamber invasion assay, both SAF and UDCA impeded CD induced tumor invasiveness of MKN-74 by 30–50%.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that signaling of hydrophobic bile acid such as CD in gastric cancer cells is through PKC activation and COX-2 induction, which leads to increased cellular invasion. By perturbing the bile acid pool, UDCA attenuates CD-induced PGE2 synthesis and tumor invasiveness.

Consequences of bile salt biotransformations by intestinal bacteria

Emerging evidence strongly suggest that the human "microbiome" plays an important role in both health and disease. Bile acids function both as detergents molecules promoting nutrient absorption in the intestines and as hormones regulating nutrient metabolism. Bile acids regulate metabolism via activation of specific nuclear receptors (NR) and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The circulating bile acid pool composition consists of primary bile acids produced from cholesterol in the liver, and secondary bile acids formed by specific gut bacteria. The various biotransformation of bile acids carried out by gut bacteria appear to regulate the structure of the gut microbiome and host physiology. Increased levels of secondary bile acids are associated with specific diseases of the GI system. Elucidating methods to control the gut microbiome and bile acid pool composition in humans may lead to a reduction in some of the major diseases of the liver, gall bladder and colon.

Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer with ursodeoxycholic acid: pro

Colorectal cancer is the third and second most common cancer among men and women, respectively, in France. Interest in the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer has increased over the last two decades. Experimental data strongly suggest that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) may have chemopreventative actions in colorectal cancer. UDCA is able to inhibit tumor development in azoxymethane and in dextran-related colitis models. In high-risk populations such as subjects with previous colorectal adenoma removal or inflammatory bowel disease, five out of 10 published studies suggested beneficial effects with UDCA on colonic carcinogenesis. In the azoxymethane model, UDCA inhibited tumor development by counteracting the tumor-promoting effects of secondary bile acids such as deoxycholic acid (DCA). The opposing effects of UDCA and DCA on lipid raft composition may be central to their effects on colonic tumorigenesis. Differential effects of DCA and UDCA on growth factor and inflammatory signals involved in colorectal carcinogenesis, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and COX-2 expression, very likely mediate their opposing effects on colonic tumor promotion and tumor inhibition, respectively.

The effect of ursodesoxycholic acid on duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective randomized placebo-control trial

AIM

Duodenal adenomas occur in about 90% of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and are the second cause of death of patients who have had a prophylactic proctocolectomy. Studies suggest that biliary acids have a role in the development of duodenal adenomas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ursodesoxycholic acid (UDCA) on duodenal adenoma formation in patients with FAP.

METHOD

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was carried out of 71 patients (20-65 years) who already had a restorative proctocolectomy. Subjects received either 10 mg/kg of UDCA orally per day or a placebo tablet for 24 months. The Spigelman severity score was determined after duodenal axial and lateral view endoscopy at 12 and 24 months.

RESULTS

At 2 years 55 patients had completed the entire period of treatment. At the end of the follow-up period, nine (25%) patients in the UDCA group and seven (20%) in the placebo group had a decrease in the Spigelman score (P = 0.6142). Patients receiving UDCA had no side-effects (0%) compared with four (14%) in the placebo group (P = 0.0392).

CONCLUSION

UDCA had no effect on the development of duodenal adenomas in FAP patients (NCT: 00134758).

Risk modification of colorectal adenoma by CYP7A1 polymorphisms and the role of bile acid metabolism in carcinogenesis

Cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1), the rate-limiting enzyme in the conversion of cholesterol to bile acids, is a postulated gene modifier of colorectal cancer risk and target for the therapeutic bile acid, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). We investigated associations between CYP7A1 polymorphisms and fecal bile acids, colorectal adenoma (CRA), and UDCA efficacy for CRA prevention. Seven tagging, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in CYP7A1 were measured in 703 (355 UDCA, 348 placebo) participants of a phase III chemoprevention trial, of which 495 had known baseline fecal bile acid concentrations. In the placebo arm, participants with two minor G(rs8192871) alleles (tag for a low activity promoter polymorphism at -204) had lower odds of high secondary bile acids (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10-0.69), and CRA at 3 years' follow-up (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19-0.89), than AA carriers. Haplotype construction from the six polymorphic SNPs showed participants with the third most common haplotype (C(rs10957057)C(rs8192879)G(rs8192877)T(rs11786580)A(rs8192871)G(rs13251096)) had higher odds of high primary bile acids (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.12-4.89) and CRA (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.00-3.57) than those with the most common CTACAG haplotype. Furthermore, three SNPs (rs8192877, rs8192871, and rs13251096) each modified UDCA efficacy for CRA prevention, and CCGTAG-haplotype carriers experienced 71% lower odds of CRA recurrence with UDCA treatment, an effect not present for other haplotypes (test for UDCA-haplotype interaction, P = 0.020). Our findings support CYP7A1 polymorphisms as determinants of fecal bile acids and risk factors for CRA. Furthermore, UDCA efficacy for CRA prevention may be modified by genetic variation in CYP7A1, limiting treatment benefit to a subgroup of the population.

Ursodeoxycholic acid and chemoprevention of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is respectively the third and second most common cancer among men and women in France. Interest in chemoprevention for colorectal cancer has increased over the last two decades. Beside non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) may have chemopreventive action in colorectal cancer with a likely better tolerance. In high-risk populations such as patients with inflammatory bowel disease or prior colorectal adenoma or carcinoma, retrospective and prospective studies have suggested a beneficial effect of UDCA. In azoxymethane model, UDCA inhibits tumor development by countering the tumor-promoting effects of secondary bile acids, such as deoxycholic acid (DCA). The opposing effects of UDCA and DCA on lipid raft composition may be central to their effects on colonic tumorigenesis. Differential effects of DCA and UDCA on growth factor and inflammatory signals involved in colorectal carcinogenesis, such as epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) signaling and Cox-2 expression, likely mediate their opposing effects on colonic tumor promotion and tumor inhibition, respectively.

Bile acids and Barrett's oesophagus: a sine qua non or coincidence?

BACKGROUND

Barrett's oesophagus (BO), a premalignant condition associated with the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), is thought to be a consequence of chronic duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux. Of the refluxates, bile acids, either alone or in combination with acid, are probably the most important.

METHODS

Analysis of the literature on the role played by bile acids in inducing BO and/or progression to OAC.

RESULTS

Combined pH and Bilitec 2000 (as a measure of bile reflux) monitoring and oesophageal aspiration studies in humans suggest a combined role for bile acids, particularly taurine conjugated bile acids, in causing oesophageal mucosal injury. Evidence from animal models has demonstrated that duodenal juice alone is also able to induce BO and/or OAC. Likewise, ex vivo studies with biopsies from BO patients show that increased proliferation and cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression are present after a pulsed exposure to acid or conjugated bile acids, but not if acid and bile acids are combined. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been shown to decrease the biliary component of the refluxate. There is some evidence that PPIs are able to reduce neoplastic progression in BO. On the other hand, chronic PPIs can also stimulate bacterial overgrowth, which can result in increased production of secondary bile acids, particularly deoxycholic acid, in the stomach. Deoxycholic acid has been demonstrated to have a tumour-promoting capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

It is unknown what factors of the refluxate (acid and/or bile) induce BO and/or promote carcinogenesis, but there is evidence that secondary bile acids play a role. A better understanding of the molecular steps involved in the induction of BO, and the role of bile acids herein, may identify targets at which preventive therapies can be directed.

Phase III trial of ursodeoxycholic acid to prevent colorectal adenoma recurrence

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment is associated with a reduced incidence of colonic neoplasia in preclinical models and in patients with conditions associated with an increased risk for colon cancer. We conducted a phase III, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of UDCA to evaluate its ability to prevent colorectal adenoma recurrence.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 1285 individuals who had undergone removal of a colorectal adenoma within the past 6 months to daily treatment with UDCA (8-10 mg/kg of body weight; 661 participants) or with placebo (624 participants) for 3 years or until follow-up colonoscopy. Recurrence rates (number of recurrent adenomas per unit time) were compared by use of a Huber-White variance estimator. Proportions of participants with one or more recurrent adenomas were compared with a Pearson chi-square statistic; adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were obtained by logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

We observed a non-statistically significant 12% reduction in the adenoma recurrence rate associated with UDCA treatment, compared with placebo treatment. However, UDCA treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction (P = .03) in the recurrence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (adjusted OR = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.39 to 0.96). We observed no statistically significant differences between UDCA and placebo groups in recurrence with regard to adenoma size, villous histology, or location.

CONCLUSIONS

UDCA treatment was associated with a non-statistically significant reduction in total colorectal adenoma recurrence but with a statistically significant 39% reduction in recurrence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia. Because severely dysplastic lesions have a high risk of progression to invasive colorectal carcinoma, this finding indicates that future chemoprevention trials of UDCA in individuals with such lesions should be considered.

Ursodeoxycholate/Sulindac combination treatment effectively prevents intestinal adenomas in a mouse model of polyposis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Preclinical studies in animal models, human epidemiological data, and clinical trials in patients with adenomatous polyposis have consistently indicated that sulindac and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or cyclooxygenase inhibitors have the greatest potential efficacy among current candidates for colon tumor chemopreventive agents. However, at highly effective doses they all have some risk of toxicity, and their therapeutic profile might be improved by use at lower, more tolerable doses, in combination with a second agent acting via other mechanisms.

METHODS

Sulindac was tested in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (ursodiol), a naturally occurring 7-B-epimer of the bile component chenodeoxycholic acid, for prevention of adenomas in the Min mouse model of adenomatous polyposis.

RESULTS

Ursodeoxycholic acid caused a dose-dependent decrease in the number of intestinal tumors. Unlike sulindac and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which are quite beneficial in the distal intestine but are somewhat less effective in the proximal small intestine (especially the clinically important periampullary duodenum), ursodeoxycholate had equal efficacy throughout the entire intestine, both proximal and distal. Combined treatment with low-dose sulindac was less toxic, with normal weight gain and fewer gastrointestinal ulcerations than high-dose sulindac. Combined treatment with sulindac and ursodeoxycholate was more effective than either agent alone for the prevention of tumors throughout the entire intestine.

CONCLUSIONS

These experiments provide the first evidence that ursodeoxycholic acid is effective for preventing adenomas in an animal model. Cyclooxygenase inhibition, when combined with this naturally occurring bile component, may become a promising approach for colon cancer prevention.

Hyposulfatemia, growth retardation, reduced fertility, and seizures in mice lacking a functional NaSi-1 gene

Inorganic sulfate is required for numerous functions in mammalian physiology, and its circulating levels are proposed to be maintained by the Na+-SO42- cotransporter, (NaSi-1). To determine the role of NaSi-1 in sulfate homeostasis and the physiological consequences in its absence, we have generated a mouse lacking a functional NaSi-1 gene, Nas1. Serum sulfate concentration was reduced by >75% in Nas1-/- mice when compared with Nas1+/+ mice. Nas1-/- mice exhibit increased urinary sulfate excretion, reduced renal and intestinal Na+-SO42- cotransport, and a general growth retardation. Nas1-/- mouse body weight was reduced by >20% when compared with Nas1+/+ and Nas1+/- littermates at 2 weeks of age and remained so throughout adulthood. Nas1-/- females had a lowered fertility, with a 60% reduction in litter size. Spontaneous clonic seizures were observed in Nas1-/- mice from 8 months of age. These data demonstrate NaSi-1 is essential for maintaining sulfate homeostasis, and its expression is necessary for a wide range of physiological functions.

Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy and the risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: an observational study

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). The long-term administration of UDCA might indirectly favor colon carcinogenesis by increasing the fecal excretion of secondary bile acids or, in contrast, it might inhibit colon carcinogenesis, as demonstrated in animal models. In patients with PBC, we examined the effect of prolonged UDCA administration on the prevalence and recurrence of colorectal adenoma and on the proliferation of colon epithelial cells. One hundred fourteen patients (103 women, 11 men; mean age, 55 years) with PBC, were enrolled in a colonoscopic surveillance program. The prevalence of colon adenoma was compared in patients already treated with UDCA (mean duration 46 months) at the time of colonoscopy (treated group, n = 52) and in patients undergoing colonoscopy just prior to treatment initiation (untreated group, n = 62). The recurrence of adenoma following removal (mean follow-up, 35 months) was compared between UDCA-treated patients and appropriate age- and gender-matched controls (2/1) selected from a cohort of 205 patients undergoing polypectomy. Epithelial cell proliferation was assessed using anti-Ki67 antibodies on colon biopsies from both treated and untreated patients. Treated and untreated patients displayed similar demographic characteristics. The prevalence of colorectal adenomas was 13% in the treated group versus 24% in the untreated group (P =.16). The colon epithelial cell proliferation index was significantly lower in treated patients than in untreated patients (P =.001). Following removal of the adenoma, the probability of recurrence was significantly lower in patients treated with UDCA than in controls (7% vs. 28% at 3 years, P =.04). In conclusion, this study suggests that, in patients with PBC, the prolonged administration of UDCA (1) is not associated with an increased prevalence of colorectal adenomas, and (2) significantly decreases the probability of colorectal adenoma recurrence following removal. These results are strengthened by the significant reduction in colon epithelial cell proliferation seen in patients treated with UDCA.

Epidemiology and prevention of colorectal cancer

CRC, the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States, is a highly preventable disease. Ironically, available and effective screening technologies are not consistently applied, even as new ones are developed. This discordance between preventive opportunity and practice conveys a sobering message regarding nontechnologic issues that must be addressed if the promise of CRC prevention is to be realized. Our response to this message will determine the public health impact of cancer prevention. In the 1980s, cancer chemoprevention was regarded as scientific speculation. Within the last decade, however, cancer has been recognized as a late, nonobligate stage of carcinogenesis, a chronic process that provides time and targets for preventive intervention. Further advances are emerging out of rigorous clinical testing, which remains the limiting factor in transforming ingenious concepts into useful tools for the prevention of CRC. The challenges and rewards of participation in chemoprevention research--both as patients and health care providers-have never been greater.

Most effective colon cancer chemopreventive agents in rats: a systematic review of aberrant crypt foci and tumor data, ranked by potency

Potential chemopreventive agents for colorectal cancer are assessed in rodents. We speculated that the magnitude of the effect is meaningful and ranked all published agents according to their potency. Data were gathered systematically from 137 articles with the aberrant crypt foci (ACF) end point and from 146 articles with the tumor end point. The potency of each agent to reduce the number of ACF is listed in one table and the potency of each agent to reduce the tumor incidence in another table. Both tables are shown in this review and on a website with sorting abilities (http://www.inra.fr/reseau-nacre/sci-memb/corpet/indexan.html). Potency was estimated as the ratio of the value in control rats to the value in treated rats. From each article, only the most potent agent was kept, except in articles reporting the effect of more than seven agents. Among the 186 agents in the ACF table, the median agent reduced the number of ACF by one-half. The most potent agents to reduce azoxymethane-induced ACF were Pluronic, polyethylene glycol, perilla oil with beta-carotene, and sulindac sulfide. Among the 160 agents in the tumor table, the median agent reduced the tumor incidence in rats by one-half. The most potent agents to reduce the incidence of azoxymethane-induced tumors were celecoxib, a protease inhibitor from soy, difluoromethylornithine with piroxicam, polyethylene glycol, and a thiosulfonate. For the 57 agents present in both tables, a significant correlation (r) was found between the potencies against ACF and tumors (r = 0.45, P < 0.001); without celecoxib, a major outlying point in the correlation, r = 0.68 (P < 0.001, n = 56). In conclusion, this review gathers most known chemopreventive agents, ranks the most promising agents against colon carcinogenesis in rats or mice, and further supports the use of ACF as a surrogate end point for tumors in rats.

In colorectal carcinoma patients, serum vitamin D levels vary according to stage of the carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated an inverse correlation between dietary calcium and vitamin D intake and the incidence of colorectal carcinoma. Elevated serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH-D3) are associated with a major reduction in the incidence of this neoplasm. The reduction in tumor size and number induced by calcium supplements in an experimental carcinogenesis model was neutralized by vitamin D3 deficiency. To the authors' knowledge, vitamin D serum levels have never been determined previously in colorectal carcinoma patients. They compared serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), 25-OH-D3, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels of colorectal carcinoma patients with those of healthy controls.

METHODS

Serum 1,25(OH)2D3, 25-OH-D3, and PTH levels were determined in 84 colorectal carcinoma patients (10 with Stage I, 29 with Stage II, 25 with Stage III, and 20 with Stage IV) and 30 healthy controls, all of whom were normocalcemic and not taking calcium or vitamin D supplements.

RESULTS

25-OH-D3 serum levels were higher in cancer patients than controls, irrespective of stage. Serum 1,25(OH)2D3 decreased with advancing stage: 73 +/- 18, 48 +/- 16, 39 +/- 12, 34 +/- 13, and 75 +/- 20 pg/mL in Stages I, II, III, IV, and controls, respectively. There was a corresponding increase in serum PTH levels: 58.0 +/- 9.4, 73.7 +/- 14.4, 79.0 +/- 21.3, 100.4 +/- 30.9, and 51.2 +/- 3.9 pg/mL in Stages I, II, III, IV, and controls, respectively. Serum vitamin D metabolite levels did not correlate with gender, age, tumor localization, or histologic grade.

CONCLUSIONS

An inverse correlation between serum levels of the active metabolite of vitamin D and colorectal carcinoma stage has been demonstrated for the first time, to the authors' knowledge, in colorectal carcinoma patients. Because 1,25(OH)2D3 has been shown to inhibit proliferation of colonic epithelial cells, decreased serum levels may facilitate the growth of colorectal carcinoma and influence its biologic behavior.

The chemopreventive role of ursodeoxycholic acid in azoxymethane-treated rats: suppressive effects on enhanced group II phospholipase A2 expression in colonic tissue

Great interest has been focused on the chemoprevention of colonic carcinogenesis by oral administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) because its administration reportedly reduces the incidence of colon cancer in animal experiments. To elucidate the precise role of UDCA in the chemoprevention of azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis, we examined the expression levels of group II phospholipase A2 in the colonic tissue of UDCA-treated and untreated rats and correlated the levels with the findings of aberrant crypt foci, putative preneoplastic lesions. Twelve weeks after azoxymethane exposure, the total number of aberrant crypt foci in 0.4% UDCA-fed rats and 1% UDCA-fed rats was significantly decreased compared to the untreated animals. The mucosal concentrations of PGE2 and 6-keto PGF1alpha were significantly lower in the UDCA-treated rats than in untreated rats. In correlation with lowering, the enhanced activity, protein mass and mRNA levels of group II phospholipase A2 were significantly attenuated in the UDCA-treated animals. The chemopreventive role of UDCA in colon carcinogenesis may lie in its modulation of the arachidonate metabolism in colonic mucosa.