Operative fixation of fractures of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae by Williams plates with reference to late kyphosis

The successful short-term treatment of flexion-distraction injuries of the thoracic spine using posterior-only pedicle screw instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective study, the results of treating unstable flexion-distraction injuries (FDI) of the thoracic spine with posterior-only thoracic pedicle screw (P/TPS) instrumentation were investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine the ability of P/TPS to correct and maintain the focal kyphosis of the injured spine. Clinical outcome and complications of the surgical procedure were also a focus of the study.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The treatment of FDI of the thoracic spine remains controversial. There continues to be difficulty in maintaining the corrected kyphosis angle regardless of the surgical approach used.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with FDI of thoracic spine who underwent P/TPS were identified. The initial and corrected focal kyphosis was evaluated radiographically. Failure of treatment was defined as a >5-degree progression of corrected kyphosis from initial to latest follow-up. Clinical evaluation included complication rate, Injury Severity Score, and Frankel grade.

RESULTS

Of the 18 eligible patients, 15 (83%) had adequate follow-up for evaluation. The mean length of follow-up care was 16.1 months. The average Injury Severity Score was 23. The average number of instrumented levels was 6.8. The focal kyphosis of the injury was reduced from a mean of 19.60 to 5.73 degrees (P<0.001), with an average progression of only 2.27 degrees (P=0.128) at final follow-up. Complications were limited to wound infections and occurred in 2 study participants. Neurologic status returned to normal in all patients with incomplete cord injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

FDI of the thoracic spine may be amendable to a uniform surgical approach with P/TPS. This procedure carried a relatively low complication rate and allowed for reduction and restoration of the posterior tension band with a biomechanically rigid construct.

Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature, pertaining surgical treatment of traumatic thoracic and lumbar spine fractures, was performed.

OBJECTIVES

To provide information on surgical techniques for traumatic spine fracture management, their respective performance and complication rates, based on previously published information.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine remains controversial. There is insufficient evidence in the literature to choose between the various surgical options. In absence of conclusive studies, a systematic review can be an alternative to obtain more convincing information.

METHODS

Full-text papers from 1970 until 2001 were included if strict inclusion criteria were met. Five surgical subgroups were recognized: posterior short-segment (PS), posterior long-segment (PL), reports on both posterior short- and long-segment (PSL), anterior (A), and anterior combined with posterior (AP) techniques. Clearly defined and generally accepted parameters were scored and subsequently analyzed. The preoperative injury severity of the surgical groups was compared. The neurologic, radiologic, and functional outcome and complications of all groups were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 132 papers, the majority being retrospective case-series, were included representing 5,748 patients. The preoperative injury severity revealed an inequality between the subgroups. Partial neurologic deficits had the potential to resolve irrespective of treatment choice. None of the five techniques used was able to maintain the corrected kyphosis angle. The functional outcome after surgery seems to be better than generally believed. Complications are relatively rare.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, surgical treatment of traumatic spine fractures is safe and effective. Surgical techniques can only be compared using randomized controlled trials.