The management of penetrating injuries of the anterior triangle of the neck

Diagnosis, management and treatment of neck trauma

Trauma injuries to the neck account for 5-10% of all trauma injuries and carry a high rate of morbidity and mortality, as several vital structures can be damaged. Currently, there are several treatment approaches based on initial management by zones, initial management not based on zones and conservative management of selected patients. The objective of this systematic review is to describe the management of neck trauma.

Management of cervical stab wounds in low volume trauma centres: systematic physical examination and low threshold for adjunctive studies, or surgical exploration

INTRODUCTION

In Nordic countries penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) are infrequent and management has traditionally been guided by surgeons' preferences. Some form of selective non-operative approach is currently practised in most urban trauma centres.

OBJECTIVE

To examine demographic features and treatment outcome of non-ballistic penetrating neck injuries in southern Finland and provide management guidelines for centres with low volume of penetrating neck trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 85 platysma penetrating neck injuries in two southern Finland hospitals (Helsinki University Central Hospital, HUCH and Tampere University Hospital, TaUH) was carried out using the ICD-10 based hospital databases to identify PNI-patients.

RESULTS

The incidence of admitted patients with penetrating neck injuries was 1.3/100000/year. Fifty-two (61%) injuries were caused by random acts of violence, 28 (38%) were self-inflicted and 5 (6%) were accidents. Of all 85 patients, 52 (61%) underwent operative exploration with a negative exploration rate of 65%. Hard signs for vascular or aerodigestive trauma were present in 23 (27%) patients and all of these were operated with a negative exploration rate of 30%. Two patients had no hard signs on physical examination but were operatively explored and significant injuries were found in both patients. The hospital mortality rate was 0% and the overall complication rate for operated patients was 7.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma centres managing PNIs infrequently should have an individually tailored management protocol for penetrating neck injury patients. If mandatory exploration is not practised, a systematic physical examination should be the mainstay of diagnostic work up but the threshold for adjunctive studies should be low. Although not evident by the current data, protocol-based management could be useful in decreasing treatment variation and enhancing residency training.

Role of flexible endoscopy in the evaluation of possible esophageal trauma after penetrating injuries

OBJECTIVE

In urban medical centers, penetrating injuries of the chest, neck, and head are frequently encountered due to the use of firearms and sharp weapons. Successful management of esophageal injury requires a high index of suspicion and prompt diagnosis. The role of flexible endoscopy, a readily available modality, has not been studied extensively in the management of potential esophageal injuries due to trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 55 patients who underwent emergent flexible endoscopy for the evaluation of suspected penetrating esophageal injuries was performed to determine if endoscopy was safe and if it yielded information that altered patient management.

RESULTS

Flexible endoscopy was performed safely in all patients. It yielded a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.4%, a negative predictive value of 100%, and a positive predictive value of 33.3% for detecting an esophageal injury. Although positive findings (prevalence, 3.6%) are infrequent, no esophageal injuries were missed. Endoscopy altered patient management in 38 (69.1%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent flexible endoscopic examination of the esophagus is a safe and useful diagnostic tool in the early evaluation of penetrating injuries. Flexible endoscopy resulted in four negative surgical explorations, which was deemed acceptable by the Trauma Service, as the consequences of a missed esophageal injury is likely to be devastating.

Selective surgical management of zone II gunshot injuries of the neck: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The management of penetrating neck trauma remains controversial, with many studies supporting either mandatory exploration or selective conservatism.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a prospective study of 75 patients with gunshot injuries to zone II of the neck. Forty patients (53.3%) underwent immediate exploration because of clinical indications or positive initial investigations. A 7.5% incidence of unnecessary explorations, a 5% mortality rate, and average hospital stay of 10.5 days were noted. Thirty-five patients with negative clinical or investigational findings underwent observation with constant monitoring. A 5.7% incidence of missed injuries, no mortality, and an average hospital stay of 3.5 days were noted for these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that conservative management in gunshot injuries confined to zone II of the neck selectively supplemented by appropriate investigations is a viable proposition in this type of injury. Further contemporary studies reporting specifically on this injury will enable us to reach statistically significant conclusions.

Complex problems in penetrating neck trauma

This article discusses the problems and controversies in the assessment of penetrating injuries of the neck. The role of physical examination and color-flow Doppler imaging in the initial assessment is highlighted. Complex injuries of major vessels, the aerodigestive tract, and the parotid are discussed and therapeutic options are presented.