Ulnar nerve palsy: a complication following percutaneous fixation of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children

Ulnar neuropathy

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is the second most common compressive neuropathy. Less common, although similarly disabling, are ulnar neuropathies above the elbow, at the forearm, and the wrist, which can present with different combinations of intrinsic hand muscle weakness and sensory loss. Electrodiagnostic studies are moderately sensitive in diagnosing ulnar neuropathy, although their ability to localize the site of nerve injury is often limited. Nerve imaging with ultrasound can provide greater localization of ulnar injury and identification of specific anatomical pathology causing nerve entrapment. Specifically, imaging can now reliably distinguish ulnar nerve entrapment under the humero-ulnar arcade (cubital tunnel) from nerve injury at the retro-epicondylar groove. Both these pathologies have historically been diagnosed as either "ulnar neuropathy at the elbow," which is non-specific, or "cubital tunnel syndrome," which is often erroneous. Natural history studies are few and limited, although many cases of mild-moderate ulnar neuropathy at the elbow appear to remit spontaneously. Conservative management, perineural steroid injections, and surgical release have all been studied in treating ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Despite this, questions remain about the most appropriate management for many patients, which is reflected in the absence of management guidelines.

The use of ultrasound for monitoring reduction and ulnar nerve subluxation in pediatric humeral supracondylar fractures

BACKGROUND

Traditional treatment for displaced humeral supracondylar fractures (SCFs) in children involves closed reduction (CR) under fluoroscopic guidance, percutaneous pinning, and immobilization with a long-arm cast. This study aims to explore the viability of using radiation-free ultrasound (US) for guiding CR and tracking ulnar nerve dynamics during medial pinning, contrasting the US method with the conventional cross pinning technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed 70 children with acute displaced SCFs. The US group (n = 30) underwent US-guided reduction, whereas the traditional group (n = 40) underwent fluoroscopy-guided reduction. Both groups received percutaneous cross pinning and subsequent cast immobilization. Postoperative outcomes were compared between the two methods after a 6-month follow-up. In the US group, ultrasonography assessed fracture displacement distances before and after CR. The angle at which the ulnar nerve relocated to the cubital tunnel during elbow extension was documented using real-time US monitoring during medial pinning.

RESULTS

The US group demonstrated improved reduction accuracy, increased range of motion, superior restoration of both Baumann and Humeroulnar angles, and a decreased incidence of malunions compared to the traditional group (all p < 0.05). The ultrasonographic measurement of fracture displacement was comparable with that of fluoroscopy (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.90). In the US group, no ulnar nerve injury was noted, compared to 2.5 % in the traditional group, and real-time US observations revealed ulnar nerve hypermobility, with 53.3 % of patients exhibiting anterior ulnar nerve subluxation at 120° elbow flexion, 40 % at 90°, 16.7 % at 60°, and none at 30° flexion.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound is as reliable as fluoroscopy for evaluating fracture reductions. The use of intra-operative ultrasound significantly improves reduction accuracy and radiographic outcomes while reducing the risk of ulnar nerve injury.

Management of iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsies after cross pinning of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Up to 4% of patients who undergo cross pinning of a pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture sustain an iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsy (IUNP). This study aims to summarize the evidence regarding the management of IUNP in this setting, and to identify if early intervention (early wire removal or exploration) leads to faster and/or more complete recovery of the ulnar nerve.

METHODS

A formal systematic review was undertaken, with databases searched including Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane central. This was performed in accordance with JBI methodology and PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

In all, 26 articles were included in final evaluation, reporting a total of 179 IUNP. In all, 153 cases (85%) were managed expectantly, reporting full recovery at final follow-up (average 4.5 months) in 140 cases (91%). There were 26 cases of IUNP which were managed with early wire removal and/or exploration, of which 22 had full recovery (85%). There were 17 cases of 179 (9%) which did not have full recovery.

CONCLUSION

The majority of IUNP are managed expectantly, with approximately 90% achieving full recovery at final follow-up. The literature does not support early wire removal and/or exploration, possibly because the damage to the nerve is done at the time of wire placement.

A Mini-Open Approach to Medial Pinning in Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures May Be Safer Than Previously Thought

BACKGROUND

Displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHFs) are stabilized after reduction by smooth pins. Although some SCHFs are biomechanically stable after lateral-only entry pinning (lateral pinning), an additional medial entry pin (cross-pinning) confers superior stabilization in some SCHFs. There is a recognized risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury with medial entry pinning. The best existing evidence has estimated an iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury rate of approximately 3.4% in cross-pinning. In similar studies, the rate of iatrogenic nerve injury (all nerves) in lateral pinning is estimated at 1.9%. This study aimed to use a large, single-center, single-technique (mini-open) retrospective case series to determine the rate of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury in cross-pinning.

METHODS

Patients undergoing percutaneous cross-pinning via the mini-open technique for SCHFs from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Injury characteristics, operative variables, fixation technique, and complications, such as iatrogenic nerve injury, were recorded. Patients who underwent operative treatment at another hospital, had no postoperative follow-up, or died due to polytrauma were excluded.

RESULTS

In this study, 698 patients undergoing cross-pinning during the study period were identified. Patients treated with cross-pinning had severe fractures, including a total of 198 preoperative neurovascular injuries (28.4%), 32 patients (4.6%) with skin tenting, and 19 patients (2.7%) with open fractures. Iatrogenic nerve injury was reported in 3 cases (0.43%), all of which affected the ulnar nerve. In 2 of 3 cases of iatrogenic nerve injury, the ulnar nerve symptoms resolved at a mean follow-up of 15 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The mini-open approach for medial pin insertion is safer than previous estimates. Here, in the largest single-center study of cross-pinning for SCHFs, the iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury rate of 0.43% was nearly 10 times lower than estimated rates from recent meta-analyses. Considering all nerves, the iatrogenic injury rate for this cross-pinning cohort was also lower than the estimated iatrogenic nerve injury rate for lateral pinning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of daytime and after-hours surgical treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children

Reports on different types of surgical procedures show that night-time surgeries are often associated with a high number of complications than daytime surgeries. However, there are no data, and hence evidence that relate the outcome of supracondylar humeral fractures in children to the time of the day when the respective surgical procedure is implemented. In this study, we analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures surgically treated during daytime and night-time hours. In total, 91 patients with Gartland type-3 fractures were included; 47 patients treated between 0800 and 1700 h were defined as the daytime group and 44 patients treated between 1701 and 0759 h were defined as the after-hours group. Age, sex, affected side, fracture type, and day and time of operation were recorded. Any preoperative neurovascular injuries, open fractures, or ipsilateral fractures were noted. The surgical method, use of a medial pin or pins, operation time, any postoperative neurovascular complications, extent of successful reduction, fixation rate, any resultant deformity, and functional loss rate were evaluated. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of operation time, open reduction rate, rate of poor reduction, extent of poor functional outcomes, or induction of deformity (P>0.05). The poor fixation rate was significantly greater in the after-hours group than in the daytime group (P<0.05). No significant between-group differences were evident in age, sex, affected side, or length of postoperative follow-up (all P-values>0.05). After-hours treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children is associated with a higher poor fixation rate compared with daytime procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

therapeutic study (retrospective comparative study), Level III.

Trans-olecranon fossa four-cortex purchase lateral pinning in displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus - a prospective analysis in 48 children

Objective

The current study aims at a functional analysis of trans-olecranon lateral pinning for displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus (SCFH) in children.

Methods

A prospective study of 48 children (30 males, 18 females; mean age: 7.4 years) with displaced SCFH was treated at this institution with modified technique from March 2011 to September 2014. Cases were selected on the basis of inclusion criteria. The functional outcome was assessed clinically by modified Flynn's criteria along with achievement of full range of motion.

Results

All 48 children with a mean follow up of 20 months (range: 6–26 months) were assessed. All fractures united well. With modified Flynn's criteria, results were excellent in 40 children (83.3%), good in six children (12.5%), and fair in two children (4.2%). There were no poor results. Preoperative nerve palsies seen in four children recovered at ten weeks. Full range of motion was achieved on an average of 20 days after K-wire removal and no new post-operative nerve palsies were noted.

Conclusion

The modified trans-olecranon fossa four-cortex purchase (TOF-FCP) technique was promising in all cases of unstable SCFH without the complications of loss of reduction or iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. This technique is simple, safe, and reproducible, with good clinical results in this type of fracture.

Iatrogenic brachial artery injury during pinning of supracondylar fracture of humerus: A rare injury

Complications following supracondylar fracture of humerus are well-known. Pre- and post-operative complications have been documented in the literature. Neurovascular injury due to fracture fragments following this type of fracture is described. Iatrogenic brachial artery during surgical treatment of this fracture is unknown to the literature. So we report a rare case of iatrogenic brachial artery injury during pinning of supracondylar fracture of humerus and try to create awareness to the surgeons that such injuries can occur with improper operative techniques.

Biomechanical comparison of different external fixator configurations for stabilization of supracondylar humerus fractures in children

BACKGROUND

Currently, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning are considered the treatment of choice for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. However, indications exist for the use of external fixation with Schanz screws. In this in vitro study, we evaluate the biomechanical properties of a new variation for external fixation and compare them to an established construct.

METHODS

Twenty distal cadaver humeri (10 pairs) were allocated to 2 groups. The humeri of the first group were fixed by an external fixator consisting of Schanz screws and an oblique K-wire inserted from the distal radial cortex of the humerus, those of the second group were fixed by a new variation with the oblique K-wire inserted from the distal ulnar cortex of the humerus. Displacement and stiffness in static loading in internal and external rotation, as well as in extension and flexion were evaluated and compared.

FINDINGS

The variation of the external fixator of the second group proved to be statistically significantly superior to the variation of the first group in internal rotation loading (p>0.05). In sagittal loading conditions and external rotation loading, the variations were equally stable (p>0.05). There was no significant effect of the samples' bone density on displacement and stiffness values in any direction of loading.

INTERPRETATION

In cases of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures when an external fixator is used for osteosynthesis, the insertion of an additional ulnarly inserted anti-rotation K-wire should be preferred to a radially inserted one as it reduces secondary displacement of the distal fragment.

The medial epicondyle-ulnar nerve relation with various elbow positions in healthy children

BACKGROUND

The position of the ulnar nerve relative to the medial epicondyle in healthy children was determined with a high-resolution ultrasonography with elbow flexion, forearm pronation, and supination maneuvers which are commonly employed during reduction of the supracondylar humerus fractures.

METHODS

Healthy children aged between 4 and 12 years were enrolled in this study. Both elbows of the children were evaluated with a high-resolution sonography device with gradual flexion of the elbow, whereas the forearm is alternately in pronation and supination. The medial epicondyle-ulnar nerve distance was measured with the various positions of the elbow and the forearm. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences of medial epicondyle-ulnar nerve distance at different elbow flexion angles and forearm supination-pronation positions. Paried t test was used to compare the differences between the age and sex of the children.

RESULTS

Twelve female and 26 male children (76 elbows) with a mean age of 8.36 years were included in the study. Ulnar nerve was translated anteriorly through the medial epicondyle with increasing elbow flexion. The mean medial epicondyle-ulnar nerve distance that was 3.7 mm in an extended elbow decreased to 1.1 mm with full elbow flexion. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.0001). Presence of the forearm in either supination or pronation did not produce a statistically significant difference. The age and sex of the children did not produce a statistically significance difference in medial epicondyle-ulnar nerve distance.

CONCLUSIONS

Flexion of the elbow brings the ulnar nerve to a close proximity to the medial epicondyle independent of forearm pronation and supination in healthy children. The decrement of the medial epicondyle-ulnar nerve distance up to 1.1 mm in a fully flexed elbow might be a factor that endangers the nerve during medial pinning in supracondylar humerus fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I-diagnostic studies.

Medial and lateral crossed pinning versus lateral pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: decision analysis

BACKGROUND

The choice of pinning techniques in supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children has been a debate regarding its fixation stability and risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsy. This study was performed to determine as to which fixating method (medial and lateral crossed pinning vs. lateral pinning) is better for the displaced supracondylar fractures using a decision analysis tool in terms of function.

METHODS

A decision analysis model was designed containing the probability of iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsy and malunion caused by unstable fixation for each of lateral pinning and medial and lateral crossed pinning techniques. The final outcome was function adjusted life year and used as a utility in the decision tree, where function was evaluated using the McBride disability evaluation. The probabilities of all cases were obtained by literature review and assumptions. A roll back tool was used to determine the better pinning technique, and sensitivity analysis was performed to compensate for the uncertainty of the model.

RESULTS

Overall, our decision model favored the lateral pinning technique over the medial and lateral crossed pinning with the utilities of 99.6 and 99.3 in terms of function adjusted life year. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the threshold rate of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury as a complication after medial and lateral crossed pinning was 0.7%, below which the model favored medial and lateral crossed pinning over lateral pinning. The decision model was found to be sensitive to the percentage of permanent ulnar nerve palsy after medial and lateral crossed pinning. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that the lateral pinning technique was more beneficial than the medial and lateral crossed pinning technique.

CONCLUSIONS

In our decision analysis model, the lateral pinning technique was found to be more beneficial than the medial and lateral crossed pinning technique for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children, on the basis of current evidences. However, the results were sensitive to the data of ulnar nerve injury. Avoiding the worst clinical scenario (permanent ulnar nerve palsy) might be more important and affordable than obtaining favorable clinical results (stable fixation) at the potential cost of disastrous complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after the surgical treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus: number needed to harm, a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are common pediatric elbow injuries. Most displaced or angulated fractures are treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, with either a crossed pin or lateral pin configuration. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to determine if there is an increased risk of iatrogenic nerve injury associated with the crossed pin configuration.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified by searching electronic databases and hand searching-related journal and conference proceedings. Within each trial, the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury was calculated for each pinning technique. For studies comparing crossed versus lateral pinning, the resulting trial-based differences in risk estimates were pooled using a random effects meta-analysis. A number needed to harm was determined using the pooled risk difference.

RESULTS

Thirty-two trials consisting of 2639 patients were used in the pooled analysis. The pooled risk difference of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury is 0.035 (95% confidence interval, 0.014-0.056), with a higher incidence of injury in the crossed pinning group. The weighed number needed to harm for the crossed pinning is 28 (95% confidence interval, 17-71).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review suggest that there is an iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every 28 patients treated with the crossed pinning compared with the lateral pinning. Further research is necessary to ensure that the optimal pinning technique is chosen to treat these factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Dorgan's lateral cross-wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: A retrospective review

INTRODUCTION

The currently accepted treatment for displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children is closed reduction and fixation with percutaneous Kirschner wires. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review a novel cross-wiring technique where the cross-wire configuration is achieved solely from the lateral side, thereby reducing the risk of ulnar nerve injury.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all children who had undergone this procedure at our centre over a 10-year period. The primary end points were a major loss of reduction as determined by radiological alignment and iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Secondary end points included clinical alignment, elbow range of motion and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients, who underwent lateral cross-wiring for displaced supracondylar fractures (Gartland type II and type III) of the humerus were reviewed with a mean follow-up time of 36 months. No major loss of reduction occurred. The mean change in Baumann's angle (4.2+/-1.6 degrees) between intra-operative and follow-up radiographs was not significant (p>0.05). No iatrogenic case of ulnar nerve injury occurred. The 'carrying angle' and 'return to function' in all children had returned to normal relative to the other side. Postoperative complications consisted of three patients developing pin-site infections, which were successfully treated.

CONCLUSION

Dorgan's lateral cross-wiring technique is an effective option in treating displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. It is as effective as the traditional cross-wire technique in terms of fracture healing with a reduced risk of ulnar nerve injury.

Outcome of Gartland type II and type III supracondylar fractures treated by Blount's technique

BACKGROUND

According to some orthopedic surgeons, almost all supracondylar humerus fractures should be treated operatively by reduction and pinning. While according to others, closed reduction and immobolization should be used for Gartland type II and some type III fractures. However, the limit of this technique remains unclear. We present 74 patients with displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures treated by closed reduction and immobilization with a collar sling fixed to a cast around the wrist. The purpose of the study is to give a more precise limitation of this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data acquisition of 74 patients with a Gartland type II or type III fractures treated by closed reduction and immobilization (Blount's technique) between January 2004 and December 2007 was done. The mean age was 6.3 years (range, 2-11). The mean time of follow-up was 6.5 months (range, 3-25). All open injuries and complex elbow fracture dislocations or T-condylar fractures were excluded from the study. All patients were evaluated with standardized anteroposterior and true lateral x-rays of the elbow, and Flynn criteria were used for functional assessment.

RESULTS

Gartland type II fractures had 94% good or excellent final results. Gartland type III fractures had 73% good or excellent final result. The Gartland type III outcome depended on the displacement. The fractures remained stable in 88% for the posterior displacement, and 58% for the posteromedial displacement. These displacements were mild. However, for the posterolaterally displaced fractures, only 36% were stable; 36% had a mild displacement and 27% had a major displacement.

CONCLUSION

Pure posterior displacement is more stable than posteromedial displacement which is more stable than posterolaterally displaced fractures. This study suggests that Gartland type II and pure posterior or posteromedial displaced Gartland type III fractures can be treated by closed reduction and immobilization with success.

Operative versus non-operative management of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures: a systematic review

PURPOSE

There is ongoing debate about the management of medial epicondyle fractures in the pediatric population. This systematic review evaluated non-operative versus operative treatment of medial epicondyle fractures in pediatric and adolescent patients over the last six decades.

METHODS

A systematic review of the available literature was performed. Frequency-weighted mean union times were used to compare union rates for closed versus open treatments. Moreover, functional outcomes and range-of-motion variables were correlated with varying treatment modalities. Any complications, including ulnar nerve symptoms, pain, instability, infection, and residual deformity, were cataloged.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies, encompassing 498 patients, met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. There were 261 males and 132 female patients; the frequency-weighted average age was 11.93 years. The follow-up range was 6-216 months. Under the cumulative random effects model, the odds of union with operative fixation was 9.33 times the odds of union with non-operative treatment (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between operative and non-operative treatments in terms of pain at final follow-up (P = 0.73) or ulnar nerve symptoms (P = 0.412).

CONCLUSIONS

Operative treatment affords a significantly higher union rate over the non-operative management of medial epicondyle fractures. There was no difference in pain at final follow-up between operative and non-operative treatments. As surgical indications evolve, and the functional demands of pediatric patients increase, surgical fixation should be strongly considered to achieve stable fixation and bony union.

Closed reduction of the pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: the "joystick" method

INTRODUCTION

Our goal in this study was to propose an alternative closed reduction method to avoid open reduction in the management of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. A temporary Kirschner wire is inserted to the proximal part of the humerus to be used as a joystick to have a better control of the proximal fragment.

PATIENTS

Twenty-three patients with closed Gartland type III extension fractures were operated between 2003 and 2007. Mean age of the patients was 6.7 (4-10) years.

METHOD

Uninjured and fractured elbow's Bauman angles, lateral condylar angles, the carrying angles and ROM values were compared statistically according to independent samples t test.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up 96.73 weeks (53-150), clinical results using the Flynn criteria were excellent in 21 (91.3%), good in 1(4.35%), fair in 1 (4.35%) patient.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the "joystick" reduction method is a reliable alternative when closed reduction itself is not successful.

Supracondylar humeral fractures in children

Operative fixation is indicated for most type-II and III supracondylar humeral fractures in order to prevent malunion. Medial comminution is a subtle finding that, if treated nonoperatively, is likely to lead to unacceptable varus malunion. Angiography is not indicated for a pulseless limb, as it delays fracture reduction, which usually corrects the vascular problem. A high index of suspicion is necessary to avoid missing an impending compartment syndrome, especially when there is a concomitant forearm fracture or when there is a median nerve injury, which may mask symptoms of compartment syndrome. Lateral entry pins have been shown, in biomechanical and clinical studies, to be as stable as cross pinning if they are well spaced at the fracture line, and they are not associated with the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury.

The assessment of the ulnar nerve at the elbow by ultrasonography in children

We evaluated the morphological changes to the ulnar nerve of both elbows in the cubital tunnel by sonography in a total of 237 children, of whom 117 were aged between six and seven years, 66 between eight and nine years, and 54 between ten and 11 years. We first scanned longitudinally in the extended elbow and then transversely at the medial epicondyle with the elbow extended to 0°. We repeated the scans with the elbow flexed at 45°, 90°, and 120°. There were no significant differences in the area of the ulnar nerve, but the diameter increased as the elbow moved from extension to flexion in all groups. More importantly, the ulnar nerve was subluxated anteriorly on to the medial epicondyle by 1.5% to 1.9% in extended elbows, by 5.9% to 7.9% in those flexed to 45°, by 40.0% to 44% in those flexed to 90°, and by 57.4% to 58.1% in those flexed to 120°, depending on the age group. Sonography clearly and accurately showed the ulnar nerve and was useful for localising the nerve before placing a medial pin. Because the ulnar nerve may translate anteriorly onto the medial epicondyle when the elbow is flexed to 90° or more, it should never be overlooked during percutaneous medial pinning.

How should one treat iatrogenic ulnar injury after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries after supracondylar humeral fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning.

METHODS

The series consisted of 473 children. All patients were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Neurological examination performed immediately after the operation revealed 25 ulnar nerve injuries (5.2%) in patients who had completely normal neurological findings in the preoperative period. Electromyographic examinations were performed at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively in patient with ulnar nerve lesions.

RESULTS

The mean age was 6 years (4-8 years). The mean hospitalisation time was 2 days and the mean follow-up time was 30.8 months (17-63 months). Twenty-two patients with electromyogram showed partial denervation and conduction blocks at the elbow at 6 weeks. Regenerative electromyogram findings were found at 12 weeks. Sensory function in all patients had returned at a mean of 2 months (1-4 months) while motor function had returned at a mean of 5.4 months (1-7 months). Unusually all patients had complete return of nerve function and full motion in their elbows.

CONCLUSION

We evaluated the results of 473 patients and to our knowledge this is the largest series in the literature. Although the rate of ulnar nerve injuries (5.2%) is comparable, the number of the patients (n: 22) is the largest in the literature and may allow us to draw stronger conclusions. In our opinion, if ulnar nerve injury is detected after the operation, patients should be followed up for 7 months without intervention.

Die elastisch-stabile intramedulläre Nagelung (ESIN) der suprakondylären Humerusfraktur im Kindesalter

Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow lesions in children. The standard procedure for displaced fractures has up to now been crossed-wire osteosynthesis. A new option is elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN). We retrospectively reviewed the results of all supracondylar fractures that were treated in our department from 2000 to 2005 by the ESIN technique with the aim to provide evidence of advantages and disadvantages of this method. The mean age of the 60 patients included in the study (27 female, 33 male) was 5.9 years (range 1-12 years). Most patients presented with type II fractures (85%), 10% sustained a type III fracture and 5% the most displaced type IV. All patients were treated with the ESIN technique and underwent clinical and radiological follow-up examinations during the next 3-5 months. Average duration to implant removal was 100 days. All patients achieved free range of movement of the affected elbow. No visible malpositions, pseudarthrosis or nerve lesions were observed, in comparison to the conventional surgical technique (crossed-wire osteosynthesis) with up to 19% for these complications. Furthermore, due to the excellent stability of ESIN, the patients do not need a cast and movement is encouraged immediately. Our good experiences encourage us to continue applying the ESIN technique.

A review of K-wire related complications in the emergency management of paediatric upper extremity trauma

INTRODUCTION

Kirschner wires (K-wires) are immensely versatile in fracture fixation in the paediatric population. Complications associated with the K-wiring procedure vary from minor to a life-threatening. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of fracture fixation using K-wires in all types of upper-extremity fractures in children in order to assess the incidence and type of complication critically.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 1999 and September 2001, we retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 105 fractures in 103 paediatric trauma cases (below 12 years) treated with K-wires in a university teaching hospital. The case notes and radiographs were reviewed by an independent single assessor. All paediatric, acute, upper-extremity, displaced and unstable fractures were included. All elective procedures using K-wires were excluded.

RESULTS

We observed an overall 32.3% complication rate associated with the K-wiring procedure affecting 34 pins (24 patients). Wound-related complications included over-granulation in 13 cases, pin tract infection in 6 cases and hypersensitive scar in 1 case. Neurapraxia was found in 3 patients and axonotmesis in 1 patient. Wire loosening at the time of removal in 14 cases and retrograde wire migration in 4 cases were observed. There were 2 cases of penetrating tendonitis and 1 case of osteomyelitis. There was a higher complication rate in terms of wire loosening and pin tract infection when the K-wires: (i) were left outside the skin compared with those placed under the skin; (ii) stayed longer in the patients; and (iii) did not traverse both cortices. There were more complications in complex operations performed by senior surgeons (P = 0.056). The duration of K-wire stay, associated co-morbidity and anatomical location were statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications are part of operative procedures; an important point to consider is what causes them in order to take preventative measures. We recommend that the risks and complications should be explained to parents during the consenting process to allay their anxiety, irrespective of the fact that most complications are minor and of short duration.

Prevention of ulnar nerve injury during fixation of supracondylar fractures in children by 'flexion-extension cross-pinning' technique

No consensus exists concerning the best pin configuration for displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Although cross-pinning is the most stable biomechanically, this configuration may cause iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsy. For the last 7 years, we have been using a three-pin fixation technique with insertion of two K wires from the lateral side (elbow in full flexion) and the third wire through the medial side (elbow in full extension). We used this technique in 67 displaced supracondylar fractures without any complications related to the ulnar nerve. The technique provides excellent stability and eliminates the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsy.

Ulnarisläsion nach Osteosynthese der suprakondylären Humerusfraktur im Kindesalter

Since 1948, closed reduction and osteosynthesis for supracondylar humeral fractures using two K-wires from the medial and lateral side has been performed on a regular basis. Although this procedure is used routinely, many authors have described paralysis of the ulnar nerve after blindly inserting the medial K-wire. Only very few publications describe the treatment options after iatrogenic paralysis of this nerve. The patients described showed progressive paralysis of the ulnar nerve after K-wire osteosynthesis. Intraoperatively, all patients showed scarring but intact continuity. After surgical revision and neurolysis, all four patients showed complete restitution after 1 year. If patients show progressive paralysis of the ulnar nerve early operative revision after 3 months should be performed.

Correlation between iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and angular insertion of the medial pin in supracondylar humerus fractures

The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the occurrence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and frontal and saggital angular insertion of the medial pin in type 3 pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures treated by closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using a cross-pin configuration. Radiographs of 90 children were retrospectively reviewed and two radiographic parameters were measured. The frontal humerus-pin angle was formed between the long axis of the humerus shaft and the axis of the medial pin on an anteroposterior radiograph. The saggital humerus-pin angle was formed between the long axis of the humerus shaft and the axis of the medial pin on a lateral radiograph and expressed as positive and negative values if the insertion direction of the pin was anterior to posterior or posterior to anterior, respectively. There was a significant difference between the mean saggital humerus-pin angle values of ulnar nerve injury and no neurological complication groups (12.1 degrees versus 1.6 degrees , respectively; P=0.001). It was concluded that, anteroposterior insertion of the medial pin in the saggital plane, while the elbow was in hyperflexion, correlated with the occurrence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury.

Complications and timing of follow-up after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures: follow-up after percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the need for clinical evaluation with radiographs within 10 days of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for the treatment of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. Between May 1 and December 31, 2001, the authors evaluated the complications with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of 104 displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. Fifty-two of the patients had the initial follow-up examination with radiographs 10 days or less after pinning; the other 52 patients had the initial follow-up examination with radiographs either after 10 days or on the day of pin removal. The overall complication rate for the series was 7.7% (8/104). All eight complications were in type III fractures. The early follow-up group had six complications; the late follow-up group had two complications. Baumann's angle, lateral humerocapitellar angle, and lateral rotational percentage were not significantly different between the two groups. The only variable tested that was associated with a complication was pin configuration. No association between late follow-up and complications was identified. The authors conclude that clinical and radiographic evaluation of routine displaced supracondylar humerus fractures requiring closed reduction and percutaneous pinning may be safely delayed until pin removal.

Low incidence of ulnar nerve injury with crossed pin placement for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using a mini-open technique

OBJECTIVES

Several recent studies have suggested that medial pinning in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures leads to increased rates of ulnar nerve injury. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury in a consecutive series of supracondylar fractures treated using a standardized technique of crossed pin placement.

DESIGN

Single cohort retrospective.

SETTING

Metropolitan university tertiary care center.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-one consecutive children with Gartland type II or type III supracondylar humerus were treated surgically by 2 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons at 1 institution between 1995 and 2000 using a medial mini-open and cross-pinning technique. Sixty-five patients were available for follow-up (92%).

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated with a combination of medial and lateral pins using a mini-incision technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Outcomes analyzed included ulnar nerve injury and clinical and radiographic evidence of healing.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 65 patients, of whom 29 (45%) presented with Gartland type III fractures, and the remaining 36 (55%) presented with a type II fracture. There were no ulnar nerve motor injuries. One patient was noted to have transient sensory changes in the ulnar nerve distribution postoperatively, which resolved by the 1-week follow-up visit. All patients were noted to have normal ulnar motor and sensory nerve function at final follow-up (average 4.5 months). No cases of nonunion, malunion, or infection were identified during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury with this specific technique of crossed pin placement for extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures was extremely low in this series. A single case of transient ulnar sensory neuropraxia occurred. Our series demonstrates that crossed pin fixation can be performed safely and reliably and is an appropriate treatment option for unstable supracondylar humerus fractures.

Late presentation of supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children

In children with delayed presentation of displaced supracondylar fractures, closed or open reduction with K-wire fixation risks complications. Gradually reducing the fracture with traction potentially reduces these risks. An unacceptable deformity can be corrected later by an osteotomy. This concept was used for 28 children, with an average age of 7 years 6 months, who presented after an average delay of 5.6 days. Their stay in the hospital was 14 days on average. At followup (average, 24 months), five children (18%) who had cubitus varus greater than 10 degrees had corrective osteotomy. There were no additional neurovascular injuries after treatment. The results are comparable with other methods of treatment.

Management of Gartland's type III supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: the role audit and practice guidelines

In 1995, we audited the outcome following Gartland's type III supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Closed reduction under anaesthesia (MUA) and cast immobilisation was the treatment of choice, with the treatment changed whenever displacement occurred. The result of the audit showed that 86% of cases were treated with this method. The rate of re-operation was 45.6%. Cubitus varus deformity developed in 50% of cases. Guidelines were introduced in order to abandon the use of MUA and cast immobilisation for type III fractures. The guidelines recommended treating these fractures with rigid fixation using Kirchner (K) wires. A re-audit was conducted in the year 2000 to study the impact of introducing the guidelines. The rate of compliance was 64%. The re-audit showed a significant drop in the rate of re-operations from 45.6 to 17.7% (P = 0.0043), and a significant drop in the incidence of cubitus varus from 50 to 6.6% ( P < 0.0001). The results of the re-audit suggest that practice guidelines can have a major impact on clinical practice.

The Use of the 3-mm K-Wire to Supplement Reduction of Humeral Supracondylar Fractures in Children

BACKGROUND

Most children with humeral supracondylar fractures can be treated with simple closed reduction and cross-fixation with Kirschner (K)-wires. However, in a small proportion of cases, an acceptable closed reduction cannot be obtained, and open reduction becomes necessary. An alternative to open reduction is the use of a temporary 3-mm K-wire to manipulate and reduce the distal fragment. This report introduces the method of manipulation, as well as indications, and draws comparisons with complete close reduction cases.

METHODS

Of 118 patients, 76 (64.4%) were managed with the standard closed reduction method and additional K-wire fixation to secure a good alignment (group 1). In the remaining 42 cases (35.6%), acceptable reduction could not be achieved by closed methods alone, and another temporary 3-mm K-wire was used to manipulate the distal fragment. After reduction of the fracture with the additional wire, standard cross K-wires were inserted to stabilize the fracture (group 2). As long as there was contact at the fracture site in cases of humeral supracondylar fracture, the traditional closed method was used easily to achieve excellent restoration. However, for cases in which the fracture site was totally displaced, and contact at the fracture site via traction was unsuccessful, a 3-mm K-wire was used to perform supplemental restoration treatment. All the patients, after the operation, were temporally immobilized with a long-arm splint for about 3 weeks. The fixation K-wires were removed after the radiograph had shown callus formation over the fracture site. Then the operation indications, operation methods and time, complications, and differences in range of motion were analyzed for these two sets of patients.

RESULTS

The average group 1 surgery time was 18 minutes (range, 9-32 minutes), whereas the average surgery time for group 2 was 33 minutes (range, 15-45 minutes). Three cases in group 1 were complicated with ulnar nerve injury caused by the fixation wire. There were no ulnar nerve injuries in group 2. However, the ulnar nerve injury complication rates for the two groups (3 in 76 for group 1; 0 in 40 for group 2) did not reach statistical difference (p = 0.5502, Fisher's exact test). The union times for the two groups were almost the same (average, 3 weeks; range, 2-5 weeks). The 3-mm K-wire manipulation reduction cases and the closed reduction cases seemed to yield the same healing results in all aspects, except for the longer surgery time in group 2 (p < 0.0001). Both groups achieved satisfactory results.

CONCLUSIONS

The closed reduction method should be used for children with humeral supracondylar fractures, whenever possible. The 3-mm K-wire manipulation method reduces the probability that open reduction will be required in some severe cases. This is a simple method without complications. The prognosis is the same as for closed reduction cases.

Ulnar nerve injury associated with trampoline injuries

OBJECTIVE

This study reports three cases of ulnar neuropathy after trampoline injuries in children.

METHODS

A chart review was performed on children who sustained an ulnar nerve injury from a trampoline accident. In all cases, surgical intervention was required.

RESULTS

Injuries included upper-extremity fractures in two cases and an upper-extremity laceration in one case. All cases required surgical exploration with internal neurolysis and ulnar nerve transposition. Nerve grafts were used in two cases and an additional nerve transfer was used in one case. All patients had return of intrinsic hand function and sensation after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Children should be followed for evolution of ulnar nerve neuropathy after upper-extremity injury with consideration for electrical studies and surgical exploration if there is no improvement after 3 months.

Effect of surgical delay on perioperative complications and need for open reduction in supracondylar humerus fractures in children

This retrospective study examined whether a delay of greater than 12 hours is associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications in the operative treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Of 150 consecutive children with supracondylar fractures, 50 underwent surgery in less than 12 hours and 100 underwent surgery greater than 12 hours after injury. There was no significant difference between groups in rate of open reduction (P = 0.55), pin tract infection (P = 1.0), iatrogenic nerve injury (P = 1.0), vascular complication (P = 0.33), or compartment syndrome (P = 1.0), including when Gartland type III fractures were analyzed independently. There was no iatrogenic nerve injury, no compartment syndrome, and one pin tract infection in 150 patients. The study confirms previous retrospective studies finding no significant difference in perioperative complications or rate of open reduction in children undergoing early versus delayed surgical treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures.

Surgical technique for supracondylar fracture of the humerus with percutaneous leverage pinning

Percutaneous pinning with a leverage technique for supracondylar fracture of the humerus was performed in 36 elbows in 35 children. The patient was placed in the lateral position with the forearm hanging. Under radiographic imaging, a Kirschner wire, as a reduction pin, was inserted into the fracture line from the dorsal side, passed through the posterior cortex of the proximal fragment, and turned distally. After reduction of the posterior displacement by the leverage technique, the reduction pin was driven into the anterior cortex of the proximal fragment. Subsequently, a Kirschner wire was inserted from the lateral condyle for fixation between the proximal and distal fragments. This percutaneous pinning technique was successfully performed in 32 of 36 elbows, with excellent functional results in 28 elbows and good results in 4, as well as excellent cosmetic results in 27 elbows and good results in 5, based on the evaluation criteria of Flynn et al.

The effect of surgical timing on the perioperative complications of treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perioperative complication rates associated with early surgical treatment (eight hours or less following injury) and delayed surgical treatment (more than eight hours following injury) of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients had early surgical treatment and 146 patients had delayed surgical treatment of a displaced supracondylar humeral fracture. The perioperative complication rates of the two groups were compared with the use of bivariate and multivariate statistical methods.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the need for conversion to formal open reduction and internal fixation (p = 0.56), pin-track infection (p = 0.12), or iatrogenic nerve injury (p = 0.72). No compartment syndromes occurred in either group. Power analysis revealed that our study had an 86% power to detect a 20% difference between the two groups if one existed.

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to identify any significant difference, with regard to perioperative complication rates, between early and delayed treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures. Within the parameters outlined in our study, we think that the timing of surgical intervention can be either early or delayed as deemed appropriate by the surgeon.

Evaluation of the role of pin fixation versus collar and cuff immobilisation in supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children

Long term results of children with supracondylar humeral fractures treated with manipulation and strapping and manipulation followed by pin fixation were evaluated. Forty patients were regarded as Gartland type II injuries. 33 of these were treated with closed reduction and collar and cuff immobilisation and 7 with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Two cases of cubitus varus were reported one from each treatment modality. Forty-four patients were included as Gartland type III injuries. Of these 14 were treated with closed reduction and collar and cuff immobilisation, 25 with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning and five with open reduction and pinning. There were two cases of cubitus varus and one case of cubitus valgus following pin fixation. In addition one case of extension lag and one significant ulnar nerve neurapraxia was recorded following pin fixation. One case of cubitus varus was seen following manipulation and collar and cuff treatment. There was no statistical difference between either treatment modality in terms of predicting a better outcome (p0.05). We conclude that pin fixation has no advantages over simple immobilisation in certain Gartland II and III type injuries. Although pin fixation is beneficial in unstable injuries collar and cuff immobilisation continues to have an important role in the treatment of stable supracondylar fractures.