A proposal for a possible role of nucleosome positioning in the evolutionary adjustment of introns

Origins and Evolution of Spliceosomal Introns

Research into the origins of introns is at a critical juncture in the resolution of theories on the evolution of early life (which came first, RNA or DNA?), the identity of LUCA (the last universal common ancestor, was it prokaryotic- or eukaryotic-like?), and the significance of noncoding nucleotide variation. One early notion was that introns would have evolved as a component of an efficient mechanism for the origin of genes. But alternative theories emerged as well. From the debate between the "introns-early" and "introns-late" theories came the proposal that introns arose before the origin of genetically encoded proteins and DNA, and the more recent "introns-first" theory, which postulates the presence of introns at that early evolutionary stage from a reconstruction of the "RNA world." Here we review seminal and recent ideas about intron origins. Recent discoveries about the patterns and causes of intron evolution make this one of the most hotly debated and exciting topics in molecular evolutionary biology today.

Models of spliceosomal intron proliferation in the face of widespread ectopic expression

It is now certain that today living organisms can acquire new spliceosomal introns in their genes. The proposed sources of spliceosomal introns are exons, transposons, and other introns, including spliceosomal and group II self-splicing introns. Spliceosomal introns are thought to be the most likely source, because the inserted sequence would immediately be endowed with the essential set of intron recognition sequences, thereby preventing the deleterious effects associated with incorrect splicing. The most obvious spliceosomal intron duplication pathways involve an RNA transcript intermediate step. Therefore, for a spliceosomal intron to be originated by duplication, either the source gene from which the novel intron is derived, or that gene and the recipient gene, which contains the novel intron, would need to be expressed in the germ line. Intron proliferation surveys indicate that putative intron duplicate-containing genes do not always match detectable expression in the germ line, which casts doubt on the generality of the duplication model. However, judging mechanisms of intron gain (or loss) from present-day gene expression profiles could be erroneous, if expression patterns were different at the time the introns arose. In fact, this may likely be so in most cases. Ectopic expression, i.e., the expression of genes at times and locations where the target gene is not known to have a function, is a much more common phenomenon than previously realized. We conclude with a speculation on a possible interplay between spliceosomal introns and ectopic expression at the origin of multicellularity.

Statistical analysis and prediction of the exonic structure of human genes

Nonhomologous fully sequenced human protein-coding genes were studied. Three sets of exon-exon junctions were formed defined by the intron (shadow) position relative to the reading frame. For the analysis of intron shadow signals in exons, information content and discrimination energy approaches were used with the correction allowing one to ignore the influence of a protein-coding message. The corrected formulas allow one to define the consensuses for the three types of intron shadow signals as a AG/guwn, cAG/GUnn, and cAG/gunU, and provide better recognition than the original formulas. The analysis of the codon usage in the signal positions leads to the conclusion that the prevalence of some amino acids in corresponding protein sites is caused by the signal requirements and not vice versa. The distribution of potential intron shadow signals in exons contradicts the hypothesis of intron insertion into suitable preexisting sites. There exists a correlation between the intron types and/or the exon length modulo 3.

Intron evolution: a statistical comparison of two models

The two most frequently occurring explanations for the existence and distribution of introns in the genes of different species are: (1) introns are remnants of the original genetic material. (2) Introns were introduced during evolution. We construct mathematical models corresponding to these two explanations, and calculate the probabilities that the intron distribution in genes from different species coding for actin, alpha-tubulin, triosephosphate isomerase and superoxide dismutase are described by these models. In both models, the branch lengths as well as the structure of the corresponding evolutionary tree is taken into account. Every branch in the evolutionary tree is assumed to have its own individual rate of loss of introns for the first model and rate of gain of introns for the second model. These rate constants are estimated from the actual number of introns. Using the rate constants we stimulate the intron evolution and calculate the probabilities that the actual intron arrangements are produced. The results for actin and alpha-tubulin, which are the two genes we have the most data for, favor the model corresponding conjecture (1), i.e. the idea that introns are old. This contradicts the results from an earlier attempt to model intron evolution where almost the same data was used (Dibb & Newman, 1989, EMBO J. 8, 2015-2021).